Showing posts with label TRASH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TRASH. Show all posts

Monday, November 8, 2010

TRASH #1, 5 of 5



I know a couple people who took a drawing class with Walter Brogan and that he was the best draftsman they ever saw. His pieces in humor magazines don't show that with the likeness seeming to not be using a photo reference, but those of other caricaturists, and different ones at that. I'll assume he was a better artist, and since some of these magazines wanted someone who drew like Mort Drucker, he could do that in his sleep.






Monday, November 1, 2010

TRASH #1, 3 of 5

A lot of other humor magazines parodied MAD for their antiquated sense of humor and for claiming they owned the format, but in this case I think the staff of TRASH was just jealous they weren't MAD.








Thursday, October 28, 2010

TRASH #1, 2 of 5

Though in the seventies we were all supposedly enlightened, and you'd think racism would be over, there were still some ethnic groups it was still OK to make fun of, especially for childrens' entertainment. The fact that there were more people from the GI generation didn't help. But if you think this is racist, scroll down a bit further.







See? I told you.

This last panel could apply to people of all races and ages today.

Monday, October 25, 2010

TRASH #1, 1 of 5

Some people object to my calling all humor magazines MAD imitations. They have a point. After all, I wouldn't say Burger King was an imitation of McDonalds or Facebook was an imitation of Myspace. More than anything, it's shorthand. MAD didn't own their formula nor were they the first to do what they did. They created the template for which others followed suit, though. Some were more like MAD than others, and depending on the editor they tried to do their own take with varying degrees of similarity.

Despite this, there were some magazines that were unquestionably created solely for the purpose of emulating MAD and this is one of them. For every magazine that had its own style, there were magazines like TRASH. You can make a magazine with a cover mascot, the same audience as MAD, 52 pages in black and white on newsprint, and even with seemingly those kind of restrictions there's still room for originality. Not so with TRASH. In addition to imitating MAD, they imitated other juvenile humor magazines, and not only cashed in on the success of those magazines, like everyone else they also cashed in on other elements of popular culture. They seemed to aim towards a younger audience than usual with their posters and contests.

Thanks again to Michael Sullivan for providing me with xeroxes of magazines I don't have.



At one time, it was considered absurd that there would be a convention devoted solely to science fiction. Wouldn't that be weird if there were such a thing?
It's supposed to take place in 2001 which in 1978 was considered a long way away. The artist either didn't pay attention or there's a city on Planet X that looks just like New York City. Or maybe they were suggesting that Planet X would be the name for Earth in the future.