/[www]/www/philosophy/free-sw.html
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /www/philosophy/free-sw.html

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

revision 1.27 by canderson, Fri Jul 2 00:36:09 2004 UTC revision 1.129 by rms, Mon Feb 17 01:35:57 2014 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>  <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
2  <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"  <!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
3      "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">  <title>What is free software?
4  <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">  - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
   
 <head>  
 <title>The Free Software Definition - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</title>  
 <meta http-equiv="content-type" content='text/html; charset=utf-8' />  
 <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/gnu.css" />  
 <link rev="made" href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org" />  
 </head>  
   
 <!-- This document is in XML, and xhtml 1.0 -->  
 <!-- Please make sure to properly nest your tags -->  
 <!-- and ensure that your final document validates -->  
 <!-- consistent with W3C xhtml 1.0 and CSS standards -->  
 <!-- See validator.w3.org -->  
5    
6  <body>  <meta http-equiv="Keywords" content="GNU, FSF, Free Software Foundation, Linux, Emacs, GCC, Unix, Free Software, Operating System, GNU Kernel, HURD, GNU HURD, Hurd" />
7    <meta http-equiv="Description" content="Since 1983, developing the free Unix style operating system GNU, so that computer users can have the freedom to share and improve the software they use." />
8    
9  <p><a href="#translations">Translations</a> of this page</p>  <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-sw.translist" -->
10    <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
11    
12    <h2>What is free software?</h2>
13    
14  <h3>The Free Software Definition</h3>  <h3>The Free Software Definition</h3>
15    
16    <blockquote>
17  <p>  <p>
18  <a href="/graphics/philosophicalgnu.html"><img src="/graphics/philosophical-gnu-sm.jpg" alt=" [image of a Philosophical Gnu] " width="160" height="200" /></a>  The free software definition presents the criteria for whether a
19    particular software program qualifies as free software.  From time to
20    time we revise this definition, to clarify it or to resolve questions
21    about subtle issues.  See the <a href="#History">History section</a>
22    below for a list of changes that affect the definition of free
23    software.
24  </p>  </p>
25    </blockquote>
26    
27  <p>  <p>
28  We maintain this free software definition to show clearly what must be  &ldquo;Free software&rdquo; means software that respects users'
29  true about a particular software program for it to be considered  freedom and community.  Roughly, it means that <b>the users have the
30  free software.</p>  freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the
31    software</b>.  Thus, &ldquo;free software&rdquo; is a matter of
32    liberty, not price.  To understand the concept, you should think of
33    &ldquo;free&rdquo; as in &ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; not as in
34    &ldquo;free beer&rdquo;.
35    </p>
36    
37  <p>  <p>
38  ``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price.  To understand the  We campaign for these freedoms because everyone deserves them.  With
39  concept, you should think of ``free'' as in ``free speech,'' not as in  these freedoms, the users (both individually and collectively) control
40  ``free beer.''</p>  the program and what it does for them.  When users don't control the
41    program, we call it a &ldquo;nonfree&rdquo; or
42    &ldquo;proprietary&rdquo; program.  The nonfree program controls the
43    users, and the developer controls the program; this makes the
44    program <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">
45    an instrument of unjust power</a>.
46    </p>
47    
48  <p>  <p>
49  Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy,  A program is free software if the program's users have the
50  distribute, study, change and improve the software.  More precisely,  four essential freedoms:
51  it refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software:</p>  </p>
52    
53  <ul>  <ul>
54    <li>The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).</li>    <li>The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).</li>
55    <li>The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs    <li>The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it
56        (freedom 1).   Access to the source code is a precondition for this.</li>        does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source
57          code is a precondition for this.
58      </li>
59    <li>The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor    <li>The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor
60        (freedom 2).</li>        (freedom 2).
61    <li>The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements    </li>
62       to the public, so that the whole community benefits    <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions
63        (freedom 3).   Access to the source code is a precondition for this.</li>        to others (freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole
64          community a chance to benefit from your changes.
65          Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
66      </li>
67  </ul>  </ul>
68    
69  <p>  <p>
70  A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  A program is free software if it gives users adequately all of these
71  Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or  freedoms.  Otherwise, it is nonfree.  While we can distinguish various
72  without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for  nonfree distribution schemes in terms of how far they fall short of
73  distribution, to <a href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being  being free, we consider them all equally unethical.</p>
