Latest Posts
Showing posts with label slutwalk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label slutwalk. Show all posts

When is A Slut a Slut, Taking Another Look..

" I'll be your slut", was that the topic or what ? Bystanders are amused..

Here we go again. Take two and counting, as the nonsense continues as feminists once again vomit their usual inane aims and goals while being totally convinced their cause is well, just. Their relentless and never ending demands for ever more "rights" now borders on the insane, just as this future protest will once again demonstrate..

Feminists, and thereby women in general, as feminists have made the claim that they represent all women regardless of whether or not they actually agree. Will enjoy another outing of fun and frolicking in their underwear and expect the world to take them seriously, while they "RECLAIM" the word "slut". I have yet to read any article or argument, that has made any sense of this apart from it being a political move designed to promote the feminist hegemony and their maniacal adherence to feminist ideals. For proof, notice the self aligned political agitators from Hollywood and other "stars" lending their names to this lunacy..

It is and has become the situation where it hard not to burst out laughing and just sitting back and enjoying the comedy..

I would have thought that there would be better words to reclaim like being morally "vapid" or "vacuous", what about "vacuousness", they would be more suitable. But a word used primarily by females, aimed at females in a derogatory fashion, in order to cut down the competition, is apparently the word to be saved. That is the reason why this is still being forced onto the public, but I still think it's just some kind of "gotcha" event, where in a couple of years from now they will claim that it was all just a joke, ha! ha! ha!, and all you suckers fell, for it. The joke is on you. I am waiting for the punchline..

The other mentality at work here also is the feminist mantra that women should not be held accountable for their own actions. Here we can see why that must be introduced into law and judges trained to accept it..

Link to John the Other article at AVfM..



March 7, 2012 Feminist Lies

SlutWalk returns

It is now the beginning of the spring on 2012, which means we should all expect the international grass roots protest movement known as SlutWalk to return bigger and better than ever before.
For those few who might not be familiar with this populist juggernaut, SlutWalk is a humanist protest movement against the badly worded suggestion by one Canadian police officer that women, in order to avoid sexual victimization, should avoid dressing as sluts.
The movement, which in a single year has spawned protest marches in dozens of cities worldwide, took the words of the Canadian cop, constable Micheal Sanguinetti to mean that when women find themselves the victims of the lowest incidenced type of violent crime tracked by the FBI in their uniform crime victimization survey, that these women have only themselves to blame.  And that’s the story. That is the narrative behind the mobilization of women in protest marches all over the western world, the story that Micheal Sanguinetti, the Toronto cop, was telling rape victims it was their own stupid fault they got raped or sexually assaulted.
This message, this black-and-white over-simplification of criminal victimization, this “it’s your fault,” is a terrible, regressive and hateful position to take. Anyone who blames the victim of a crime rather than the perpetrator of a crime is clearly a deranged sociopath who should never be employed in any capacity dealing with the general public.

More Proof That Feminism is a Social Cancer..

Some would have to wonder if Fidelbogen's request for the "roaring" from women request will ever eventuate, call me cynical but I have never seen it nor would I expect it. When women can sit in a television audience and laugh along with the likes of Sharon Osbourne about some lunatic cutting off a man's penis then one has to wonder if there is any level of humanity left in them at all..

Feminists have hit on two of their favourite topics - One, is the prostitution angle, where free women go about selling sex for money as is their majority wish, easy money for minimal effort on their part. Secondly, the radical feminist introduced the "Slutwalk" response because a man told women not to dress like sluts, take some responsibility for your behaviour, the sensible women do anyway. So it is not a problem of it being good advise, the issue was that feminists found another opportunity to malign and generate hate against men. Regardless of the fact that a majority of men do not use prostitutes as a majority are married, not that it makes much difference, ask Bettina Arndt. What amazes me about the entire topic of prostitutes and slutwalks is that it can all to traced back to women and their behaviour  being the culprits, but don't mention any of that as it appears to be irrelevant. Waiting for feminists to be honest will never happen..




