Latest Posts
Showing posts with label relationships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relationships. Show all posts

Making this a major pursuit just causes more problems. Best left alone..

Having been exposed to quite a few articles regarding the ubiquitous relationship issues, that is not only never ending by there are copious, thousands of so-called expert sites, explaining or trying to explain why you are screwing up, why those relationships or trying to find someone to have a relationship with is just so screwed up. Also, how screwed up one has to be in order to stop yourself from being screwed up. No really, apparently, without a princess in tow, you obviously have a major issue, really..

Here...Slut Feminist's favorite topic..SEX..Bringing home a porn star
I did wonder if the prerequisite was to have the camera running, I tried reading it, way too narcissistic for me..



Comment on Ramzpaul vid..
I(i) for one think she deserves the clap...err, a clap i mean....standing ovulation...dammit did it again...knowthingman
Here are just a few links covering that soulless, mind bending, irrelevant and mostly useless drivel one can excess.

Why Are Men Frustrated With Dating?
What Do Men Really Want?
Becoming A Renaissance Man Series

and ofcourse this masterly effort..
Prof: “Men Without Girlfriends Are Sick Because of Games!” 


Some indifferent, some stupid and the odd one that may make sense, but. I for one never had any issues as I just did not give a stuff about it. It just happened. It is when desperation hits, it becomes some self induced, artificially elevated issue that apparently girls like to talk endlessly about and most guys are being dragged into that drivel, hopefully unknowingly..

How to make an issue out of a non-issue..

All articles, suggestions and advice are in some specific context that aims to right what in their opinion is what everyone is really doing wrong. They seem incapable of comprehending that this has been going on for eons and it doesn't take a genius to work that out, neither does it take one long to realise that if you totally ignored it all and just got on with your own life, the same ratio of meetings and attraction would still exist. Basically meaning, that if you sat on a hill top, looking at the view, the chances of meeting a member of the opposite sex who appeals and has some prerequisite traits, some merit, would just about be the same..

To expect or assume that somehow you deserve better or you think you may be losing out or are of the opinion that those issues are of either no importance or can wait for the right person to come along, it will just happen. It is entirely up to you, use the bigger head to decide the path you want to take..

So in reality, no one has a right to a relationship or has any right to assume their situation is any different to what men have been through for centuries. It appears to be more about self delusion and an over active imagination to assume that you are somehow missing out. Skirt chasing should not be a major activity as that brings way too many problems, best to just sit back and watch, get on with your own life and watch those on the merry go round, living their narcissistic, self interested lives where the assumption is that everyone DESERVES it rather then realistically thinking that in actual fact, who really cares..

Meanwhile back on that mountain top, you are at least enjoying the view..

But I digress as I rarely do, sometimes. The latest posting by Ramzpaul has all those lovely examples of narcissism, blatant stupidity, standard repulsive slut feminism behaviour and ofcourse, that selfish pursuit of the "feel good" factor that most those abhorrents feel they deserve, while being surprised when the response is not what they expected or demand. thank goodness there are more mountain tops..



You know absolutely nothing about this okay, nothing..


While I am on the topic of skirt chasing and doing stuff with the opposite sex, I must be the bearer of sad tidings. Not only does the guy who suffers a dose of the BFF infliction as noted in the previous post, ain't gonna get nowhere, He is apparently not the only one who may be having problems when trying to charm his way into doing what one normally does when chatting up the opposite sex..

It goes without saying that regardless of the warnings and dangers of skirt chasing, if one has to persist, at least do it properly..

It is sadly the case that the highly intelligent male, of which there are many, as technology and all else demonstrates. But one's penchant of proudly pontificating one's perspicacity is apparently pointless and does not bode well with that same sex. One has to bear in mind that the claim that the other sex is that overly brimming with advanced levels of intelligence, does not like anyone demonstrating that it is not actually the case. One has to also remember that whenever the brain is saturated with shopping, nail maintenance and choosing one's hair colour, does not really do it for the brain, as far as maintaining it's  levels of cognitive normality. One may lay claims to being in the enhanced levels a decade ago, according to some doctored procedure that ensured a positive outcome, but the grey matter does scream for more attention than just reading magazines, having a facebook page and discussing what's on the menu..

That being the case, it would be way too easy to demonstrate that one's mental ability and capacity is above the belt size on the "Brain Richter Scale", so one does have to tone down that level to meet the requirement of the opposite sex..

You aren’t going to win over the hot babes with your profound pontifications.
Studies show the most attractive women have the highest standards for men in most every category surveyed — except intelligence.
Via Do Gentlemen Really Prefer Blondes?: Bodies, Behavior, and Brains–The Science Behind Sex, Love, & Attraction:
The evolutonary psychologists recruited a rotating team of male and female interviewers who paired up and evaluated more than two hundred married participants in the Midwest. Each subject was judged for physical attractiveness and assessed in three separate sessions for the factors they valued and insisted on in choosing a mate. The prettiest women had the highest standards — they wanted and expected their partners to be masculine, fit, physically attractive, loving, educated, a few years older than themselves, and desirous of home and children, with a high income potential. Surprising to the researchers there was only one quality beautiful women did not insist on more than plainer women did: intelligence.
No surprise here that the hottest women have the highest overall standards. Hot chicks and high status men have the sexual market options available to them to plausibly hold very high standards for themselves. What is perhaps interesting to the game neophyte and the nerd proud of his electric ham’s horsepower is the finding that beautiful women don’t place much stock in a man’s intelligence. If you can score that CEO gig with a 90 IQ and a psychopathic personality, women will still love you just as hard.
This study comports with the Chateau Dating Market Value Test for men at the top of the blog front page, which has a section on male intelligence that only added a point for smarts that were somewhat above average, and deducted a point for smarts that were in the stratosphere (where personality defects start to manifest.) Women may say they want a smart guy, but in my observation of couples in which the girl was hot, the guy was more usually kind of a douchey middle of the road mental mediocrity. But he had the right attitude, and alpha attitude trumps smarts any day of the week.
This is not to say smarts won’t help a man with women. A very smart man uses his gift to seduce, but also to conceal or ameliorate the most obvious vestiges of his mental prowess. In other words, since most chicks are average intelligence, it is paramount for the master seducer to calm women’s fears of being mentally outclassed by a wide enough margin that discomfort arises. All else equal, women like smart men, but they’ll choose cocky mediocrities over cloying geniuses every time. Nerds who hope to bank shot their encyclopedic knowledge of male-centric hobbies into hot babe pussy are shit out of luck.

“But why does she go for IDIOTS? I’m a Mensa member!”

Back to the masturbatorium with you, nerdling!
The usual caveats apply to self-assessment studies like this one: what women say they want in a man and what they actually go for are often enough not the same thing. I tend to frown upon self-reported sex surveys because of this psychological anomaly; however, I do think the conclusions can hint at, and reveal the shady contours of, women’s innermost desires. But your best teacher is still real world, direct experience.
As for why women, and particularly hot women, don’t much emphasize men’s intelligence as an attractiveness trait… well, it’s hard to say for certain, but I’d stick with the fundamental premise that our sexual desire is fully ensconced in the same hindbrain we had way back in the ancestral environment, where aloof, socially savvy and dominant men pounded pussy “Quest for Fire”-style in front of teary-eyed slabworms who looked upon the proceedings with visions of missile technology to take out the alphas dancing in their heads. And then, of course, the alphas stole credit for the new tech invented by the beta nerds, and still got the women.
There’s a lesson there.

What is that again about humour reflecting reality. One has to wonder whether this was written by a female or someone just taking the mickey..

It also goes a long way to answering the question "can men and women just be friends". Ohhh, that's just too awkward..

But how true are these words for every single male who has viewed both those barrels from the wrong side. If you find yourself in this situation and are wondering what to do about it or wonder how you can change it. The only answer would be to have a good read of some of the PUA sites and stoke up on some realistic female behavioral patterns, traits and urges, see if the worm will turn..

Here is one of those better sites..
I really like you. I do. You're so nice, and sweet, and you listen to all my problems and respond with the appropriate compliments. But, well, I don't really see a relationship in our future. It would be terrible if we let sex destroy this great friendship we have where I get everything I want and you get nothing you want. Don't you think?
I knew you would understand. You always do.
We're so perfect as friends, you know? I can tell you anything, and you know you can always come to me anytime you need to hear me bitch about work or how ugly I feel. You wouldn't want to ruin a friendship like that just so you could be my boyfriend, and have me look at you with desire and longing in my eyes, if only once—would you? Of course not. Well, if we started dating, it would only complicate this wonderful setup I've got going here.
It's just…you're like my best friend, and I would hate for something you desperately want to change that. I mean, sure, we could go on some dates, maybe mess around a little and finally validate the six years you've spent languishing in this platonic nightmare, but then what? How could we ever go back to the way we were, where I take advantage of your clear attraction to me so I can have someone at my beck and call? That part of our friendship means so much to me.
No. We are just destined to be really, really good friends who only hang out when I don't have a boyfriend, but still need male attention to boost my fragile and all-consuming ego.
Anything can happen once you bring romance in. Think about how awful my last relationship was at the end, remember? The guy I'd call you crying about at 3 a.m. because he wouldn't answer my texts? The guy I met at the birthday party you threw me? I had insanely passionate sex with him for four months and now we don't even talk anymore. God, I would die if something like that happened to us.
Plus, ick, can you even imagine getting naked in front of each other? I've known you so long, you're more like a brother that I've drunkenly made out with twice and never mentioned again. It'd be way too weird. And if we did, then whenever you'd come shopping with me, or go to one of my performances or charity events, or take me for ice cream when I've had a bad day at work, you'd be looking at me like, "I've seen her breasts." God, I can't think of anything more awkward that that.
Oh, before I forget, my mom says hi.
Anyway, you would totally hate me as your girlfriend. I'd be all needy and dramatic and slowly growing to love you. If I was your girlfriend, I would never be able to tell you all about the other asshole guys I date and pretend I don't see how much it crushes you. Let's never lose that. That's what makes us us.
Don't worry. You're so funny and smart and amazing, any girl but me would be lucky to date you. You'll find someone, I know it. And when you do, I'll be right by your side to suddenly become all flirty and affectionate with you in front of her, until she grows jealous and won't believe it when you say we're just friends. But when she dumps you, that's just what we'll be.
Best friends. Friends forever.
Link to article, the Onion..

The scanner would have forewarned and froe-armed right here. A distinct need..


Over the past few decades there have been some claims of interest raised and then through lack of interest of keeping the lie alive or those claims were just downright delusional, only really existed in the minds of the delusional, whom I will not name...alright slut-feminists..

That's just the thing, catching on..
They introduced the "Multitasking" ability, that apparently only women possessed. They were actually capable of using a phone on one ear/shoulder, holding a child in one arm and stirring some contents in a pot on the stove (no sammich making though). That became representative of the "Multitasking" ability of the opposite sex. One would stare incredulously at the screen when one read that hyped up irrelevant drivel and wondered what a drummer in a band was doing, while singing at the same time, nope that was something else. Just as one would be even more incredulous as a member of that same sex actually used it for bragging rights.

Meanwhile ofcourse, that multitasking ability is of no advantage and leads to work or actions being superficial, inefficient or negligible. Apparently to perform any set function that requires concentration is not included when undertaking the multitasking actions. Oh dear. It was so popular. Also it appears that both sexes are quite capable of performing it, but most do not bother as quality beats quantity... 

It could be an accessory..
Anyway, I had that experience late last year and the culprit was in actual fact, a nurse. One assumes that nurses are intelligent, as they are educated, maybe that may have been the problem..

When she overheard the conversation I was having with my daughter about an article I was reading. I mentioned that the multitasking ability was somewhat of a disadvantage and the nurse overheard it and yelled out a response that "only wimmin could and men can't". Now I am never one to sit back and accept obvious blatant lies, misinformation or exaggerations,  even in passing, so one did ofcourse straighten her world view out, much to her disgust. The same response I received a few months earlier, while I was visiting a relative, a young female commented out loud "All men are the same". When I suggested that she desist from maligning me, as I did not even know who she was. I proceeded to inform her that if she persisted in maligning my sex, then I would start on hers (she was already well aware where that would go), that had the appropriate response and bought her back to Earth with a thud and as she stood there with an open mouth, stunned, but only for about three seconds though, a lifetime apparently when having a good gossip session..

Started already..
The point of all this was to see if we could determine how we could guage the varying behavioural patterns of the opposite sex, the loving to psycho in 30 seconds, question.  Wondering why no one had yet invented some type of warning mechanism/device that would indicate what stage the opposite sex was in her monthly cycle. The gadget itself would not have to be prominent or obvious. A colour would indicate what level the PMS was at present and whether or not the slightest issue would turn her into a raging, screaming harridan, capable of dismembering or causing grievous bodily harm.

Maybe a new age"mood" ring would suffice or some miniature LEDs displayed just under the bottom eyelid, flashing red when required, projecting "Run" on the wall when circumstances were desperate. Maybe some thing less obtrusive, like a hand held scanner that could sense the condition level with a quick scan, be taken at least twenty paces away, just in case. Surely there would be a huge market for it. One could have one permanently installed in the house and a warning would sound as one entered the front door. Maybe a mobile model supplied to all the HR departments, to all businesses, so whenever they received another one of those copious complaints of feelings being hurt, they could just do a quick scan and if it shows red, just give her the rest of the day/week off..
Another variation..

It would do wonders for the employee relationships  as well as partner/personal relationships. I cannot understand why no one has introduced one yet. Maybe some time in the future, eh!!



Bernard's favourite "Lezebel" term, he prefers to use to describe that obnoxious feminastie site originated by Valenti, may even be worth a quick look just to witness how depraved, farcical and deluded, it's mainly American females audience, have become. The overall attitude is that repugnant that they are pushed to even find any appropriate topics to denigrate and smirk at, as it would appear that they have really done it all, already..

So in typical Lezebel fashion, they found something to snipe about and nothing gets their feathers more ruffled than the knowledge that American men are wife chasing in other countries. Now we already know that it is a pet hate of the feminastie slow-mo-movement, as they introduced IMBRA in order to try and stop American men from getting wives overseas, in order to see firsthand what real feminine females, untainted and unprocessed by the hate movement, are really like. It really does affect them immensely, probably more so that IMBRA did not discourage the lads from finding partners at all. They achieved it by finding those who were not educated in the  "screw them for every cent they have" mentality that the AW have. Down right disappointed they are and it's showing in more ways than one..

We have the 10-reasons-to-not-marry-why-men-should-avoid-Marriage  and it goes without saying that if one was thinking in that direction for some reason, than it would be good advice. In this day and age the AW's are best to be avoided at all costs as they are now very well versed in making one's life as uncomfortable and miserable as possible, because they can, and they have the backing of the law to make it legal should you dare complain..
Winston Wu

Check this out! A popular female celebrity/fashion blogger named Jezebel
 just attacked my anti-marriage article (the same one posted here) that
was posted in YourTango. But as you can see in her critique, there is
hardly any substance or serious points. Most of it consists of hyperbole
 and petty one-liners. I'm not sure what her point even is. lol. There
are a lot of comments posted in the feedback section though.

http://jezebel.com/5873827/fou...
It's a bit circular as we quote a quote but it's fun and a good laugh. Winston Wu promotes dating Asian women, which is ofcourse an ever expanding market for obvious reasons. So that being the case, the feminasties have even more reason to dislike the advice as well the recommendation that AW's are really equivalent to some virus and should be avoided at all costs..
One would have expected some relevant points and at least some logical arguments to be pursued but I forgot that it is a feminastie site and that is ofcourse the last thing one should expect. It's loaded with the usual strawman arguments and little snippy comments that can only have relevance to their usual audience, they're AW ofcourse and what else could one expect. It's truly is exasperating. Instead of making or stating some solid reasons and salient points, we have snark and snuff.. 

Yep, they live in the real universe and the now..

So then we have Rex Patriarch forwarding some sage opinion on the topic as to what Lezebel and fellow "Slut" promoters can do with their opinions.  Feminist Hate Foreign Women, You Should Love Them, which ofcourse just rubs a little more salt into the already weeping wound..
I have always said that where feminist hate men they hate women or each other even more and if they are nonfeminized foreign women they hate them most of all.

Pinegrove33(Ed. Bernard) has pointed this out with his Feminists Furious Over Foreign Wives video. It seems that the ladies over on Lezebel have discovered Winston Wu’s Happier Abroad global dating web site and they are not so Happier At home about it.
And so the battle royal begins in earnest and the Lezebellians are besides themselves trying to argue that "Hey, what wrong with us lovely AW's anyway" argument, when in reality, it only takes five minutes of reading to identify what the problem really is and it's apparently beyond their comprehension. They are actually doing their best to promote women from other countries just by being their usual obnoxious selves. It really is a circus and they would appear to be the one who will be the last on the planet to eventually comprehend the reasons why..



I must confess to having a soft spot for Bettina Arndt as she has on several occasions taken the MRM cause and pushed the men's side without bias or conflict. I did come across a site a few months back that listed this site for special mention as well as canning the piss out of Bettina for reasons I cannot remember. I emailed Bettina with the information and she responded with (I paraphrase) "Screw em! I have better things to do with my time than take any notice of those morons"..

My kinda girl. She states a few issues about women in general and about those huge lists of demands they favour, what they expect from their future male partners (where do they get that crap from).For confirmation, check any dating site and you will have a list as long as your arm but the main part missing is ofcourse, what she will do for you. Somehow they forget to mention that trivial fact or just take it for granted that you will accept them just as they are, plastic bits, camouflage and all..

I have recently posted the fact that women have just excluded themselves from the market by assuming quite a few things and forget exactly what their worth really is, how much market value they have for a possible future partner. The main issue is that women have been sucked into the slut-feminist' dream of having it all. Foregoing the need to establish any relationship when younger, while desperately seeking one in their thirties, when the time clock is screaming the end of the spawning cycle, and the competition is massive. Desperation sets in and the main problem they have is landing a suitable sucker to finance the next part of their own induced, self interested lifestyle, while competing with much younger, more nubile, models. Not a good tack, as a matter of fact, a rather fruitless one. So we have them posing those inane and obvious put downs, as men are not lining up for their assumed importance, they pose charming articles like "Where have all the good men gone?"..

Everyone already knows the obvious answer but they still ask, akin to a child asking for more lollies when their mouths are already full. It really borders on the pathetic. They still have not absorbed one important and indisputable fact that appears to avoid them and their inflated egos and that is "You cannot have it all". Wake up to yourselves for crying out loud. It's akin to talking to a wall..
But woman take the cake when compiling their list. Bettina explains, “Women often have a very long shopping list which is totally unachievable and unrealistic. They want someone who is not only good looking, slim, intelligent, but also creative, sensitive, humorous and successful and the list just keeps rolling on.” Bettina says, “Stop … it is just too much!” 
 Personally I think most guys have just two wishes on their list when it comes to the opposite sex - Not being a total bitch or a feminist, would be a major advantage..

Being able to make a sammich would help as well ofcourse..

Odile Faludi recently interviewed Bettina Arndt, aged 63, renowned sex therapist and social commentator. She has spent over thirty years writing about sex and relationships for Australian newspapers, magazines and appearing on radio and television.

Bettina insists women are losing out by simply saying the word, No, far too often. She suggests women who are looking for a mate often set themselves up for failure by being too quick to dismiss a possible partner. Women have too many idealistic expectations and in their search to find the perfect soul mate they are destroying the possibility of finding real love and, eventually marriage. Trapped in their private fantasies it’s now time for women to get out of their own way and find true bliss.As the saying goes, “Men fall in love with their eyes while women fall in love with their ears.” Men will normally have a couple of key points when it comes to their wish list. Yes, it is fair to say, men prefer slimmer and more attractive ladies. But woman take the cake when compiling their list. Bettina explains, “Women often have a very long shopping list which is totally unachievable and unrealistic. They want someone who is not only good looking, slim, intelligent, but also creative, sensitive, humorous and successful and the list just keeps rolling on.” Bettina says, “Stop … it is just too much!”  She believes women need to be more realistic and realise it’s really rare that one person will tick all the boxes on their list. They need to think carefully about what is really important to them. Therefore, it’s a matter of tossing away half of the wish list and focusing on getting to know someone who could be a suitable partner for them.
Link..

Apparently this is the preferred option according to slut-feminists..

One can never accuse Heartiste of not placing the problem precisely where it belongs and here it is in black and white. The major issue that is now being faced by women in general, but will they finally wake up or just take it for granted that men will tow the line and accept whatever is on offer..
There’s been a lot of talk lately in the mainstream (read: leftist) media organs about the rising numbers of single moms and their bastard spawn in America, a dystopian trend to which hosts at Le Chateau were generous enough to alert the reading audience on and off over the past four years. The hand-wringing, the excusing and the rationalizing have reached a fever pitch as sob stories of tragicomic proportions litter the pages of esteemed broadsheets like the Beta Times. It’s a crescendo of heartwarming, anti-male anecdotes about poor, put-upon single moms with snot machines in tow bitterly complaining about the lack of good, reliable men.

Reading this gruesome tripe, something occurs to me. Not once, not anywhere, is the point of view of the typical man in these benighted communities across America examined. Nowhere did I find a mention, even the slightest acknowledgement, of the responsibility that women bear to attract a decent man for marriage and future fatherhood. It’s just assumed that men alone are the sex abdicating their societal duty, that all women need to do is show up, no matter how broken, bedraggled and burdened with bastards, and men will feel an overwhelming urge to marry these unfeminine, spiteful ogresses and provide for them. Yeah right!

Peruse any feminist or beta male columnist pontificating on the single mom + illegitimate hellion phenomenon, and the message condenses to a screech against male desire, tantamount to a lede saying “Men drop out, women and children suffering, men need to man up”. Someone should acquaint this crowd with the saying “it takes two to tango”.

If you want to know why men are running away from marriage, children and beta provisioning, one major reason is that the women available to these working class men are flat out disgusting. Take a look for yourself. What man of normal mental health and active libido wants to romantically woo and date, let alone marry, a beastly, waddling tatted mountain of pustulence with the issue of three other men barking and nipping at her cankles?

It would also appear that Suzanne Venker may be having a problem pointing the finger in the right direction as usual. The more applicable points come out very nicely in GWW video, as she explains the reasons a lot better than Venker does..
This past Valentine’s Day brought with it, as it often does, scores of articles about love and romance. But rather than celebrate its usual counterpart — marriage — we celebrated something new: singlehood. Single women, to be exact. 
The rise of the single woman is hardly something to celebrate. She represents the culmination of a decades-long revolution that has chipped away, relentlessly and insidiously, at the traditional family unit. First it was motherhood, now it’s marriage.
The “bad news” about men is always couched in the context that men aren’t “manning up,” or doing what’s necessary to be responsible adults. Perhaps they aren’t — they’re certainly retreating from marriage, that’s for sure. The question is, why? And the answer is simple. With premarital sex a foregone conclusion and cohabitation on the rise, men live the good life with no responsibilities. Moreover, women have made it clear they don’t need a man to support them, to be happy, or even to become a mother. The result is that men become slackers.
And those so-called empowered women feminists created? Many learn, eventually, that they were cruelly misled. Millions of women find that they do, in fact, want to stay home with their babies when they’re young and therefore need a husband with a good job. But by that time, it’s too late. Their husbands have been schooled in the art of feminism just as they have and expect their wives to go to work and “pull their weight.”
This has to be one of the most interesting topics to rear it's head. After years of slut-feminist's indoctrination, they have managed to turn women into useless, self-serving, narcissistic member of the human race, who appear to be incapable of holding down a relationship or even capable of finding an appropriate partner without applying their over inflated sense of self, while at the same time blaming everyone else for the exact problem that she has created all by herself..
The problem with rectifying the situation would mean that women would have to make the appropriate readjustment in order to make everything more appealing for a future partner, but the chance of that happening is akin to slut-feminists apologising for screwing up their lives, so that will never happen..



The opposite sex is a lot more comfortable blaming others than actually admitting or confessing that they may have screwed up and just ignored what men want by assuming that they will just jump aboard and accept these women under any circumstances, or situation and under any condition. The ego has swelled to that degree. It's the "take or leave it" option and to the girl's surprise they are taking the "leave it" option and are quite comfortable in doing so..

So how do the girls respond apart from living in denial or generating endless hand-wringing articles, where they still try to coerce men into marriage, threaten or cajole, like we have seen now on so many occasions. Realising that it's not working, it may finally force them to sit down and face the facts of life. At the moment, there is no advantage or reason to get married, or to create a relationship with an American woman, as the risks are just too great. The chance of ending up with one of those females that GWW lists in her video or Heartiste states, is very real. They are out there making unreasonable demands and it's all falling on deaf ears..

Obviously it is not males that need to shape up for anything, it the females who need to get their act together, get off their high horse and learn something about themselves that they have been ignoring and avoiding for way too long. The realisation that if they don't start changing their attitudes, they are just not worth the effort, or the time or worth the risk..



Sof's rumination on life does hit my interest as she looks at life from as many perspectives as is possible, which is quite a feat in itself. But she occasionally massages the funny bone with it's progress..

Sofiastry

What I’ve learned pretending to be a man

So, I’ve been posing as a guy online for nearly twenty-four hours with positive results. I am competing against a pool of polyamorous-vegan-feminist-omegas, but it’s still a minor feat nonetheless. A few things I’ve learned:

Men constantly have to be onNot only were my initial messages to girls necessarily concise and witty with a healthy dose of denigration, but every succeeding message has to be interesting even if – as in most cases – the girl gives you a minimal level of conversational material to work with. It also has to be sensitive to her mood and the changing tone and course of the interaction. As my friend put it, the messaging process goes something like:
Probe –> Response –> Calibrate –> Flirt –> Calibrate –> Exchange numbers

The hardest part is constantly having to be interesting lest you fuck it up.
Women are fickle. Even if a sequence of messages seems to be going really well, a woman will arbitrarily change her mind at any given point if you did not re-calibrate effectively, or her competing options are disqualifying you as a sexual candidate. This trait in particular made me really sympathetic to the hoops men have to jump through when acquiring a girl’s attention, even though most women have nothing to offer .

Women are boring and have very high estimations of themselves. I mean, I really should say “people” in this case, because having maintained a female profile on such a website, I can tell you that most men (at least online) don’t really know what they’re doing either. The difference is the self-evaluation. Most men undervalue themselves online and most women overvalue themselves. I understand this is a natural consequence of the sexual marketplace, but after you read the literally hundredth, carefully worded profile of a girl touting her intellectual strengths and esoteric pop culture references, it gets EXCRUCIATINGLY boring. The annoying part is that she thinks she’s being really unique with her taste in independent music + film, off-kilter or “quirky” sense of humour (god, that word gets abused) and how intelligent she is (knowledge accumulation is very different from stringing two abstract thoughts together to make an original one). Please don’t get me started on the contrived neuroticism.
Made-up example of something an urban, hipster girl will say in her profile with her thick-framed glasses:
I tend to get lost in my own headspace a lot [focus on her self-absorbed, female emotional content]. Sometimes I ride the bus without a destination in mind. It makes me feel like a single cell in the mass organism of humanity.
I’m studying sociology/gender studies/exchangeable liberal arts program and it’s intensely interesting. I’m contemplating going to grad school and getting increasingly useless degrees [remark that is simultaneously self-depreciating and attempting to be self-aware].
etc. etc.
I can see how having to be in this frame of mind makes men cynical. I’ve heard men previously remark that they use male friends for intellectual stimulation and women for emotional companionship + sex, and now I understand the compartmentalization a little bit better. A high investment/low return interaction does make you perceive women as a monolithic category that don’t deserve much sincerity. I understand that is self-defeating to admit as a woman, but my male persona can’t help but experience it.
While I think it’s important for men to develop charisma and personality, the fact that my profile (which indicates I’m a professional masturbator,  who does drugs, seeks casual sex and lives with his parents) gets more attention than a relationship-seeking, professional who is being nice to girls, makes you wonder what fucked up mechanism is responsible for this.
Real message I just received: Your profile makes you seem charming. And halarious. [sp.]
Case in point.

Will it ever change back to normal?..

Unfortunately, Nickonian just about wraps up the general situation about relationships, speaking even wiser than he may have originally intended, but it does definitely appears to be the general consensus.
All this attitude is solely due to feminists and their interference and their introduction of the "War between the Sexes", with this sole purpose in mind. You have to remember that this was their original aim to begin with and one they have actually stated as being a goal, an original aim. They planned to destroy families and separate them as they have realised, as all other socialist and communists have in the past, that the family will and is the breeding ground against their hateful and dysfunctional doctrine. Families have to deal with reality on a daily basis, not go off onto some fancy delusional social justice fantasy. Feminists were well aware that while the family existed, they would never be able to introduce their hate doctrine and get the support they demanded. Single mothers are a lot easier to manipulate as they rely on governments for handouts..

Meanwhile, we have millions of people suffering the consequences which would not have happened if feminism was not given the support and funding it has received..

Have they changed their attitude from that at all. How could they as they are the one who planned it all right from the beginning and it is going precisely to plan. Meanwhile we have that endless, legitimate observations by people who have been affected by it and one wonders where exactly you stand in your current situation. How affected have you been by this hate movement that has no issue whatsoever with sacrificing your life on their alter of imaginary social justice..


Nickonian..

I haven't found anybody anyway. I'm way too cynical and picky to begin with. In addition I have a problem with most women because they split you. You are either friendzoned or in the attractive box. I refuse to marry for a "sex partner", what is the point in that when you can get sex a million other cheap ways? If you want the position, you have to offer more than sex...

I also find that most women I've experienced are flip-floppish and don't have solid morals but instead have a belief system that follow a social system (church, liberal, etc). Most women also think it is okay to emotionally manipulate you and then claim gaslighting when you point it out. In addition most women drive and motivate their men to be the perfect "man" they currently are not. I've spent so much time around entitled women I know much of what to look for (alot of it isn't obvious either)... Big stamp of NO!

I know many Men exhibit these bad qualities too but I'm talking about wife potential here

My list is simple yet impossible. I want somebody with Integrity, Accepting/open-minded, non abusive, and grounded in a personal moral system. I guess Integrity and grounded in a personal moral system are similar enough but either is extremely hard to find especially in women. Most women follow a governed moral system and when they are grounded in it often are controlling (ever met a church lady?) and sometimes abusive to exhort that control. To find somebody grounded in what she thinks yet not close minded is even harder....

I know good women exist but they are hard to find around here (and harder if single). Most think they are God's gift to men and need to be worshiped as such. Too bad they didn't read Genesis 2:18 to back up that idea :P

Yep I'm going to die famous and alone...
H/T to Feckless for the title..



Feeding the endless lies to women is ofcourse a main passion for feminists, as they believe that they are the epicenter of all wisdom and sage advice. One cannot falter to flatter, condone and encourage women more than by recommending and suggesting that the recommended path they have to follow will eventually, somehow, within a particular length of time, will meet with their euphoric predictions. Meanwhile they have waited in vain for decades for it to eventuate but it never appears to arrive. Feminists and women generally, will ofcourse never admit that they are on the wrong road in trying to fulfill their "mommy track with the picket fence", dream. They are of the opinion that regardless of what they do, how they behave or what they promote, everything will eventually come their way automatically..

Cause the feminists said so. They have been lied to for so long that they actually believe the drivel they have been fed. Unfortunately, the facts are not out there to back it up. Those same females are now witnessing that in their daily lives as they continually hide their heads in the sand and live in constant denial. It truly is a sad sight..

What the feminasties do not tell, is that there is actually a preferential scale that men generally follow to find a partner of choice. One would hazard a guess that being attached to a feminist would be missing on that list altogether or be down amongst the crippled and lame as they suffer from the same..

A Man Wants a Wife, Not a “Co-Worker”

Studies and real life has already clearly demonstrated that females want to have kids, want to work part time and be a wife. mother and everything that that entails. But feminists demand the opposite, feminists want women out in the workforce so they can continually keep changing the rules, knowing that they have a lot of women out there who would in most situations, condone their actions. They can also guarantee that some level of that income will come their way and also ensure that funding and privileges will keep flowing while they have politicians by the balls. That has so far worked a dream..

We can always rely on the New York Times to keep pushing the feminist theme as they have for so long.
As Kate Bolick wrote in a much-discussed article in The Atlantic last fall, American women face “a radically shrinking pool of what are traditionally considered to be ‘marriageable’ men — those who are better educated and earn more than they do.” Educated women worry that they are scaring away potential partners, and pundits claim that those who do marry will end up with unsatisfactory matches. They point to outdated studies suggesting that women with higher earnings than their husbands do more housework to compensate for the threat to their mates’ egos, and that men who earn less than their wives are more likely to experience erectile dysfunction.
Link to the above article in the NYT.. 



This is the typical ego feeding that female journalists are mostly into, especially when they are feeding the feminist agitprop in ooze covered drool. Never cease to feed the ego and don't forget to pat them on the head for being good girls and doing as they are told..

How many times have we witnessed "high flying female exectutives" quit their jobs just to be stay at home moms. What does that tell you ?

Meanwhile, and as we have seen time and time again, it's those women who want to make a different life for themselves who are still marginalised and berated. They have to be seen to be doing the feminist's bidding, even if it is at their own expense and that is what this is all about. As we have witnessed right from the beginning, the feminists have a standard FU response aimed at anyone who dares to think or act differently to their demands and it's this girlthink that is basically causing all the problems. So the ball is in the girls court but they fail to pick it up and run with it, meanwhile feminists are screwing their lives even further into the ground..

It truly is pitiful..




More Hollywood feminist Propaganda..

One can understandably be confused by the attitudes of the opposite sex when it comes to feminism, their own part in it's growth and nurturing, it's interference into laws and the family courts, wonder why they are having problems with finding a partner, blame the male sex for all their issues, and yet, still not make one single confession about how they were party to it all. Their overall attitude appears to be "well it's happened", so lets move on. The blinkering process is ofcourse part of the female behavioral pattern and mindset, it demonstrates clearly that they nor feminists, will ever admit to being party to the most destructive upheaval society has ever known. All this came about with their compliance, with their help and assistance and now that the end result of feminist meddling is glaringly obvious, they look the other way and pretend that it was something they had no control over whatsoever..

How is that working out for you now I wonder..

The endless carping by female journalists and feminist enablers demostrates also that the outcome they wished for was just a dream. Radical feminists are still working on that reality outcome which ofcourse will never be achieved. But meanwhile, we have the ongoing carping about the sexes and the end result being, that a movement run by women in order to install special privileges for women at the cost of all men, has not delivered what they assumed it would and there has to be blame metered out and its for certain that the privileged sex ain't gonna wear it even though they are totally responsible and answerable for it..

Have a look at this article and a few paragraphs I pulled from it to demonstrate precisely how these female journalist enjoys nothing more than blaming men for what women have gained from..
(Link to article)
This message seems to have come through especially loud and clear in Italy where it is only too easy to find men who are the embodiment of the self-indulgent stereotype. The effeminate man-child is a plague in Italy; vain, self-important, shallow and self-seeking mamma’s boys who live in their parents’ house into their thirties and forties. The once-family oriented Italians are increasingly either divorcing or refusing to marry in the first place.
Italian journalist Rosaria Sgueglia writes in the Huffington Post that the former master of the Costa Concordia is one of those Italian men who match the stereotype point for point. Italians are “furious,” she wrote, at “people like Mr. Schettino [who] do nothing but compromise the already damaged image the rest of the world has of Italian people.”
Now as far as I can tell, the female journalist writing this article is supposed to be on our side, enemies like these eh!.
But, as you can read and even if you read the entire article, there is not one single word of blame aimed at her own sex or even bothers to point it out except when referring to the feminastie movement as being the only one accountable which is ofcourse only half true. It is the usual demonstration of living in denial as they obviously and blatantly shirk their own responsibility and accountability because they are so pissed off with the way things have turned out and they are now well aware of the fact that there is absolutely nothing they do about it. Their generation will pay for the excesses and now they live in regret and in some cases, in abstract terror as their own dreams are shattered beyond repair. Life in their opinion, is not supposed to be this hard. It's all been turned upside down and they are absolutely besides themselves wondering how it got this bad..

We have been telling them for years that this will be the outcome. We have stated it precisely, patiently and consistently and did they listen, no way. All those euphoric goals promised by lying feminists were just too good, too imaginable, to easily achieved and guaranteed as they manipulated employment laws and promotions. They were basically given everything they wished for and took the rest for granted. I would like to think of it as payback but I think that is a little too simplistic. It is more like a rational response where men have been washed and scrubbed in the feminist toxicity and decided that maybe that relationship or partner can legally do me over without even trying and I stand the chance of loosing everything I have to an individual who has already demonstrated that she is incapable of keeping in a relationship for any period of time, will automatically call on legal representatives as a standard procedure, just to see what she can get out of it all, it has to be made worth her while..

None of it looks like it worth it or even workable anymore. The parents never had these issues, so obviously it's this current generation or three, that has decided on the tactics they want to use, so why bother to give them any chance at all. It will be the case where all this will get worse before it gets any better.  Even that remains to be seen as women generally are more interested in complaining about it all rather than actually doing something positive about it. That first step would the hardest for them, it would mean they would have to accept some accountability, if not all the blame and I do not see that happening, ever..

Nope, No Vamp Here..

Desperation for copy apparently permits female journalists to make shit up. But let's assume that this is real and happening to someone you know..

Better sharpen the nails..
The New Adulteress
Women who cheat with married men are no longer getting a bad rap. Today's mistress isn't a vamp, she's not desperate, and she's not afraid to poach what's yours
The endless pursuit of market share by the women's mags carry no bounds when it comes to exposing the amoral attitudes of women. I am trying to think as to whom this actually benefits, why would they even expose this if not to tar all women with the same brush and ofcourse include the husbands as well..
vamp - informal
noun, a woman who uses sexual attraction to exploit men.
verb [ trans. ] blatantly set out to attract
The journalist must have a different dictionary to mine..
She claims that banging your friend's husband is not desperation and being a vamp is not even considered unreasonable. These are desperate times where the girls apparently, have no issues with poaching just for the sake of some company, any company, even if it means destroying a friends marriage, not a problem at all..

Enlightening issues to ponder and applying even more pressure on the female's wellbeing and body image is the order of the day with any of these magazines and they walk out the door as willing enthuisiasts inhale this inane drivel on a daily basis just to ensure they are totally uncomfortable with themselves, thereby raising their own angst-level in order to blame others for their "emotional" self loathing, mood swings, promoting the never ending "life sucks" mantra. They cannot feel good about themselves and need to be told why. Cannot just go without the latest "news" of course and did I mention the gossip, that's where you get to read how other women screwed up their lives just to make you feel better. and while we are at it have a look at the dress that even they are pushed to afford. So in actual fact the overall affect is quite neutral(misery-blame) which ofcourse makes them go back for more..

Having flicked thru a few on the odd occasion when there was nothing else on the table, not even a medical journal on lobotomies, it would appear to be the case that you could indeed pick up any example and the messages were all the same. It's almost like they have a premenstrual erm, a brainstorming session before any are printed just to ensure the projection of misery and angst is synchronised..

This one is actually called "Women's Health", where it should in reality be termed "Women's Misery and Angst" instead. Here are the latest headlines..


You too can heighten your misery level by purchasing just one copy. Anyway, where was I. Oh yes, the bonking someone's husband stuff.

Too boring..

Link..

What is that about art reflecting real life, in this case it's music doing some reflecting. I am still wondering if the "Pill" has any accountability here or is it that women prefer arseholes naturally, need that excitement, abuse and attitude. Maybe they need someone who refuses to put up with their shit. A cry for help from females where they are saying "Stop me from being myself", probably the real reason..

Cannot say that it was as much the phenomenon in the past as it appears to be today. Maybe it is just being exposed more..

Nice Guys Finish Last is a fact and that is why we have the huge multimillion following "Game" sites  that we have on the Web today, and that's not computer games, it's chasing pussy, games..





I have often wondered why women all of a sudden had major issues with staying in an relationship. Why they had no issues whatsoever about tossing out one mate for another and make that effort so blase as it could be compared with changing underwear or lunch venue for the day..

T'was not a problem pre-pill days as your long married parents will testify..

Now we have the situation where the female sex, while swallowing the drug that allows them to endlessly fornicate, turns out to be a bigger problem than initially assumed. I have heard many females complaining about the side effects of the pill and wondered if that was the all of it. I wondered that the daily consumption of a drug would indeed develope into a more "gregarious" life..

Sadly, the woman ends up picking a partner that appears fine at the time while she is under the enhancement of this drug but the withdrawal symptoms appears to be a real bummer. The end result too, which will be ignored ofcourse, as will be the effect to the Husband and the hell he is about to be put through..

More info on the link below for anyone interested in the academic studies instigated in 1995, where this condition was first noticed..

Picking the Wrong Partner.


MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans.

However, the COCP (P. The Contraceptive Pill) has an unexpected side effect: it reverses women’s scent preferences for men. It is important to remember that as far as a woman’s body is concerned, when she’s on the pill, she’s perpetually pregnant.

While no one knows why pregnancy might reverse a women’s preferences for male body odor some have speculated that once pregnant a woman no longer needs to risk going out to meet unfamiliar men with differing MHCs. Instead, she would be safest being protected by her father, brothers, uncles and male cousins whom she now feels more comfortable being around because their MHC is most similar to her own.
However, women on the pill these days will go out and meet the potential fathers of their children while they are on the pill; while their bodies think they’re pregnant. While they’re attracted to men with similar MHCs instead of differing ones. This is potentially a whole load of bad news.


The Pill is Eroding our Civilisation.. 


Many couples meet when the woman is on the pill.


They go out for a while, like each other a lot, and then decide to get together and have a family. She goes off the pill, gets pregnant, and has a baby. But her response to him changes. There's something about him she finds irritating- something she hadn't noticed before.


Maybe she finds him sexually unattractive, and the distance between them grows. But her libido is fine. She gets flushed every time she gets close enough to smell her tennis coach. Her body, no longer silenced by the effects of the pill, may now be telling her that her husband (still the great guy she married) isn't a good genetic match for her.
But it's too late. They blame it on the work pressure, the stress of parenthood, each other. . . .(P. But usually HE is blamed) 


Psychology Today..

H/T Percy..



A WoManifesto – Newyear’s resolution: Part 1:
What women want
Guest Author - Joanna T.
Suisse.

I am at a huge disadvantage. I accepted a challenge for which I am ill-prepared.
Men NEVER listen to women about relationships. According to the grand dukes of the manosphere, they shouldn’t.
I agree.
But what if I told you I was a Red Pill woman? OK, not helping. 
What if I told you that this post was commissioned by a man who specifically wanted a sympathetic woman’s point of view?
I feel a slight shift in resistance.
What if this post was heavily edited by this man to make sure any male-bashing nonsense was excluded?
Ah, now I have an audience.
Good.

I like men. Just because. 
I am a woman. Given that I am not into self-hatred, I also like women. Especially those who like men.
So without further ado, allow me to proceed.
This post and the rest which follow in this series address the problem with no name. That which has seen a gulf the size of a small planet develop between the sexes.
Christian J had the brilliant idea to collaborate in an effort to address the issue in a hopefully lighthearted manner and see where that leads.

I have another problem.
I am doing this all wrong.
The first post should be one about ‘What women can offer men’.
I know. I know. Women these days are all about what they want, rather than what they should give.
I promise you, there is a good reason I am doing it this way.
In any war negotiation I imagine (now, it must be said: I have never been a negotiator for say, the UN, so my speculation is purely that - speculation) that the most efficient way forward is to allow each party a chance to be heard first. Once the cards are on the table, demands on each party can then proceed. This may not guarantee that everyone is happy in the end, but I believe it is a good start.

Christian J will be posting a similar article on what men want from women.
I guarantee you something. His list will be longer than mine.

Let me preface this by letting you in on a little secret:
Most women really need to have a (good) relationship. That is her raison d’ètre.
Relationships are a woman’s domain (link to let the woman chase you).
The feminists will shoot me for this, but it is true.
This means that most women are prepared to work hard to keep a man.
So, with respect to relationships, you are already onto a winning streak if you were born male.
But you already knew that. It is no secret.
All women want from a man is...
That he ignores her bad behaviour and rewards the good.

That’s it.
So, guys, you are already doing it right if you have Game.
The biggest complaint women have about men is that whatever they do, it is not enough.
Some women really try hard for their man. Let’s call these women the ‘nice girls’.
They are the feminine women, the ones who actually like men. The ones men say they want.
These women get passed over for the ‘bitch’.
These ‘nice women’ finish last.
Most of these women remain nice. Some start to change, to turn into the bitch.
When a woman with a low ‘number’ realises that the slut is getting all the male attention, she wonders if she is doing it wrong.

When a woman who cooks for her boyfriend and encourages him to spend time with his friends watching the game on Sunday afternoons is passed over for the drama queen who has ‘issues’ with time apart from her man, the first woman will (mistakenly, of course) not repeat her ‘niceness in her next relationship. It is simple Pavlovian conditioning.
Nice girls finish last.
One way to solve today’s SMP problems is for men to do their best to nullify this idiom.
Nice guys finish last was a good propeller for you to learn Game. It was appropriate for you
This is one example of where men and women’s differences should be celebrated (link to Male and female He created them). When a woman is not nice, she is not being feminine.

Masculine men want feminine women.
Encourage the feminine.
Discourage the bitchiness.
That is, if you really want to find and keep a good woman.
Most women are good women. Despite feminism.

A small minority are too entrenched in feminist ideation to be reached by common sense and goodwill. Avoid this woman. She is easy to spot. Many men in the manosphere have already had the misfortune of her acquaintance.

Unfortunately, the unintended consequences of this encounter has been the birth of the axiom ‘AWALT’ (All Women Are Like That).
The problem is, it does not really matter whether you are right or wrong.
The serious problem here is that this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Here’s the sequence of events:
Man encounters the ‘not so nice’ woman who wreaks havoc on him by the time she has finished with him.
Man learns Game as he gets older.
Man becomes proficient PUA who preys on the younger generation of women.
He is ‘successful’ with numerous of these, in a casual sense.
As these younger women mature, they turn into their older counterparts. Rinse and repeat.
I get it. Youth=beauty=fertility=what men want.
I respect Game. But only when it is used honourably. One of the laws of physics is that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 
In other words you reap what you sow.

If you indiscriminately take advantage of the younger generation, you will breed horrible older women.
The sad thing about the women of the younger generation (Generation Y) is that they are unbelievably immature. This is a trend that began with Generation X. 
In previous generations, girls matured faster than boys. That was Nature’s way to ensure that a woman’s maturity coincided with her peak fertility.
The unintended consequences of feminism (which has had a greater direct effect on women than men) is that this is no longer necessarily true.

An older man pursuing a young girl for marriage would in previous generations have had no trouble. It is after-all in accordance with Nature. The problem nowadays is that the young girl is too immature for marriage. Most young women are not marriage-minded until well after their twenties, thanks to feminism. In addition, the very young woman has an understandable natural aversion to the much older man. Parents are more upset if their daughter is cavorting with a much older man than a boy her age. There is a reason for that.

Even in primitive societies where very young women were forced into marriage with older men, it was rare that this young woman was anything other than a reluctant bride.
Generation Y women are the same, even more so. They are ‘creeped out’ by the much older man even if he is this man (link to ‘The curious case...). The more adventurous ones (perhaps even more immature than their peers) would engage in casual encounters with these men if they are Gamed hard enough. But it does not end well, of course.
Rinse and repeat.

In conclusion, one way to solve the riddle of today’s SMP is this:
Game with good intentions. Reward good behaviour, ignore the bad.
That’s it.


Christian J. Response from the Dark Side..
What Women Want..

To be honest, when I first read Joanna's article, it had an immediate response. It was one of incredulity. How is it possible that men and women want the same thing and how come we are both complaining about the exact same issues. They actually see themselves as being the odd one out. This cannot be right, a woman can get just about any male, at any time. It is the case that women are making life as difficult as possible for us. It is them, who make all the demands and it's them who make all the decision about "the relationship" and it's them who toss us aside whenever they have an inkling that the grass is greener somewhere else, rip our hearts out, shred it, return in a plastic bag with the FU tag attached..

That is precisely what we have been told, witnessed and feasted on for years..

The incredulity remained as I remember the copious amount forums and articles I have read and commented on where those exact same issues were raised by guys. Each and everyone of those issues were mentioned, pointed out and complained about; these are the exact same claims that Joanna states, that affect women at large. It just doesn't make sense..

The epiphany appeared once the thought processes kicked into gear..

It definitely is the case that we were attracted by that "slut", that "look at me I am so sexy" individual who was showing the goods and demanding acceptance. The same ones who were forward and not shy, made the conversation and the first moves. The same girls who were less of an effort to get to know and willing to hand over the goods instead of it being akin to some “aircraft without a pilot talk-down” episode. The same one who made the game easier to play. But the same who would just disappear and leave you wondering what the hell you just did wrong.. 

Joanna on the other is quite right about guys putting up with women's bad behaviour, I have witnessed that and so have you. Those loads of obnoxious harridans whose standard behavioural patterns demonstrates that they are out of control and someone needs to straighten them out at all costs. It almost appears to be the case where that type of behavior is now the preferred standard. I cannot understand why but apparently it is evident in the majority of women in the western world. They have been educated to behave in that fashion and passed it off as being a "strong" woman, when in reality all she demonstrates is an obnoxious level that only it's cat would gladly ignore..

The other side of the coin is ofcourse the introduced legislation that protect women to such a degree that one is hesitant, probably too shit scared to criticise any female in the fear of being falsely accused or abused, either physically or verbally. The rest of the audience would gladly join in as well because again, it's their mindset. Excusing bad female behavior is norm and any attempt to correct it will be punished..

So what do men want in a female?

It is a simple question and I am no expert but the answer appears to be quite simple as well. It's a relationship with mutual benefits..

Think back to when you were in your early teens and you were physically affected by a member of the opposite sex (you stared, your heart raced, you had no control over it, it was embarrassing when someone pointed that out and even then your were a complete goose in that person's company) and you could not work out why, how scary was that, it still happens. That first encounter has made everyone wary ever since. How can one single individual affect you in such an overwhelming fashion, you can still remember it now regardless of age. How is that possible when you have met, spoken to and been involved with thousands of other people. 

One of life's greater mysteries..

We like the idea of a female partner sharing situations that arise. One comes to mind and that is the party situation where you are talking to friends and your partner walks up behind you and slips her hand in yours without saying anything or demanding the front seat. The joy of introducing your squeeze to your friends without ceremony and her acceptance of them is rare, but should be just normal. Afterwards just walking away and leaving you to it (many times in the past I have witnessed wives and girlfriends wander on the scene, had a listen and wander off, fine)..

We enjoy the occasional impromptu squeeze almost anywhere accept when we are talking to someone and your partner walks up and kisses you in front of everyone else, like your a tree stump and she is just marking territory..

We like it when major issues can be dealt with in an unhysterical fashion, calmly work out the problem and create a positive outcome. In the majority of cases, that would be the logical step to take. We greatly dislike it when a minor issue requires the rest of the day to rectify, when initially the one single step to fix it was ignored..

We generally like peace and quite whenever possible. Prefer to be told what the problem is, instead of having to guess.  If we are told that “it's nothing”, then as far as we are concerned, that will be the case. I think the majority of males hate it when asking "what's wrong" and the response is "nothing", when in actual fact we can sense that it's just a lie. The response is taken at face value, fine, forgotten, move along..

Men are deemed to be totally devoid of sensing emotive situations and it has been something   completely ignored, only women can “feel” we are told. It was not that long ago that Hollywood propaganda actually admitted that men have feelings, surprise!. Emotional responses send out copious indirect recognisable signals that some can detect more than others and right there lies the potential for future drama queens to go into act 5, if queried and acted upon every time. Some women actually enjoy the drama of suffering, note the movies they enjoy watching..

But I digress, I wanted to show some examples of behaviour that the majority of guys have stated they would like to see and for their girl, to take note of. The other side of all this was that women appear to not even bother with finding out what their men like and dislike. It appears to be irrelevant..

This is an endless topic as it would eventually hit on personal preferences. My inkling was that both sexes enjoy the exact same things, they both immensely enjoy a great relationship with a member of the opposite sex but we have been arguing and discussing with the harpies and harridans who have accepted the feminist indoctrination and forgotten about all those other girls who are out there wishing for the same outcome..

It's going to be a long road back..