74  free to do these things means (among other things) that you do not  
75  have to ask or pay for permission.</p>  <p>The rest of this page clarifies certain points about what makes
76    specific freedoms adequate or not.</p>
77    
78    <p>Freedom to distribute (freedoms 2 and 3) means you are free to
79    redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either
80    gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
81    <a href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these
82    things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay
83    for permission to do so.
84    </p>
85    
86  <p>  <p>
87  You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them  You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them
88  privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they  privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they
89  exist.  If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to  exist.  If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to
90  notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.</p>  notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.
91    </p>
92    
93  <p>  <p>
94  The freedom to use a program means the freedom for any kind of person  The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person
95  or organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind  or organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
96  of overall job, and without being required to communicate subsequently  overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it
97  with the developer or any other specific entity.</p>  with the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is
98    the <em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em>
99    purpose; you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes,
100    and if you distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it
101    for her purposes, but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
102    </p>
103    
104  <p>  <p>
105  The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable  The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable
106  forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and  forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and
107  unmodified versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is  unmodified versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary
108  necessary for conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is  for conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there
109  ok if there is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a  is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program
110  certain program (since some languages don't support that feature), but  (since some languages don't support that feature), but you must have the
111  you must have the freedom to redistribute such forms should you find  freedom to redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to
112  or develop a way to make them.</p>  make them.
113  <p>  </p>
114  In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved  
115  versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of  <p>
116  the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary  In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the
117  condition for free software.</p>  freedom to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you must have
118  <p>  access to the source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of
119  In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be irrevocable as  source code is a necessary condition for free software.  Obfuscated
120  long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the software has the  &ldquo;source code&rdquo; is not real source code and does not count
121  power to revoke the license, without your doing anything to give  as source code.
122  cause, the software is not free.</p>  </p>
123    
124    <p>
125    Freedom 1 includes the freedom to use your changed version in place of
126    the original.  If the program is delivered in a product designed to
127    run someone else's modified versions but refuse to run yours &mdash; a
128    practice known as &ldquo;tivoization&rdquo; or &ldquo;lockdown&rdquo;,
129    or (in its practitioners' perverse terminology) as &ldquo;secure
130    boot&rdquo; &mdash; freedom 1 becomes a theoretical fiction rather
131    than a practical freedom.  This is not sufficient.  In other words,
132    these binaries are not free software even if the source code they are
133    compiled from is free.
134    </p>
135    
136    <p>
137    One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
138    subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you
139    cannot merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
140    requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
141    license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
142    </p>
143    
144    <p>
145    Freedom 3 includes the freedom to release your modified versions
146    as free software.  A free license may also permit other ways of
147    releasing them; in other words, it does not have to be
148    a <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a
149    license that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify
150    as a free license.
151    </p>
152    
153    <p>
154    In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be permanent and
155    irrevocable as long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the
156    software has the power to revoke the license, or retroactively add
157    restrictions to its terms, without your doing anything wrong to give
158    cause, the software is not free.
159    </p>
160    
161  <p>  <p>
162  However, certain kinds of rules about the manner of distributing free  However, certain kinds of rules about the manner of distributing free
163  software are acceptable, when they don't conflict with the central  software are acceptable, when they don't conflict with the central
164  freedoms.  For example, copyleft (very simply stated) is the rule that  freedoms.  For example, copyleft (very simply stated) is the rule that
165  when redistributing the program, you cannot add restrictions to deny  when redistributing the program, you cannot add restrictions to deny
166  other people the central freedoms.  This rule does not conflict with  other people the central freedoms.  This rule does not conflict with
167  the central freedoms; rather it protects them.</p>  the central freedoms; rather it protects them.
168    </p>
169    
170    <p>
171    &ldquo;Free software&rdquo; does not mean &ldquo;noncommercial&rdquo;.  A free
172    program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
173    and commercial distribution.  Commercial development of free software
174    is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.
175    You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have
176    obtained copies at no charge.  But regardless of how you got your copies,
177    you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to
178    <a href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
179    </p>
180    
181    <p>
182    Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.
183    If your right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that
184    someone else considers an improvement, that program is not free.
185    </p>
186    
187  <p>  <p>
188  Thus, you may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you  However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable,
189  may have obtained copies at no charge.  But regardless of how you got  if they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified
190  your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the  versions, or your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.
191  software, even to <a href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.</p>  Thus, it is acceptable for the license to require that you change the
192  <p>  name of the modified version, remove a logo, or identify your
193  ``Free software'' does not mean ``non-commercial''.  A free program  modifications as yours.  As long as these requirements are not so
194  must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and  burdensome that they effectively hamper you from releasing your
195  commercial distribution.  Commercial development of free software is  changes, they are acceptable; you're already making other changes to
196  no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.</p>  the program, so you won't have trouble making a few more.
197  <p>  </p>
198  Rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if they  
199  don't effectively block your freedom to release modified versions.  <p>
200  Rules that ``if you make the program available in this way, you must  Rules that &ldquo;if you make your version available in this way, you
201  make it available in that way also'' can be acceptable too, on the  must make it available in that way also&rdquo; can be acceptable too,
202  same condition.  (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of  on the same condition.  An example of such an acceptable rule is one
203  whether to publish the program or not.)  It is also acceptable for the  saying that if you have distributed a
204  license to require that, if you have distributed a modified version  modified version and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you
205  and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.</p>  must send one.  (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of
206  <p>  whether to distribute your version at all.)  Rules that require release
207  In the GNU project, we use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">``copyleft''</a>  of source code to the users for versions that you put into public use
208  to protect these freedoms legally for everyone.  But  are also acceptable.
209  <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted  </p>
210  free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are  
211  important reasons why <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html"> it is  <p>
212  better to use copyleft</a>, but if your program is non-copylefted free  A special issue arises when a license requires changing the name by
213  software, we can still use it.</p>  which the program will be invoked from other programs.  That
214  <p>  effectively hampers you from releasing your changed version so that it
215  See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>  can replace the original when invoked by those other programs.  This
216  for a description of how ``free software,'' ``copylefted software'' and  sort of requirement is acceptable only if there's a suitable aliasing
217  other categories of software relate to each other.</p>  facility that allows you to specify the original program's name as an
218  <p>  alias for the modified version.</p>
219  Sometimes government <a id="exportcontrol">export control  
220  regulations</a> and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to  <p>
221  distribute copies of programs internationally.  Software developers do  In the GNU project, we use
222  not have the power to eliminate or override these restrictions, but  <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>
223  what they can and must do is refuse to impose them as conditions of  to protect these freedoms legally for everyone.  But
224  use of the program.  In this way, the restrictions will not affect  <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">noncopylefted
225  activities and people outside the jurisdictions of these governments.</p>  free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
226  <p>  <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>,
227  Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are  but if your program is noncopylefted free software, it is still basically
228  limits on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  ethical. (See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a> for a description of how &ldquo;free software,&rdquo; &ldquo;copylefted software&rdquo; and other categories of software relate to each other.)
229  If a copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described  </p>
