The Reality Blog

The scanner would have forewarned and froe-armed right here. A distinct need..

Over the past few decades there have been some claims of interest raised and then through lack of interest of keeping the lie alive or those claims were just downright delusional, only really existed in the minds of the delusional, whom I will not name...alright slut-feminists..

That's just the thing, catching on..

They introduced the "Multitasking" ability, that apparently only women possessed. They were actually capable of using a phone on one ear/shoulder, holding a child in one arm and stirring some contents in a pot on the stove (no sammich making though). That became representative of the "Multitasking" ability of the opposite sex. One would stare incredulously at the screen when one read that hyped up irrelevant drivel and wondered what a drummer in a band was doing, while singing at the same time, nope that was something else. Just as one would be even more incredulous as a member of that same sex actually used it for bragging rights.

Meanwhile ofcourse, that multitasking ability is of no advantage and leads to work or actions being superficial, inefficient or negligible. Apparently to perform any set function that requires concentration is not included when undertaking the multitasking actions. Oh dear. It was so popular. Also it appears that both sexes are quite capable of performing it, but most do not bother as quality beats quantity... 

It could be an accessory..

Anyway, I had that experience late last year and the culprit was in actual fact, a nurse. One assumes that nurses are intelligent, as they are educated, maybe that may have been the problem..

When she overheard the conversation I was having with my daughter about an article I was reading. I mentioned that the multitasking ability was somewhat of a disadvantage and the nurse overheard it and yelled out a response that "only wimmin could and men can't". Now I am never one to sit back and accept obvious blatant lies, misinformation or exaggerations,  even in passing, so one did ofcourse straighten her world view out, much to her disgust. The same response I received a few months earlier, while I was visiting a relative, a young female commented out loud "All men are the same". When I suggested that she desist from maligning me, as I did not even know who she was. I proceeded to inform her that if she persisted in maligning my sex, then I would start on hers (she was already well aware where that would go), that had the appropriate response and bought her back to Earth with a thud and as she stood there with an open mouth, stunned, but only for about three seconds though, a lifetime apparently when having a good gossip session..

Started already..

The point of all this was to see if we could determine how we could guage the varying behavioural patterns of the opposite sex, the loving to psycho in 30 seconds, question.  Wondering why no one had yet invented some type of warning mechanism/device that would indicate what stage the opposite sex was in her monthly cycle. The gadget itself would not have to be prominent or obvious. A colour would indicate what level the PMS was at present and whether or not the slightest issue would turn her into a raging, screaming harridan, capable of dismembering or causing grievous bodily harm.

Maybe a new age"mood" ring would suffice or some miniature LEDs displayed just under the bottom eyelid, flashing red when required, projecting "Run" on the wall when circumstances were desperate. Maybe some thing less obtrusive, like a hand held scanner that could sense the condition level with a quick scan, be taken at least twenty paces away, just in case. Surely there would be a huge market for it. One could have one permanently installed in the house and a warning would sound as one entered the front door. Maybe a mobile model supplied to all the HR departments, to all businesses, so whenever they received another one of those copious complaints of feelings being hurt, they could just do a quick scan and if it shows red, just give her the rest of the day/week off..

Another variation..

It would do wonders for the employee relationships  as well as partner/personal relationships. I cannot understand why no one has introduced one yet. Maybe some time in the future, eh!!

I must confess to following the AGW debate on about eight different sites and blogs on the net just to get an overview on the hype being pedalled as science and came across a blog by Prof. Judith Curry and followed it for a couple of months. Needless to say that Curry is a talented professional in the area of climate science and only commenced her blog as the science started to lack integrity and tended to wallow more in the political rather than reality..

Good so far. Interesting articles and discussions were read and had, so it came as somewhat of an almost surprise when Curry's latest article started pushing and promoting the Feminist Hegemony and it's associated inane doctrine. Some infantile ex.Don promoted a female supremacist article which was posted today. The article can only be regarded as being their usual garbage. A posting that had nothing whatsoever to do with AGW or the science,  it was about the promotion of females in the academic world. The article is the usual mishmash of incoherent feminist drivel that we have come to expect from that hate movement that moans and whines about the lack of women in academic posts and also the lack of women on teaching staff  positions at those misandric temple of indoctrination even though the majority of students are females, just demonstrates that Curry is just another female firster, pushing her own gender at the expense of all men to the detriment of science as well as the general community...

Show me, apart from the occasional rare examples of women's discoveries that outshone anything Men have invented especially over the last 50 years or so when women were free to choose and do whatever they wanted. Blaming men for their own incompetence appears to be the order of the day..

We even have this bit of soundly discounted drivel..

 It puzzles a woman that a man cannot watch television and listen to her at the same time: she can watch television, listen to him, hold the baby, make dinner and if necessary answer the telephone as well.  She is, in a temporal sense, multi-skilled.  He can do all those things, but not at the same time, and if it must be at the same time, not at all well.

That dream of superiority has been discounted as being farcical as that was only ever demonstrated to being the case when the female was at home. You know the routine. Baby on the boobs, reading a trash mag while talking on the phone is just a brilliant example of what not to do if you want to do it properly..

The recently-published study discovered that frequent multitaskers are actually worse at multitasking, because they're more easily distracted by useless information - a result, the researchers believe, of their brains losing the ability to successfully filter out irrelevant data and stay on target. Scientists at UCSF claim that more research is needed before suggesting specific remedies to this problem, but agree that spending less time being distracted and more time concentrating on one thing at a time wouldn't be a bad thing.

Multitasking is bad for you.. 

Oh dear, another feminist/female boast shot to hell. Such a shame..

What could one expect when we read the usual excuse for a degree and turning up at university just so you can pay for a course that the majority of females are doing already.

I was taught as a young social scientist

That one comment is enough for me to finish right there as you and I already know precisely what road this feminist is already heading down which surprisingly makes the whole trash piece not only unpalatable but unreadable as well..

I think it's just too much multitasking that's causing all that frontal lobe damage..