Sit, Hugo, sit, there's a good boy..

Life is just full of disappointments apparently, especially for the feminist movement as well as their very own equivalent version of "Ladies in Waiting", so are male feminists to that female movement. Even after they have been roundly and succinctly told that their services are no longer required, not politely asked to be excused. But soundly informed that they should all just f*** off and hit the road.

They perservere..

But just like any obedient puppy with it's eyes all round, whining and needy, will refuse to leave the master who feeds it, so are they fixated to their self deluded paucity. It really is a sad and pitiful sight. We should really pass the hat around and sent them all some sympathy cards as they would be not be feeling too great about themselves at the moment. They should make themselves available to the public as a carnival act, so the public could personally witness their petty, needy and embarrassing behaviour, they may even collect the odd coin or two in the process. Hey, it's a money spinner, don't knock it..

The other issue that has perplexed the feminist movement and in particular, the male feminists, has been how to go about destroying the free speech enjoyed by the Men's Movement, it's steady and ever increasing growth. They are determined to destroy that any way they can. Their efforts have unfortunately been so pathetic that I am tempted to make a few suggestions but I will refrain. The one single suggestion, were I to make one, would be for them to start actually telling the truth, now there would be a change and then people could determine for themselves, whether or not to take any notice of them or just write them off as another version the "Occupy Everything" crowd. Who demonstrated only one thing and that was, that the world owed them a living. Male feminists are of the same mindset, they honestly believe that the Female Feminist Organisation actually owes them a living..

It is truly sad..

One of the ongoing attacks they have orchestrated apart from that obvious effort in the recent past by the "Good Men Project", which died a quite death for the hate mongers when one male, one of the site owners, actually wondered out load, why male bashing was such a fundamental right of feminists to automatically undertake. Well, that just won't do. Disgraced Hugo "shag 'em silly" or "I am here for the sluts" Schwyzer and also lunatic left winger, Amanda "All men are bastards and rapists" Marcotte, had an attack of the vapours and smelling salts were just not strong enough to kick any sense into them, so they huffed off..

 We now have their latest efforts and one that once again demonstrates, their clear and obvious desperation, as one could almost imagine them banging their heads against some wall, trying to induce a thought, a new method of attack. One they have not already ruined in the past. No success though. So it's back to the usual finger pointing, vapid accusations they are so amateurish at but persevere with, any open discussion or debate is just not any part of their strategy, they are more into snide, irrelevance and vitriol rather than facts, honest debate and any sincere efforts at coming to any understanding..

More from Paul Elam at AVfM on the subject below..

While I think of it. I am also disappointed at missing out on being on that list. It just isn't cricket..

An open letter to Richard Cohen of the SPLC

Richard Cohen
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36104

Re: Identification of A Voice For Men as a Misogynist Web Site

 

Dear Mr. Cohen,
Yesterday I received the unfortunate news that your organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center (“SPLC”) listed my website, avoiceformen.com, among others, as misogynistic, or “woman-hating.” This description is found in “Intelligence Report, Spring 2012, Issue Number: 145,” on your website at http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites.
Specifically, your report states the following:

A Voice for Men is essentially a mouthpiece for its editor, Paul Elam, who proposes to “expose misandry [hatred of men] on all levels in our culture.” Elam tosses down the gauntlet in his mission statement: “AVfM regards feminists, manginas [a derisive term for weak men], white knights [a similar derisive term, for males who identify as feminists] and other agents of misandry as a social malignancy. We do not consider them well intentioned or honest agents for their purported goals and extend to them no more courtesy or consideration than we would clansmen [sic], skinheads, neo Nazis or other purveyors of hate.” Register-Her.com, an affiliated website that vilifies women by name who have made supposedly false rape allegations (among other crimes against masculinity), is one of Elam’s signature “anti-hate” efforts. “Why are these women not in prison?” the site asks.

The excerpts you have chosen from these sites are taken out of context and misrepresent the goals of A Voice For Men (“AVfM”) and Register-Her.  Contrary to what readers of your site may be led to believe, the goals of SPLC and AVfM are quite similar: We both work to identify groups who seek to oppress others, and inform the public of the inequities they would perpetuate.  If you would allow me to do so, I would like to clear up some misconceptions about AVfM so that SPLC and its supporters can reconsider their view of my service.
A Voice for Men has more than 90 registered contributors.  Similar to the supporters of SPLC, AVfM’s contributors are male and female, Black, White, Hispanic and Asian; gay and straight; Jew, Atheist and Christian; from all points of the political spectrum; and they all hail from many different nations across the planet. We invite even more diversity. All of our contributors share a common interest and concern in the affairs of men and boys. They speak to the issues autonomously – not as a mouthpiece for the editor.  I regularly find AVfM publishing content I do not wholly agree with, or stated in terms that I personally would not necessarily use.  However, it is not my role to impose a uniform voice upon AVfM’s contributors – my role is to ensure that the site furthers its purpose of speaking truth to power.
The work of AVfM is vital and, despite what you may think, not dissimilar from the goals and aims of the SPLC.  The beneficiaries of SPLC’s labors are more likely than not to be men.  Men and boys face very serious problems in modern society.  Men are more likely than women to be homeless, on society’s bottom rungs.[1]  Men are more likely than women to commit suicide, as well.[2]  America’s exploding prison population, which overwhelmingly includes and victimizes the working class and new poor, contains more than 2 million people, but under 100,000 women.[3]  This disparity has had profound effects on African-American men, as more of them are incarcerated than in post-secondary education.[4]  Young men, ignorant rather than criminal, are placed on lifelong sex offender registries that prevent them from obtaining education and even healthcare, and ensuring that they will never contribute to society.[5]  Relatedly, male attendance in higher education has fallen to 40% and continues to diminish,[6] and men lag far behind women in obtaining advanced degrees.[7] The performance of boys in our grade, middle and high schools is deteriorating.  Meanwhile, men have become a minority in the workforce, ensuring their further social and economic marginalization, as well as any hope of upward economic mobility.[8]
Men face additional disparities in selective service, reproductive rights, healthcare funding, and many other areas.  These differences are documented and undeniable.  While society once rallied around the right of a woman to control whether she has a child – an the economic consequences it carries – there is no concomitant outcry to ensure men are not laden with the lifelong obligation of another human being.  While the NFL is awash with pink every October to raise awareness for breast cancer, nary a mention is made of its equally lethal male-only cousin, prostate cancer.[9]  The examples are endless.  These are problems that must be addressed in a just society. Sadly, until now, it would seem to have been in the purview of SPLC to help ameliorate these problems, not aggravate them.
I also believe you may have misunderstood some of AVfM’s semantics.  A “white knight” is an expression describing a traditional male, one who practices chivalry to a degree that is irrational and demeaning in this day and age. Also, the term “mangina” is not a euphemism for “weak men,” but rather a label for men who enable and excuse female misconduct – ranging from physical violence to exculpatory false reporting of crimes[10] – solely because the offender is female (and to gain women’s approval).
Regarding Register-Her.com, SPLC states the following:

