I need to put out a call to all men in OZ (Australia) who can supply me with a list or individual site names/links on Men's Activists and supporters in OZ..
The reason is ofcourse simple, we have to gather our forces, combine our efforts and go about kicking some serious arse..
If you know of anyone, or are part of any site/organisation(not listed on the web), please send me the information via this address (have to keep the spammers away with this temporary listed mail address which is mensactivismoz at the Gmail dot com..pany)..
Any assistance would be a great help. I do already have a few of the main "fighters" like father4families, mensrights etc. but I would like to start from scratch. Even use my comments section to supply information as all comments are moderated before they are published and I will pick it up from there..
Thank you in advance. This will go a log way to ending the feminist tyranny currently flooding Australian Politics, which will eventually sweep the rest of the planet..
We have already found feminists working in Australia are from all over the world. We stop them here and they will not be able to practise and promote their hate movement anywhere else.
We will cast this sexist, racist female in the "The World would be a better place if run by women" category and why not. What a dishonest, nasty piece of work this woman really is, but I suggest you make your own decision and then ask yourself the same question that feminists have been promoting for so long!
| Don't even think about defending yourself as you will go to jail without question. Women can abuse at will. |
One wonders if anything else dares to break through that heightened wall of victimhood. But alas, we have a slight clearance in the fog as a request is forwarded for some input into issues apart from their own mountain of doom..
One does have to be carful whenever asking this question as the response may not be what one expects. Once the floodgates are opened there will be no closing them again.
My response to this question would simply be to direct the request here (the online compendium of Men's Issues) . All or most of the issues are covered, it is still in the process of being updated as TDOM has stated. But it does give the gist of what is ailing society today and where the sexism, discrimination and bias really is..
So we have this request..
AW - Greetings and salutations, forum members!Maybe a few of the followers or readers may like to express their opinion and respond to the question and I will update as we go along. Meanwhile, here are a few responses on that forum where the question was originally posed..
A few disclaimers:1. I'm an American woman, but I'm not here to promote myself. I'm telling you to put my post in context.2. I don't want to pull focus from the issues. If you find my post disruptive, I'll take a hint from the silence and leave.3. This forum is primarily for men to exchange ideas, rant, and support one another. I've posted under "Opposing Views" out of respect for that mission, not to challenge it.4. These disclaimers aren't to paint myself as a good American woman; I just worry about not saying exactly what I mean. My apologies if it sounds tedious or self-promoting.
I'm not so much posting from an opposing view but a limited view. I appreciate men's plight, but I as a woman can never fully understand it. And since words don't do much, I want to actively address whatever sexism I see -- walk the walk, I suppose. Of course, there are probably thousands of little sexisms I don't pick up on. I can pay my half at meals, write letters advocating against false rape charges, etc -- but there's probably so many things I won't catch from my perspective.
So here's my question: aside from major issues like paternity fraud and women using sex as leverage, what small acts of misandry to you see regularly? And how can well-meaning women avoid them -- as girlfriends, sisters, coworkers, wives, etc? We can't make things equal, but we can still do our best to be fair.
You now have the floor. I greatly appreciate any and all contributions (and will understand if I receive none).
Opening Pandora's Box..
Man 1 - Seen any MacDonald's ads recently?
AW - I haven't seen any McDonald's ads recently. Is one you're referring to available online?
Man 2 -How about all the Progressive ads on TV with cute, lovable Flo and the men who come in her insurance store? They're always fat, balding, and wearing glasses except for one male character I saw. And they're always shown as either sexist, stupid, crazy or amazingly immature, while the female customers are always attractive and witty and mature. Think how feminists would react if it were the reverse.
Or how about the sit-coms on TV today which almost all follow the "Simpson's" formula, with the husband as totally incompetent and bumbling, cowardly, selfish and immature but their wives are intelligent and hard working, unselfish, etc.
Or the beer commercials, I forget the beer, where men go into a bar and are friendly with the pretty bar maid but she ridicules them mercilessly just because their pants aren't in style or they say the wrong thing. And they probably drink the wrong beer too.
And on and on. This is common is today's media. What effect does this have on young boys growing up today? How about news reports about a story where 20 male miners died in a tragic mine disaster? The reporters will never say it was 20 MEN who died. They'll say that 20 WORKERS died or that there were 20 VICTIMS of the disaster. But if there was one woman who got killed, all the reports would be "19 men and one woman killed". There's a great video about this on manwomanmyth.com, among many others that go into other topics, like how so many of the laws today are anti-male and pro-female, and how schools are biased against boys and toward girls.
The most common ones I see on a regular basis:
1. The appropriation of men as "useful objects" to women who are either lazy or have no interest in performing certain duties if they can simply require men to do these things for them. The examples of this are countless, but are not limited to "borrowing" money from men (which, in my experience, is almost never paid back), commanding men to carry heavy shit, making jokes about responsbilities that they simply pass off to men (IE telling their girlfriends "that's what men are for"), asking men to fill their shifts at work for no intrinsic benefit/reward, and asking men to fix things that they broke instead of using google to figure it out themselves.
2. Creating false dichotomies involving polar opposites of men where neither extreme is viewed favorable - like the niceguy/badboy. Women tend to denigrate both of these parties even though they are loosely defined and highly pidgeonholed, despite the tendency for American women to be attracted toward the latter group. In other words, men are always viewed as guilty/flawed even when he fits the bill perfectly. This is some combination of paranoia/entitlement among women, but it is clearly evident because women try to take advantage of even those men who they perceive to be the most attractive.
3. Using legal/social leverage to manipulate men through false allegations (if you don't do XYZ for me then I'll report you for crime/offense ABC). While this is rarer than the above two embodiments of misandry, it is perhaps the most foul. Since men are presumed to be guilty when their accuser is a woman (who often employs other friends or fake witnesses to persecute the man) it can be extremely difficult for a man to beat. Your post implies that you are somewhat familiar with this already, so I'll leave it there.
4. Intentional emotional abuse of men for personal sense of power. Taunting, nagging, manipulation, teasing/controlling men with sex, suggesting competition from other men and implying superiority are all part of this. Most men in relationships can reiterate this better than I can.
I personally do not see an easy solution to these dynamics because many of them are enforced legally (IE promoting women to divorce a rich man because its a faster way to wealth than working through the corporate ladder) and can therefore profit from the objectification and disposal of men. If individual men and women decide to genuinely reject this sort of behavior, that is perhaps the best response without systemic changes. And it is precisely the focus of this particular forum.
GWW (Girl Writes What) states some very important points in relation to Systemic Gender Violence. That entire mentality that has been instituted by feminists into every walk of live, soon it will be in every society.
Only female comfort is important and men's anything is totally irrelevant..
Having exposed the lunatic rantings from the RADFEM Hub and the ongoing exposure of radical feminists, denied and ignored by supposed "fun" feminists, even though they support that movement in every fashion. Be it financially, legally and morally, including white knighted males and ignorant enablers, who prefer to ignore the violence that feminism introduces across our entire society.Those supporters should to be held just as accountable as those radical feminists..
Their support ensures those anti-male laws are excepted and legalised. Their efforts are on par, as they live in denial, but still claim that there is no bias or male hate promoted. Those people are the result of feminist doctrinal training that ignores anything that does not support one sex and thereby ignores and blatantly introduces sexism and discrimination against the other. They still refuse to accept that obvious and blatant fact..
One comment made in relation to this video apart from it's expose of the feminist hate movement and it's mindset. "Is this video too little,too late", to even slow the systemic bias and hate introduced. Unless politicians and political parties are informed or are told to stop ignoring men's issues maybe we can stop those radicals from completely destroying society and turning every nation into another Sweden..
I would urge all viewers to use the links to this site and the RADFEM Exposed site to spread the message whenever and wherever you can. Unless people are informed, they will never be aware of the monstrous actions of this movement, that feminists and their enablers are taking under the guise of equality, when it is blatantly obvious that it has never been the case or their aim..
| Australia's Feminist Gillard.. |
It is now the excepted fact that Feminism is as far from equality than a certain dictator was admiring the athletic ability of Jesse Owens. Feminism does not deserve any support or attention as this is primarily what that hate movement is all about..
A recent example of the interest those haters have received and the ongoing attention they will warrant is indicated here on this sample screen image. They are few, as their hit rates indicate..
