Latest Posts
Showing posts with label sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexism. Show all posts



I need to put out a call to all men in OZ (Australia) who can supply me with a list or individual site names/links on Men's Activists and supporters in OZ..
The reason is ofcourse simple, we have to gather our forces, combine our efforts and go about kicking some serious arse..

If you know of anyone, or are part of any site/organisation(not listed on the web), please send me the information via this address (have to keep the spammers away with this temporary listed mail address which is mensactivismoz at the Gmail dot com..pany)..

Any assistance would be a great help. I do already have a few of the main "fighters" like father4families, mensrights etc. but I would like to start from scratch. Even use my comments section to supply information as all comments are moderated before they are published and I will pick it up from there..

Thank you in advance. This will go a log way to ending the feminist tyranny currently flooding Australian Politics, which will eventually sweep the rest of the planet..

We have already found feminists working in Australia are from all over the world. We stop them here and they will not be able to practise and promote their hate movement anywhere else.

We will cast this sexist, racist female in the "The World would be a better place if run by women" category and why not. What a dishonest, nasty piece of work this woman really is, but I suggest you make your own decision and then ask yourself the same question that feminists have been promoting for so long!



Don't even think about defending yourself as you will go to jail without question. Women can abuse at will.
What is that saying again, ask and shall receive, seek and you will find. Words of wisdom apparently as I posed something similar not that long ago about whether or not there are any women left on the planet who have any idea or can give any indication that they actually give a damn about what is going on. One continually wallows need deep in the usual "what women want/demand" as that has been the topic to ad nauseam for the last 40 odd years..

One wonders if anything else dares to break through that heightened wall of victimhood. But alas, we have a slight clearance in the fog as a request is forwarded for some input into issues apart from their own mountain of doom..

One does have to be carful whenever asking this question as the response may not be what one expects. Once the floodgates are opened there will be no closing them again.

My response to this question would simply be to direct the request here (the online compendium of Men's Issues)  . All or most of the issues are covered, it is still in the process of being updated as TDOM has stated. But it does give the gist of what is ailing society today and where the sexism, discrimination and bias really is..

So we have this request..
AW - Greetings and salutations, forum members!
A few disclaimers:1. I'm an American woman, but I'm not here to promote myself. I'm telling you to put my post in context.2. I don't want to pull focus from the issues. If you find my post disruptive, I'll take a hint from the silence and leave.3. This forum is primarily for men to exchange ideas, rant, and support one another. I've posted under "Opposing Views" out of respect for that mission, not to challenge it.4. These disclaimers aren't to paint myself as a good American woman; I just worry about not saying exactly what I mean. My apologies if it sounds tedious or self-promoting.
I'm not so much posting from an opposing view but a limited view. I appreciate men's plight, but I as a woman can never fully understand it. And since words don't do much, I want to actively address whatever sexism I see -- walk the walk, I suppose. Of course, there are probably thousands of little sexisms I don't pick up on. I can pay my half at meals, write letters advocating against false rape charges, etc -- but there's probably so many things I won't catch from my perspective.
So here's my question: aside from major issues like paternity fraud and women using sex as leverage, what small acts of misandry to you see regularly? And how can well-meaning women avoid them -- as girlfriends, sisters, coworkers, wives, etc? We can't make things equal, but we can still do our best to be fair.
You now have the floor. I greatly appreciate any and all contributions (and will understand if I receive none). 
Maybe a few of the followers or readers may like to express their opinion and respond to the question and I will update as we go along. Meanwhile, here are a few responses on that forum where the question was originally posed..

Opening Pandora's Box..

Man 1 - Seen any MacDonald's ads recently? 


AW - I haven't seen any McDonald's ads recently. Is one you're referring to available online? 

Man 2 -How about all the Progressive ads on TV with cute, lovable Flo and the men who come in her insurance store? They're always fat, balding, and wearing glasses except for one male character I saw. And they're always shown as either sexist, stupid, crazy or amazingly immature, while the female customers are always attractive and witty and mature. Think how feminists would react if it were the reverse.

Or how about the sit-coms on TV today which almost all follow the "Simpson's" formula, with the husband as totally incompetent and bumbling, cowardly, selfish and immature but their wives are intelligent and hard working, unselfish, etc.

Or the beer commercials, I forget the beer, where men go into a bar and are friendly with the pretty bar maid but she ridicules them mercilessly just because their pants aren't in style or they say the wrong thing. And they probably drink the wrong beer too.

And on and on. This is common is today's media. What effect does this have on young boys growing up today? How about news reports about a story where 20 male miners died in a tragic mine disaster? The reporters will never say it was 20 MEN who died. They'll say that 20 WORKERS died or that there were 20 VICTIMS of the disaster. But if there was one woman who got killed, all the reports would be "19 men and one woman killed". There's a great video about this on manwomanmyth.com, among many others that go into other topics, like how so many of the laws today are anti-male and pro-female, and how schools are biased against boys and toward girls. 

