The Reality Blog

well, this is a turn up for the cards. Not only were you noticing those lesbians, cross dressers and trannies on the slutwalk debacle and wondering where the hell the world was heading. You were also wondering whether or not to sign up for another one of those PUA lessons and get the gist on how to chat up a babe. Maybe you are not even slightly concerned about those little crazy bugs that somehow transfer from one organ to the next, will demand immediate attention plus some rather drastic or ongoing and annoying itchy treatment..

 Just when you thought that being in college or Uni gave you excess to hooking up in competition with the academe, no competition really as the girls just want to flash a bit of paper in someone's face with reasonable marks knowing ofcourse that it cost more than the tuition fees. After all that chasing, rejection, spending money on that correctly labelled watch or easily identified, well cut jacket or that right car or which specific restaurant to book. All this for when the dame will be courted although that is not the term used these days by the actions and the outcome is about the same..

Just when you memorised those negative compliments and got them down pat, the haircut just right, the female interested enough and it's all looking rather promising..Only then does a bunch of bastards come along and inform that shagging ain't good for your health. It just ain't worth dying for.
As a matter of fact, all that posturing from those cretins in that slutwalk lunacy, all that effort that has gone into the hookup culture, all those PUA lines and methodology on how to successfully chase skirt, you spend learning over the last year is now under a very dark cloud and decisions time is here and now..Is having a shag that important that I am quite happy to die for it..

 It's a biggy, it is ginormous but it's one, from the look of it, you will inevitably have to make a decision on. So instead of it being called the "night out", we could rename it to "Russian Roulette Night" or how about "The Valentine's Day massacre Death Wish". The night you have when life really comes secondary and that other pursuit becomes tantamount..

I can see the new reality shows now, you sign an agreement to hand over everything you own (saves being married/relationship), to your your sassy, hot assed, rollicker and the audience waits with anticipation for her to exit the room and shout "I DID IT, I WON".  Electrifying television, make the decision or book your place..
    

A strenuous sex life can be deadly, as it can trigger dangerous cardiac events and sudden heart attacks, according to a study published overnight in the Journal of the American Medical Association.In the two hours after sex, the chances of having a heart attack are dramatically higher than normal, warned the study from two researchers associated with the Tufts University Medical Center in Boston.
“The increased risk is three to five times higher … compared to a time when you are not physically or sexually active,” Jessica Paulus said.
Paulus and co-author Dr Issa Dahabreh, found that regardless of overall fitness, deadly heart attacks or other cardiac failures strike more often in the heat of physical activity or sex than at other times.
Unsurprisingly, people with less active sex lives or infrequent exercisers showed the highest risk for problems during-and-after periods of heavy sweating, Dahabreh said.

From Articles About Men Website..

I have in the past posted the odd comments regarding PUA's (pick up artists) when some disparaging remarks about MRA's and the Men's Rights Movement were made while at the same time as they tried to paint it as some irrelevant and futile activity while at the same time glorifying their own pussy begging activity as being beyond question. Their efforts were ofcourse noble and just while every one else were just, well, wasting their time..

Apart from myself being somewhat taken aback by those snarky comments, it did raise some interesting points regarding their activities. One would wonder what level of ignorance one has to cross with the current laws in place could, can, will and does throw men in jail for even frowning at a member of the opposite sex, which could be interpreted as having either abusive or sexual implications on her word alone without evidence, verification or witnesses. One would also wonder why inserting a penis into a vagina is so important that hours, days, weeks and months should be invested in "learning" the appropriate methodology to trick or con some female in between the sheets just so you can inseminate her with your DNA in the hope that nothing breaks and ensuring that the used condom does not mysteriously disappear as too many examples of that being precisely that type of action has already been penned. Women have impregnated themselves in order to sue for child support and "alimoney" which is some states is for life..

One would have thought that living a lie, feigning friendship and coital friction should be left to the original experts who have honed their skills over centuries and it's not the PUAs. To my way of thinking and in todays "sexual" climate where sex is served up on a pretty platter on demand, pua's would be better off just posing the question directly like "wanna shag" and if the answer is either a neg or not you would at least not wasted all that time in preparation and training to achieve the same rejection rate. Although I must admit that the odd examples I have seen do work like smooth clockwork as even time limits were set and beaten. On one occasion, a time limit fo sixty seconds was set to achieve some face suction from an unsuspecting female and that worked a treat. Whether it was real or rehearsed, one just does not know... Each to their own I guess..

Apart from the topic being raised in the past, we have that same discussion rearing it's head again in  two different articles on the AVfM site this week which I will link further down but before I do

Fidelbogen“What’s the difference between a PUA and an MRA?An MRA is a political thinker.
A PUA tends to be apolitical, “naturalistic” in his ethics, oriented toward the social microcosm, and more concerned with personal power and status within said microcosm.
MRAs have no “stated goals”. They are for the most part theorists and agitators. Their modus operandi is to slowly crank up the heat and pressure on feminism by means of their writings, and by indirect channels of influence. They are also highly effective in raising the level of social consciousness and bringing new recruits on board.
The unstated goal of the MRA sector is to inflict “death by a thousand cuts” upon feminism.
MRAs and PUAs, ideally, ought to exist in a happy and mutually beneficial state of symbiosis, with each attending to its duties in its own sphere. Unfortunately, one of those sectors is shitting the bed in a pretty serious way — and I shall tactfully refrain from saying which side I mean. ;)

Link to my previous post..

