Harman, the most loathed Slut Feminist, in the center..

Following Guido's site on Britain's political scene is always a great source or mirth and sniggers. Guido's site is apparently the first thing they visit, do when they get up in the morning, even before they have had a chance to make their first, early morning cup-a-char(tea). Many a time, after an action or comment has been exposed on his site, by one or more of their pollies, do they act or raise the topic of exposure in their PMQ's question time in Parliament. Thoroughly entertaining event and a major point scoring exercise..

So if you follow politics just for the entertainment value like I do, well worth taking the RSS feed..

We have the UK Independent site as well, for a different perspective, and here is Harman, one the most obnoxious slut-feminists on the planet. Hated and loathed equally by all, there's equality for you...

One of the more laughable incidents is ofcourse when "Slut Feminist" Harriet Harman raises her sexist, biased, obnoxious and "used by date" head, to demonstrate again what a loser it really is by asking questions or making some irrelevant feminist agitprop comment, the usual "women are victims of everything" banality..

Anyone following this blog would already be well aware of the "carry on" and drivel this feminist has already undertaken when Labor was in office in the UK a few years back. A nasty piece of work and unrivaled in her obvious sexist comments, actions, while promoting and encouraging, anti-male discrimination..

Nick rises to Harriet's limp challenge

Lloyd Evans 4:06pm



 Basketball in America. Netball at PMQs. Harriet Harman, Labour’s venerable form-prefect, took her leader’s place today and lobbed a few rubbery missiles at the PM’s under-study, Nick Clegg. It came down to arithmetic. Even if Hattie had stormed it at PMQs she had no hope of reviving her extinct career. But Clegg has it all to play for. He was ready for it too. Assured, combative and well-briefed, he filled his replies with fresh, punchy rhetoric. (Mind you, his match-fit performance should be credited to his party activists.
Clegg must have spent the last 22 months fielding nasty questions from chippy wonks at Lib Dem constituency meetings.) Hattie tried to upset him by accusing the coalition of ‘throwing women out of work.’ But under Labour, Clegg replied, women’s unemployment rose by 24 per cent. Then she mocked him for failing to get healthcare professionals to support the NHS reforms. But Labour, said Clegg, had promised in its manifesto that ‘sustained reform was needed to safeguard the health system.’ Hattie then decided to show everyone that she’d found time to do a spot of homework before today’s session. She quoted Vince Cable’s leaked opinion that ‘this government has no compelling vision.’ Though barely two weeks old this soundbite already feels as ancient as a fob-watch. ‘No one agrees with Nick,’ said Harman daintily, ‘but does Nick agree with Vince?’

This soft-boiled approach made the session feel more like a massage than a mauling. Clegg fired back and attacked Labour on a range of issues. It had ‘sucked up to the City’; it had ‘relied too heavily’ on public sector jobs; it had ‘spent £250m’ allowing NHS managers to make ‘sweetheart deals with the private sector’.
Harman was aghast. She rattled off a bullet-point list of her government’s achievements on health — ‘more doctors, more nurses, lower waiting times and greater patient satisfaction’ — which Labour members know better than their home telephone numbers. Offering oodles of fake sympathy, she regretted that Clegg hadn’t managed to persuade his grassroots supporters to accept the health reforms. And, she asked pointedly, what difference are the Lib Dems making in government?‘Well, Labour must think we’re making a difference,’ said Clegg, ‘because they were handing out leaflets at our conference.’

Hattie had had enough. Realising she couldn’t land a blow on this battle-hardened bruiser, she staged a diplomatic retreat and offered this affectionate joke which she’s probably been working on since Pancake Day. ‘In undermining the NHS,’ she said, ‘and making Shirley Williams vote for the bill, he has trashed not one but two national treasures.’ Clegg seized the opportunity to lay into Labour all over again. They’d left the banking system in a mess. (Cheers from behind him). They’d left the economy in a mess. (More cheers from behind him, slightly louder.) They’d abandoned the NHS to ‘arbitrary privatisation’. (Even louder cheers, possibly even from some Tories.)

Conversing with an esteemed member of the MRM does have distinct advantages, Especially when discussing topics and issues of interest and that always leads to issues that are so obvious as you wonder how the hell you missed it.

The bleeding obvious point that Amfortas raised was the fact that the riots in Britain could be placed quite correctly at the feet of Harriet Harman, professional male hater and feminist, whose Labor government decided that aiding and abetting single mothers with copious payments was just the thing as it is part of the feminist wet-dream to exclude Fathers and give sole ownership of children to the mother without holding her to account for the irresponsibility of her offspring..

We have recently seen a video of a mother of 11 kids, yep, eleven kids, all to a selection of fathers, she took offense when she was asked how she felt about her hoodlum offspring behaving in that fashion (may of been either male or female), she responded with the claim that it was the government's fault. She soundly shirked her responsibility as a parent and put the blame for her children's criminal behaviour and activity on an institution that pays it money and encourages that type of stupidity,  maybe in return one might expect some accountability, but not in the PC Britain of today..

