--- www/philosophy/free-sw.html	2014/01/03 16:57:27	1.127
+++ www/philosophy/free-sw.html	2014/02/17 01:35:57	1.129
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 the program and what it does for them.  When users don't control the
 program, we call it a “nonfree” or
 “proprietary” program.  The nonfree program controls the
-users, and the developer controls the program; which makes the
+users, and the developer controls the program; this makes the
 program <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">
 an instrument of unjust power</a>.
 </p>
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+It is acceptable for a free license to specify which jurisdiction's
+law applies, or where litigation must be done, or both.
+</p>
+
+<p>
 Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits
 on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
 copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it
@@ -357,6 +362,10 @@
 
 <ul>
 
+<li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.128&amp;r2=1.129">Version
+1.129</a>: State explicitly that choice of law and choice of forum
+specifications are allowed.  (This was always our policy.)</li>
+
 <li><a href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.121&amp;r2=1.122">Version
 1.122</a>: An export control requirement is a real problem if the
 requirement is nontrivial; otherwise it is only a potential problem.</li>
@@ -514,7 +523,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/01/03 16:57:27 $
+$Date: 2014/02/17 01:35:57 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>