“Register-Her.com, an affiliated website that vilifies women by name who have made supposedly false rape allegations (among other crimes against masculinity), is one of Elam’s signature ‘anti-hate’ efforts.”

To the contrary, all of the offenders on Register-Her.com who have been placed there for making false allegations have either 1) had the falsity of their claims proven in a court of law, or 2) publicly recanted their false police reports.  All of these actions are a part of public record. There is nothing “supposed” about these false rape accusations.
Curiously, though, SPLC has not taken any sort of stand on websites like RadFemHub.com, which openly advocates the extermination of males (including male infants), eugenics and sex-specific child abuse.  Perhaps these outlets may warrant further examination, and treatment from the SPLC as sources of Misandry.
The movement for civil and socioeconomic equality in America was and is difficult, and spans both racial and class lines.  For many years the majority resisted progress, but found that nothing could stem the human desire for civil liberty; Not slavery, not Jim Crow, not water cannons or batons or even bullets.  While the SPLC has done good work for the cause of equality across incomes and races, it was not lawyers and arms-length activists that took the brunt of standing up to an unjust system.  It was the men and women on the street that would not be bullied any more that forced the world to change. That world was as hostilely indifferent to the struggles of African-Americans as you appear to be to the struggles of men and boys.
There are hundreds of websites dedicated to real, actual hate on the Internet, with more springing up all the time.  AVFM, a human rights organization, is not one of them.  Nor are the others that you identify as sources of misogyny, such as The Spearhead and the False Rape Society.  Those who fear truth, and brand it as hatred and bigotry, hide behind the worst kind of cowardice – the sniveling complacency that for generations allowed the rich to starve the poor, for one person to own another because of the color of their skin, and for the officers at Nuremberg to claim they were “just following orders.”  For men and boys, there is no more time for complacency.
It is no surprise that a movement like AVfM’s began on the internet, as the free flow of information finally made it possible for men to see what they had long suspected: The laws and norms of society had turned against them. This movement will grow, as it has since its inception, and the time will come when the SPLC (and other groups) must admit our fundamental similarities and aspirations.  I am inviting you, with open arms, to do just that.
The alternative, I fear, is that you come down on the wrong side of history, with the likes of Dred Scott as your legacy.

Sincerely,

 

Paul Elam

Publisher,
avoiceformen.com

This letter available in .pdf download: Open-Letter-SPLC.

I can relate to Alcuin's explanation of the male feminist and their need for acceptance by the female sex. They actually remind me of Elliot's wish at being "The most sensitive man in the world"in Bedazzled.

One can also imagine a male feminist as being one of those overweight, scruffy malcontents, stumbling blindly down some darkened back street, staying in the shade, using chopping motions with their hands and muttering to themselves, secretly ofcourse, so no one else can be party to their imaginary revelations.  Being of the opinion that only they have been given the insight into feminism's Utopia, their holy grail and only they are the select few, proudly chosen to determine it's outcome, it's inevitable theoretical destination and they will be proudly counted as the semi elect, appointed to the position of altar boy in subservience to their high priestesses..

Affirming

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: One of the more irritating things about the matriarchy is the endless stream of manginas trying to talk some matriarchal sense into you, peacocking their own politically correct horseshit in front of the staffroom Frauen.

These men are desperate for outer affirmation, so try to get qualified as a feminist. One way they do that is with the this is what a feminist looks like game, where they publicly build their feminist portfolios through public shaming of men like you and me, men who don't need that same level of affirmation.

Public humiliation is not to be considered as a negative to their enlightened mindset. They are the blessed, they are the chosen, not bypassed as they eagerly volunteered their services by enhancing their cognitive dissonance levels, suitably enhanced to entertain their delusional lofty positions..

First, they are hungry for affirmation because they have the personality of a woman and therefore need some outer force or authority telling them what's what. While we all need this at times and to a certain extent, these guys need it as much as women do rather than the occasional pat on the back.

Second, they were brought up in a feminized environment, and tend to see the woman's point of view rather than their own. They have been brainwashed by the feminist educational system, in other words. Or traumatized. Masculine men, non-compliants, make them uneasy.