The Men's Movement has been saying exactly that,  it will be the inevitable outcome if you take dads out of the family equation. Stupidity is not just feminist Harriet Harman's speciality but it's the general ingrained practice practised extensively by feminists. We still hear it today and consistently that same ridiculous family destroying statement that women can raise kids on their own because they swallowed the feminist mantra of "don't need no man". Well, you might think that is a "you go girl" high five moment but tell that to your teenage daughters or sons as they drag them off to jail for drug running,  Stealing, gang association, destroying public property as they just did in Britain. Tell them the reason Dad is not around is because you were being ignorant and stupid, you assumed that you could do it all by yourself just to appease your fellow feminist's ego, but where are they now ?

Fatherlessness, violence and the British malaise
by Bill Muehlenberg
August 14, 2011

The London riots have simply reconfirmed and graphically illustrated what the social sciences have been telling us for a half century now: when we allow society to disregard the institution of marriage and in fact assault the institution of family, we are asking for – and will get – trouble.

The social science evidence on this is as overwhelming as it is clear: by every indicator, children will be worse off when not raised in a biological two-parent family. They will be more likely to do less well at school, to become involved in drugs, to commit suicide, to have a range of mental and psychological problems, and to get involved in gangs and criminal activity.
This has been documented so thoroughly now that only an ideologue who is pushing agendas can deny the evidence. Let me here just offer the smallest sampling of research data on this. These are just a few bits of the available evidence.
In an important book on the subject, Francis Ianni found that most gang members in America come from female-headed households. And a study of British communities in the American Journal of Sociology by Sampson and Groves found a direct statistical link between single parenthood and virtually every major type of crime, including mugging, violence against strangers, car theft and burglary. 

Feminists specifically planned this course of action and we (MRM) kept warning and shouting that if you destroy marriage, you will destroy the structure of society..

"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." -- Robin Morgan

If you are wondering who Morgan is just Google that member of the feminasty movement..

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

So feminists are to blame but they will never put their hand up to acknowledge that fact as they will do everything they can to place the blame somewhere else because they know if people find that to be the case, things will change. The main stream media, or most of it, refuse to even credit the riots as a byproduct of Fatherless homes as they too follow the same feminist doctrine..

feminist Harman

Thank goodness some journalists are still awake..

Quadrant Online
Melanie Philips
Goodbye to Enlightenment.

One of them, Harriet Harman, was on TV last night preposterously blaming cuts in educational allowances, of all things, for the fact that teenagers and pre-pubescent children have been torching and looting shops and robbing and murdering people in the streets. It was Harman, of course, who was one of the principal forces behind the promotion of lone parenthood and the marginalisation of fathers as the only progressive position. Yet here she is, faced with the Hobbesian scenes of violent anarchy which are the result of those policies, still parroting the same old claptrap and still totally incapable of acknowledging the terrible damage to individuals, social destruction and de-civilisation she has helped wreak.

I really do not have say too much about this obnoxious feminists as it has already done the damage herself. One of the most loathed male hating feminist I have ever come across..

Harman is the male hater in the middle of the picture..

http://order-order.com/2011/08/13/harriet-harman-is-gangsta-mutha-1/

It was Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first refuge for battered women, who in the late eighties identified Labour's then radicals Harriet Harman and Patricia Hewitt as dangerous feministideological enemies of the family. 
Harman and Hewitt were in those days leading lights of the loony left's radical feminist wing, arguing in pamphlet after pamphlet that "It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony and cohesion." 
After decades of agitation, which influenced social policy as well as social workers, their attack on men and their role in modern life has reached its nadir in Tottenham. Local MP David Lammy put it bluntly last week: "We are seeing huge consequences of the lack of male role models in young men's lives.." Harriet Harman is the ideologicalsingle-mother of those gangsta rioters.
Peter Oborne correctly identifies that behind the scenes New Labour's party policy was captured by the likes of Harman and Hewitt who viewed the traditional two-parent family as an instrument of male, patriarchal oppression. The riots are the toxic legacy of such poisonous "progressive" attitudes.
In government Iain Duncan Smith has perhaps only until the next election to reverse decades of progressive social policies, he has to make work pay for people who have known only inter-generational worklessness and rebuild the traditional family as the prevailing societal norm. 
That task first starts in the think-tanks, moves onto the broadsheet editorial pages, before becoming a stated policy objective eventually leading to changes in the infrastructure of social policy. There is also a necessity for a reversal of the secular kulturkampf which progressives have waged to make non-judgemental, moral relativism the only acceptable official view. We are currently only at the think-tank and broadsheet editorial stage.
Harman's 1990IPPR pamphlet “The Family Way”, was described by Feminist Review as "An attempt to combat stultifying, traditionalist concepts of ‘the family". We have reached the end of that decades long struggle by Fabians and feminists to undermine the family; with 40% of children born outside marriage and a minority of childhoods completed in the household of both biological parents. It is now apparent to all that few if any of Harriet Harman's fatherless gangsta progeny come from those supposedly stultifying traditional families.
Add a comment to this post

Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter
Labour figures' bizarre link to paedophile groups
Their involvement with an organisation to which two groups campaigning for the legalisation of paedophilia were affiliated has come back to challenge three leading Labour Party figures.
Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Miss Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.
more within link21st Century British Nationalism: Harriet Harman - Paedophile Supporter