--- www/philosophy/free-sw.html 2017/12/31 07:26:02 1.155 +++ www/philosophy/free-sw.html 2019/07/29 21:25:25 1.165 @@ -1,8 +1,13 @@ - +
-Have a question about free software licensing not answered here? See our other licensing resources, @@ -18,9 +26,7 @@ at licensing@fsf.org.
+“Free software” means software that respects users' @@ -59,17 +74,17 @@
A program is free software if the program's users have the -four essential freedoms: +four essential freedoms: [1]
-+
- The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
- The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
-- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor +
- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
- The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions @@ -104,8 +119,20 @@ sell copies. -
The rest of this page clarifies certain points about what makes -specific freedoms adequate or not.
++A free program must offer the four freedoms to any user that obtains a +copy of the software, provided the user has complied thus far with the +conditions of the free license covering the software. Putting some of +the freedoms off limits to some users, or requiring that users pay, in +money or in kind, to exercise them, is tantamount to not granting the +freedoms in question, and thus renders the program nonfree. +
+ +Clarifying the line at various points
+ +In the rest of this article we expain more precisely how far the +various freedoms need to extend, on various issues, in order for a +program to be free.
The freedom to run the program as you wish
@@ -131,7 +158,7 @@In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the -freedom to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you must have +freedom to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you need to have access to the source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code” is not real source code and does not count @@ -414,6 +441,7 @@ word “open” never refers to freedom.
+
Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2017 +
Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This page is licensed under a Updated: -$Date: 2017/12/31 07:26:02 $ +$Date: 2019/07/29 21:25:25 $
- +
The free software definition presents the criteria for whether a particular software program qualifies as free software. From time to @@ -29,7 +35,16 @@ below for a list of changes that affect the definition of free software.
- + ++“Open source” is something different: it has a very +different philosophy based on different values. Its practical +definition is different too, but nearly all open source programs are +in fact free. We explain the +difference in +Why “Open Source” misses the point of Free Software. +
+