A call to mothers to stop killing their children
Of course women are not expected to take a similar oath, even though in the Western world women are just as likely as men to commit domestic violence towards their partner, and women are three times more likely then men to physically abuse, neglect or murder children in their care.[2][3][4] Furthermore, men are almost six times more likely to be the victim of a violent assault and almost four times as likely to be the victim of a homicide.[5][6]
Since feminists seem to be pushing this campaign rather hard, and receiving so much media attention, I have a few questions that never seem to get answered. Why are men who are the victim of violence viewed as less as important than women who are the victim of violence? Why don’t we also have another ribbon campaign where women pledge not to abuse, neglect or murder their children? Why not also have them take a pledge to not commit domestic violence against men?
In an even more bizarre twist, a new organization has appeared that bills itself as ‘A Call to Men: Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’. On the front page of their professional website is what I can only describe as a bizarre picture, where a group of men, all wearing white shirts, stare blankly into the camera. Underneath this picture that is ‘straight out of a John Waters movie, is their mission and purpose statement:
To galvanize a national movement of men committed to ending violence and discrimination against women and girls.A Call to Men’s 10 Step Program[7]
To influence change in men’s behavior through a re-education and training process that promotes healthy manhood.
To shift social norms defining manhood in our culture
A CALL TO MEN believes that preventing domestic and sexual violence is primarily the responsibility of men. Although historically it has been almost entirely women who have been at the forefront addressing this issue, we think it is essential that men play a primary role in the solution. To do that, well-meaning men…men who, for the most part don’t see themselves as part of the problem…need to get involved.[8]
Wait, what? Shouldn’t ending violence be the responsibility of both sexes; I mean isn’t violence a human problem? Furthermore, why should some organization take it upon themselves to tell me that I need to redefine my manhood in order to stop harming women? I’ve never abused a man nor a woman in my life, and indeed most men in our society haven’t abused anyone either. Not only am I supposed to take an oath to not commit a criminal act just because I am a man, they think I need to be “re-educated” about how I define myself as a man, and go through a “training process” to show me what a “healthy manhood” is like. If this isn’t some radical misandric garbage, then I don’t know what is.
Here is what I think about all this. First, these groups, the White Ribbon Campaign and A Call to Men, should go to the grave sides of the 12,000 men who are murdered in the US each year, and give an oath to remember that their lives were just as precious and just as valuable as any other life. Next, since they insist on making this issue about sex, rather than the criminals that perpetrate the violence, I’d ask these groups, as well as the people who passed the various Violence Against Women’s Acts around the world, to go to the grave sides of all the children murdered by their mothers and make an oath to remember that women can be just as violent and deadly as men.
Furthermore, they should track down the endless numbers of men who were, or are, being abused in a relationship by a women, but are too afraid to come forward because society doesn’t think men are as valuable as women, and take an oath to them that their physical and emotional pain is just as imp0rtant as the pain of women. Oh, and don’t forget the tens of thousands of men who are raped in prison each year, but receive neither justice nor physical or emotional support.
I don’t need any organization, government nor university to attempt to define who I am as a man, and I certainly don’t need to be guilted into taking an oath to NOT become a criminal. All human life is valuable, and one sex is NOT more expendable than the other sex. Men are human beings for God’s sake, not some problem that needs to be solved.
***A Call to Men is run by an organization calling itself the ‘National Association of Men and Women Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’ and is part of a larger group called ‘Tides’. Tides is a very large and well funded foundation that considers itself a group that works toward “positive social change.”[9]
[1]http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2011/white-ribbon-day-my-oath/
[2]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table4_5.htm
[3]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table5_1.htm
[4]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/natl_incid/reports/natl_incid/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf
[5]http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/gender.cfm
[6]http://www.infoplease.com/us/statistics/murder-victims.html
[7]http://www.acalltomen.com/page.php?id=51
[8]http://www.acalltomen.com/index.php
[9]http://www.tides.org/about/board/
Written byKyle Lovett
| The Men's Rights Movement.. |
What most people do not see is the forest for the trees. I told you I like them metaphors. Seriously, when one stands back and has a good look at what is happening now compared to what was happening over the last five years, one would be proud, one would notice the overall change in attitude and the feminasties are well aware of it and their desperation is showing. Canadian Feminists tried to ban all Men's Rights sites on the web as they were getting too much correction on their lies and misinformation. Their desperation was glowing red. One main act of desperation on feminisms part was the introduction of the "Good Men Project", a comical farce introduced by feminists to try and halt the rise of forums and sites aimed at men. That site was introduced in order to raise the level of hypocrisy and false information that feminists were already introducing on a daily level. But it was too little, too late..