Roissy and the Manifesto: Wrong About MRA & MRM..

Links to AVfM on two articles, both wondering the same thing I had...

Game – zeta style: Part 1, what and why
Chateau Bullshit

To be fair to Chateau/Roissy, I did in time past post a few articles from that site as I found their comprehension of and their learned knowledge on female behaviour was fascinating as well as being spot on. One needs to know how the opposition ticks..

Why am I not surprised ?

Feminists have always promoted shagging as some type of recommended behaviour that should be allowed at random without limitation or indeed have any limits attached to it. Probably explains why most of the feminist mangina sites have little tags like "I support Porn" or "I support BDSM" as they would heartily agree that the promotion of free sex on demand would allow them unlimited access especially if there is a feminist female involved. Brainwashing does apparently have it positive side..

What surprises me the most is the lack of information concerning  sexually transmitted diseases of all types. Those nasty disease like HIV or those others that munch your body at random. Not really something you want to be told after a night of debauchery with some slut feminist ( they promote themselves to be sluts now) willingly spreads her legs for some horizontal tango..

More gender equality leads to more sex, global study shows

 WASHINGTON – Equality leads to more sex. 

That's the gist of a new study about the sexual marketplace that used global data and found there's more sex in countries with higher gender equality than in those with less.
The study is part of a big-picture look at sexual behaviors worldwide using "sexual economics," in which supply and demand are key elements.
It's a "notoriously unromantic theory," said Roy Baumeister of Florida State University in Tallahassee Sunday at the American Psychological Association meeting here.
In his presentation, "Sexual Economics: A Research-Based Theory of Sexual Interactions, or Why the Man Buys Dinner," Baumeister, a psychologist, explained how applying economic principles helps understand people's sexual decision-making, especially when they're just beginning a relationship.
"Women's sexuality has a kind of value that men's sexuality does not," he says. "Men will basically exchange other resources with women to have sex, but the reverse doesn't work. Women … can trade sex for attention, for grades, for a promotion, for money, as in prostitution or sex with a celebrity."

So I guess my previous question on a previous post has been answered, "why do women demand men pay for dinner" is because she needs some confirmation that if she is giving away pussy, someone has to pay, something, anything. That is ofcourse after she has decided that she was going to have sex with you after the first five seconds of meeting you. That precondition very rarely changes..

Interesting, as it is something that I think we already knew but could not quite explain, why was it such an important demand that even hardcore feminasties demanded it, even though the chance of anyone lining up to dating any of them was about as slim as someone lining up for free lobotomies even though such an operation would benefit feminists..

Supply and demand rule, so whichever sex is more scarce has more power. The theory focuses on heterosexual interactions only. When women outnumber men (as on many college campuses today) there's more competition among women for those guys, says Mark Regnerus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas-Austin

He addressed that in the book he co-wrote, Premarital Sex in America, out earlier this year.
Regnerus says Baumeister's theory of sexual economics was a key element. "It's a perspective through which to understand sexual relationships and sexual behavior," he says.
Regnerus' research attributes the rise of the "hookup" culture on campus to the fact that there are so many more women in college.

He says Baumeister and Kathleen Vohs "wrote the key work on the subject" in 2004. Because a woman's sexuality has a value to men, a man who wanted sex typically had to give her something of value, such as a marriage proposal

So demand at college exceeds supply, interesting. I have not heard any complaints from male students but I do for some unfathomable reason that campus rape is taking place in gigantic proportions according to exaggerating feminists even though the male students are being well serviced. I wonder where they get all that energy from..So, count back a few decades ago and you would understand why there were so many marriages as women were not giving it away free to no one, they were well aware that guys were going to offer the magic license in order to get them into the sheets and procreate as well. Apparently worked out pretty well too, as both parties obviously enjoyed their roles in those situations..

The situation today is full of paranoia and uncertainty as both sexes don't have a bloody clue how to go about meeting and greeting each other as feminists continually keep screwing that part up by their relentless inane demands for more laws and inane commentary about women victimhood and how it's impossible for any female to walk anywhere without (Gasp) being looked at. More laws thanks..
Dating sites are full of women and desperate to attract more males as aging is the main deterrent to a relationship as if everyone is not already well aware of it. The stupidity of divorcing at 40+ appears to be the current hype and trend and relationship death wish, but they do not comprehend that at that age that the admirers are gone and desperate measures need to be taken like facial surgery or a boob job just to compete with the younger women who are also looking at a shrinking market of men who have choosen to go their own way..

If in doubt ?

This fairly typical response that appeared at the Seattle Post Intelligencer website: “Sorry ladies. In the age of PlayStation 3s, 24-hours-a-day sports channels, and free Internet porn, you are now obsolete. All that nagging, whining, and stealing our hard earned cash have finally caught up to you."

Even Hymowitz has a go at explaining the aversion..

Shocked? I wasn t. During the last few years researching this age group, I’ve stumbled onto a powerful underground current of male bitterness that has nothing to do with outsourcing, the Mancession, or any of the other issues we usually associate with contemporary male discontent. No, this is bitterness from guys who find the young women they might have hoped to hang out with entitled, dishonest, self-involved, slutty, manipulative, shallow, controlling—and did I mention gold-digging?