More Proof That Feminism is a Social Cancer



Here we are treated to the famous anti-porn feminist Gail Dines on a talk show. And if you don't savvy what's wrong with this blabbering diarrhea-mouth, who fills the air with lies and won't shut up for even one second, then you are either willfully obtuse or rectal-cranially conjuncted. Do I really need to explain what is EVIL about this? If you cannot instantly comprehend the poignancy of the crisis here, then you are frankly beyond hope and I haven't got the patience to deal with you. So please go away. Now.

Gail Dines is not what's generally called a "radical" feminist. She is not a person of the so-called fringe. She is a mainstream activist, and people like her are painfully common. They yak it up on talk shows, they write glossy books that get reviewed by glossy critics, and they have a large following of uncritical sponges who sop up every word they say. Nobody -- especially not men -- will publicly stand up to these people and administer the verbal bitch-slapping they so desperately need. Pretty much the only ones who will tackle that unpopular job, are the "creepy" men who populate obscure websites.These men call attention to creepy things, and that makes them "creepy".

As feminism goes, Gail Dines is standard fare -- although I grant you she is worse than many. In olden days of rough village justice she'd have gotten the scold's bridle, or the the ducking stool, or the stocks. And quite right. Half the women in the village would have been throwing rotten garbage at her too, back in those days. But nowadays . . . women in critical numbers are eerily silent. And I won't try to explain that, especially considering that men are equally silent.

I realize that Gail Dines is ostensibly "not as bad" as the radfems who hide in private forums and talk about male genocide. No, Gail does not talk about male genocide (although it is an open question whether she entertains the thought), but that only makes her somewhat less poisonous. Two drops of cyanide in a glass of water as opposed to three, let us say. Aye, her demonic hatred of men is painted in blazing colors for all to behold.

I should add, that in my opinion Sharon Osbourne -- who thought it was "quite fabulous" when a man got his penis cut off -- is somewhat less poisonous than Gail Dines. And I would say the same of the female audience on Sharon's TV show, the ones who tittered uproariously about the incident. Overall, they are somewhat less poisonous than Gail Dines, and I don't doubt they would be totally creeped out if they knew about the radfems in the private form. And I'm sure it is a great relief to know that they would feel this way, even while they were tittering uproariously about the man who got his whacker whacked off.

And I am certain that Sharon and most of her female audience would assure us that those feminists in the private radfem forum are only "fringe radicals", that not all feminists are like that, and that certainly not all women are like that.

Here is a thought experiment for you. How if all hatred of men -- and all social proclivity to be silent about such -- were all at once to vanish from the world? Do you seriously believe that this thing we call "feminism" would continue to exist for even five minutes?

A concluding thought. Although it is deadly clear to me that all feminists are indeed "like that", I still refuse believe that all women are like that -- although a painfully large number are! Call me a fool, call me a Simple Simon, but I still think the majority of women are fundamentally decent, honest people. And I really think they need to find their voice. I really do.

I want to hear them roar.

It is urgently important for this to happen. The future depends on it.

Racism and Slutwalk in NYC, What else..

I have been spending the last few days studying the actions of radical feminists and their inane attempts at trying to destroy all things male. I have even tracked a few sites back to Sweden, which ofcourse is no surprise..
 I have come across several feminist blogs and sites discussing how much they loathe and hate radical fems and how much radical feminists hate the heterosexual feminists, it really is laughable. Radical feminists (most) look at the slutwalk effort as a major joke and don't we all.. Failing to hide their contempt and derision, belittling their efforts as they were children or worse still, exhibitionists..
 There is not an ounce of agreement between them as radical feminists (mostly lesbians)want to cull the male population to anything less than 30% but some feminists object as they have boys as well as male partners and try to justify that incomprehensible behaviour or are busy apologising for being contaminated because they had sexual relationship with that sex kowtowing to these hateful lesbian feminists. It is such a circus..

The hate just wafts like a fog from those sites..

