/[www]/www/philosophy/selling.html
ViewVC logotype

Annotation of /www/philosophy/selling.html

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.2 - (hide annotations) (download) (as text)
Sat Apr 28 22:15:59 2001 UTC (23 years, 6 months ago) by bkuhn
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.1: +3 -6 lines
File MIME type: text/html
   * Fixed information about Don Marti's patent essay (deadline is passed,
     but still of historical interest)

   * Per RMS' decision, removed the by-line on essays that are primarly
     FSF policy and the author doesn't matter much

1 webcvs 1.1 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
2     <HTML>
3     <HEAD>
4     <TITLE>Selling Free Software - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</TITLE>
5     <LINK REV="made" HREF="mailto:webmasters@www.gnu.org">
6     </HEAD>
7     <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#1F00FF" ALINK="#FF0000" VLINK="#9900DD">
8    
9     <H3>Selling Free Software</H3>
10    
11     <P>
12    
13     <A HREF="/graphics/philosophicalgnu.html"><IMG SRC="/graphics/philosophical-gnu-sm.jpg"
14     ALT=" [image of a Philosophical Gnu] "
15     WIDTH="160" HEIGHT="200"></A>
16    
17     <!-- Please keep this list alphabetical!!! -->
18     [
19     <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.ca.html">Catalan</A>
20     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.html">English</A>
21     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.fr.html">French</A>
22     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.it.html">Italian</A>
23     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.ja.html">Japanese</A>
24     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.ru.html">Russian</A>
25     | <A HREF="/philosophy/selling.es.html">Spanish</A>
26     ]
27    
28     <P>
29    
30     <HR>
31    
32     <P>
33    
34     <H4>Table of Contents</H4>
35     <UL>
36     <LI><A HREF="selling.html#HigherPriceNoHurt"
37     NAME="TOCHigherPriceNoHurt">Will
38     a higher distribution price hurt some users?</A>
39     <LI><A HREF="selling.html#HigherPriceNoDiscourage"
40     NAME="TOCHigherPriceNoDiscourage">Will
41     a higher distribution price discourage use of free software?</A>
42     <LI><A HREF="selling.html#ConfusingTerm"
43     NAME="TOCConfusingTerm">The
44     term ``selling software'' can be confusing too</A>
45     <LI><A HREF="selling.html#HighOrLowFeesAndGPL"
46     NAME="TOCHighOrLowFeesAndGPL">High
47     or low fees, and the GNU GPL</A>
48     <LI><A HREF="/philosophy/philosophy.html">Other Texts to Read</A>
49     </UL>
50    
51     <P>
52    
53     <HR>
54    
55     <P>
56    
57     Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you
58     should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
59     you should charge as little as possible -- just enough to cover the
60     cost.
61    
62     <P>
63     Actually we encourage people who redistribute
64     <A HREF="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</A>
65     to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to
66     you, please read on.
67    
68     <P>
69     The word ``free'' has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
70     either to freedom or to price. When we speak of ``free software'',
71     we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of ``free speech'',
72     not ``free beer''.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to run
73     the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
74     without changes.
75    
76     <P>
77     Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
78     substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
79     from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
80     because users have freedom in using it.
81    
82     <P>
83     <A HREF="categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Non-free programs</A>
84     are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
85     a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
86     Price or no price, the program is non-free because users don't have
87     freedom.
88    
89     <P>
90     Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price isn't more
91     free, or closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
92     software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
93     some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
94     legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
95     from it.
96    
97     <P>
98     Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
99     ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
100     distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to the
101     <A HREF="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</A>
102     or some other free software development project. By funding
103     development, you can advance the world of free software.
104    
105     <P>
106     <STRONG>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
107     funds for development. Don't waste it!</STRONG>
108    
109     <P>
110     In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
111     charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
112     development.
113    
114     <P>
115    
116     <H4><A HREF="selling.html#TOCHigherPriceNoHurt"
117     NAME="HigherPriceNoHurt">Will
118     a higher distribution price hurt some users?</A></H4>
119    
120     <P>
121    
122     People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
123     software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
124     <A HREF="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
125     software (18k characters)</A>, a high price does exactly that -- but free software is
126     different.
127    
128     <P>
129     The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
130     and there are many ways to get it.
131    
132     <P>
133     Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
134     proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
135     is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.
136    
137     <P>
138     With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
139     distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
140     program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
141     has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
142     price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
143     CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.
144    
145     <P>
146    
147     <H4><A HREF="selling.html#TOCHigherPriceNoDiscourage"
148     NAME="HigherPriceNoDiscourage">Will
149     a higher distribution price discourage use of free software?</A></H4>
150    
151     <P>
152     Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
153     think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
154     users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.
155    
156     <P>
157     This is true for proprietary software -- but free software is
158     different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
159     service has less effect on popularity.
160    
161     <P>
162     In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
163     mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
164     is to use. Many users will continue to use proprietary software if
165     free software can't do all the jobs they want to do. Thus, if we want
166     to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
167     <em>develop more free software</em>.
168    
169     <P>
170     The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
171     <A HREF="/software/software.html#HelpWriteSoftware">free software</A>
172     or
173     <A HREF="/doc/doc.html#HelpWriteDocumentation">manuals</A>
174     yourself. But if you do distribution rather than writing, the
175     best way you can help is by raising funds for others to write them.
176    
177     <P>
178    
179     <H4><A HREF="selling.html#TOCConfusingTerm"
180     NAME="ConfusingTerm">The
181     term ``selling software'' can be confusing too</A></H4>
182    
183     <P>
184     Strictly speaking, ``selling'' means trading goods for money. Selling
185     a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we encourage it.
186    
187     <P>
188     However, when people think of
189     <A HREF="words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">``selling software''</A>,
190     they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
191     software proprietary rather than free.
192    
193     <P>
194     So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
195     article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
196     ``selling software'' and choose some other wording instead. For
197     example, you could say ``distributing free software for a fee''--that
198     is unambiguous.
199    
200     <P>
201    
202     <H4><A HREF="selling.html#TOCHighOrLowFeesAndGPL"
203     NAME="HighOrLowFeesAndGPL">High
204     or low fees, and the GNU GPL</A></H4>
205    
206     <P>
207     Except for one special situation, the
208    
209     <A HREF="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License (20k
210     characters)</A> (GNU GPL) has no requirements about how much you can
211     charge for distributing a copy of free software. You can charge
212     nothing, a penny, a dollar, or a billion dollars. It's up to you, and
213     the marketplace, so don't complain to us if nobody wants to pay a
214     billion dollars for a copy.
215    
216     <P>
217     The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
218     without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
219     required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
220     Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
221     a fee too large for anyone to pay--such as, a billion dollars--and
222     thus pretend to release source code while in truth concealing it. So
223     in this case we have to limit the fee for source, to ensure the user's
224     freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there is no such
225     justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not limit them.
226    
227     <P>
228     Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line of what the GNU
229     GPL permits plead for permission, saying that they ``won't charge
230     money for the GNU software'' or such like. They don't get anywhere
231     this way. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
232     defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
233     distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
234     charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.
235    
236     <P>
237    
238     <HR>
239    
240     <H4><A HREF="/philosophy/philosophy.html">Other Texts to Read</A></H4>
241    
242     <HR>
243    
244     Return to <A HREF="/home.html">GNU's home page</A>.
245     <P>
246     FSF &amp; GNU inquiries &amp; questions to
247     <A HREF="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><EM>gnu@gnu.org</EM></A>.
248     Other <A HREF="/home.html#ContactInfo">ways to contact</A> the FSF.
249     <P>
250     Comments on these web pages to
251     <A HREF="mailto:webmasters@www.gnu.org"><EM>webmasters@www.gnu.org</EM></A>,
252     send other questions to
253     <A HREF="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><EM>gnu@gnu.org</EM></A>.
254     <P>
255     Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
256     59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111, USA
257     <P>
258     Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
259     permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.<P>
260     Updated:
261 bkuhn 1.2 <!-- timestamp start -->
262     $Date: 2001/04/09 23:23:22 $ $Author: paulv $
263     <!-- timestamp end -->
264 webcvs 1.1 <HR>
265     </BODY>
266     </HTML>

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26