The Reality Blog

One does not have to look too far to witness the total lack of female empathy when applied to the Men's Movement. Sadly, it almost appears that the movement is on it's own and fighting for decency and equity is not one of the topics that women are generally interested in. It can only be put down to the off chance that, going against feminism and their male-hating vitriol, is either way to hard, too difficult or it would displace their hierarchal sisterhood status, the sisterhood principles are more important then the general good that we fight for. It is a well known fact that females bully each other endlessly, more so then males. The male situation is mostly about sorting out the problem, if you have a problem with someone, stand up to it and take it from there. No festering or denial, confront the issue, if there is a reason and deal with it and that is the way men deal with it. For females there is, as usual, a lot more to consider as I have, while running this blog over the past (almost) seven years, witnessed how totally ruthless and maniacal females can be when reeking revenge..

Nastier than men as far as I can tell. I have many articles where women have abused each other to such a degree that I had to readjust my own thinking towards the opposite sex. The worst example would be an article where a female surgically removed a foetus from a pregnant "mother to be" and took the child home claiming it was hers because she could not have her own. Affective but hardly sane. I have photographs of young girls who have been attacked by their peers and the end result has both physically and mentally scarred them for life. Women are not overly brave when it comes to any possibility of being physically traumatised or physically abused. Normally they call in some white knight or pussy whipped partner to do their dirty work just so they can claim the ethical high road by claiming that it was not their fault or blame for instigating the melee, over some imaginary and ill conceived  hubris..

Apart from al that, we do see and witness quite a few females on side. These ladies can and do witness the sexist, discriminatory male hating efforts that feminists continually promote and proclaim. Those same females, in some cases are even more forward and state their opinions in a more direct way than some men do. They are not shy about coming forward and telling it precisely the way it is, what the issues are and what needs to be fixed regardless of the abuse and personal harm they may have to carry in speaking out..
There would not be too many men on this planet who are not attached or have not been involved with a loving and caring female in their lives, generalisations aside. I have to make that confession myself, as it's undeniable. Those females do have a major impact on our attitudes and thinking, more so than we care to admit or confess.
That is the problem I have with the opposite sex. They can see the issues we face, the misandry, the promotion of a male hating society and all that comes with that and yet there are very few female voices involved in trying to clean that mess up. Maybe it is time that women sat down and made some decisions regarding their own future as our efforts requires the input from both sexes to make it acceptable as well as tenable. we need more women onside to soften the overall impact that feminists are trained to inflict and the sooner they come onside, the sooner they voice their dislike about where all things are heading, the sooner we can fix the problem..

The title name and this blog in general, may appear to be somewhat of an enigma but to my way of thinking, it's totally justifiable and self explanatory. The feminist penchant of promoting all women as being something they are not, eg. blameless, incapable of dishonesty or breaking the law was and is way too incomprehensible. So this blog is here to refute those false and fake claim, argue the men's purview, hence the title..

Feminists and feminism is the main problem, they need to be neutralised for their obvious actions, shut down so society can return to sanity and equity instead of heading towards an inevitable conflict where no one will win and we all loose..
Demonstrate as well to all and sundry that ethics and honour does still ride within the female spyche instead of the endless negative representations we have from male hating feminists that only compounds the "anti-woman" attitude..
You are going to have to make that decision sooner or later as there is no longer a middle road to follow as it's at the stage of "either for or against", better still, promote your altruism..
How else could you possibly restore respect for your own sex..

Two reasonably bright lads explaining the puculiarities of the opposite sex. Their efforts demonstrate to us all those funny little quirks that are so foreign to us as to make us wince and wonder.. Many issues will become clear once you read these comments..

Nietzshe is hated by feminists so he must be good. His philosophy is more about behaviour and responses while Schopenhauer gets down to the basics, the nitty gritty on how women function and what makes them tick and tock....

Arthur Schopenhauer 

Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.  

With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a “striking effect,” for she endows them for a few years with a richness of beauty and a, fulness of charm at the expense of the rest of their lives; so that they may during these years ensnare the fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honourable care of them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime—a step which would not seem sufficiently justified if he only considered the matter. 

Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as she has the rest of her creatures, with the weapons and implements necessary for the protection of her existence and for just the length of time that they will be of service to her; so that Nature has proceeded here with her usual economy. Just as the female ant after coition loses her wings, which then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding purposes, so for the most part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or two children; and probably for the same reasons.
The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people. 

The advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her weaker reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive understanding quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not embrace anything that is remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less degree than men. This is why they have greater inclination for extravagance, which sometimes borders on madness. Women in their hearts think that men are intended to earn money so that they may spend it, if possible during their husband’s lifetime, but at any rate after his death. 

It is because women’s reasoning powers are weaker that they show more sympathy for the unfortunate than men, and consequently take a kindlier interest in them. On the other hand, women are inferior to men in matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness. Again, because their reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and real, and belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely counteracted by abstract thoughts, fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in general, by regard for the past and future or by consideration for what is absent and remote. Accordingly they have the first and principal qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities which are often a necessary instrument in developing it. 

Women may be compared in this respect to an organism that has a liver but no gall-bladder.⁹ So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice.” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. 

Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop counters. - Arthur Schopenhauer

 Friedrich Nietzsche

"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"I know of no better life purpose than to perish in attempting the great and the impossible."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"Love is a state in which a man sees things most decidedly as they are not."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"The true man wants two things: danger and play. For that reason he wants woman, as the most dangerous plaything."— Friedrich Nietzsche
"Today as always, men fall into two groups: slaves and free men. Whoever does not have two-thirds of his day for himself, is a slave, whatever he may be: a statesman, a businessman, an official, or a scholar."— Friedrich Nietzsche