Here we have another feminist going over the top and this time the 'SlutWalk" enabler got trampled under foot for being a racist. I would have thought that her efforts would have introduced a few more charges but it is what it is..Feminists once again demonstrate their utter and total disregard for fellow human beings as they rage against imaginary version of the male, their obsession failed to recognise limits of offensive and acceptable behaviour..

They really are the most obnoxious human beings that wallow in malice and callousness, to such a degree that you would not even allow your own mind to think, it let alone act on it..

But here they are. Wonder why this was not front page news eh!!





The feminist double-think applies as one must try to comprehend, how much thought went into the sign and why she would instigate this type of malice without consideration and what were her fellow feminists thinking by allowing that sign to be displayed without so much as a warning or request to have it removed for being over the top, offensive..
One must wonder about the apology below and how any human being could actually deny being racist when the sign she was holding expressed precisely that. She apologises for being caught in the act and all is forgiven because, it made her "cry"..
"There was no disrespect, hurt, pain, or offence intended. I don't think there was one racist person there. I, the one holding the sign, though not the one who made it, would never use that word offensively. The word and it's meaning is wrong, but the sign is true. There is no contest about it. I am probably the least racist person out there. I have never even mistakenly judged someone by the color of their skin. Don't judge before you know what is really going on. I did not make the sign, but still feel wrong and sick. I apologize for being photographed with it and would like to ask for it to be taken down. I never thought this experience could make me ashamed or hurt, or even make me cry, but it has. Anyone who has seen photos of me with it please ask for them to be taken down. ____ this is not your fault, I just don't wish to be hated for a word."

I Can Walk Around in My Bra if I Want To..

Slutfest apparently broadened someone's mind but the width requirement was just to much. Just like every other sane person would have asked "WTF" are they doing if not demonstrating precisely that the original suggestion was totally correct. Dress like a slut and you will be treated like one, guaranteed. I fail to see any disparity between the actions of delusional feminists and the sane suggestion of the much maligned Canadian police officer who is now aware that no good deed goes unpunished. He may as well stated that they should not play with crocodiles at the zoo wrapped in tuna fillets and that would not be affected by the way they're dressed..
The feminist response to the cops statements was a "slut walk": a self righteous egregiously crass posturing of what women now consider a "right". How funny that most of the time, women--feminists particularly---complain about being objectified and wanting to get recognition, only to completely go back on themselves, change their feral little minds and engage in such ostentatious displays of their own unrealistically high self regard.
Yeah I know, feminists have a lot of explaining to do and if they start now they would finish just in time to christen the new century.. 


Well, good thing Zanbato writes and explains it all so nicely.. 
The article itself is particularly well written and is an apt response to the selfish whining of a girl who didn't understand the implications of walking down the street--yes, a public space, little girl-- in her bra.
Basically this is what happened: Dumb slut attends a "slut walk" and decides, on likely an emotional high full of exorbitant feminist choler and misguided anger, that she's got to be the one to take things a step further. So in response to her own volatile (and as you'll see, highly transient) emotional state, she strips down and bears a whole lot more skin than she'd probably normally be comfortable exposing in a public place. This was doubtlessly done in the interest of being swept away in the "power" of the movement; the ubiquitously childish sentiments shared feminist hordes manifesting itself in an ugly mob procession through city streets. (This also furthers a personal belief of mine that women are particularly susceptible to the mental paralysis and divesting of personal choice and responsibility that groupthink and mob mentality entails.)

After the fact? Dumb slut (of course) regrets stripping down and looking like a slut. (Maybe somewhere in the back of her little zoological brain, she realized how stupid it was to get caught up in the mob mentality, and that no, nobody gives a damn about why they're parading through the streets dressed like sluts; most people are just thinking: "What a bunch of sluts!") Anyway, in her moments of remorse, she decides that she'd rather the small time newspaper published by the local campus take down pictures of her "bearing her body".
What she fails to realize is that her trivial insecurities are outside of the objective scope of the media. She fails to realize that the importance of the documentation of the news by the media far outweighs her own petty personal narcissism. And through her asinine inability to grasp larger concepts by which the media abides (regardless of how small a scale it operates on), she feels she has yet, another right: She feels she has the right to demand pictures that *gasp!* depict her only in a bra be taken down, because they were published without her permission!