Third, they like to talk about their feelings about as much as women do. They particularly love the intoxication of getting angry over some cause. They crave that anger like the lassies do. They want and need the sanctimony. These guys have little on the inside, so fill it with emotions. Notice that emotional types tend not to be big thinkers, though they think of themselves as such. Instead of reasoning through a problem or a belief, they emote and sentimentalize their way through, which leads to useless or childish conclusions.

One can be left in no doubt at all that they are happy and content in their newly appointed positions, they no longer have to behave like a man but only be the pretend version, as long as it is interspersed with Elliot's sensitivity factor and continual obeisance to the female superior. Wishing above all that they will assume the female psyche just like they did back in the Hellenistic period.  They too will be able to assuage the Hellenistic personification of the soul of female, just like they have always dreamed and fantasized..
What ofcourse they do not realise or even comprehend is that there is a different aspect to their groveling abeyance..

The ladies sit back and chuckle to themselves, both at the loser they've manipulated into fighting their fight even though he gains only in his own mind, and at the man presently between the pathetic sights of the peacock.

The self absorption of the male feminist is that intense that they have failed to listen to the command of their masters, their very own feminist female leaders, who have repeatedly informed them to "fecke" off. But their only response is in their in utter disbelieve as they mutter "Hugo", as if that would have some magic affect. They hope they can use that chant to castaway any negatives they may have witnessed their masters have already undertaken. But it won't work, it's just not working, as that echo rebounds and only reminds them where they actually stand in the Matriarchy.. 

Fifth, being second-hand means being a useful idiot, because some puppeteer is pulling the strings. These guys like being the furniture mover for die Frauen because they believe in chivalry. Again, it's about shaky identity: I'm a nice guy, they need to tell themselves - even though, in fact, they practice knifing other men, strong self-formative men, in the back, and in public as part of their public campaign to belong to the cause.

The back-stabbing highlights the lack of honor they have, the fifth reason these guys are like this. A mangina has no honor. Matriarchy has no honor.

They will be remembered and history will align them to others of equal behaviour and treat them with that same disgust, distaste and repugnance..

Just one more guffaw session about Hugo and I will let it go. It has been such an ongoing hobby over the past few years to demonstrate precisely what male feminists are really all about that once they are thrown under the bus by their female masters, one stands back in incredulity and wonders how they could justify it all. But justify they did even if it was only in their own tiny, bigoted, narrow minds..

When you have a look at Schwyzer's overall zeal at promoting that male hate movement, one would witness a fanatic at work. Apart from endless demonstrations of cognitive dissonance that every feminists must possess, you would not find a more dedicated and hard working whipping boy than Hugo. So why did they toss him under the bus? Solely because he was a male, the angst sisters recognised the fact that he was better at it then they were and they were loosing the argument as well as loosing control of their menopausal baby. Radical feminists are back in control and Hugo was in the way as their hatred for all males is palpable and constant, Hugo just had to go, the loathing and verbal detritus does not come any more concentrated than in a radical feminist's hate for all men. Probably because most are indeed lesbians. That may seem like some cop out but it is unfortunately true and can be easily verified. Check the RadFem Hub for verification. You could easily compare the hate for males to a similar event in the second world war against the jews, the comparison is real..

Feminism's last gasp is currently being played out as they are only just kicking rocks, wandering through the desert, looking for minutiae to wallow in. Even Steinem has transferred her loathing and hate sessions to Arab countries as there is much more obsessive behaviour that she can throw a grenade into..

The Atlantic has just published an article regarding the exile of Hugo Schwyzer from the feminist camp. America’s most vocal male feminist ally has just been kicked to the curb by the feminists who he so worshiped. Schwyzer has made a career of writing articles that have promoted a self-emasculating viewpoint in favor of promoting feminist ideas. Until recently, he wrote a series of articles on the Good Men Project, politely telling men how horrible they were and particularly telling the world that “the answer to men’s rights was more feminism.”

Yep, that was Hugo's answer to everything, more feminism to fix the same problems that feminism has created and is responsible for. Obviously, Hugo has absolutely no idea what he is talking about and he is going to find out exactly what happens when more feminism is applied, better still, he has already found that out..

Hugo thrown under the Bus..

Hugo Schwyzer Showing his inner slut..

Hugo Schwyzer is still reeling from the rollicking he got from feminists of the radical persuasion, which is ofcourse generally all feminists, about giving him the bullet and told to just "f*ck off" out of the their "female only" feminist hegemony. He has been soundly informed that they view him as a feminist the same way they view a transvestite as being a female. On both occasions, both history..

Schwyzer then, by proclamation, is not a feminist any longer and yet he has problems adhering to his female bosses edict and persists in preaching his male hate testament like it is his cleverly interpreted feminist revelation. Problem is that it is of no interest whatsoever to anyone, male or female, let alone that lunacy circle..

In his enthusiasm to try and get back into the good books, Schwyzer must now dig, scrap and bow even lower than he has already done to seek their approval. A task that he has become an expert at. Not only is it embarrassing to witness, but this poor pathetic example of almost manhood, would have to have a sex change to reapply but even then he would not be accepted..

He truly is the pathetic example of what feminists want to do to all men..

As usual and ofcourse intentional, twice removed feminists always take care to do, they forget to mention that 33% of the porn audience are in fact women. That brings up that 1 in 3 scenario, sound familiar..

• 66% of women watch porn
• 57% of women watch porn with their partner
• 87% of women that view porn are married or in a relationship
• 10% of women that view porn are single
• 6% of women admitted to watching porn once a day
• 26% of women admitted to watching porn once a month
• Out of the 57 % of women who watch porn with a partner, a third regularly use it as part of foreplay, while 41% admit to having watched it several times with their man.

I wonder if that information has any relevance to what Schwyzer is trying to make..?

Update.. Just incase you were not bemused enough, there is more to Hugo.

But I also had a lot of sex with women—and men—who weren’t my students or in any way under my supervision. And some of that was joyful, fun, and life-affirming.

There is a Thorn onside..

Hugo Schwyzer’s Phony Feminism

February 9, 2012 by Heartiste
Our favorite false flag limpwrist, Hugo Schwyzer, is licking the hairy taint of feminists once more in a vomitous piece about the popularity among men of “barely legal” porn. He really tries hard to put a feminist-friendly (read: anti-male) spin on the uncomfortable reality that men naturally prefer the stimulating sight of lithe, supple, fully ripe young women.[indent]
Across the web, videos and images featuring 18- and 19-year-olds — or actresses in their twenties trying to look younger — are by every measure the most in demand. “Teen porn” is the most common genre-specific term used in Google searches, and teen-themed videos dominate the top 25 most-viewed videos on YouPorn. (Link is absolutely NSFW.) [Ed. Link removed...]
Beyond Derbyshire, the most common explanation given for adult men’s particularly intense attraction to teen girls is reproduction. But on closer scrutiny that theory falls apart. Women’s fertility peaks between 22 and 26, well after their “salad days” have come to a close.
The argument that men in their 30s, 40s, and beyond are evolutionarily hardwired to lust after girls just above or below the adulthood threshold has less merit than we think.
One alternative answer has much more to do with adult men’s anxiety than with their reproductive longings. In the fantasy world of “barely legal” pornography, the teen girl is an ingénue longing for sexual initiation at the hands and body of an experienced older man. For an older man (the average male porn user is over 30) perhaps intimidated by the erotic and emotional demands of his own female peers, the imagined naïveté of a much-younger woman is a source of comfort. The less experience she has, the less likely she’ll mock his clumsiness and the more likely she’ll appreciate whatever savoir-faire he does possess.
[ed: alert! feminist feelgood twaddle incoming] The reality is that only those who are wise and confident enough to challenge us can help us grow. Age isn’t just a number; that confidence and wisdom takes time to emerge. So when men eroticize the young, the tentative, and the innocent — for whatever reason — they’re possibly just eroticizing their own reluctance to accept adulthood and responsibility. In that scenario, everybody loses.[/indent]
This guy can really fling the bullshit. Only someone with intimate knowledge of the subject of barely legal teens can so effortlessly BS his way into nonsensical alternate explanations for male sexual behavior that are otherwise easily explained by a naturally evolved male preference for peak fertility women with little baggage. After all, he’s gotta cover his ass for past, uh… indiscretions. As Bill Clinton understood, nothing distracts feminist attention from one’s own very unfeminist lifestyle like mouthing the platitudes feminists want to hear.
I was once a broken, bad man taking advantage of young women, but now I have seen the light! Praise the bog! Men suck! Men have issues! Men are intimidated by older women! Speaking of which, let’s you and I go for a drink after class today and discuss our mutual loathing of rape culture. I’ll pay just the tip. Heh heh heh.
First, Schwyster is wrong about women’s peak fertility. He pulled his number from Wikipedia which should be a clue to take it with a grain of salt. The age range varies in the studies I’ve seen, but basically most peg female peak fertility in the 18-24 year range. Since barely legal porn filmmakers, by law, can’t hire girls under 18, the most important premise of Schwyster’s argument falls apart before he’s even out of the gate. Instead of confirming Schwyster’s fevered pathologizing of normal male sexuality, the evidence that men prefer watching porn featuring 18-21 year old girls, who are within the peak fertility range, simply affirms the evolutionary theory that gives hives to feminists and feminist suck-ups like Schwyster.
Second, men lust for younger women because those women are less likely to be saddled with other men’s children, or to be pregnant by other men. A young woman’s implied virginity means that fucking her results in a greater chance that any kids she pops out will be that man’s kids. This is important to men, as evolutionary theory would conclude, because men, unlike women’s perfect knowledge of maternity, do not have guarantees of paternity. So men must rely on other signals, such as the youth, fidelity and relative inexperience of their lovers.
Anxiety, or that catch-all feminist trope “intimidation”, has got nothing to do with men’s preference for younger women. It’s all about the sexy biology. By way of analogy, if older men are intimidated by the “erotic and emotional demands” of their female peers, then using Schwyster’s reasoning we may assert that women, who exhibit preferences for higher status men and older men, are intimidated by the erotic and emotional demands of younger men and lower status men. Of course, no one ever makes that claim. Because it’s stupid on its face. Much like Schwyster’s claim that men are intimidated by older, less fertile, less attractive women is stupid on its face. Women aren’t attracted to lower status men, just as men aren’t attracted to older women.
Schwyster knows all this, too, which makes him a phonyfuck of the highest caliber. The guy spent his early years as a professor cashing in his higher status for the pleasure of fucking his 18-21 year old students. Maybe he is wracked with guilt, and his current ultrafeminist stance is his form of atonement. Or maybe (and more likely, in my view) his hypocritical feminist sycophancy is a ruse to get in the panties of the deluded naifs who take his classes.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. The difference between me and a lickspittle errand boy like Schwyster is that I don’t go around claiming there’s something psychologically wrong with men for desiring the hot bods and feminine charms of young women. I don’t blame a guy like Schwyster for wanting to stick his dick in his peak fertility students, nor do I stroke feminist egos to earn PC brownie points and page views.
PS Hugo, word of advice. You can get a lot further with better looking, mentally stable women by not sucking up to them so badly. Chicks dig unapologetic men.
http://heartiste.wor...phony-feminism/

Getting rid of the body and evidence, standard feminist coven practise.