Feminism has already lost and now they are just trying to save some semblance of their hegemony so the funding will continue to flow and even that will come to an end as the country can no longer afford the billions to support their lunacy and sexist practises..
The other obvious method used to gauge whether or not feminism and their male hating messaging is on the decline is what happens when companies generate "male hate" advertising and how the general public responds to it. This is not anything that is confessed or stated, no company wants to admit that they got their message wrong and alienated their customers but this is exactly what happened with PepsiCO..
There are millions of men who are resentful of the misandry for every member who spends time on MRA web sites. For example, last February PepsiCo ran a men bashing commercial on the Superbowl broadcast. The cows who run PepsiCo thought it was "funny" to have men being humiliated and kicked in the nuts. They blew off the few hundred of us who wrote to them about their misandry. But within 2 months a million men had switched brands. Pepsi sales dropped to 3rd place in cola behind Coke and Diet Coke. The drop in sales had only cost them about $3,000,000 for a couple of minutes bashing men on Superbowl.
It is an old truth taught in Business classes at Universities. For every customer who complains there are more than 100 who just go buy somewhere else. The moral taught in business school is that every single customer complaint is a serious representation of a big mistake by the company and should be listened to because managers will never hear from the mass of unhappy customers. PepsiCo learned that lesson the hard way when they ignored those of us who took time to complain about their misandry. Politicians and young women are behind the curve listening, but are suffering the consequences for their deafness.
What I'm saying is that for every one of the hundred thousand men who read MRA sites daily, there are a hundred, or a thousand, or a million other men who live in frustration with femiNazi dominated society, who are turning away from companies, products, and politicians that promote feminist misandry. We are winning in the hearts and minds of MEN. Keep up the good work.
H/T Bob..
| The Feminist Waaaaaaahmbulance... |
Feminists end goal of neutering males has always been present. Their endless mudslinging efforts about male violence has always been presented as being toxic and everything should be done to change male behaviour, even if it means to introduce new laws specifically aimed at masculinity..
The problem with feminism's claim about men is that they refuse to except the fact that females are capable of violence as well. When claiming that ignorance, feminists work from a level of zero violence when referring to women and then lay claim that only one sex is capable of using force in order to fulfil any mission..
Claiming that men are violent and women are not just re-establishes their stereotypical attitude towards males, making it glaringly obvious about how sexist their viewpoint really is. The other issue they refuse to face is also the use of force that women demand from men in order for them to feel safe and dominate any critic. By demanding endless protective laws and demanding and utilising state control and use of violence against males only demonstrates their innate bias. It is not that coercion or control is the issue but that feminists themselves are of the opinion that only they should control it..
| Nope, feminists say "women are not violent", Check.. |
Feminists live in denial about their own situation as well, where their own agitators went about violently, actively introducing their own level of violence to achieve their end. They even resorted to coercion, threats and bombing establishments in order to promote their message. While the violence levels by men has dropped exponentially over the past few decades, female violence has increased by an astounding 255% according to one study in England. Bear in mind also that they are pointing the finger at a minutiae of the population who resort to violence and blatantly ignore the majority of peace loving individuals whose last resort would be to ever take that course of action..
It has all be orchestrated by feminists to once again introduce control and abeyance onto the male population which has always been their aim, while at the same time put up that mystical picture of females being the peace loving, nurturing individuals which they most certainly are not..
| Non-violent females.. |
Male hating feminists such as Cynthia Cockburn and Ann Oakley, have no issue at all about turning every country in the world to imitate the lunacy feminists have wrought in Sweden. That is their goal and aim. To neuter all men and boys, by violence if need be, while ending up with a sex that neither want them to be.
Fourth Wave Feminism
Jack Donavan.
Author of "No Man's Land"..(free download)..
But those facts have met a stone wall while feminists and their minions refuse to accept the proffered information and continue on their usual misinformed path of "all women are victims" and yet here we have additional proof that the same sex they claim to be major victims, are in actual fact perpetrators as well. When will that finally end up in recognised facts and figures and introduced into those biased government bodies and departments..
The entire Domestic Violence issue is just a gigantic farce as long as they deny that women are more than just victims..