The article that responds to her selfish demands is written in the didactic tone of a firm, but gentle parent, explaining to a pouting child that no, the world does not revolve around them. Although it tends to ramble about other things that aren't pertinent to this particular discussion, I'll cut through the jumble to get at a memorable and effective quote intended to stymie the childish and vain indignation expressed by the bra-wearing-slut:
"If you march down a main street in a bra, the media will take your photo. If you lead a march protesting violence against women, you will get reporters asking tough questions. It’s naive to expect otherwise. Welcome to public life."
Essentially, the author shuts her down and makes my point clear-as-a-bell. The media is here to take the information out in the world, regardless of how ugly or unappealing it may be, and provide it to the masses. (Sometimes that can be subject to befuddlement by political agendas and the like, but that's another story altogether.)
In the case of a small university newspaper that nobody outside the environs of the campus really gives all that much of a f*ck about, this is no less true. The information the Dalhousie Gazette provides the public is objective and partial to no one--that's what news should be.
Unfortunately, the bra-clad slut, the clueless self-aggrieved bimbo wielding her own narrow-minded notions of self-entitlement, the lovely example of whats wrong with women today that she is, didn't realize this simple fact. She'd rather the media bend over backwards, change standards and customs as old as printed word itself, and accommodate her own self-absorbed vain emotional demands, as if those demands matter to anyone other than her and some seething cabal of feminist c*nts!
Can you believe this? 
Link to article in small country newspaper.. 

Rape Culture, What Rape Culture ?


Nota rape culture, just a PC one ByJulia Fisher
Let’smake this perfectly clear: there is no rape culture at Yale.
IfYale had a rape culture, there would be students and faculty speakingin favor of rape. Rape would be a common practice; it would beroutine to hear someone talking about raping or being raped bysomeone last weekend. People would discuss what styles or methods ofrape they prefer. Obviously, the existence of a rape culture is afarcical idea. These things just don’t happen at Yale.
Thispost is really just one to rub salt into the wounds of the feminastiesas they suffer from a thousand cuts for their compulsive lying andevery time they do so, well. What can I say, BDSM is only around thecorner...

Fisherstates it correctly about the rape culture's non existence. Toeveryone else it does not exist but to feminists it's in plagueproportions and the reason they want that to be the case is ofcoursebleeding obvious. They demand the funds to stop a non-existent culture, they falsely instigated, they falsely cook the books just so they can lay long term claim to all  that money andsecondly, they want to ensure that all men and boys are continuallyhumiliated and denigrated in the process while they manufacture those theoretical cases that only exists in their biased and sexistminds.
Thereare isolated incidents of rape, and that is surely a severe problem.Beyond the physical harm the victim suffers, rape erodes trust. Likeany crime, it arouses fear.
Rapefalls somewhere on a wide spectrum between murder and robbery. Thenumber of people who commit rape is a tiny percentage of thepopulation at large. The vast majority of people are notcriminals.
Whenwe talk about a rape culture, when we look at everyone as a potentialcriminal, and when we condemn different opinions as promoting rape,we create an environment of suspicion. This suspicion, like crime,erodes trust and arouses fear.
No one has ever denied that rape does not exist or never happens as to do that would not only be foolish as well as totally incorrect. It does happen and the appropriate punishment and assistance programs are in place to help and assist anyone faced with that ordeal.
The problem that has reared it's ugly head and which has made the issue just another feminist tragedy is that they are incapable of taking a realistic view, a comprehensive analysis and offer even the slightest positive input or answer to  assist in reducing or rectifying this problem resorting only to slanging and insulting the male sex while females can continue their activity at will.
The fix part is the furthest from their minds as it is in their interest to keep the rape culture active and alive for as long as they can because they are far from interested in creating any positive outcomes, that would hinder their political and emotive advantage. They are quite happy to offer a few sacrifices as that will benefit them no end. More female fodder at the alter of feminist hypocrisy and what does it matter if a few or a hundred or more are sacrificed. So they loose a few in the process, who cares. Sacrifices must be made for the evil empire while the fodder lines up to be counted..