Man 3 -This is a perfectly valid question, and I will answer it honestly and completely:

The most common ones I see on a regular basis:

1. The appropriation of men as "useful objects" to women who are either lazy or have no interest in performing certain duties if they can simply require men to do these things for them. The examples of this are countless, but are not limited to "borrowing" money from men (which, in my experience, is almost never paid back), commanding men to carry heavy shit, making jokes about responsbilities that they simply pass off to men (IE telling their girlfriends "that's what men are for"), asking men to fill their shifts at work for no intrinsic benefit/reward, and asking men to fix things that they broke instead of using google to figure it out themselves.

2. Creating false dichotomies involving polar opposites of men where neither extreme is viewed favorable - like the niceguy/badboy. Women tend to denigrate both of these parties even though they are loosely defined and highly pidgeonholed, despite the tendency for American women to be attracted toward the latter group. In other words, men are always viewed as guilty/flawed even when he fits the bill perfectly. This is some combination of paranoia/entitlement among women, but it is clearly evident because women try to take advantage of even those men who they perceive to be the most attractive.

3. Using legal/social leverage to manipulate men through false allegations (if you don't do XYZ for me then I'll report you for crime/offense ABC). While this is rarer than the above two embodiments of misandry, it is perhaps the most foul. Since men are presumed to be guilty when their accuser is a woman (who often employs other friends or fake witnesses to persecute the man) it can be extremely difficult for a man to beat. Your post implies that you are somewhat familiar with this already, so I'll leave it there.

4. Intentional emotional abuse of men for personal sense of power. Taunting, nagging, manipulation, teasing/controlling men with sex, suggesting competition from other men and implying superiority are all part of this. Most men in relationships can reiterate this better than I can.

I personally do not see an easy solution to these dynamics because many of them are enforced legally (IE promoting women to divorce a rich man because its a faster way to wealth than working through the corporate ladder) and can therefore profit from the objectification and disposal of men. If individual men and women decide to genuinely reject this sort of behavior, that is perhaps the best response without systemic changes. And it is precisely the focus of this particular forum. 

GWW (Girl Writes What) states some very important points in relation to Systemic Gender Violence. That entire mentality that has been instituted by feminists into every walk of live, soon it will be in every society.
Only female comfort is important and men's anything is totally irrelevant..

Having exposed the lunatic rantings from the RADFEM Hub and the ongoing exposure of radical feminists, denied and ignored by supposed "fun" feminists, even though they support that movement in every fashion. Be it financially, legally and morally, including white knighted males and ignorant enablers, who prefer to ignore the violence that feminism introduces across our entire society.Those supporters should to be held just as accountable as those radical feminists..

Their support ensures those anti-male laws are excepted and legalised. Their efforts are on par, as they live in denial, but still claim that there is no bias or male hate promoted. Those people are the result of feminist doctrinal training that ignores anything that does not support one sex and thereby ignores and blatantly introduces sexism and discrimination against the other. They still refuse to accept that obvious and blatant fact..

 One comment made in relation to this video apart from it's expose of the feminist hate movement and it's mindset. "Is this video too little,too late", to even slow the systemic bias and hate introduced. Unless politicians and political parties are informed or are told to stop ignoring men's issues maybe we can stop those radicals from completely destroying society and turning every nation into another Sweden..

 I would urge all viewers to use the links to this site and the RADFEM Exposed site to spread the message whenever and wherever you can. Unless people are informed, they will never be aware of the monstrous actions of this movement, that feminists and their enablers are taking under the guise of equality, when it is blatantly obvious that it has never been the case or their aim..


Australia's Feminist Gillard..
As we have witnessed the unending loathing and hate generating feminism at work, this is supposed to be an equal opportunity movement but instead it's more about extermination, child murdering, terrorism while encouraging the bombing of Men's Sheds around the world. These feminists are not a minority, they are precisely what Feminism is all about. It is a hate movement of such proportions that one would have to wonder why anyone would regard themselves being any type of feminist at all..

It is now the excepted fact that Feminism is as far from equality than a certain dictator was admiring the athletic ability of Jesse Owens. Feminism does not deserve any support or attention as this is primarily what that hate movement is all about..

A recent example of the interest those haters have received and the ongoing attention they will warrant is indicated here on this sample screen image. They are few, as their hit rates indicate..



Abuse

A call to mothers to stop killing their children

Iam sure by now you’ve all heard of the rather strange ‘White Ribbon Campaign’, which is also known as the ‘International Day for the Eradication of Violence Against Women.’ This campaign asks that men and boys take an oath in front of others that goes something like “I swear never to commit, excuse or remain silent about violence against women.”[1] In many cases, on college campuses around the world, groups of White Ribbon activists walk around with a basket of white pins, seeking out any man that passes their way, confronting them and then demand that they take this pledge.
Of course women are not expected to take a similar oath, even though in the Western world women are just as likely as men to commit domestic violence towards their partner, and women are three times more likely then men to physically abuse, neglect or murder children in their care.[2][3][4] Furthermore, men are almost six times more likely to be the victim of a violent assault and almost four times as likely to be the victim of a homicide.[5][6]
Since feminists seem to be pushing this campaign rather hard, and receiving so much media attention, I have a few questions that never seem to get answered. Why are men who are the victim of violence viewed as less as important than women who are the victim of violence? Why don’t we also have another ribbon campaign where women pledge not to abuse, neglect or murder their children? Why not also have them take a pledge to not commit domestic violence against men?
In an even more bizarre twist, a new organization has appeared that bills itself as ‘A Call to Men: Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’. On the front page of their professional website is what I can only describe as a bizarre picture, where a group of men, all wearing white shirts, stare blankly into the camera. Underneath this picture that is ‘straight out of a John Waters movie, is their mission and purpose statement:
To galvanize a national movement of men committed to ending violence and discrimination against women and girls.
To influence change in men’s behavior through a re-education and training process that promotes healthy manhood.
To shift social norms defining manhood in our culture
A CALL TO MEN believes that preventing domestic and sexual violence is primarily the responsibility of men. Although historically it has been almost entirely women who have been at the forefront addressing this issue, we think it is essential that men play a primary role in the solution. To do that, well-meaning men…men who, for the most part don’t see themselves as part of the problem…need to get involved.[8]
A Call to Men’s 10 Step Program[7]