230  above, it is unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never  
231  anticipated (though this does happen occasionally).  However, some  <p>
232  free software licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can  Sometimes government <a id="exportcontrol">export control regulations</a>
233  impose a much larger range of possible restrictions.  That means there  and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to distribute copies of
234  are many possible ways such a license could be unacceptably  programs internationally.  Software developers do not have the power to
235  restrictive and non-free.</p>  eliminate or override these restrictions, but what they can and must do
236  <p>  is refuse to impose them as conditions of use of the program.  In this
237  We can't possibly list all the possible contract restrictions that  way, the restrictions will not affect activities and people outside the
238  would be unacceptable.  If a contract-based license restricts the user  jurisdictions of these governments.  Thus, free software licenses
239  in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses cannot, and which  must not require obedience to any nontrivial export regulations as a
240  isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think about it,  condition of exercising any of the essential freedoms.
241  and we will probably decide it is non-free.</p>  </p>
242  <p>  
243  When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like  <p>
244  ``give away'' or ``for free'', because those terms imply that the  Merely mentioning the existence of export regulations, without making
245  issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as  them a condition of the license itself, is acceptable since it does
246  ``piracy'' embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See  not restrict users.  If an export regulation is actually trivial for
247  <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases  free software, then requiring it as a condition is not an actual
248  that are Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  problem; however, it is a potential problem, since a later change in
249  We also have a list of <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations  export law could make the requirement nontrivial and thus render the
250  of "free software"</a> into various languages.</p>  software nonfree.
251    </p>
252    
253    <p>
254    It is acceptable for a free license to specify which jurisdiction's
255    law applies, or where litigation must be done, or both.
256    </p>
257    
258    <p>
259    Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits
260    on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
261    copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it
262    is unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
263    (though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
264    licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
265    range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
266    such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
267    </p>
268    
269    <p>
270    We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a
271    contract-based license restricts the user in an unusual way that
272    copyright-based licenses cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as
273    legitimate, we will have to think about it, and we will probably conclude
274    it is nonfree.
275    </p>
276    
277    <p>
278    When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms
279    like &ldquo;give away&rdquo; or &ldquo;for free,&rdquo; because those terms imply that
280    the issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such
281    as &ldquo;piracy&rdquo; embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See
282    <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that
283    are Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have
284    a list of proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
285    &ldquo;free software&rdquo;</a> into various languages.
286    </p>
287    
288  <p>  <p>
289  Finally, note that criteria such as those stated in this free software  Finally, note that criteria such as those stated in this free software
290  definition require careful thought for their interpretation.  To  definition require careful thought for their interpretation.  To decide
291  decide whether a specific software license qualifies as a free  whether a specific software license qualifies as a free software license,
292  software license, we judge it based on these criteria to determine  we judge it based on these criteria to determine whether it fits their
293  whether it fits their spirit as well as the precise words.  If a  spirit as well as the precise words.  If a license includes unconscionable
294  license includes unconscionable restrictions, we reject it, even if we  restrictions, we reject it, even if we did not anticipate the issue
295  did not anticipate the issue in these criteria.  Sometimes a license  in these criteria.  Sometimes a license requirement raises an issue
296  requirement raises an issue that calls for extensive thought,  that calls for extensive thought, including discussions with a lawyer,
297  including discussions with a lawyer, before we can decide if the  before we can decide if the requirement is acceptable.  When we reach
298  requirement is acceptable.  When we reach a conclusion about a new  a conclusion about a new issue, we often update these criteria to make
299  issue, we often update these criteria to make it easier to see why  it easier to see why certain licenses do or don't qualify.
 certain licenses do or don't qualify.</p>  
 <p>  
 If you are interested in whether a specific license qualifies as a  
 free software license, see our <a href="/licenses/license-list.html">list  
 of licenses</a>.  If the  
 license you are concerned with is not listed there, you can ask us  
 about it by sending us email  
 at <a href="mailto:licensing@gnu.org">&lt;licensing@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>  
   