The saga concerning Schwyzer really is a sad and sorry sight to behold. The sad part about all of this is that now the feminist hordes are just demonstrating what total hypocrites and sexists they really are. We have a so-called upper echelon member of the feminist hegemony, a male feminist, being castigated and marooned by the very church that he has attended for most of his life..

Schwyzer has spent years preaching the feminist doctrine, it's deconstruction theories. He even  turned against his own sex in order to assimilate feminist aims and goals and apply them in real life. A task that is ofcourse impossible as feminist theories are based on assumptions and lies. Try living a lie and it will sooner than later, catch up with you. Schwyzer's mistake was to confess some wrongdoings, for which he was hoping to achieve some or any level of forgiveness. He was hoping that if he opened up and confessed his sins that the feminist church would expunge his past evils, he would pay for indulgences and move onto greener pastures..

What Hugo failed to comprehend a few simple things that he should have known right from the start. In order for forgiveness to be given, the feminist congregation he appealed to would have to have some level of compassion, (error number one), some indications of  dignity within themselves,(error number two) some level of honour that had to be upheld(error number three) and a contriteness that the flock would have to share(error number four). They had to actually have some original level of compassion for it to be overcome..

He forgot about the mentality of the gathered assassins who had already determined that there must be someone who must  pay in order for their order to continue. They decided that the transgression was just too wicked to be ignored and the price must be paid..

Remove Schwyzer, he is a male.

Imagine for a moment if Hugo had of been a Hugeena, how proud feminists would have been at her efforts. At her "power" to overcome what must have been a totally evil situation. Imagine the praise and glory she would have received from the same bunch of feminist hypocrites as they  toss Schwyzer out because of his sex.Feminists will forgive anything female but a male is on borrowed time

We have stated all along that male feminists are only there at the whim of the "movement", while they prostrate themselves sufficiently and pay homage to their superior idols.

Out came the priesteses who consisted of same minded people as Hugo -

Here are some statement from Jill at the feministe site stating the obvious ofcourse..

Hugo to be banned from Feministe, link removed and comments denied..

 Feministe is a community that centers on women and feminist thought..the decision to not link or promote Hugo’s work is one that all of the Feministe editors have agreed on.

.. I am committed to developing a feminist-centered and responsive, responsible community here, which means not linking or promoting Hugo.

No feminist has yet claimed any responsibility for the negative effects of the poison they spreead and promote which makes the above statement from feministe rather superfluous....

Also this comment regarding Feministe -

When I saw people were demanding Marcotte be banned from Feministe because she was friends with Schwyzer, that’s when I knew mob mentality had overtaken legitimate criticisms of Schwyzer.

What was that you were saying about building a "responsible Community" again Jill ?

So we have a group of people who are highly positioned and involved in the feminist hegemony and they are as follows -

Hugo Schwyzer who is a self confessed drug user, abuser and brags about having sex with young students. Regarded as one of the leading lights in the feminist movement who is aided and abetted by Amanda Marcotte, who of her own accord promotes hate and misandry..

We have -

Ginmar, who is on full disability and taking anti psychotic meds. she is a regular commenter on Feministe and feminists sites promoting the feminist hegemony and doctrine.

We also have

Male feminist Jeff (All MRA's are rapists) Fecke stabbing Schwyzer in the back in order to maintain some level of popularity, also prominant in the feminist hegemony pecking order..  "am going to find it awfully hard to link to him". One of Hugo's friends

And here we have another nail in Schwyzer's coffin or should that be another match for the pyre. Scarleteen (a sex education site) removing all of Hugo's articles and banning him completely..

Previously unknown information about this writer and his history has recently been made available to Scarleteen with which we have very serious conflicts, including conflict because Hugo chose not to disclose these things to us prior to working with us. For the benefit of the safe environment we always aim to create for our users, and in accordance with the ethics and practices of our organization as a whole, Scarleteen no longer wishes to be associated with him or his work, which is why his contribution was removed.

Seats will need to be booked as there will be a rush of bookings expected for the final removal of all rights and privileges, ofcourse..

I am so disappointed, I went to this Facebook page to give my total support to the efforts of banning or whatever they had in mind about Hugo Schwyzer. You would recognise him from being the recipient of the now almost famous WMASAW Mangina Award.


The Feminists Against Hugo Schwyzer Facebook page had my full support and I even stated that on their wall. The response I got was the usual incoherent drivel that one expects from feminists and one even commented that MRAs like myself, were only pretending that we were against Hugo and would after he has done his penance, be reinstated, we would once again meet and greet his sorry arse and accept him once again into the fold..

Some irrelevant blathering..

Feminist male wimp: Rob Diaz - you should change the name to "Some Feminists Against Hugo Schwyze"ryou dont represent the whole, not everyone Feminist agree with what you are all saying. If you don't believe me as Jezebel.

I must admit to not being too friendly with my response when I pointed out that Hugo wanted to turn men into something that no one wanted or was even remotely interested in, I suggested that Hugo would serve sufficiently as the prime example..

More irrelevant blathering..