Wait, what? Shouldn’t ending violence be the responsibility of both sexes; I mean isn’t violence a human problem? Furthermore, why should some organization take it upon themselves to tell me that I need to redefine my manhood in order to stop harming women? I’ve never abused a man nor a woman in my life,  and indeed most men in our society haven’t abused anyone either. Not only am I supposed to take an oath to not commit a criminal act just because I am a man, they think I need to be “re-educated” about how I define myself as a man, and go through a “training process” to show me what a “healthy manhood” is like. If this isn’t some radical misandric garbage, then I don’t know what is.
Here is what I think about all this. First, these groups, the White Ribbon Campaign and A Call to Men, should go to the grave sides of the 12,000 men who are murdered in the US each year, and give an oath to remember that their lives were just as precious and just as valuable as any other life. Next, since they insist on making this issue about sex, rather than the criminals that perpetrate the violence, I’d ask these groups, as well as the people who passed the various Violence Against Women’s Acts around the world, to go to the grave sides of all the children murdered by their mothers and make an oath to remember that women can be just as violent and deadly as men.
Furthermore, they should track down the endless numbers of men who were, or are, being abused in a relationship by a women, but are too afraid to come forward because society doesn’t think men are as valuable as women, and take an oath to them that their physical and emotional pain is just as imp0rtant as the pain of women. Oh, and don’t forget the tens of thousands of men who are raped in prison each year, but receive neither justice nor physical or emotional support.
I don’t need any organization, government nor university to attempt to define who I am as a man, and I certainly don’t need to be guilted into taking an oath to NOT become a criminal. All human life is valuable, and one sex is NOT more expendable than the other sex.  Men are human beings for God’s sake, not some problem that needs to be solved.
***A Call to Men is run by an organization calling itself the ‘National Association of Men and Women Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’ and is part of a larger group called ‘Tides’. Tides is a very large and well funded foundation that considers itself a group that works toward “positive social change.”[9]


[1]http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2011/white-ribbon-day-my-oath/
[2]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table4_5.htm
[3]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table5_1.htm
[4]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/natl_incid/reports/natl_incid/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf
[5]http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/gender.cfm
[6]http://www.infoplease.com/us/statistics/murder-victims.html
[7]http://www.acalltomen.com/page.php?id=51
[8]http://www.acalltomen.com/index.php
[9]http://www.tides.org/about/board/

The Men's Rights Movement..
Part of the problem with fighting for the rights of Men is the total frustration the we encounter when we think that nothing much is happening. The same frustration felt when Fathers face family courts and watch their children taken away by an uncaring and contrived system who claim to act for the best interest of the children. Nothing is ofcourse farther from the truth. That same frustration hits Men's Rights Activists and it can change their attitude or even stop them from proceeding.

What most people do not see is the forest for the trees. I told you I like them metaphors. Seriously, when one stands back and has a good look at what is happening now compared to what was happening over the last five years, one would be proud, one would notice the overall change in attitude and the feminasties are well aware of it and their desperation is showing. Canadian Feminists tried to ban all Men's Rights sites on the web as they were getting too much correction on their lies and misinformation. Their desperation was glowing red. One main act of desperation on feminisms part was the introduction of the "Good Men Project", a comical farce introduced by feminists to try and halt the rise of forums and sites aimed at men. That site was introduced in order to raise the level of hypocrisy and false information that feminists were already introducing on a daily level. But it was too little, too late..

Feminism has already lost and now they are just trying to save some semblance of their hegemony so the funding will continue to flow and even that will come to an end as the country can no longer afford the billions to support their lunacy and sexist practises..

The other obvious method used to gauge whether or not feminism and their male hating messaging is on the decline is what happens when companies generate "male hate" advertising and how the general public responds to it. This is not anything that is confessed or stated, no company wants to admit that they got their message wrong and alienated their customers but this is exactly what happened with PepsiCO..

A Lesson for PEPSICO..

There are millions of men who are resentful of the misandry for every member who spends time on MRA web sites. For example, last February PepsiCo ran a men bashing commercial on the Superbowl broadcast. The cows who run PepsiCo thought it was "funny" to have men being humiliated and kicked in the nuts. They blew off the few hundred of us who wrote to them about their misandry. But within 2 months a million men had switched brands. Pepsi sales dropped to 3rd place in cola behind Coke and Diet Coke. The drop in sales had only cost them about $3,000,000 for a couple of minutes bashing men on Superbowl. 

It is an old truth taught in Business classes at Universities. For every customer who complains there are more than 100 who just go buy somewhere else. The moral taught in business school is that every single customer complaint is a serious representation of a big mistake by the company and should be listened to because managers will never hear from the mass of unhappy customers. PepsiCo learned that lesson the hard way when they ignored those of us who took time to complain about their misandry. Politicians and young women are behind the curve listening, but are suffering the consequences for their deafness.

What I'm saying is that for every one of the hundred thousand men who read MRA sites daily, there are a hundred, or a thousand, or a million other men who live in frustration with femiNazi dominated society, who are turning away from companies, products, and politicians that promote feminist misandry. We are winning in the hearts and minds of MEN. Keep up the good work.
H/T Bob..

The Feminist Waaaaaaahmbulance...
Feminism's Conformational Bias..

Feminists end goal of neutering males has always been present. Their endless mudslinging efforts about male violence has always been presented as being toxic and everything should be done to change male behaviour, even if it means to introduce new laws specifically aimed at masculinity..

The problem with feminism's claim about men is that they refuse to except the fact that females are capable of violence as well. When claiming that ignorance, feminists work from a level of zero violence when referring to women and then lay claim that only one sex is capable of using force in order to fulfil any mission..
Claiming that men are violent and women are not just re-establishes their stereotypical attitude towards males, making it glaringly obvious about how sexist their viewpoint really is. The other issue they refuse to face is also the use of force that women demand from men in order for them to feel safe and dominate any critic. By demanding endless protective laws and demanding and utilising state control and use of violence against males only demonstrates their innate bias. It is not that coercion or control is the issue but that feminists themselves are of the opinion that only they should control it..
Nope, feminists say "women are not violent", Check..
The endless denial that women are not violent plays into this charade. The end result is only to ensure that females control the violence as they have done from the word go. How many times have you witnessed females demanding action or demanding that males carry out their violent demands while at the same time live in denial about taken or demanding that action. The other issue being that males raised in single mom homes have already been studied and demonstrated that without a male mentor to teach behaviour and self control, that sibling will end up even more violent than would normally be the case. Another feminist achievement..

Feminists live in denial about their own situation as well, where their own agitators went about violently, actively introducing their own level of violence to achieve their end. They even resorted to coercion, threats and bombing establishments in order to promote their message. While the violence levels by men has dropped exponentially over the past few decades, female violence has increased by an astounding 255% according to one study in England. Bear in mind also that they are pointing the finger at a minutiae of the population who resort to violence and blatantly ignore the majority of peace loving individuals whose last resort would be to ever take that course of action..

It has all be orchestrated by feminists to once again introduce control and abeyance onto the male population which has always been their aim, while at the same time put up that mystical picture of females being the peace loving, nurturing individuals which they most certainly are not..
Non-violent females..
One only has to view that video out of Sweden to determine how violent females can be and how feminist females promote violence, to see where this is all heading. The entire argument is tired and has been bashed to death, feminisms hypocrisy on this subject is once again glaringly demonstrated.

Male hating feminists such as Cynthia Cockburn and Ann Oakley, have no issue at all about turning every country in the world to imitate the lunacy feminists have wrought in Sweden. That is their goal and aim. To neuter all men and boys, by violence if need be, while ending up with a sex that neither want them to be. 



Fourth Wave Feminism


Jack Donavan.
Author of "No Man's Land"..(free download)..