One must not forget the biggest of all hypocrites in the ranks of that hegemony. Those deranged  females taking part in the "slutfest" marches would have to be awarded the "hypocrites of the year" award as never before has that level of hypocrisy ever been witnessed. Take for example the march in Oregon which was organised and attended by the lesbian crowd who have been recorded as being the most abusive females so far on the planet. Their record stands at triple the normal heterosexual couples amount for physical abuse, murder, suicide, illness and deaths, you name it and there they are "tongue in cheek", helping the sisters complain about an issue that does not exist or if it does, it is so minor as to not even be noticeable. Incredible..

Feminist Fodder with matching mentality.Rather watch paint dry.


Female Terrorist and the Berlin Slutwalk Wins First Prize..

Female Terrorist..

Another entry in the "Women are not violent" section that feminists living in denial about, they refuse to comprehend it as they keep their head in the sand by ignoring it, trying to blame one sex for it's existence..

Ah yes, the female terrorist with matching headband and sash will go very nice with the bombs she will strap to herself while she demonstrates to other humans just how caring and sharing she really is. Bugger the kids by the way. They can make it on their own..


Berlin Slutwalk..

Then ofcourse we have another one of those umpteen examples of the slutwalk. Misanthropes educating others on how to humiliate yourself in public and claiming it to have some merit. This one in Berlin, had to be even more garish and self debasing than any previous slutwalks. In the USA, (one in Portland Oregon) instigated by the local Gay and Lesbians group, demonstrated that being a slut was something new. The concept behind that protest was ofcourse to point out what slutting was all about, it was something they did not normally take part in (go to one of their parties and see the contradiction) and the local public were supposed to have some type of epiphany, raise their hands to their mouths and go into deep thinking mode concerning their protest, however, all they really did was wonder what drugs they were on and what level of stupidity does one have to possess to participate in such ridiculous behaviour..
So we had another one in Australia where they ranted and raged about the same delusional issues and then they went home, high fiving each other with a job well done, failing to realise that they did not stop just because the event was over. England was next, what can one say about English woman, most wanted them to put their clothes back on as the sight of too many frumps was just too much. The usually stoic English were dry reaching on the pavements..
So we get to Berlin, they were the latest so far and were required to really go all out and prove beyond doubt that they were really the real thing and they completed that task with alacrity.
I was wondering what a suitable first prize would be when they front up to the rostrum to collect it for best slutwalk ever. A giant dildo perhaps or in keeping with the theme, a replica of a vagina made from gold would probably be more suitable. No, the best trophy that I could think of would be a tattoo on the forehead of each participant, denoting "I am a Slut 2011", they would be so much more appropriate, they would be more than proud of that recognition and they could explain that to their cats and other animals they keep for company..



Don't dress like a Slut:Feminist Hyperventilate Again..


One does have to wonder if feminism does actually breed stupidity as we already are aware of the fact that cognitive dissonance is a requirement for membership as that allows you to partake in the "groupthink" mentality. Not normally attributed to rational thinking human beings but quite "normal for feminist's doublethink( refer George Orwell's 1984 for more information) mentality..

Allow me to give an example of cognitive dissonance..

 Martin was told that she would attract unwanted attention from men and her safety was at risk.
Knowing ofcourse how easily these feminists are offended and also feel the need to moan and bitch about irrelevances, we have this CD female complaining that she was not permitted to walk around in her underwear. Obviously, it did not dawn on her victimhood mentality that maybe it was probably not that great an idea as the security dude informed her..
Feeling victimised is another emotion that feminists encourage and ofcourse this female having read all those appropriate paragraphs in women's studies, would have known that being a victim, any type of victim, for any unperceived impost was apparently quite valid for this privileged princess, "I just want to walk in my underwear because I protested last week that I wanted to dress like a slut" did apparently not dawn on the security service either..

