Oh Look it's me on Facebook..

I do wonder what level of hell Demi Moore is going through after seeing her pictured on the cover of one of those moronic magazines that the opposite sex use as their Bible of all truth and knowledge, knowing full well that everything in it is doctored to the max and the majority of articles goes through the hands of about 10 different editors who all have their own bitchiness to prove..

One was under the illusion that this "one million dollar" plastic surgery phenomenon, an inspiration to all and sundry, would be made of sterner stuff just like the feminists have been lying to all and sundry about, you know that "Strong, Independent" who "don't need no damn man" Woman. You already know those mantras that really explain more opposite than what it claims in truth..

So much for the feminist's claims, as this is not the first time we have witnessed that either. Moore folded like a pack of cards, wallowing in self pity as well as doses of substances that were banned long ago. But one would not wish that on even one's worst enemy, so it goes without saying that one hopes for a reasonable recovery and the hope that it will move on and put that poisonous Hollywood existence in the garbage bin where it belongs. Get herself a real life..

The other reason for the gloat was an article written, once again, about the body image problem that young women face (94%), an issue all of their own making, their own doing. They apparently refuse to believe that we would not take them without the fake tits, the slut wear, the drunken bouts and the bad behaviour and language. It was also not that long ago where the femimatrix decided to blame men for those issues, just to ensure that women were not held accountable for their own actions which is ofcourse another of their dream-time wish..

The female population apparently find it exceedingly difficult to comprehend and understand that it's not men who have changed but they. Given them the freedom to make up their own minds, make their own choices and make their own life changing decisions and look where it's got them. A total house wreck in progress, while at the same time having the total inability of knowing how to deal with or communicate with the opposite sex while they spend their every spare hour wallowing on the online stupidity of Facebook and other such notorious frivolity while failing to comprehend that life is for living and not just writing/talking about..

But as you will read next, the penny has once again dropped and the next round of hand wringing is in place as the angst merchants wallow on without placing the blame precisely where it originated from, totally and completely falls back on, that same plethora of liars that we have been against all along. At least this time the girls finally confess that it's all self induced and they have to take the steps to fix it..

Stop spread of this toxic sex culture

Images of an emaciated Demi Moore in the weeks before her hospitalisation for what some are saying is anorexia show that even the world’s most celebrated beauties suffer body image crises.
In Moore’s case the recent separation from her much younger husband of 16 years, Ashton Kutcher, 33, may have been a catalyst for self-hate. But it can’t have been easy for the 49-year-old actress to live with gossip websites which cruelly scrutinise her body for telltale signs of cellulite or ageing.
In a recent interview the actress admitted to a lifelong “love-hate relationship” with her body. “What scares me is that I’m going to ultimately find out at the end of my life that I’m not worthy of being loved.”
It could be the cri de coeur of her sex. You can’t open a woman’s magazine without reading about already gaunt celebrities popping diet pills and starving themselves to fit into Golden Globes gowns.
And it’s never too young to join in the body scrutiny game.
In France, a 10-year-old is modelling for Vogue and 13- and 14-year-olds are common on the catwalk, their tiny breastless bodies dressed up and adorned with makeup, photographed in provocative poses to sell clothes to women their grandmothers’ age.
The push to be “hot”, to conform to some idealised image of female perfection at a younger and younger age is at the root of this epidemic of female self-hate, according to teacher turned author Danielle Miller.
Girls are the canary in the coal mine of a sick society and the increasing incidence of self-harm and eating disorders indicates not all is well in girl world.
It’s hard enough being a teenage girl at the best of times.
But these days, bombarded with the toxic messages of a pornified culture, your every impulsive moment Facebooked and Tumblred for posterity, forced to grow up far too young, it can be overwhelming.
It’s no wonder, then, that Miller sees girls afraid to grow up. “We’re a society that idolises youth,” she said last week. “Why would we be surprised if young girls are fearful of womanhood?”
In her book, to be published next month, The Girl With the Butterfly Tattoo, Miller dispenses common-sense advice to girls about how to navigate adolescence in an unforgiving era.
When she gives workshops at schools, she increasingly finds girls with “body image angst, even though we talk of this being an empowered generation. The ultimate glass ceiling is the bathroom mirror.”
She points to statistics suggesting 94 per cent of teenage girls wish at some point that they were more beautiful, while a quarter want to completely overhaul their physical appearance.
“There is something all girls and women share: we are at war with our bodies because there is a war waged on our bodies.
“We are surrounded by words and images dictating what beauty is ... It is now one colour, one shape, one size. The standards are impossible to attain.”
Miller says body self-hate is “the new normality”, with women turning increasingly to surgery to correct perceived imperfections. The explosion in vaginal surgery to conform with an airbrushed porn fiction of female genital perfection is a case in point.
Miller points to the flow-through to girlhood. For instance, teenage girls binge drink more than any other demographic. “In our hypersexualised culture there is increasing pressure on teen girls to gain attention by doing stripper-like dance moves and bare all when they go out with friends.
“Girls tell me this is easier to do when they are drunk.” Technology amplifies the normal impulsive behaviour of teens. Everything is recorded for the world to see and remember.
Miller says mothers need to be aware of their own behaviour as role models for their daughters, and parents need to talk openly and transmit their values about sex.
“We know porn is impacting on the way young girls see themselves. So more than ever, you need to have that conversation and help our young people understand their emerging sexuality.
“The days of hoping they could pick it up or of leaving a book on kitchen bench are gone. They’ve seen it all online, unfortunately, and it’s hard and soulless and cold.”
But Miller also pays tribute to this generation of girls, who she sees as remarkably resilient.
“We need to credit the girls who are making healthy choices and aren’t running off sexting and binge drinking.”
And she encourages all women, mothers or not, to mentor younger women: “We have an obligation to give of ourselves to the next generation. They do yearn to look at confident, strong women.”
But the best immunisation against a toxic culture is to teach girls to love themselves.
Take a lead from 19-year-old Hannah Montana star Miley Cyrus. When she was mocked last year for gaining a little weight she posted a photo of an emaciated woman on twitter and wrote: “By calling girls like me fat this is what you’re doing to other people.
“I love myself & if you could say the same you wouldn’t be sitting on your computer trying to hurt others.

Just one last post on the "Occupy Everything" crowd and I will ignore them just like everyone else..

They are like or akin to the feminist enablers and followers,  where someone owes them something and it's big, they just cannot make up their minds as to what it really is. Someone else is to blame for their pathetic life's choices and never will they will be held responsible or accountable for any of their own actions..

It reeked so much of that same doctrine that when I first noticed their antics, my brain went into automatic overdrive and when it does that, there has to be something almighty askew. A bit like switching on a movie, thinking it will be an action or a watchable drama but turns out to be a chick flick. That same response was what I got from their first efforts. The "Oh, the world owes me a living" crowd,  a collection of pathetic little children suffering from self inflicted torment only managed to isolate and open themselves up to ridicule that was not exceeded by those looney's back in the seventies when most were too stoned to even notice. One day, they will grow up and learn, hopefully..

It’s time, kiddies 


 Miranda Devine 
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 


It’s the end of the line for the Occupy movement.They made their point. Everyone has been very decent about it. But the grownups are calling time.Yesterday, Occupy Melbourne protesters were up in arms when police moved in and cleared out their tent city in Treasury Gardens.Scuffles broke out and three men were arrested.“We are being totally unfairly discriminated against,” whined Tulsi Emmett to the ABC..No. They’ve been cluttering up public space with their unhygienic detritus for almost two weeks. Enough is enough.As New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said this week after police cleared out the Occupy New York protesters from Zuccotti Park: “Protesters have had two months to occupy the park with tents and sleeping bags.“Now they will have to occupy the space with the power of their arguments.”And maybe they could have a bath.

Next up we have two more articles from Tim Blair and his great sense of humour and irony..

Australian feminasties were mortified and besides themselves when some "man" decided to state that maybe being a little more practical could solve a few more problems where women were concerned. But, just as that policeman in Canada dared to proffer a suggestion about the way women dressed, encouraged the childish slutwalk hysteria; those comments thus invoked similar hysterics when these two gentleman come to suggesting that women could use a bit more common sense when going out and maybe resist the laddette culture of getting  pissed and blacking out or spewing and sleeping on the street. Maybe that type of behaviour required some reappraisal as any thought capable human being may interpret it as such. We have the modern woman now ofcourse where their rise to stardom did not include a functioning frontal lobe capable of reasoning, I forgot.
But as women do, tell them they can't and they will go out of their way to show with fashion enhancements, that they can and don't ever even think about criticising any princess as that would be breaking the number one golden rule of "Never criticise a Woman", EVER..
The damage to their ego is apparently unrepairable..
Thank goodness there are a few exceptions. One willing to tell it like it is..

Miranda Devine has a bit of a go at it..
THE birthrate paradox is the phenomenon that the fewer children in a society, the more childishly the adults behave.