Feminists have nursed a perverse obsession with what men think and do for decades. They’ve had to, because the success of the feminist program has always been completely dependent on what bell hooks called “the will to change.” The female strategy has always been to nag and manipulate until men stop doing what men want to do and start doing what women want them to do.  Men caving and giving women what they want is as natural as salmon swimming upstream. It’s painful to watch but almost everyone does it eventually.
Industrialization, birth control, globalism and a First World shift to managerial and service economies allowed women to push past old boundaries and upend the balance between the sexes.
First Wave Feminists marched for the vote and property rights.  Feminists love marches, walks, and long candlelight vigils on the beach. Second Wave Feminists shouted “I am Woman” and stomped around for more exciting employment opportunities and the Gaia-given right to kill their babies.  Third Wave feminists stripped off the polyester pantsuits of yesteryear, got painted up like trash and went genderqueer.
Forth Wave feminism, already well underway, is a female coalitionary effort to control male behavior through public policy while wielding the threat of state-sponsored violence.
Feminists have long dreamed of a gender-neutral world of peaceful security, pleasure and plenty.  For years, they held to the idea that men and women were essentially the same and that traditional ideas about gender were as“lightly linked to sex as are the clothing, the manners, and the form of head-dress that a society at a given period assigns to either sex.” Patriarchal male culture could be blamed for all of the evil in the world, and our ancestors were all peaceful goddess-worshipping pansies.
Now that St. Margaret Mead has been all but discredited, only pink-haired stoners believe in peaceful prehistory, and “SCIENCE” keeps validating both tradition and common sense, feminist gender theory has run aground on the rocky shores of reality and punctured the hull of her Big-Boned Barbie cruise ship.
Feminists have needed to change directions to stay afloat, so they have slowly been conceding that men and women are, in fact, different. Today’s feminists brag about the things women do better than men.  The traveling sisterhood of the New Girl Order is proud that women have the kinds of traits that 21st century employers say they want.
Cynthia Cockburn and Ann Oakley want to you to understand that women are more peaceful than men, and men are more violent than women.
Men aren’t always content to march with candles; men are more likely to riot and loot. Oakley and Cockburn noted that 92% of the UK rioters this summer were male, and all of the rioters charged with violent offences were male. Cockburn and colleague then reported that men were responsible for 87% of traffic offences and 81% of speeding offenses. Citing prison statistics, they suggested that if men committed crimes leading to custodial sentences at the rate women did, their nation could save about £3.4 billion every year.
Cockburn and Oakley concluded with some conflicting commentary about testosterone and violence.
First, Cockburn and Oakley explained that, according to SCIENCE, testosterone is associated with status-seeking, but not necessarily with violence.
I’ve read the same studies and this may in fact be true. They failed to address the logical progression of status competition. As I’ve written,violence is golden because while it may not be the only way to resolve a given conflict, it is a definitive way to resolve a conflict. Violence beckons from the end of a path of escalation. You can beat me at checkers 30 times in a row, but somewhere in my frustrated gut I know that if I stand up and shoot you in the face, I win.  Game over. Violence is “the nuclear option.”
Violence is not merely a criminal or “anti-social” action. The use of force against criminals is merely the violence of the many against the one, disguised by the pretense of “justice.”
The same logic of escalation plays out in state vs. citizen conflicts. Even the most soft-spoken regime must carry a big stick. For instance, a gay liberal mayor can ask some protesters nicely again and again to stop camping in the park, but if they refuse again and again, eventually some kind of physical action—however “non lethal”—will be required to restore order.  Likewise, if kids are going to sit in the road and block traffic, eventually you have tobreak out the pepper spray and “negotiate” more aggressively.
There may be more chemical links between maleness and violence, but since Cockburn and Oakley are willing to accept that testosterone increases status competition, one could simply say that:
Male violence is the continuation of status competition by other means. (h/t Clausewitz)
After saying that testosterone doesn’t have to increase violence, for good measure Cockburn and Oakley suggest ways that male testosterone can be influenced.
Here’s the whole quote:
Testosterone, the male hormone, the “metaphor of manhood”, is portrayed as driving men inexorably towards aggressive behaviour. Yet studies show that testosterone is related to status-seeking but not directly to aggression. Many other factors are influential. Testosterone levels are increased or diminished in both males and females by diet, activity and circumstance. The opportunity to interact with guns, for instance, appears to increase testosterone, while men’s testosterone levels fall when they are involved with the care of children.
The case we are making is that certain widespread masculine traits and behaviours are dangerous and costly both to individuals and society. They are amenable to purposeful change. The culture of masculinity can be, and should be, addressed as a policy issue.
Some researchers believe that the average man’s testosterone level has plummeted over the past 20 years.  According to the MAYO clinic, normal testosterone levels help men maintain healthy bone density, fat distribution, muscle strength and mass, red blood cell production, sex drive and sperm produc tion. Testosterone can be increased naturally through weight training, and while most men experience a gradual decline in testosterone after age thirty, evidence suggests that weight training can help men can keep their levels higher for longer and possibly stave off some of the negative effects of aging. Unusually low testosterone levels in men are associated withcoronary artery disease, aortic atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, and depression.
Policy initiatives aimed at pacifying men by lowering male testosterone are a kindler, gentler alternative to castration, with the same net effect.  Men will have lower sex drives, lower sperm counts, and they will more often be fat, depressed and diabetic.  Feminist dreams of sleek, gender-neutral utopias will inevitably lead to more doughy bonobos and chunky Chaz Bonos playing out their endless manic-depressive melodramas in a big bean-flicking circle of sterility, sickness and desperation.
As far as I can tell, we’re half way there already.




  


Feminist Dictionary

Men seeking equal treatment = “backlash“
Women seeking equal treatment = “feminism“
Discrimination against men = “equal opportunity“
Discrimination against women = “discrimination“
A woman with grievances = “victim“
A man with grievances = “angry“
Open discussion of gender issues = “misogyny“
Men looking for equal treatment in the courts = “abuse“
Consensual sex between a man and woman = “rape“
Heated discussion between a man and woman = “domestic violence“
Women receiving preferential treatment/privileges = “equality“
A numeric majority of the human species = “minority“
Any woman = “victim“
Any man = “oppressor“
Any child = “property“
A woman talking about hating men = “empowerment“
A man talking about hating women = “hate speech“
A sexually predatory woman dressed like a hooker = “liberation“
A man with any interest in sex = “rapist“
A woman who wants to be with her children = “mother“
A man who wants to be with his children = “abuser“
A woman who forces children under her care/authority into sex = “the child was lucky“
A man who forces children under his care/authority into sex = “pedophile“




A shelter providing emergency services to abused women = “women’s shelter“
A shelter providing any services to abused men = “prison“
Female genital mutilation = “sexual repression“
Male genital mutilation = “acceptable custom that protects women from HIV“
A man assaulting a women = “(domestic) violence“
A woman assaulting a man = “humor“
A man who beats his female partner = “batterer“
A woman who beats her male partner = “victim“
A disposable slave = “man“
A human being = “woman“
Hating women = “a crime“
Hating men = “‘a viable political act’“
Distorting or lying about reality = “feminist analysis“
Biology = “lies“
Reality = “discrimination“
Any power a man has = “patriarchy“
Any power a woman has = “empowerment“
Pornography pleasing to lesbians = “erotica“
Pornography pleasing to men = “exploitation and degradation of women“
Person who says feminists are wrong = “hate criminal“
Woman-firster and advocator of any measure against men = “feminist“
Patriarchy = “bad“
Matriarchy = “good“
Male leader = “backwards“
Female leader = “improvement“




Pro-lesbianism and female, anti-male = “feminist ideology“
Same standards, honest competition = “unfair“
Female sexuality = “nurturing“
Male sexuality = “objectifying“
Female virgin = “pure“
Male virgin = “pathetic“
Female modesty = “noble“
Male modesty = “creepy“
Pandering to male audiences = “sexism“
Pandering to female audiences = “fulfilling a niche“
Women standing up for themselves = “empowerment“
Men standing up for themselves = “chauvinism“
Woman proud of her appearance = “confident“
Man proud of his appearance = “vain“
Innate female advantages = “complementary“
Innate male advantages = “sexist“
Women’s space = “safe haven“
Men’s space = “patriarchal breeding ground“
Women discussing their issues = “ therapeutic“
Men discussing their issues = “whining“
Female intellect = “pioneering“
Male intellect = “masturbatory“
Man obeying a women = “respect“
Women obeying a man = “slavery“
Men being sexually critical = “shallow“
Women being sexually critical = “having standards“
Female rage = “indignation“
Male rage = “insecurity“
Male abuse of power = “direct consequence of patriarchy“
Female abuse of power = “indirect consequence of patriarchy“
Unemployed woman = “homemaker“
Unemployed man = “loser“
Female indulgence = “happiness“
Male indulgence = “selfishness”

H/t Rajesh V.

Some issues regarding this article, has the general consensus just changed or what is going on here. We have for years proven beyond denial that females are as abusive as their partners are and we can even produce a study by Fiebert to prove just that.
But those facts have met a stone wall while feminists and their minions refuse to accept the proffered information and continue on their usual misinformed path of "all women are victims" and yet here we have additional proof that the same sex they claim to be major victims, are in actual fact perpetrators as well. When will that finally end up in recognised facts and figures and introduced into those biased government bodies and departments..

The entire Domestic Violence issue is just a gigantic farce as long as they deny that women are more than just victims..
 59 percent said they had perpetrated some kind of violence against a partner. Those rates were similar in boys and girls,
 but girls were much more likely to fear getting seriously injured,
she said. "We can't just focus on girls as victims."
Those statements of facts will go down like a ton of bricks where the feminised, pro-female, abuse industry is concerned, that would mean changing that latest "all men are guilty" recommendation that Obama's shrews just introduced into colleges and universities. That would be too hard I would imagine and it would also reduce the copious funding they receive from the federal government for pretending they give a damn..


Here is one of those unarguable studies that has been around for years and everyone in the abuse industry has chosen to ignore.  It just does not fit into their biased mindset. Cannot go about admitting they were wrong, how could they..




Martin S. Fiebert
Department of Psychology
California State University, Long Beach
 

Last updated: May 2011


SUMMARY:  This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800.

A few examples..LINK.



  "Anderson, K. L. (2002).  Perpetrator or victim?  Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being.  Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 851-863.  (Data consisted of 7,395 married and cohabiting heterosexual couples drawn from wave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households <NSFH-1>.  In terms of measures: subjects were asked "how many arguments during the past year resulted in 'you hitting, shoving or throwing things at a partner.'  They were also asked how many arguments ended with their partner, 'hitting, shoving or throwing things at you.'"  Author reports that, "victimization rates are slightly higher among men than women <9% vs 7%> and in cases that involve perpetration by only one partner, more women than men were identified as perpetrators <2% vs 1%>.")


   Archer, J. (2006).  Cross cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis.  Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 133-153.  (A review article which suggests that "women's empowerment is associated with lower victimisation rates from their partners."  Greater individualism and empowerment by women, however, are also associated with higher perpetration rates.)"

So, one wonders how long it will take this to filter through the corridors of denial and ignorance. That massive multibillion dollar monster that have decided the feminist doctrine is beyond questioning, for all it's lies and manufactured vilification against our sex, that was accepted as fact and not here-say. Taken up and accepted by those people who claim to give a damn and are paid accordingly. Fascinatingly, whenever we read these reports, the facts somehow get lost and the pro-female bias corrected, further up the pay chain it goes..

So we wait and wonder for the pretenders to stop and finally make a difference rather than just filling office space and placing bums on seats..