As was the case when that constable in Canada that dressing like a slut may not be a good idea and would attract the attention that you may not want, was the same advice this child received and like the previous example, feminists got all hyperventilated and suffered an attack of the vapours, with no smelling salts on hand..
Toronto woman told to put her top on'Plain normal black bra not okay' 
CBC News Posted: Aug 9, 2011 5:59 PM ET  
Back to accessibility linksJeanette Martin enjoys herself at Toronto's annual beer festival. A short time after this photo was taken security officials told her to put her shirt back on
More than two decades after a woman from Guelph, Ont., won the right to take off her shirt in public, a Toronto woman is complaining that organizers at a local beer festival told her it wasn't allowed.
Jeanette Martin was at the annual Toronto beer gathering on Sunday when she took up a dare from one of her friends and took off her shirt. She was wearing a bra but apparently that wasn't enough for organizers.
"Within 10 seconds flat I had a security guard telling me to put my top back on or else I'd be escorted out of the grounds," Martin told CBC News.
Martin was told that she would attract unwanted attention from men and her safety was at risk."I didn't feel unsafe," she said. "I just wanted to be comfortable."
Martin said she was shocked. "Hot pink string bikinis are okay — a plain normal black bra is not okay."
The incident comes 20 years after Gwen Jacobs took off her shirt while walking in Guelph on a 33 C day. Jacobs, who was not wearing a bra, took her fight all the way to Ontario's Court of Appeal where she was vindicated.
The court struck down a lower court ruling.
In part, the Appeal Court decision said "there was nothing degrading or dehumanizing in what the appellant did. The scope of her activity was limited and was entirely non-commercial. No one who was offended was forced to continue looking at her."
Since that 1996 decision it has been legal for women to remove their tops in public in Ontario.
Martin said the people who told her to cover up were looking at the problem the wrong way.
"Deal with the guys if there is a problem," she said, "but don't come over and pre-emptively tell me that I'm going to start a problem."
"This is the reason we have events like SlutWalk now — to bring attention to the fact that we're not just sexual beings, we're just out having a good time."
Martin's not sure why she got so much attention at the beer fest. The security team apologized and she's had lots of support, even from her parents.
"I actually think they'll be very proud of me for standing up for my rights — and it is an issue of rights for women to be able to do this without being sexualized," Martin said. http://www.cbc.ca/ne...ess-martin.html

Erm I am Confused Re: Slutwalk and How to be a Slut..


Look, I am somewhat confused regarding the whole feminist argument in relation to the "Slutwalk" and the above photo. They find it necessary to promote "being a slut" as some right women should possess but if you have a look at the photos below they are already flat out demonstrating that it's well under control. So where does the right to being a slut come into the argument when in reality there really are no restrictions..





These photos below are from the "Slutwalk in Portland, Oregon in US of A. Some of the comments in relation to it are somewhat interesting as it once again demonstrates how stupid and dumb one has to be to enjoy being a member of the feminasty movement..

Dawn Lynnelle Higgins Dear Mr. Donovan: You seem to make a blanketed staement about everyone who was there and you are making assumptions you REALLY know nothing about. It wasn’t just lesbians there at this march, there were bisexual, trans, queer, and even straight women as well as straight, bisexual, queer, and trans men all standing together against rape. Rape is not a funny thing and rape does not discriminate, maybe if you were actually there you would actually not be making these types of bullshit statements. You sir, are a complete idiot who should turn in your queer card at the door IMMEDIATELY!
Fabulous, the ultimate and optimum insult by a gay is to accuse someone else of being one as well..
Yes, obviously unconcerned about the rape of the opposite sex as well. Oh well, hypocrisy is one of the standard nascent requirements to being a feminist..