I made that up, but it makes sense that our declining birthrate would be linked to the infantile fury that greets any grown-up who imparts home truths that might impinge on people’s lifestyles.
God forbid that the grown-ups’ words of wisdom might cause people to take responsibility for their own behaviour instead of crying victim when their lives go pear-shaped.
Especially if that grown-up is a man.
Take the mouth-frothing abuse heaped on two men in the last week. NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione was abused for warning young women of the hazards of going out and getting blind drunk.
And Perth obstetrician Barry Walters was viciously pounced on for daring to say that women who have put off having babies until their late 30s are “self-centred”, and risk miscarriage, pregnancy complications and birth defects.
For his trouble, Scipione has been branded a “rape apologist” and patriarchal busybody who doesn’t realise that having random unwanted sex when blotto is every woman’s human right.
Walters has been denounced on TV, radio, columns, blogs and twitter, as a know-nothing dinosaur suffering from PMS, as in “Pale Male and Stale”.
Hello, ladies. These bearers of bad tidings might be male, but they actually had your best interests at heart.
Scipione was responding to the epidemic of drunk, drug-addled young women staggering around city streets in various states of undress and dangerous vulnerability, vomiting, passing out in the gutter, and being hauled into hospital by ambulance to have their stomachs pumped

The Australian public have been treated to another example of the moronic drivel that feminists contemplate on a daily basis. So desperate are they to keep the worst Prime Minister in Australia's History in power, Julie Gillard, that all stops have been pulled in an all out effort to malign the next PM of Aus. if the polls stays they way they are now. As a matter of fact, it will be a landslide of ginormous proportions which should just about witness the end of the Labour Party as we know it. No members of parliament, no money for their re-election.To me it's just another example of what happens when you put a feminist female in office who is way over her head. It has no experience and was not voted in by the Aus. public as she knifed the former leader to get at the position. It really is a case of good riddence to bad rubbish..

And so the comedy continues..

Miranda Devine also joins in the fray against the feminasties..

Women see Abbott as "a relic of an old-style male: pugnacious, aggressive, arrogant. Very few women find it appealing. They have been subjugated and disempowered by such men for too long".Seriously. Anyone who knows Abbott knows he is far from a misogynist. A loving husband and father of three girls, he has two sisters, and a mother who love him, and women in key roles in his office. 

When it comes to opinion polls, the leader with woman-trouble is Julia Gillard. She has lost the female vote by eight percentage points, from 38 per cent to 30 per cent, in the past three months, according to Newspoll.Blokey Abbott is more popular with women by five points.Female Abbott-haters are a particular type. Like Mitchell, they cling to a 1970s view of feminism, still resent the patriarchy, and sneer at red-blooded blokes. The photograph on the cover of Mitchell's book, of Abbott barbecuing sausages, encapsulates what they loathe. 

A muscular, sweaty meat-eater wielding tongs. Ugh. Her book is the first shot by the progressive Left to stop Abbott taking office.They fear that his confident conservatism, mellowed by time in office, is beginning to resonate with an electorate that thinks much like he does, and is fed up with political correctness.They fear that his combination of good-natured, unpretentious authenticity and ferocious intellect will have wide appeal as soon as it gets clear air.

Just in case you are wondering how corrupt the judiciary is in Australia as well as everywhere else and how feminists have infiltrated it than here is the optimum example. Why not rub out and erase the Father off the birth certificate and give that right to a lesbian. To you and I, this is incomprehensible but to feminists, the radical feminists who we can state are mostly male hating lesbians is without argument. We have witnessed so many laws introduced to favour the privileged sex as to make them even more toxic than they are already. It will get to the stage where no one will want a bar of them in the fear that even sneezing in the same elevator would be considered as either assault or sexual abuse. But they will not stop there while men sit on their hands and do nothing. Evil will grow because of it. They want every male to be a non-entity, no right, no claim to law and definitely no power whatsoever whenever a member of the opposite sex is involved..