59 percent said they had perpetrated some kind of violence against a partner. Those rates were similar in boys and girls,
but girls were much more likely to fear getting seriously injured,
she said. "We can't just focus on girls as victims."Those statements of facts will go down like a ton of bricks where the feminised, pro-female, abuse industry is concerned, that would mean changing that latest "all men are guilty" recommendation that Obama's shrews just introduced into colleges and universities. That would be too hard I would imagine and it would also reduce the copious funding they receive from the federal government for pretending they give a damn..
Here is one of those unarguable studies that has been around for years and everyone in the abuse industry has chosen to ignore. It just does not fit into their biased mindset. Cannot go about admitting they were wrong, how could they..
Department of Psychology
California State University, Long Beach
Last updated: May 2011
| SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800. A few examples..LINK. |
"Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 851-863. (Data consisted of 7,395 married and cohabiting heterosexual couples drawn from wave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households <NSFH-1>. In terms of measures: subjects were asked "how many arguments during the past year resulted in 'you hitting, shoving or throwing things at a partner.' They were also asked how many arguments ended with their partner, 'hitting, shoving or throwing things at you.'" Author reports that, "victimization rates are slightly higher among men than women <9% vs 7%> and in cases that involve perpetration by only one partner, more women than men were identified as perpetrators <2% vs 1%>.")
Archer, J. (2006). Cross cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 133-153. (A review article which suggests that "women's empowerment is associated with lower victimisation rates from their partners." Greater individualism and empowerment by women, however, are also associated with higher perpetration rates.)"
So, one wonders how long it will take this to filter through the corridors of denial and ignorance. That massive multibillion dollar monster that have decided the feminist doctrine is beyond questioning, for all it's lies and manufactured vilification against our sex, that was accepted as fact and not here-say. Taken up and accepted by those people who claim to give a damn and are paid accordingly. Fascinatingly, whenever we read these reports, the facts somehow get lost and the pro-female bias corrected, further up the pay chain it goes..
So we wait and wonder for the pretenders to stop and finally make a difference rather than just filling office space and placing bums on seats..
Originally made by those seriously corrupted and self inflicting, non-emolience hegemony's claims are placed under the microscope of reality..
Ofcourse the rest of the population just ignored their irrelevant rantings and went on their merry way and left them with some explaining to do, while abuse workshops were compulsory attended in the hope they might forget to administer their usual caring and sharing mentality..
Mark 0 out of 10
| Misandric Queen Dowd.. |
Mark -1 out of 10
3. 'A woman would never lie about rape", whoa, I may just let you read that again and wonder how anyone could be stupid enough to allow the brain to force that comment to verbally escape the orifice. Needless to say that it has kept copious people employed, proving beyond doubt that feminists do actually escape from their other dimension and expose to the world their very own self improved version of waxing nonsensically, lyrical..
Mark 0 out of 10
4. "A woman can do anything a man can" except participate on a level playing field. Better add to that a copious amount of other facts as well. Sadly, in their effort to compete with men, women have lost their own identity and now wonder why misery and loneliness makes up their ever increasing, privileged lifestyles. After changing everything possible in the work place, demanding equal pay for less work and effort, ensuring automatic promotion when not warranted, lowering every possible standard in order to"compete" with men. We have the final admittance that their life sucks and now refuse to join in on the fun of being a wage slave. Their burnout rate is now set at thirty, that picket fence and those rugrats that feminists screamed at them to not want, occupies them more then ever. Meanwhile the guys are standing back, sipping their beer and going, mmmmm, let me think about it!!
Mark 1 out of 10
Mark 0 out of 10
7. "Women are not sex object" would have to be the most confusing statement ever made. One has to wonder whether or not they are just having a joke at our expense. It's a bit like the "slutwalk" mentality where dressing up as a slut would not set any precedence, traipsing around flashing boobs and skin is apparently meaningless, dressing in fashionable clothing along with makeup, perfume, Victorias little secret accessories, does not enter that argument at all. Behaving in any fashion without responsibility or accountability was demanded to be standard practise. But entering an elevator and breathing the same air or looking more than one third of a second too long, must be deemed to be abuse. New accessories will have to be stopwatches with microsecond measurements..
Mark 0 out of 10
Total = Nada..
Kardashian should be charged and face accountability for it's abusive behaviour as this signals to all and sundry that it's funny to be an abuser or in reality, no one gives a stuff including those law officers who are paid to do so..
Dereliction of duty only applies when princesses are involved..
Dr. Drew calls Kim Kardashian punch 'domestic violence'
Read more: