--- www/philosophy/free-sw.html 2012/06/10 08:06:12 1.116 +++ www/philosophy/free-sw.html 2013/05/27 03:49:32 1.121 @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ - +
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the -freedom to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have +freedom to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code” is not real source code and does not count @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@
Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter. -If your modifications are limited, in substance, to changes that -someone else considers an improvement, that is not freedom. +If your right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that +someone else considers an improvement, that program is not free.
@@ -190,15 +190,6 @@
-A special issue arises when a license requires changing the name by -which the program will be invoked from other programs. That -effectively hampers you from releasing your changed version so that it -can replace the original when invoked by those other programs. This -sort of requirement is acceptable only if there's a suitable aliasing -facility that allows you to specify the original program's name as an -alias for the modified version.
- -Rules that “if you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same condition. An example of such an acceptable rule is one @@ -211,6 +202,15 @@
+A special issue arises when a license requires changing the name by +which the program will be invoked from other programs. That +effectively hampers you from releasing your changed version so that it +can replace the original when invoked by those other programs. This +sort of requirement is acceptable only if there's a suitable aliasing +facility that allows you to specify the original program's name as an +alias for the modified version.
+ +In the GNU project, we use copyleft to protect these freedoms legally for everyone. But @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ and avoid various practical problems.
-Software manuals must be free, @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ free cultural works applicable to any kind of works.
-Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean @@ -332,11 +332,11 @@ never refers to freedom.
-From time to time we revise this Free Software Definition. Here is -the list of changes, along with links to show exactly what was -changed.
+the list of substantive changes, along with links to show exactly what +was changed.-Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, -2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +Copyright © 1996-2002, 2004-2007, 2009, 2010, 2012 Free Software +Foundation, Inc.
This page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.
--Updated: + + +
Updated: -$Date: 2012/06/10 08:06:12 $ +$Date: 2013/05/27 03:49:32 $