Toxic Feminastie - Rafaela Stancic -  I like how she noted the similarities between Hugo and Tim Wise (whom I CANNOT stand), because that's also something I've been noticing for a while. Although Hugo is definitely in a class of his own when it comes to privileged douchebaggery and the co-opting of marginalized peoples' movements (plus Tim Wise never raped or tried to kill anyone, at least to my knowledge).

But all to no avail unfortunately, they shut the wall down to invite only and I failed to track any of my comments to show here so I would say they were deleted or hidden. But I would believe that I may have overstepped my welcome when I suggested that "All you girls" should get their act together and toss him to the curb where he belongs. just no sense of humour. Gee! what is the world coming to..

And even more IB..

Feminastie afterbirth recipient : Placental Mammal - Infuriating, but at this rate not too surprising. Jill engages in the both sides bullcrap with Nice Police lecturing about the problems of marginalizing perpetrators of gendered violence. I'd say Stick A Fork In It, but that blog died years ago. I'm sure the real feminists out there can create something new and better.http://www.feministe.us/blog/​archives/2012/01/17/​on-the-hugo-business/

Hang on a sec,.... waiting for the tears of laughter to clear, "Placental Mammal" who thinks this stuff up, I mean really, what level of child are these feminists. It is worth a look just to witness that cognitive dissonance at work, in quadraphonic as surround sound just doesn't quite explain it sufficiently. The best comedy of the week. 9 Points..

The one single disappointing factor that really affected me the most was David Man-tits wasn't there to stand up for his buddy, his hero, his mentor, to fight in his corner and demand some level of "equality" of justice. Oh ofcourse, I forgot, that would be way out of character..

Is that Taunting ?

There are still a few things that gladdens my little heart and that is the sacrificial offering feminists make of their own, hoisting themselves on their own petards..

The self-immolation of Schwyzer and Marcotte is a sheer pleasure to watch. As some may already know, the GMP (Good Men Project, a feminist enabler site) appears to have come to the realisation that feminism is up against the wall and disappearing faster than this morning's fog, they need to introduce an attitude shift if they want to survive the steamrolling affect the MM has finally engineered, constructed and is currently steering in their (Feminist) direction. Anyone who does not see that obvious state, does not deserve to survive..

I for one have demonstrated what Hugo Schwyzer was and is all about, over many years. Here is a pretend feminist of the worst example, one who not only claims to be a speaker on feminist issues but also claims to have some magic formula for turning men into the pathetic example of himself. A confused, self loathing male who pedestallises women, solely to serve his need for their affirmation. This pathetic example has already confessed to behaviour that most would be jailed for and rightly so. But here he is, serving as a "Women's Studies" professor at Pasadena City College, allowed and permitted to carry out his own claims of bedding young students and steering hapless males into his own theoretical hell by claiming it has some relevance to their lives. The entire episode is way past sickening and the long term consequences of his interferences will be a long time coming..

People like Schwyzer should be locked away, treated and helped, not given a position as a lecturer in an establishment that affect young adult minds..

Here is one example of his fetishes -

He Wants to Jizz on Your Face, but Not Why You Think

The article is just another example of self promotion and staying the course with usual rabid use of feminist terminology while trying to infuse some level of indifference on a topic that he apparently prefers to raise. Most of the male feminists, are a gaping example on how the psychology industry reqiures some major reconstruction in order to recognise obvious conditions applicable to their field of interest..

Here are the examples of the hand-wringing and angst levels that Hugo has probably deliberately instigated..

xuananigans:
As a feminist who is a friend of Hugo Schwyzer’s, I’m very disheartened to see that there are self-identified feminists who would take such a reactionary stance against Hugo without looking at his words, actions, roles, and past in context. It’s a disappointing moment in history when we as a movement attempt to expel our best members based on quotes and accusations carefully culled to be as misleading and inflammatory as possible, simply because someone doesn’t fit the mold of being the perfect feminist with an always do-gooder past and the right demographic background.

 The problem some people have is, they are incapable of actually seeing what "looking at his words, actions, roles, and past in context" actually means. Those hazy, rose coloured, femi-tinted, glasses will have that affect..

STFU Sexists - As a feminist who does not have a personal relationship with Hugo Schwyzer, allow me to completely insincerely and disingenuously apologize for making you disheartened when I and my own feminist friends spoke out about our discomfort for having this man as the mouthpiece of feminism.
If, at any point, any of my close personal friends starts a fairly lucrative career based upon saying the same things that women have been saying for decades while relating it back to how it affects his white male self — and it comes to light that he totes tried to murder someone but it’s all okay now!!! — feel free to not take my friend’s miraculous transformation at face value.

It really is a laugh a minute. But I am sure a lot more commentary will follow as they fanny back and forth, trying to justify their own preconceived ideas without actually facing the reality of it, at all..

Feminists Against Hugo Schwyzer.

Marcotte Later, now there's a topic..

The Company or Government Departments/NGOs Award..

There are quite a few things that I have done to be proud of. Maybe way to boring to mention here but one that stands above the others would be the introduction of the "Mangina Awards". This award was generated to recognise the lame and incompetent, the ignorant and delusional, in other words, feminist men.
There are actually three different types of awards. One for individuals, recognising the efforts of male feminists and their total commitment in worshipping, obeying and total capitulation to the opposite sex. An action demanded by their feminist partners but abhored at the same time. Standard feminist double-think in action.

The individual/Femi-slave Award..

Next is the Individual/Group Award which recognises either a combined group effort or individual efforts by feminist men and their inane presentation and reconstruction of masculinity as well as their adherence to feminisms fake doctrine. It recognises their total capitualtion and abeyance on an individual or group level.

The Special Individual/Group Award for major misandric efforts..

The Company Mangina (top image) award recognises any company. government department or NGO that operate within the areas of feminism's demand for capitulation and abeyance. A much sought after award with plenty of competition.. 

Apart from recognising their total abeyance to the feminist discourse. By pursuing an agenda of recasting and reconstructing the male masculine. They are also recognised for the introductions of anti-male laws, promoting misandry in advertising or demonstrating sexism towards man or boy. The "Good Man/Men  Project et al" is a prime example of this in action. Trying to replace normal masculinity with some feminist variant,  admired by no one and loathed by all..

A bit like trying to reassign the feminine qualities of females by turning them into slut walkers, narcissist experts, obedient robots and pro-abortion enthusiasts...oops.."

Current Award winner are -
Barack Obama.
The Good Men Project.
Hugo Schwyzer.
Valenti's wimp.
Scott Berkowitz.
David Futrelle

Other recommendations are welcome..

Anyway, I digressed..

The Damned Olde Man states exactly my thoughts on this subject as well as my personal sentiments towards this miscreant..

or How Much Beer Can You Drink?

“There is nothing either guilty or shameful about living in a male body. There is nothing wrong with wanting sex with women, liking football, or enjoying beer. There is something wrong with deriving one’s self-worth from how many women one takes to bed, or how well one plays football, or how much beer one can drink. And there is something very wrong—something worth feeling guilt over—about promoting that narrow definition of masculinity to other men.”  - Hugo Schwyzer

Hugo Schwyzer is a guy I doubt I’d spit on if he were burning in front of me. Well, ok, I would, spit on him that is. The guy wouldn’t even be on my radar except that blogs I read regularly keep bringing him up. So I have a vague sense of who he is. He’s a wannabe male feminist (mangina) who would desperately like to be one of the guys while remaining one of the gals. Since the guys won’t have him, he likes to take pot shots at them in his spare time. The trouble is that he seems to think that the guys that won’t have him are even more despicable than he is. He’s wrong, of course. But as the old saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day. Schwyzer’s no broken clock. He’s more like a broken calendar; he’s right about once a year.
I found the above quote on Reddit where it was attributed to dear old Hugo. There was no real context given so it’s entirely possible that I’m taking this out of context which would be plausible because it is one of the very rare times I can agree with him. At least I can agree with the quote, as is, with no context provided.
Feminists frequently use shame and guilt to make men feel bad about being men. Male sexuality is attacked and condemned with regularity. Masculinity and masculine values are frequently associated with patriarchal oppression of women. And any male who expresses himself sexually is automatically deemed a threat to every woman in existence. But being male, being or acting in a traditionally masculine manner, and/or wanting sex with a woman is nothing to be ashamed of or to feel guilty about. In fact, it should be celebrated and applauded. Men who were unafraid to be men are the men who built the world. This is nothing to be ashamed of or to feel guilty about.

More on the article..

Womyn's Stuff apparently..

On numerous occasions, the RADFEM Hub feminist members speak of a festival called the 'Michigan Womyn's Music Festival', a popular occasion, their Mecca, amongst lesbian feminists and strictly off  limits to transvestites ofcourse, as they hate them with a passion, as they are not "real" women as far as they are concerned..



As a matter of fact, even being (or have been at any time in the past) in a heterosexual relationship has your browny marks reduced to zero. That would be contamination as far as they are concerned. Those radical feminists, who is part of the Feminist Movement, are really just an inevitable response of a movement that promotes hate and malice to anyone outside their own sex..

In order to witness the sickening loathing and hate they generate, one would not have to look long at their endless rantings. Part of their mindless programs begin with the total annihilation of an entire sex which one wonders if that is not self-destroying and self defeating, but that has escaped their mindless raging as they continually discuss methods of completing that task..

Bare in mind too, that Pamela O'Shaughnessy is a member of this group under the guise of Karma. Her maniacal lecturing and support for the extermination of all males is not restricted to adults as she includes the introduction of eugenics (just like that dictator did) into her many and varied recommendations and long term goals..

There would not be a site or forum on the net that would surpass the deep seated hate and maniacal loathing of these women, these feminist females have for the opposite sex..
Here is a sample of the deep seated loathing that "pretend" feminists ignore and deny..

 Disrespect is crucial. Disrespect for the cultures, values and institutions of male domination is the very foundation and sine qua non of feminism. Since religion is crucial to the construction of cultural norms in every culture, disrespect for it should be the natural amniotic fluid of feminist thought and activism.Sheila Jeffreys is an academic and writer, originally from London, who teaches in Australia. She has been a rad fem activist for 38 years.

So moving on, we have Hugo Schwyzer organising "Slutwalk LA" for the simple reason of having  plenty of young, nubile, willing females on hand, for him to practise (as the feminist call it, PIV- penis in vagina) sex with them. An accusation he has not only verified himself but blatantly brags about on his blog. What a great example for an almost "human being"..
Here is an article penned by one of the lunatic fringe members at RADFEM Hub called " Steering the Sluts", apply named I thought..

Steering the Sluts: Prof. Hugo Schwyzer Organizes Los Angeles SlutWalk
self-identified feminist man and fun-fem darling hugo schwyzer reports on his blog that he is ”proud to be a part” of the steering committee organizing the los angeles SlutWalk, scheduled to take place june 4, 2011.
according to professor schwyzer, “We’re marching to reclaim a word, we’re marching to declare zero tolerance for harassment and sexual abuse, we’re marching in defense of the basic notion that whatever women wear and whomever they sleep with,

And for those who are of the opinion that Schwyzer has any scruples at all..

FCM (Hello Mindy).... hugo admits on his blog that he “used to” have PIV with female students (including on his professorial-office desk) during what he euphemistically refers to as his “acting out years.”  what a rebel!  a college professor, teaching womens studies and womens history to women, acting out his aggressions and dysfunctions on the bodies of his female students by having PIV with them,

A great example of pure hypocrisy. Schwyzer is in it for the sex (PIV) and female attention, just like most feminist men are..

Lesbian separatist feminism at Michigan Womyn’s music festival

• lesbian feminism
 
• separatism
 
• Womyn’s space

Hugo Schwyzer's New Role..

Hugo Schwyzer defends the action of another female rapist, with his usual penchant of standing up for women regardless of what they do and then falsely compares it with a similar action if a male was involved. You have to remember that Schywzer is a male "wimmyn's studies/gender studies" lecturer, so how BIASED is his opinion going to be.

Schwyzer has no problem, as all feminists have no problem with the fact that stabbing one's own sex in the back, via the "Good Men Project", a feminist pretend, sycophant, men's forum, once again demonstrates what relevance or credibility Schwyzer has on anything to do with men's issues. His brain is so contaminated with feminist disinformation, it's endless lying methodology and inevitable "only women are victims" mentality that is just useless, irrelevant and distinctly in bad taste.
Schwyzer has been given my special "Mangina Award" for just this reason. A female supremacist, apologist, compulsive liar and female student chaser, can only be held in total  contempt and loathing..

He is basically a male feminist that the feminist hegemony would much rather be without as I have demonstrated in my MP3 "feminist men" (pages above for MP3 list), they are loathed and hated by both sexes..

Stacy Schuler, sex with underage students

Pussy Pass in action, out of jail in 6 months....

Oct. 28, 2011

http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=14831933

A popular Ohio high school gym teacher has been sentenced to four years in jail after a judge rejected her insanity defense and convicted her on 16 counts of sexual battery for sleeping with several of her former students.

Stacy Schuler, a former gym and health teacher, had sex with five former students, some of whom were football players, at the school in suburban Cincinnati, where she taught since 2000. During her trial, which ended Thursday, Schuler's lawyers defended her actions with explanations ranging from her vegan diet, the use of the antidepressants, blackouts from alcohol and even irritable bowel syndrome, claiming it rendered her unable to determine right from wrong.

Although several students testified on her behalf, the decision to reject the defense prompted some tough words from the judge hearing Schuler's case, who said it would be a "magnificent leap" believing she had no idea her actions were wrong.

"This is a noble profession that you have, and I've heard a lot of good things about you, but I know that you had the opportunity, as all teachers do, to affect the lives of our children," Warren County Common Pleas Judge Robert Peeler said. "You crossed a line."

Parents of the victims also had harsh words for the woman who was once considered an inspirational educator at Mason High School.

"She groomed these boys, she took advantage of their vulnerabilities she crossed the line and it is unacceptable," one of the victim's mothers said.

Stacy Schuler, a former health and physical education teacher at Mason High School, wipes a tear as she listens to the mother of one of her victims speak at the Warren County Common Pleas Courtroom of Judge Robert Peeler Oct. 27, 2011, in Lebanon, Ohio.

After an anonymous tip earlier this year, Schuler, 33, was arrested for inappropriate activities with students, which included providing them alcohol and marijuana and having sex with them at her home.

Five of Schuler's former students testified that the popular teacher had been drinking when she initiated the sexual contact. Most of the boys were 17 at the time; although the age of consent in Ohio is 16, it's illegal for a teacher to have sex with a student.

"We had no idea that this was going to happen, and we're like what is going on? We think she wants to have sex with us," one of the victims said in court. "She started giving us all back massages. She like gave us all each individually … we all took our shirts off and she was just rubbing down our backs."

Schuler, who did not testify at her trial, pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, with her defense team arguing that her mental illness and a mix of anti-depressants and alcohol impaired her ability to tell right from wrong. She claims to have no memory of the incidents.

"The combined effects of the use of Zoloft and moderate to heavy alcohol consumption are consistent with abhorrent behavior described as well as the memory lapses," Harry Plotnick, the defense team's toxicologist, testified.

The prosecution claimed that Schuler knew exactly what she was doing, and even how she would protect herself if she ever caught.

"She told me that if anybody ever found out that she already had her defense planned out and she would try and say that she was insane," one of the students said in court.
One of the victim's fathers testified at the trial of how his son was negatively affected by Schuler's actions.

"He suffered from depression, loss of motivation … almost didn't go to college -- he was angry at home and he didn't want to be around family or anyone -- my son was not who he used to be," the father said.

It took the judge 45 minutes to make his decision to convict Schuler on 16 felony counts of sexual battery and three misdemeanour counts of providing alcohol to minors.

Although Schuler declined to comment on her own behalf after her sentencing, she cried as she was handcuffed and led out of the courtroom, The Associated Press reported.

Sentenced to four years in jail, Schuler will be eligible for parole in six month, but she will be labeled a sexual offender and required to register her address every 90 days for the rest of her life.

----------

Btw, this is HUGO's defense in the GoodMenProject about this case...
http://goodmenprojec.../#comment-61292

HUGO: What it boils down to is this: are sexual relationships between grown women and underage boys as harmful as those between adult men and underage girls?

Because women are much less likely to sexually abuse teens than are men, those rare cases that do feature female defendants tend to attract lots of media attention – particularly when the woman involved is relatively young and conventionally attractive. 


Hugo just loves double standards..


H/t Johan..