From the moment you make eye-contact with a woman, the next 45 seconds will reveal all you need to know about her feelings, experts say. Should she glance away and then back (top left) or bashfully look to the side (top right), it is a good sign she is interested in you. However, a look straight up to the heavens (bottom left) means a suitor has no chance. But if she turns her gaze downward and her eyes sweep the floor (bottom right), this is known as the 'holy grail' of signals and almost certainly means there is an attraction.
Link..

Well at least being fore-warned is fore-armed and one should at least take this stuff with a pitch of salt. A few years back, Allan Pease wrote a book called "Body Language" (a first) which showed the behaviour of people without even themselves being aware. It did open the door to a plethora of information about prospective mates and what to look for and when to walk away..

Now we have that equivalence for the opposite sex even though many other theories have been presented over the years. With women it was the flick of the hair and the rubbing of certain part of the anatomy that would indicate interest in the person they were communicating with. Now we have another example and one does wonder that once this information is released, whether or not steps will be taken at becoming even more robotic in order to hide any obvious signals. We will have to wait and see. This should be of major interest to the PUA gamers, as they will detect that signal earlier just to see how well they are doing and how successful they will be about getting into their knickers, which is ofcourse their original reason for their existence, as far as I am aware..

Anyway, more drivel to come..

Women and their money, it's everything..

Why female bosses frighten men 

Here we have another one of those snarky, slut feminist whiners and org. like Relationship Australia who have already been demonstrated to be a sexist and consistent male bashing organisation from way back. The fact that these type of women feel the need to brag, demonstrates once again how keen they are to push the feminastie hate speech as well have a good gloat which inturn just demonstrates how desperate they really are for recognition. It really is pathetic as we witness once again their needy demand for attention and congratulations for having society ensure via copious and unlimited efforts, to ensure they succeed. It really is past pathetic..

It is also a known fact that women always marry up and here we have the demonstration of how pissed off they get when their mate does not exceed their income. Since when were women reasonable about this situation ? They have not demonstrated it yet and here we have another gloating article saying that all was fine and that it will indeed grow and expand. Meanwhile the women are the one having the problem finding partners and here is another reason why..

When Jennifer Lopez and her less-famous husband Marc Anthony announced their separation last year, it emerged she had been angry at her husband's lack of financial acumen.
While the American Idol star is one of the richest women in entertainment, with an estimated worth of $430 million, Anthony was struggling with $3.4 million owing in back taxes.
When the ultimate unequal couple, Madonna and Guy Ritchie, split up, she gave him a lump sum of almost a fifth of her estimated $500 million net worth.
But the stereotypes are changing and Hollywood is taking the lead with a new animated movie Brave featuring the princess not as the victim - but as the protagonist - a first in a Disney movie.

 One armed pole dancer takes world title

How good does one have to be to wrap up the title with just one arm. It's akin to winning the world marathon championship with one leg. But there you go.

US woman commits suicide with chainsaw

This could well have been written by myself, but I decided on a second opinion instead..

Nothing fares better than presenting the bleeding obvious as about now, lies are more required and truth ignored. Who do we have to thank again for this, I wonder..

The permanently aggrieved have indeed been waxing lyrical on Grievance Central, Twitter, about the unthinkable possibility of the BBC actually producing a list of "10 "Women's" Faces of the Year" and (gasp) one was a Panda Bear, a Panda, they are supposed to be struggling for survival as it is and yet they make them a target. It's unthinkable. There were obviously no one around to gloat over..

No female, who by the power of Political Correctness via copious employment favoritism, not one who was elevated to the top on their own sheer ability except via positive discrimination laws that demands only women be promoted. No representative from another government department that decided appointing a female as it's CEO without experience, ability or track record, failed to appear as well..

I can now understand why it's hard living up to the standard of being a bitch when you are already one. They must be of the opinion that pretending to be a faux bitch, does not count...

Anyway, further bitchery proof coming..

How Many Female Pandas Does it Take to Screw in a Lightbulb?

by Kathy Shaidle

Rounding out the Faces of the Year: a chubby singer who turned getting dumped by her boyfriend into a lucrative career; a bride (who became a princess); Michele Bachmann; another bride (who also became a princess); the president of Brazil; yet another bride (who was already a duchess); and the Marine who invited Justin Timberlake to the ball. Oh, and some Chinese tennis player. In other words, a coven of romcom or political-thriller characters in the flesh. Life imitating middlebrow trash. Couldn’t the BBC come up with even a dozen names without including any victims or consorts? And why, come to think of it, did the BBC’s “Sports Personality of the Year” list not include a single woman? Hmmmm?? 

Predictably—these are women we’re talking about—all this bitchery circled the real issue instead of confronting it. That’s because women don’t complain because they’re looking for an answer. They complain for the sake of complaining, and receiving a sensible, solution-based response takes all the fun out of that. 

The sensible and therefore unpopular response to “#pandagate” is that most women long to be princess brides, a minuscule number of them get their wish, and the rest don’t do anything to deserve a spot on “Faces of the Year” lists. That’s because women tend to be lazy or stupid or both.

(Actually, the first sensible response to “#pandagate” would be to shoot the tiresome “-gate” suffix in the head and leave it to rot in a culvert, then replace it with the infinitely superior “-quiddick.”)

As one of my fellow females puts it, “If women ran the world, mankind would still be living in caves, albeit with really, really fancy curtains.”

Women don’t cure diseases, they just design new colored ribbons.

Anyone who’s worked in a modern office knows that the feminization of the workplace has decreased productivity and rendered men bitterly resentful and/or borderline gay. Women whose “careers” amount to pushing little pieces of paper from one cubicle to the next wearily sigh ad nauseam about their need for “a break,” usually in the form of yet another office birthday or engagement party or baby shower. At every “real” job I’ve held, the women around me—be they Sex and the City clones or Roman Catholic nuns—have talked for hours every day about what they’d had (or hadn’t) for breakfast, what they planned to have for lunch, what they wound up having for lunch instead, and what they were having for dinner. I would have preferred one of those “hostile work environments” in which, legend has it, obnoxious male employees crack innuendos nonstop. Alas, there was no procedure in place for me to file complaints against “culinary harassment.”

So ladies, don’t blame the BBC for your inability to knock a zoo animal out of last spot on some year-end list. “Sweetie” eats nothing but grass yet gets fatter and fatter, thinks sex is a chore, and does nothing to earn its own keep, unless “looking adorable” counts. I can’t think of a better addition to any tally of notable modern females.

We will cast this sexist, racist female in the "The World would be a better place if run by women" category and why not. What a dishonest, nasty piece of work this woman really is, but I suggest you make your own decision and then ask yourself the same question that feminists have been promoting for so long!

We need a campaign against this woman who obviously has no problem having a really good laugh about mutilating males..

Why not use one or all the links and give her a piece of your mind and just remind her that abuse is abuse regardless of sex..
If you are on Twitter give her a serve on http://twitter.com/MrsSosbourne
also use whatever links below and spread the word..

They do not hide their glee at all, in fact Sharon Osbourne (the wife of Ozzy) even makes mixing motions with her hands, simulating a garbage disposal, and calls the whole thing 'delightful'.

http://www.sharonosbourne.com/


http://www.myspace.com/sharono​sbourne

http://www.twitter.com/MrsSOsb​ourne

http://www.cedars-sinai.edu/64​08.html

http://www.nbc.com/Americas_Go​t_Talent/

Also, here is the Facebook page to add your comments to CBS..

http://www.facebook.com/pages/We-demand-an-apology-from-CBS-for-their-sexism/242540452430511