I came across similar instructions when called upon to do some consultation work at a swimming pool, (maintenance issues) and was informed that "no camera" applied right across the nation apparently. That same hysteria appears to be worldwide and we know precisely which male hating, sexist, hegemony is responsible. Funnily enough, I have never witnessed any female copping it for precisely the same behaviour even though they are the greater child abuser and murderer of children..

Take pictures of your kids and you'll be called a sicko (Photo: Getty)

No doubt you're as shocked as I am by the story of the photographer in Scotland questioned by police after taking pictures of his 4-year old daughter eating ice-cream in a shopping mall:

Staff at an ice cream stall in Braehead shopping centre, near Glasgow, became suspicious when they saw Chris White taking pictures of his four-year-old daughter Hazel with his mobile phone at around 4pm on Friday afternoon.
'He [the security guard] said I had been spotted taking photos in the shopping centre which was “illegal”… and then asked me to delete the ones I had taken,' White told Amateur Photographer (AP).
When White said he had already uploaded two images to Facebook, and refused to delete them, the guard called police.

But what's more depressing is the Braehead Centre's non-apology apology. (H/T Welsh Toy)

Although Friday’s incident had nothing to do with a potential terrorist attack, the two retail assistants and the member of our security staff were faced with a situation they genuinely thought was suspicious. They witnessed a man taking photographs of a child, unaware that the man and the child were related.
I’m sure people will agree it is better safe than sorry.

Actually, I'm sure most people will agree that Braehead are a bunch of idiots.
You see, most people, when they see a man taking a picture of a child eating an icecream are not going to go: "Yikes! I wonder if that icecream contains Semtex and that camera button is the triggering device."
Nor are they going to go: "Alert! Alert! Paedophile! That man is DEFINITELY a paedophile."
What they're far more like to do, even in this age where paedophiles and suicide bombers are apparently lurking behind every hedge, is think: "Ah. How sweet! There's a dad taking a picture of his little girl." Or possibly: "Rather him than me. They're so much easier when they get a bit older." Or: "Wish my girl were that age again. God teenagers are a pain!" You know: normal stuff; healthy stuff; sane stuff.
But for how much longer? The overreaction of the security guard – and subsequently of the police – are very much in line with a worrying socio-political trend. I experienced this myself about four years ago when an au pair took some family photos of a recent holiday to Jessops in London's Strand to get them developed.
Next thing I knew I got a call from the Jessops branch manager.
"Are those your photos?" he asked, with a certain officious menace.
"Yes," I said. "What's the problem."
"Well I'm afraid we're unable to develop them. They contain inappropriate material."
"What ARE you on about? Oh God. You mean the pictures of the kids playing nude badminton? Is that it?"
"I can't go into specifics. But the staff member who had to process them felt uncomfortable. He thought the material was inappropriate."
"What, you're worried I'm a paedophile. Is that it?"
"No one's saying that sir. I'm just saying that we are unable to process your holiday photographs."
"Because the sight of eight-year olds, in the nude, playing badminton makes one of your staff members uncomfortable and he thinks it's inappropriate?"
I later established that the Jessops staff member who had complained was an 18-year old male. There was a time when I would have wondered quite how thick or pervily overimaginative an 18-year old you'd have to be to read something sinister into a bunch of very obviously normal family photographs, just some of which happened show kids having fun with no clothes on. But not any more.
As a culture we're now so paedophile-obsessed that when my kids sing the song that used to go "Never smile at a crocodile" they now sing "Never smile at a paedophile". And when I hug and kiss them they sometimes call me a perv.
But even worse than this contemporary variant on 17th-century witchfinding is the jobsworthery and officiousness by which its absurdities are entrenched.
The only sensible, decent and right response of that the Jessops manager would have been a) to apologise profusely to the offended customer (who needless to say hasn't used their services since) and b) to take the "offended" junior staff member aside for a quiet word to tell him to use his noddle in future.
The only sensible, decent and right response of the appalling Braehead shopping centre would have been a) a similar profuse apology to the photographer for the embarrassment and inconvenience (possibly with a gift voucher for Fried-Mars-Bar-U-Like or similar) and b) a quiet word with the security guard for having been such a heavy-handed, thick-skinned prat, and for bringing the name of BRAEHEAD SHOPPING CENTRE IN GLASGOW into disrepute.
Neither happened. This is how the Stasi gained such control over Soviet-bloc-era East Germany: thanks to the compliance of its many useful idiots in the broader society.

I really do not have say too much about this obnoxious feminists as it has already done the damage herself. One of the most loathed male hating feminist I have ever come across..

Harman is the male hater in the middle of the picture..

http://order-order.com/2011/08/13/harriet-harman-is-gangsta-mutha-1/

It was Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first refuge for battered women, who in the late eighties identified Labour's then radicals Harriet Harman and Patricia Hewitt as dangerous feministideological enemies of the family. 
Harman and Hewitt were in those days leading lights of the loony left's radical feminist wing, arguing in pamphlet after pamphlet that "It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony and cohesion." 
After decades of agitation, which influenced social policy as well as social workers, their attack on men and their role in modern life has reached its nadir in Tottenham. Local MP David Lammy put it bluntly last week: "We are seeing huge consequences of the lack of male role models in young men's lives.." Harriet Harman is the ideologicalsingle-mother of those gangsta rioters.
Peter Oborne correctly identifies that behind the scenes New Labour's party policy was captured by the likes of Harman and Hewitt who viewed the traditional two-parent family as an instrument of male, patriarchal oppression. The riots are the toxic legacy of such poisonous "progressive" attitudes.
In government Iain Duncan Smith has perhaps only until the next election to reverse decades of progressive social policies, he has to make work pay for people who have known only inter-generational worklessness and rebuild the traditional family as the prevailing societal norm. 
That task first starts in the think-tanks, moves onto the broadsheet editorial pages, before becoming a stated policy objective eventually leading to changes in the infrastructure of social policy. There is also a necessity for a reversal of the secular kulturkampf which progressives have waged to make non-judgemental, moral relativism the only acceptable official view. We are currently only at the think-tank and broadsheet editorial stage.
Harman's 1990IPPR pamphlet “The Family Way”, was described by Feminist Review as "An attempt to combat stultifying, traditionalist concepts of ‘the family". We have reached the end of that decades long struggle by Fabians and feminists to undermine the family; with 40% of children born outside marriage and a minority of childhoods completed in the household of both biological parents. It is now apparent to all that few if any of Harriet Harman's fatherless gangsta progeny come from those supposedly stultifying traditional families.
Add a comment to this post

Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter
Labour figures' bizarre link to paedophile groups
Their involvement with an organisation to which two groups campaigning for the legalisation of paedophilia were affiliated has come back to challenge three leading Labour Party figures.
Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Miss Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.
more within link21st Century British Nationalism: Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter