Latest Posts
Showing posts with label jezebel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jezebel. Show all posts



It goes without saying that the slut-feminist movement promotes violence and are quite happy doing so. Over the last few years we have witnessed that response in copious responses and articles, whenever a male is assaulted by a privileged princess (that View episode was a prime example) the close fisted salute went up in unison. They are of the opinion that they can do whatever they like with no consequences to be faced. They have been enthusiastic in their support as they are constantly encouraged by the "You Go Grrlll" epithet. Again it demonstrates that hypocrisy as they rage and scream the "Violence against Women" mantra that so often is just used to promote even more violence instead of curbing it..

Sites like slut-feminist epicentre Jezebel.com, have no problem promoting hate and violence either, as a matter of fact those drones and supporters cheer on anyone who commits it as they see it as some type of "payback" for all that imaginary suffering they have been lied to about in those gender/women's studies indoctrination classes. Those classes still run today and are still subsidised by the taxpayer dollars. Strangely, we are paying money to promote violence via the education system, how is that for a waste of taxpayers dollars and destroying the mentality and behaviour of the next generation of "we are victims" females..

But it goes on and on and not one single apology or even some slight level of remorse. One would have to question the mentality and intellectual capacity of all those so called journalists at Jezebel, who constantly promote this level of hate and abuse without so much as demonstrating a single regret for doing so..

Being a slut-feminist is to "never having to say you're sorry". Regardless of their vileness of speech or their promotions of hate. What a charming site and what an honourable movement..


If you see Jezebel in the road, run the bitch down – Part II

TRIGGER WARNING: This post contains copious amounts of sarcasm, which is yet another tool of the Patriarchy, and the author’s assertion of his Male Privilege.
We have already covered an article here about how Jezebel, an online feminist publication that focuses on pop culture, promoted violence against men. [See Paul Elam’s, If You See Jezebel in the Road, Run the Bitch Down.] They asked readers to share their oh-so-hilarious stories of when they’d wailed on their husbands or boyfriends, for whatever reason.  In one case, it was because the guy said he thought that he had breast cancer (newsflash: Men actually CAN get breast cancer.  Look up Brian Piccolo.)  In another case, it was because her boyfriend caught her writing a sex story about herself and another guy, and he confronted her about it.
Well, as if we needed any more proof that feminism promotes violence, Jezebel published an article (translation: they lifted it from somebody’s blog and published it as their own) in which a woman tells about the time she hit a man in the face.
The author, who is a lesbian, talks about a time she was walking through the streets of Boston and had a bunch of drunken frat boys whooping and hollering at her and her girlfriend.  They said such soul-destroying things as “Hey, you girls wanna sleep with me tonight?”, “Hey, baby,” and “Ooooh!”  Normally, this woman just took it in stride.
Then, the unthinkable happened.  A guy stepped out and spoke directly to her.  Can you imagine the horror?  She was so shocked by this act, she doesn’t even remember what he said to her.  So, she did what any rational human being would do when being addressed by a stranger: she punched him in the face, then acted totally surprised when it made him so angry, he called her a “fucking dyke,” which is a totally heinous hate crime that should have earned him a lifetime in prison.
What’s most revealing about the mindset of your typical Jezebel isn’t that this article was published on their site at all, it’s the comments underneath.  If you don’t have time to read them, I’ll sum a few up.  “I applaud you for standing up for yourself and women everywhere.”  “You did the right thing.”  “This’ll teach men to watch themselves.”  “Men have no idea what it’s like for us.”
Really?  Nerdy guys don’t know what it’s like to be called names or threatened with violence?  Gay men don’t know what it’s like to hear homophobic slurs?  Men never feel any fear walking alone at night, despite the proven fact that they are far more likely to be assaulted than women?
No, you don’t understand.  This guy was saying things to her.  SAYING things!  She was well within her rights to hit him, because women are such delicate, fragile flowers that can’t bear to have anything about them challenged in any way, shape, or form.  If a woman punches a man for a crude remark that she can’t even remember, that’s perfectly fine, because she was just lashing out against the Patriarchy, and doing her part to help end Rape Culture.
Yours truly tried to point out the hypocrisy here by posting a hypothetical situation in which all the same things happened, only the sexes of the parties involved were reversed.  Needless to say, this little stunt got me banned from Jezebel for life.  I’m not surprised, and I’m not angry about it.  I should have remembered that, like sarcasm and harassment, logic is a tool of the Patriarchy.
Feminists keep insisting that, barring reproductive capabilities, men and women are completely the same.  Well, except for when there’s violence involved.  Then it’s always the man’s fault, especially if it was the woman who threw the punch.  He is, after all, a part of the all-consuming patriarchy, and nothing that he does or experiences could ever make him otherwise.
So take note, men: if you ever dare to say something to a woman that she doesn’t like, she is well within her rights to hit you, and she’ll be right to do so.
You filthy, sexist pigs.

Written by Phil in Utah


4 Posts in Total See Them »
Phil in Utah is a part-time student of Geology at Utah State, and a full-time student at FTSU. An unapologetic hippie redneck, he is equally proud of his affinity for Shakespeare and his ability to spit fifteen feet.


Getting close to Valentines Day and the feminists are chaffing at the bit, trying to muster their robots, fembots, clones, enablers to protest another questionable event. But try they will.
If you're searching for a way to express your frustration with a holiday that requires you to a) be in a relationship and B) purchase heart-shaped things to prove your commitment to said relationship, you now have a place to go. Meet Occupy Valentine's Day.
The Lezebel(Jezebel) site where feminasties gather to spew vitriol and rabididy, are spewing and raging about this number one day on their "I hate it because" calender. The obvious problem they have is that they are partner-less(who want want to have anything to do with a feminist) and thereby their outbursts are much more rabid than usual. If that is possible. It's been a while since their "Slutwalk" demonstration, so they are getting bored and just dying to fill their vacant, unnecessary lives, with some other pursuit.

Here is their justification and it's as laughable as the excuse they used for Slutwalk..
Celebrating love is wonderful and romance can be great too. But we don't need corporations to dictate how we should do it, a mainstream media chastising us for not doing it right or traditional ideas touted over and over by our friends and family. That shit is oppressive and hurts us more than helps.
(laugh break)

Obviously the word "NO" does not exist in their vocabulary and neither does "ignore it" have any significance either. But insanity has always been a pre-condition for feminist adherence.
As an alternative to purchasing the perfect box of candy, she suggests you submit "a video-blog about your worst Valentine's Day date" or "a list about why the latest 'trend story' about how single women will die alone and unhappy is wrong." One user sent in a pic of her and her sister and wrote,
There is something to be said of sisterly love, that relentless, "I've got your back no matter what" kind of love. That "Do you need me to take you to the clinic?" love. My sister, the one in two-toned braids embracing me above, is 10 years my junior. She is a stand-up kid whose passion in life is photography and fighting racist, sexist and homophobic bullying in her high school. She is my sister but I have never known a love like this before. This February, sisterly love will be underrepresented, yet it will be just as valid.
I did wonder what their motive could possibly be as the majority of females just love the concept of Valentines Day, as it enhances the conversation levels for at least the next month, as they "to and fro" on the subject. But the quote above indicates that they are upset because the carpet munchers are not included in the general consensus, if we can call it that. Ahhh!, good old ulterior motives. Cannot half the heteros having fun on their own while lesbians suffer, heaven forbid..
You are well aware of the fact that cognitive dissonance reign supreme in the feminastie movement right ?
Good..

As far as Valentines Day goes, it's up to you how you go about it and what you do. If it's demanded, taken for granted than I would give it the middle finder in response. If it is not mentioned, suggested or even hinted at, than I would do something positive, just to keep the peace. It's worth it..
But, as I stated, entirely up to yourself as to what you do. Whatever you do do, do not forget her birthday or anniversary. They are grounds for divorce as far as she is concerned and spending a few bucks ain't gonna break the bank..


It would appear that we are no longer to be ignored, wonders never cease when that male hating organ of feminist malice comes out of it's gender studies alarmism and actually makes a confession. Never a word about feminists and feminism being the main instigators and ongoing culprits as that would be expecting way too much and why be honest when a lie is sufficient..

Domestic Violence Ad Implies Only Men Are AbusersA men's rights group is protesting a recent anti-domestic violence PSA sponsored by Verizon. And for once, I kind of agree with them.
So what is this, an admission, a confession or just a minor hick-up in the feminists war against men, finally forced to admit their misandry and malice. The longer they deny that feminism is a hate movement, the more credibility they loose..

 But we have this feminist actually stating the obvious, it is half the population who has been maligned and accused while the other half is just ignored and denied..

Professional male hater MichaĆ«lle Jean, former governor general, Canada.
“Women’s rights are not special rights; women’s rights are human rights,” Ms. Jean said. “To me denying more than half of the world’s population the most basic human rights, including the right to live in security, is the most flagrant form of subjugation and one of the worst scandals of our time.”
Are feminists now making our claims easier or are they just maintaining their ignorance and denial. Who knows, denying that women are violent when all indications, the witnesses, the facts are right there in front of them, begs believe. Feminist credibility has been shot to hell and back. How much longer can they really keep denying the obvious..

Dr. Phil Investigates, Exposes Truth in False Allegations CaseNovember 16th, 2011 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Dr Phil cannot be trusted to tell the truth as he visits the same methodology as Oprah "Find The Victim"  used to malign men and boys to her gullible and often totally biased female audience. The doctor has demonstrated clearly in the past that he is "Pro Woman" in all his activities and has consistently ignored and maligned the male sex as well. So the above article from Fathers and Families is something of a surprise..