Dating violence common among teens in the ER: study

By Genevra Pittman
NEW YORK | Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:16pm GMT

(Reuters Health) - More than half of teens and young adults treated at an inner-city emergency room said they had experienced dating violence, either as a victim or a perpetrator, in a new study.
The abuse includes both physical and sexual violence, from hitting and kicking to forced sex.
Both girls and boys reported high rates of partner violence, but girls were much more likely to fear getting seriously injured, researchers reported in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
"We all know this exists, now what do you do about it?" said study author Dr. Bronwen Carroll, from Boston Medical Center, where the study was conducted.
She noted that many of the adolescents didn't think they needed help, and only a few followed up on resources for victims of violence provided by the researchers.
The findings point to a need for programs specifically designed to help teen violence victims and perpetrators, Carroll said, as well as for all adults -- teachers, parents and doctors -- to do more to recognize and prevent dating violence.
MOST EXPERIENCED VIOLENCE
Carroll and her colleagues conducted their study at an ER that sees mostly poor, African American kids and teens with government-funded insurance. They knew that many adolescents came in because of substance abuse, mental health problems or unplanned pregnancy -- all of which may be linked to partner violence.
So the researchers surveyed 327 adolescents between age 13 and 21, all of whom were or had been in a romantic or sexual relationship, about violence, aggression or coercion that had happened in those relationships.
About 55 percent of the adolescents said they had been the victim of physical or sexual violence, and 59 percent said they had perpetrated some kind of violence against a partner. Those rates were similar in boys and girls, though girls were more likely to report being physically violent toward a partner.
The researchers said the findings wouldn't necessarily apply to other groups of adolescents, and the rates of violence reported are higher than what other studies have shown in surveys of high school students, for example.
Donna Howard, who studies adolescent risk behavior at the University of Maryland in College Park but wasn't part of the current research team, pointed out that all adolescents in the study had a history of dating, and that this hospital sees vulnerable, at-risk patients with a high proportion of violent injuries. The average age of these adolescents -- almost 19 -- also means more are likely to report a history of dating violence at some point, she told Reuters Health in an email.
DIFFERENT KINDS OF VIOLENCE
Despite more girls reporting being physically violent themselves, 16 percent of all girls said they were scared of sustaining a serious injury as a result of dating violence, compared to just three percent of boys surveyed.
"Both boys and girls perpetrate violence and sometimes girls perpetrate more violence," Carroll said. But, she added, "It is an enormous mistake to fall into the trap of equating those types of violence."
"The violence that is perpetrated on girls is much more severe," agreed Dr. Brian Wagers, an emergency medicine doctor who studies dating violence at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. "The injuries sustained on girls are much more severe, much more frequent."
Still, that doesn't mean violence against boys should be ignored, said Wagers, who wasn't involved in the new study. Healthcare workers need to be aware that boys may be victims too, and encourage them to seek help, he told Reuters Health.
"When boys experience it, they need to realize that this is not something that's right."
Howard echoed that sentiment.
"The toll dating violence takes on male victims, both emotionally and physically, and the extent to which victimization experiences affect subsequent dating behavior, including dating violence perpetration during adolescence and into adulthood, needs more research attention," she said. "We can't just focus on girls as victims."
GETTING HELP
Carroll's team gave all victims of violence a list of local dating-violence services where they could get help. But a month after their ER visit, only four out of 127 who were contacted again said they'd reached out to any of those resources. And two-thirds of those who didn't told interviewers they didn't think they needed any help.
"What they said was that they didn't perceive themselves as having problems that need help, and that's really concerning. (That) speaks to how common this is, and I fear that there may be some degree of normalization and they may not realize what a healthy relationship looks like," Carroll told Reuters Health.
"This is quite alarming," Howard agreed.
Carroll said that many at-risk adolescents may look around and see adults and their peers involved in relationships where physical or sexual violence or coercion also occurs.
Because of that, it's even more important for not just pediatricians, but parents and teachers as well, to talk with teens about dating violence whenever it might be a concern.
"We need to be aware about this, we need to ask. My guess is that just a meaningful discussion for an adolescent with an adult that he or she trusts about, 'What does a healthy relationship look like?' can go a long way," Carroll said.
SOURCE: bit.ly/vv8Dka Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, online December 5, 2011



The end of year school report card is not looking too healthy as we investigate some of feminism's efforts and claims, that bites them right where it hurts, the bank account, dignity, culpability and accountability for their effort..

Originally made by those seriously corrupted and self inflicting, non-emolience hegemony's claims are placed under the microscope of reality..

1. "Don't need no man", this statement ran lyrical with the lesbian feminists as it just states the obvious. Noting how lesbians cater to each others penchant for BDSM, plus other pain inducing activities, finding a partner of the opposite sex to join in their arrangements,  was deemed impossible.
Ofcourse the rest of the population just ignored their irrelevant rantings and went on their merry way and left them with some explaining to do, while abuse workshops were compulsory attended in the hope they might forget to administer their usual caring and sharing mentality..

Mark 0 out of 10

Misandric Queen Dowd..
2. "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" really belongs with the above comment as it was meant to be as offensive as a similar comment made by Maureen Dowd's myopic piece of misandry named tome "are men necessary". The answer was too slow in coming for Dowd as she started complaining about not having anyone to date under the guise that "men don't like strong women", the standard dysfunctional response from any female who has problems finding a companion. Dowd ofcourse would have that same issue as feminists like herself do, they are about as interesting as drinking the last week's bathwater but Dowd doesn't know how to change from just being a mean spirited bitch. Feminism has that affect on the opposite sex as one has to make room for all those chips on their shoulders..