A FIGHT TO REMOVE DADS
Miranda Devine
Saturday, August 20, 2011
 
At a time when the problem of fatherless children has been rammed home by feral youth rioting in London, we saw last week an example of how the state has actively sought to exclude fathers from their children’s lives.
The case in the NSW District Court of sperm donor John Williams*, whose name has been deleted from his 10-year-old daughter’s birth certificate in favour of the biological mother’s estranged lesbian partner, has made news around the world.
Judge Stephen Walmsley acknowledged the deep attachment between father and daughter, and expressed “considerable sympathy” for Williams, 58.
But his hands were tied. He had to comply with a retrospective amendment to the Status of Children Act in 2008 by then NSW attorney-general John Hatzistergos which asserted the parental rights of lesbian couples over a biological father.
Even though Williams had been an enthusiastic part-time father who loved his daughter and had contributed tens of thousands of dollars to her upkeep, he was legally cut out. Now the little girl officially has two mothers, but no father.
Williams hasn’t seen his daughter since April 14 and is contemplating life without her.
“I’m told by the law that she’s no longer my daughter and I’m no longer her father,” he says. “I’m a stable influence on my daughter. But the law’s all in favour of the non-biological lesbian mother.”
The saga began in 2000, when Williams, a gay, single, successful real estate agent, decided he wanted a child and “heir”.
He placed an advertisement in a gay magazine: “Sperm Donour (sic) Professional male mid 40s would like to meet lesbian lady to view of producing a child. Full health details available involvement and financial assistance offered.”
The lesbian couple who answered his ad had coincidentally placed an advert for a sperm donor in another gay magazine at the same time. “Lesbian couple seeks donor, view to being “uncle” figure to child. No financial obligation.”
So, as Williams wrote to them, they were writing to Williams, and the deal was sealed almost before they met.
He travelled more than an hour from his inner-city Sydney home to ejaculate into a large syringe in their spare room, before “quickly” exiting the house while the women attempted insemination. After about four attempts, they were successful.
Williams was involved in the pregnancy, at least financially. By the time the baby was born he had spent almost $10,000 on the midwife, on weekly naturopathic and chiropractic treatments and shiatsu massages for the birth mother.
But relations with the women grew testy over their frequent requests for money. Six weeks before the baby was due in August 2001, both women had given up work, and Williams questioned why they were spending between $135 and $155 a week on alternative health therapies.
Although Williams tried to become involved with the baby, and his 88-year-old mother lent the women her Rover car, his relationship with them continued to deteriorate.
When his daughter was one, he went to the Family Court and won the right to see her every second Saturday for five hours, and on Fathers’ Day, Christmas and school holidays. He also paid $150 a week in maintenance and even bought a house near her school to make visits easier. Williams estimates he has spent $50,000 in legal fees trying to retain a meaningful relationship with his daughter, now 10.
He resented the control the women placed on his visits, in part because of his daughter’s restricted diet of vegan meals every two hours.
One email from the non-biological mother sets out the child’s food routine. On waking she is to be given Chinese herbs and “homeopathic cell salts Acidophilus mixed with filtered water half an hour before breakfast. Breakfast is noodles cooked with kombu seaweed in water first in bowl full (cooled down) with hatcho miso and phyt-aloe supplement mixed to a soup in filtered water, 1.4 tsp miso mixed with one capsule phyt-aloe powder, mix to a paste with a little filtered water (not heated) and then add more cool water to make 3/4 cup. Corn thin with cashew nut butter and 1/4 ambrotose powder mixed into it.”
Obsessive though it appears, the list of instructions does show that the little girl was well loved and that her mothers put an enormous amount of thought into every aspect of her care.
Williams’ partner of two years, writes in an affidavit that the girl’s “time spent socialising with [Williams] is severely restricted by bizarre diet restrictions”.
But he adds that “all three parents are very loving and well meaning”.
Williams, in a letter before the court, also compliments the two women as “wonderful” parents.
Even after the lesbian couple split up in 2006, the three households had managed to keep up a workable custody sharing arrangement.
But it was the law that came between them. Williams says as soon as the law was introduced to parliament in 2008, “I knew [the women] were planning legal action to have me eliminated”.
The non-biological mother wrote to Williams last year asking him to remove his name from his daughter’s birth certificate.
“I am not wishing for your relationship with [the child] to change in any way. You always will be her biological donor.”
Williams was furious, writing back: “I take offence of this description. As far as I’m concerned I am and always will be [her] father.”
The relationship soon become so poisonous that Williams returned a letter to her solicitor with “See you in Court bitch” scrawled across it.
He hasn’t seen his daughter since April 14. And after last week’s court decision he feels he has been officially banished from her life.
The amendment to the Status of Children Act that was quietly passed through the parliament three years ago was social engineering at its most potent.
What it said, for the first time, was that in defiance of biological reality, the legal rights of a non-related lesbian in a relationship with the child’s biological mother trumped the rights of the biological father.
Even if that father had a committed relationship to the
child, he could be cut out as if he never existed.
The inevitable consequences of this injustice are clear in Williams’ case. Whose interests does it serve to alienate a father from his daughter by law? Certainly not the child’s.
* Name changed for legal reasons