/[www]/www/philosophy/selling.html
ViewVC logotype

Annotation of /www/philosophy/selling.html

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.65 - (hide annotations) (download) (as text)
Fri Sep 10 10:58:36 2021 UTC (3 years, 1 month ago) by th_g
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
Changes since 1.64: +10 -12 lines
File MIME type: text/html
Minor fixes: links, copyright years, redundant <abbr>, quotes, etc.

1 dkr 1.20 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
2 th_g 1.61 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
3     <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
4 th_g 1.64 <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays aboutfs principles" -->
5 th_g 1.61 <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
6 ineiev 1.44 <title>Selling Free Software
7     - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
8 ineiev 1.43 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
9 dkr 1.20 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
10 th_g 1.61 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
11     <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
12     <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
13 th_g 1.65 <div class="article reduced-width">
14 dkr 1.20 <h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
15 wkotwica 1.8
16 mattl 1.33 <p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some views on the
17     ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
18     GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
19 th_g 1.61 <hr class="thin" />
20 mattl 1.33
21 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
22 rms 1.31 Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
23 webcvs 1.1 should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
24 joeko 1.46 you should charge as little as possible&mdash;just enough to cover
25 rms 1.31 the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
26 webcvs 1.1
27 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
28 rms 1.31 Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
29 rms 1.49 <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as much
30     as they wish or can. If a license does not permit users to make
31     copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If this seems
32     surprising to you, please read on.</p>
33 webcvs 1.1
34 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
35 karl 1.18 The word &ldquo;free&rdquo; has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
36 th_g 1.65 either to freedom or to price. When we speak of &ldquo;free software,&rdquo;
37     we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of &ldquo;free speech,&rdquo;
38     not &ldquo;free beer.&rdquo;) Specifically, it means that a user is free to run
39 rms 1.55 the program, study and change the program, and redistribute the program with or
40 wkotwica 1.8 without changes.</p>
41 webcvs 1.1
42 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
43 webcvs 1.1 Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
44     substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
45     from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
46 wkotwica 1.8 because users have freedom in using it.</p>
47 webcvs 1.1
48 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
49 rms 1.31 <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree programs</a>
50 webcvs 1.1 are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
51     a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
52 rms 1.49 Price or no price, the program is nonfree because its users are denied
53 wkotwica 1.8 freedom.</p>
54 webcvs 1.1
55 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
56 rms 1.31 Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
57     the software
58     free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
59 webcvs 1.1 software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
60     some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
61     legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
62 wkotwica 1.8 from it.</p>
63 webcvs 1.1
64 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
65 webcvs 1.1 Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
66     ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
67 rms 1.31 distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free software development projects or to the
68 th_g 1.65 <a href="https://www.fsf.org/">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way you can
69 rms 1.31 advance the world of free software.</p>
70 webcvs 1.1
71 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
72     <strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
73     funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
74 webcvs 1.1
75 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
76 webcvs 1.1 In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
77     charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
78 wkotwica 1.8 development.</p>
79 webcvs 1.1
80    
81 yavor 1.24 <h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
82 webcvs 1.1
83 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
84 webcvs 1.1 People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
85     software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
86 wkotwica 1.8 <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
87 joeko 1.46 software</a>, a high price does exactly that&mdash;but free software
88 yavor 1.24 is different.</p>
89 webcvs 1.1
90 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
91 webcvs 1.1 The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
92 wkotwica 1.8 and there are many ways to get it.</p>
93 webcvs 1.1
94 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
95 webcvs 1.1 Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
96     proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
97 wkotwica 1.8 is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
98 webcvs 1.1
99 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
100 webcvs 1.1 With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
101     distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
102     program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
103     has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
104     price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
105 wkotwica 1.8 CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
106 webcvs 1.1
107    
108 yavor 1.24 <h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free software?</h3>
109 webcvs 1.1
110 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
111 webcvs 1.1 Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
112     think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
113 wkotwica 1.8 users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
114 webcvs 1.1
115 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
116 joeko 1.46 This is true for proprietary software&mdash;but free software is
117 webcvs 1.1 different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
118 wkotwica 1.8 service has less effect on popularity.</p>
119 webcvs 1.1
120 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
121 webcvs 1.1 In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
122     mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
123 rms 1.31 is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
124     may continue to use proprietary software if
125     free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
126 webcvs 1.1 to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
127 wkotwica 1.8 <em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
128 webcvs 1.1
129 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
130 webcvs 1.1 The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
131 th_g 1.65 <a href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free software</a>
132 webcvs 1.1 or
133 yavor 1.24 <a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
134     distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
135     raising funds for others to write them.</p>
136 webcvs 1.1
137    
138 yavor 1.24 <h3>The term &ldquo;selling software&rdquo; can be confusing too</h3>
139 webcvs 1.1
140 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
141 yavor 1.24 Strictly speaking, &ldquo;selling&rdquo; means trading goods for
142     money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
143     encourage it.</p>
144 webcvs 1.1
145 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
146 th_g 1.65 However, when people think of &ldquo;<a
147     href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">selling software</a>,&rdquo;
148 webcvs 1.1 they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
149 wkotwica 1.8 software proprietary rather than free.</p>
150 webcvs 1.1
151 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
152 webcvs 1.1 So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
153     article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
154 yavor 1.24 &ldquo;selling software&rdquo; and choose some other wording instead.
155     For example, you could say &ldquo;distributing free software for a
156     fee&rdquo;&mdash;that is unambiguous.</p>
157 webcvs 1.1
158    
159 yavor 1.24 <h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
160 webcvs 1.1
161 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
162 webcvs 1.1 Except for one special situation, the
163 th_g 1.65 <a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU GPL)
164 yavor 1.24 has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
165     copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
166     a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
167     complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
168     copy.</p>
169 webcvs 1.1
170 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
171 webcvs 1.1 The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
172     without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
173     required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
174     Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
175 yavor 1.24 a fee too large for anyone to pay&mdash;such as a billion
176     dollars&mdash;and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
177 karl 1.45 concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
178     have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
179 yavor 1.24 to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
180     is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
181     limit them.</p>
182 webcvs 1.1
183 wkotwica 1.8 <p>
184 rms 1.31 Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
185     GPL plead for permission, saying that they &ldquo;won't charge
186     money for the GNU software&rdquo; or such like. That won't get them anywhere
187     with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
188 webcvs 1.1 defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
189     distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
190 wkotwica 1.8 charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
191 th_g 1.61 </div>
192 webcvs 1.1
193 dkr 1.20 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
194     <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
195 th_g 1.61 <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
196 ineiev 1.47 <div class="unprintable">
197 wkotwica 1.8
198 ineiev 1.44 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
199     <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
200     There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
201     the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
202     to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
203    
204     <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
205     replace it with the translation of these two:
206    
207     We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
208     translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
209     Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
210     to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
211     &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
212    
213 th_g 1.61 <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
214 ineiev 1.44 our web pages, see <a
215     href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
216     README</a>. -->
217     Please see the <a
218     href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
219 th_g 1.61 README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
220 ineiev 1.44 of this article.</p>
221 ineiev 1.47 </div>
222 ineiev 1.44
223     <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
224     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
225 gnun 1.52 be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
226 ineiev 1.44 without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
227     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
228     document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
229     document was modified, or published.
230    
231     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
232     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
233     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
234     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
235     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
236    
237     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
238     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
239 wkotwica 1.8
240 th_g 1.63 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996-1998, 2001, 2007, 2015, 2021
241 ineiev 1.44 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
242 webcvs 1.1
243 jturner 1.37 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
244 gnun 1.52 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
245     Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
246 wkotwica 1.8
247 ineiev 1.42 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
248    
249 ineiev 1.48 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
250 bkuhn 1.2 <!-- timestamp start -->
251 th_g 1.65 $Date: 2021/08/19 07:36:45 $
252 bkuhn 1.2 <!-- timestamp end -->
253 wkotwica 1.8 </p>
254     </div>
255 ineiev 1.60 </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
256 wkotwica 1.8 </body>
257     </html>

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26