 <hr />  
   
 <p>  
 Another group has started using the term "open source" to mean  
 something close (but not identical) to "free software".  We prefer the  
 term "free software" because, once you have heard it refers to freedom  
 rather than price, <a href="free-software-for-freedom.html">it calls  
 to mind freedom</a>.</p>  
   
 <hr />  
 <h4><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">Other Texts to Read</a></h4>  
   
   
 <!-- All pages on the GNU web server should have the section about    -->  
 <!-- verbatim copying.  Please do NOT remove this without talking     -->  
 <!-- with the webmasters first. -->  
 <!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document -->  
 <!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002." -->  
   
 <div class="translations">  
 <p><a id="translations"></a>  
 <b>Translations of this page</b>:<br />  
   
 <!-- Please keep this list alphabetical, and in the original -->  
 <!-- language if possible, otherwise default to English -->  
 <!-- If you do not have it English, please comment what the -->  
 <!-- English is.  If you add a new language here, please -->  
 <!-- advise web-trans@gnu.org and add it to -->  
 <!--    - in /home/www/bin/nightly-vars either TAGSLANG or WEBLANG -->  
 <!--    - in /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html -->  
 <!--      one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway" -->  
 <!--    - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias -->  
 <!--      to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases -->  
 <!-- Please also check you have the 2 letter language code right versus -->  
 <!--     http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/iso639.htm -->  
 [  
   <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.cs.html">&#x010c;esky</a>        <!-- Czech -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.da.html">Dansk</a>       <!-- Danish -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.de.html">Deutsch</a>     <!-- German -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">English</a>  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.es.html">Espa&#x00f1;ol</a>      <!-- Spanish -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html">Fran&#x00e7;ais</a>     <!-- French -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.gl.html">Galego</a>      <!-- Galician -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.he.html">&#x05e2;&#x05d1;&#x05e8;&#x05d9;&#x05ea;</a>    <!-- Hebrew -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.hr.html">Hrvatski</a>    <!-- Croatian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.id.html">Bahasa Indonesia</a>    <!-- Indonesian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.it.html">Italiano</a>    <!-- Italian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.ja.html">&#x65e5;&#x672c;&#x8a9e;</a>    <!-- Japanese -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.ko.html">&#xd55c;&#xad6d;&#xc5b4;</a>    <!-- Korean -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.hu.html">Magyar</a>      <!-- Hungarian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.nl.html">Nederlands</a>  <!-- Dutch -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.no.html">Norsk</a>       <!-- Norwegian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.pl.html">Polski</a>      <!-- Polish -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.pt.html">Portugu&#x0ea;s</a>     <!-- Portuguese -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.ro.html">Rom&#x00e2;n&#x00e3;</a>        <!-- Romanian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.ru.html">&#1056;&#1091;&#1089;&#1089;&#1082;&#1080;&#1081;</a> <!-- Russian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.sl.html">Slovinsko</a>   <!--- Slovenian -->  
 | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.tr.html">T&#x00fc;rk&#x00e7;e</a>        <!-- Turkish -->  
 ]  
300  </p>  </p>
 </div>  
301    
 <div class="copyright">  
302  <p>  <p>
303  Return to the <a href="/home.html">GNU Project home page</a>.  If you are interested in whether a specific license qualifies as a free
304    software license, see our <a href="/licenses/license-list.html">list
305    of licenses</a>.  If the license you are concerned with is not
306    listed there, you can ask us about it by sending us email at
307    <a href="mailto:licensing@gnu.org">&lt;licensing@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
308    </p>
309    
310    <p>
311    If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the
312    Free Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The
313    proliferation of different free software licenses means increased work
314    for users in understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you
315    find an existing free software license that meets your needs.
316  </p>  </p>
317    
318  <p>  <p>
319  Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to  If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our
320  <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><em>gnu@gnu.org</em></a>.  help you can ensure that the license really is a free software license
321  There are also <a href="/home.html#ContactInfo">other ways to contact</a>  and avoid various practical problems.
322  the FSF.  </p>
323  <br />  
324  Please send broken links and other corrections (or suggestions) to  <h3 id="beyond-software">Beyond Software</h3>
325  <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><em>webmasters@gnu.org</em></a>.  
326    <p>
327    <a href="/philosophy/free-doc.html">Software manuals must be free</a>,
328    for the same reasons that software must be free, and because the
329    manuals are in effect part of the software.
330  </p>  </p>
331    
332  <p>  <p>
333  Please see the  The same arguments also make sense for other kinds of works of
334  <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations  practical use &mdash; that is to say, works that embody useful knowledge,
335  README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting  such as educational works and reference
336  translations of this article.  works.  <a href="http://wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> is the best-known
337    example.
338  </p>  </p>
339    
340  <p>  <p>
341  Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, Free  Any kind of work <em>can</em> be free, and the definition of free software
342  Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA  has been extended to a definition of <a href="http://freedomdefined.org/">
343  02111,  USA  free cultural works</a> applicable to any kind of works.
 <br />  
 Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is  
 permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is  
 preserved.  
344  </p>  </p>
345    
346    <h3 id="open-source">Open Source?</h3>
347    
348  <p>  <p>
349  Updated:  Another group has started using the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; to mean
350    something close (but not identical) to &ldquo;free software&rdquo;.  We
351    prefer the term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; because, once you have heard that
352    it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom.  The
353    word &ldquo;open&rdquo; <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">
354    never refers to freedom</a>.
355    </p>
356    
357    <h3 id="History">History</h3>
358    
359    <p>From time to time we revise this Free Software Definition.  Here is
360    the list of substantive changes, along with links to show exactly what
361    was changed.</p>
362    
363    <ul>
364    
365    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.128&amp;r2=1.129">Version
366    1.129</a>: State explicitly that choice of law and choice of forum
367    specifications are allowed.  (This was always our policy.)</li>
368    
369    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.121&amp;r2=1.122">Version
370    1.122</a>: An export control requirement is a real problem if the
371    requirement is nontrivial; otherwise it is only a potential problem.</li>
372    
373    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.117&amp;r2=1.118">Version
374    1.118</a>: Clarification: the issue is limits on your right to modify,
375    not on what modifications you have made.  And modifications are not limited
376    to &ldquo;improvements&rdquo;</li>
377    
378    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.110&amp;r2=1.111">Version
379    1.111</a>: Clarify 1.77 by saying that only
380    retroactive <em>restrictions</em> are unacceptable.  The copyright
381    holders can always grant additional <em>permission</em> for use of the
382    work by releasing the work in another way in parallel.</li>
383    
384    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.104&amp;r2=1.105">Version
385    1.105</a>: Reflect, in the brief statement of freedom 1, the point
386    (already stated in version 1.80) that it includes really using your modified
387    version for your computing.</li>
388    
389    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.91&amp;r2=1.92">Version
390    1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
391    
392    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90">Version
393    1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies
394    of your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate
395    in someone else's development project.</li>
396    
397    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89">Version
398    1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as
399    free software.</li>
400    
401    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80">Version
402    1.80</a>: Freedom 1 must be practical, not just theoretical;
403    i.e., no tivoization.</li>
404    
405    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.76&amp;r2=1.77">Version
406    1.77</a>: Clarify that all retroactive changes to the license are
407    unacceptable, even if it's not described as a complete
408    replacement.</li>
409    
410    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.73&amp;r2=1.74">Version
411    1.74</a>: Four clarifications of points not explicit enough, or stated
412    in some places but not reflected everywhere:
413    <ul>
414    <li>"Improvements" does not mean the license can
415    substantively limit what kinds of modified versions you can release.
416    Freedom 3 includes distributing modified versions, not just changes.</li>
417    <li>The right to merge in existing modules
418    refers to those that are suitably licensed.</li>
419    <li>Explicitly state the conclusion of the point about export controls.</li>
420    <li>Imposing a license change constitutes revoking the old license.</li>
421    </ul>
422    </li>
423    
424    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.56&amp;r2=1.57">Version
425    1.57</a>: Add &quot;Beyond Software&quot; section.</li>
426    
427    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.45&amp;r2=1.46">Version
428    1.46</a>: Clarify whose purpose is significant in the freedom to run
429    the program for any purpose.</li>
430    
431    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.40&amp;r2=1.41">Version
432    1.41</a>: Clarify wording about contract-based licenses.</li>
433    
434    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.39&amp;r2=1.40">Version
435    1.40</a>: Explain that a free license must allow to you use other
436    available free software to create your modifications.</li>
437    
438    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.38&amp;r2=1.39">Version
439    1.39</a>: Note that it is acceptable for a license to require you to
440    provide source for versions of the software you put into public
441    use.</li>
442    
443    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.30&amp;r2=1.31">Version
444    1.31</a>: Note that it is acceptable for a license to require you to
445    identify yourself as the author of modifications.  Other minor
446    clarifications throughout the text.</li>
447    
448    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.22&amp;r2=1.23">Version
449    1.23</a>: Address potential problems related to contract-based
450    licenses.</li>
451    
452    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.15&amp;r2=1.16">Version
453    1.16</a>: Explain why distribution of binaries is important.</li>
454    
455    <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.10&amp;r2=1.11">Version
456    1.11</a>: Note that a free license may require you to send a copy of
457    versions you distribute to the author.</li>
458    
459    </ul>
460    
461    <p>There are gaps in the version numbers shown above because there are
462    other changes in this page that do not affect the definition or its
463    interpretations.  For instance, the list does not include changes in
464    asides, formatting, spelling, punctuation, or other parts of the page.
465    You can review the complete list of changes to the page through
466    the <a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;view=log">cvsweb
467    interface</a>.</p>
468    
469    
470    </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
471    <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
472    <div id="footer">
473    
474    <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
475    <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
476    There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
477    the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
478    to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
479    
480    <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
481            replace it with the translation of these two:
482    
483            We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
484            translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
485            Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
486            to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
487            &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
488    
489            <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
490            our web pages, see <a
491            href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
492            README</a>. -->
493    Please see the <a
494    href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
495    README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
496    of this article.</p>
497    
498    <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
499         files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
500         be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
501         without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
502         Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
503         document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
504         document was modified, or published.
505        
506         If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
507         Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
508         years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
509         year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
510         being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
511        
512         There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
513         Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
514    
515    <p>Copyright &copy; 1996-2002, 2004-2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013
516    Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
517    
518    <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
519    href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
520    Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
521    
522    <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
523    
524    <p>Updated:
525  <!-- timestamp start -->  <!-- timestamp start -->
526  $Date$ $Author$  $Date$
527  <!-- timestamp end -->  <!-- timestamp end -->
528  </p>  </p>
529  </div>  </div>
530    </div>
531  </body>  </body>
532  </html>  </html>

Legend:
Removed from v.1.27  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.129

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26