Mark -1 out of 10

3. 'A woman would never lie about rape", whoa, I may just let you read that again and wonder how anyone could be stupid enough to allow the brain to force that comment to verbally escape the orifice. Needless to say that it has kept copious people employed, proving beyond doubt that feminists do actually escape from their other dimension and expose to the world their very own self improved version of waxing nonsensically, lyrical..

Mark 0 out of 10

4. "A woman can do anything a man can" except participate on a level playing field. Better add to that a copious amount of other facts as well. Sadly, in their effort to compete with men, women have lost their own identity and now wonder why misery and loneliness makes up their ever increasing, privileged lifestyles. After changing everything possible in the work place, demanding equal pay for less work and effort, ensuring automatic promotion when not warranted, lowering every possible standard in order to"compete" with men. We have the final admittance that their life sucks and now refuse to join in on the fun of being a wage slave. Their burnout rate is now set at thirty, that picket fence and those rugrats that feminists screamed at them to not want, occupies them more then ever. Meanwhile the guys are standing back, sipping their beer and going, mmmmm, let me think about it!!

Mark 1 out of 10

6. "Takes a village to raise a child", those famous words were rabbited by marxist, feminist puppeteer, Hillary Clinton, claiming ofcourse that old marxist maxim of not needing a family and better yet, no Father. Unfortunately too many incarcerated, drug addicted, gang members were drawing on their non-filtered gunge-sticks while pregnant, to realise what it was they were saying. But 51 percent of the female breeding population thought it was a great idea as it guaranteed copious government largesse and automatic withdrawals from someone else's ATM and credit card. That should have worked well except they were spending way too many hours in the company of their spawn and ensured the abuse rate increased exponentially and thereby winning the competition, if there was ever one..

Mark 0 out of 10

7.  "Women are not sex object" would have to be the most confusing statement ever made. One has to wonder whether or not they are just having a joke at our expense. It's a bit like the "slutwalk" mentality where dressing up as a slut would not set any precedence, traipsing around flashing boobs and skin is apparently meaningless, dressing in fashionable clothing along with makeup, perfume, Victorias little secret accessories, does not enter that argument at all. Behaving in any fashion without responsibility or accountability was demanded to be standard practise. But entering an elevator and breathing the same air or looking more than one third of a second too long, must be deemed to be abuse. New accessories will have to be stopwatches with microsecond measurements..

Mark 0 out of 10
Total = Nada..

If you changed the sex and had the boyfriend smack the abuser on public television, he would have been dragged out on his back, thrown into a police van and thrown in jail until someone actually remembered he was there..This is the hypocrisy that we face today. Lay even a feather on any privileged princess and you are toast, women can smack at will, mutilate any male in full view and recorded on video as evidence and not one single charge is laid. How often have we witnessed this double standard and how much longer do we have to put up with this blatant sexist bias. It stinks to high heaven..

 Kardashian should be charged and face accountability for it's abusive behaviour as this signals to all and sundry that it's funny to be an abuser or in reality, no one gives a stuff including those law officers who are paid to do so..

Dereliction of duty only applies when princesses are involved..


Dr. Drew calls Kim Kardashian punch 'domestic violence'

Last Updated: 5:14 PM, November 30, 2011
Posted: 5:03 PM, November 30, 2011


When Kim Kardashian punched her then-husband Kris Humphries in the arm during Sunday night's season premiere of "Kourtney & Kim Take Manhattan," Dr. Drew believes it was "domestic violence."
"What you are seeing there is domestic violence," says the "Celebrity Rehab" doc, while reviewing the footage on his new show, "HLN's Dr. Drew." "A lot of people watching this may not understand this. And I get that. It looks playful. What's the big deal? But it's a massive deal ... This is an incontrovertible piece of evidence of someone engaged in a domestic violence relationship."



WIREIMAGE
Dr. Drew Pinsky calls this a moment of "domestic violence."

E!
Kim Kardashian punches Kris Humphries' arm.
In the scene Pinsky pointed to, Humphries attempts to pick up Kardashian and in the process steps on her toe. Kardashian becomes enraged.
"You ruined my whole pedicure. Seriously, my whole toenail just broke in half. It hurts, Kris. You always do this (bleep) to me because you're so rough," she yells before taking a swing, with all her force, at Humphries' arm.
Because Kardashian is a petite 5-foot-2 while Humphries is a giant 6-foot-9, the punch landed without so much an "ouch." Still, Pinsky says the footage is shocking.
"Anybody viewing this has to understand the spectrum of domestic violence," charges Pinsky. "When it starts like that, and it always starts like that … it progresses. The size and gender doesn't matter. It goes to a horrible place."
But of course Humphries is not innocent in this.
"Look at the way Kris is grabbing her," says Pinsky. "That`s not OK."
In several scenes, Humphries seems not to have a clear understanding of how big and strong a human being he is. In another moment, he picks Kardashian up and throws her on the bed, falling on top of her. The couple giggles as it happens, but Pinsky still feels it is a warning sign.
"Even if it's ha ha, you have to be very aware of this stuff," says Pinsky. "People minimize this stuff until it gets to the emergency room. Then they wonder what happened."


Read more: