The Reality Blog

One does not have to look too far to witness the total lack of female empathy when applied to the Men's Movement. Sadly, it almost appears that the movement is on it's own and fighting for decency and equity is not one of the topics that women are generally interested in. It can only be put down to the off chance that, going against feminism and their male-hating vitriol, is either way to hard, too difficult or it would displace their hierarchal sisterhood status, the sisterhood principles are more important then the general good that we fight for. It is a well known fact that females bully each other endlessly, more so then males. The male situation is mostly about sorting out the problem, if you have a problem with someone, stand up to it and take it from there. No festering or denial, confront the issue, if there is a reason and deal with it and that is the way men deal with it. For females there is, as usual, a lot more to consider as I have, while running this blog over the past (almost) seven years, witnessed how totally ruthless and maniacal females can be when reeking revenge..

Nastier than men as far as I can tell. I have many articles where women have abused each other to such a degree that I had to readjust my own thinking towards the opposite sex. The worst example would be an article where a female surgically removed a foetus from a pregnant "mother to be" and took the child home claiming it was hers because she could not have her own. Affective but hardly sane. I have photographs of young girls who have been attacked by their peers and the end result has both physically and mentally scarred them for life. Women are not overly brave when it comes to any possibility of being physically traumatised or physically abused. Normally they call in some white knight or pussy whipped partner to do their dirty work just so they can claim the ethical high road by claiming that it was not their fault or blame for instigating the melee, over some imaginary and ill conceived  hubris..

Apart from al that, we do see and witness quite a few females on side. These ladies can and do witness the sexist, discriminatory male hating efforts that feminists continually promote and proclaim. Those same females, in some cases are even more forward and state their opinions in a more direct way than some men do. They are not shy about coming forward and telling it precisely the way it is, what the issues are and what needs to be fixed regardless of the abuse and personal harm they may have to carry in speaking out..
There would not be too many men on this planet who are not attached or have not been involved with a loving and caring female in their lives, generalisations aside. I have to make that confession myself, as it's undeniable. Those females do have a major impact on our attitudes and thinking, more so than we care to admit or confess.
That is the problem I have with the opposite sex. They can see the issues we face, the misandry, the promotion of a male hating society and all that comes with that and yet there are very few female voices involved in trying to clean that mess up. Maybe it is time that women sat down and made some decisions regarding their own future as our efforts requires the input from both sexes to make it acceptable as well as tenable. we need more women onside to soften the overall impact that feminists are trained to inflict and the sooner they come onside, the sooner they voice their dislike about where all things are heading, the sooner we can fix the problem..

The title name and this blog in general, may appear to be somewhat of an enigma but to my way of thinking, it's totally justifiable and self explanatory. The feminist penchant of promoting all women as being something they are not, eg. blameless, incapable of dishonesty or breaking the law was and is way too incomprehensible. So this blog is here to refute those false and fake claim, argue the men's purview, hence the title..

Feminists and feminism is the main problem, they need to be neutralised for their obvious actions, shut down so society can return to sanity and equity instead of heading towards an inevitable conflict where no one will win and we all loose..
Demonstrate as well to all and sundry that ethics and honour does still ride within the female spyche instead of the endless negative representations we have from male hating feminists that only compounds the "anti-woman" attitude..
You are going to have to make that decision sooner or later as there is no longer a middle road to follow as it's at the stage of "either for or against", better still, promote your altruism..
How else could you possibly restore respect for your own sex..

The Great Global Warming scam has surely and finally been uncovered for what it really was. A pot of gold at the end of the ever decreasing rainbow, instigated by the same lunatics who generated it from it's beginning. Even the epicentre of this farce, the IPCC, has backtracked and commenced their denial procedures and headed for the hills as they try and cover their butts. Gillard (feminist, female and fraud) has just positioned Aus. into this giant con with the introduction of a useless carbon tax via ignorance and stupidity. Another great example of what the world will be like when it's run by women. If anyone ever suggests that it will be a better world they need to do some history, maybe even visit some prisons and ask the latest genocide specialist why SHE (rape them before you murder them) enjoyed the annihilation of nearly a million people and how much of a kick she got from that..

Men are not excluded from this action(even though death and crime rate has dropped considerably)  but as sure as hell, women are no better at it either and the implication that women are saints and free of all guilt is something that needs to be put to rest as way too many feminist clones appear to be of this opinion. They need to grow up and smell that truth..

Meanwhile there appears to be some correlation between feminism and the great global warming scams that require some studies as well. The BBC in Great Britain has to be one of the most feminist controlled media outlets in the world, just ahead of the New York Times when it comes to male bashing and promoting anything derogatory about our sex. The NYT does employ that male hating cretin and ageing miscreant by the name of Maureen "don't need no man" Dowd. Dowd is a great example on how a female can not only display total hypocrisy by bashing all things male but then complain about not getting any attention or offers of partnership from our sex. The menopausal drone  is just another feminised minion and one of it's staunch enablers. Read just one of it's articles and you will automatically suffer grey cell damage as her dysfunctional ranting will immediately demonstrate it's cognitive dissonance..

The fact that the AGW crowd and the feminist movement reared it's nefarious head at roughly the same time does demonstrate that it's mentality stems from that same "flower power" mentality that claimed  "Woodstock" was more than just some sex orgy and drug users paradise. That same mentality kicked off that same mentality that both those extremes have generated world wide and it's commencement and promotion can well be nailed to those same people..

The AGW lie has been exposed and it's leaders and promoters are all heading for cover as the truth is revealed. The "sceptics" have soundly exposed those liars and exaggerators for what they really are, in it for the money. There is a lesson to be learnt from all of this and that lesson is that when we have truth is on our side, our cause is just and we will win. The opposing side of the AGW crowd has demonstrated that a concerted effort will bare fruit and that same methodology can be applied to the MM (Mens Movement) and to MRAs as well. Our concerted efforts will claim it's reward by exposing those liars and hold them accountable. It is for this reason that every one associated with the MM can hold their head high and claim effectiveness as we witness the gradual but increasing affect we are having on that monstrous hate movement, where it's leaders are starting to head for cover as well. The one clear fact is that feminism as a movement is not supported by the general public or society in general. They are a minute movement still screaming for recognition and justification but we are here to ensure they get precisely what they deserve..

To all in the MM, a hearty, well deserved pat on the back is justified and the work undertaken by all involved can be and should be congratulated on their efforts. It's a job well done, as our movement grows daily, we can witness it's affect and it's all positive but as we hear constantly from the opposition, we have a long way to go..

Back to GGWS..

The BBC's hidden 'warmist' agenda is rapidly unravelling 

Since 2006, the BBC has relentlessly promoted the global warming orthodoxy as a pressure group in its own right.The story of the BBC’s bias on global warming gets ever murkier. Last week there was quite a stir over a new report for the BBC Trust which criticised several programmes for having been improperly funded or sponsored by outside bodies. One, for instance, lauded the work of Envirotrade, a Mauritius-based firm cashing in on the global warming scare by selling “carbon offsets”, which it turned out had given the BBC money to make the programme.
Just as this scandal broke, I was also completing a report, to be published next month by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, on the BBC’s coverage of climate change. It ranges from the puffing of scare stories dreamed up by “climate activists”, to BBC reporting on wind farms, often no more than shameless propaganda for the wind industry. Part of the story told in my report is the unhealthily close relationship that developed between the BBC and organisations professionally involved in the “warmist” cause.
Some years back, the BBC adopted a new editorial policy –that the scientific and political “consensus” on climate change was now so overwhelming that it should be actively promoted, while climate sceptics, or “deniers” as the BBC calls them, should be kept off the airwaves.
A key moment in developing the new party line was a “high-level seminar” in 2006, attended by a bevy of top BBC executives. It was organised by Roger Harrabin, one of its senior environmental correspondents, and Dr Joe Smith, a geographer and climate activist from the Open University. They had set up the Cambridge Media and Environment Programme to promote the consensus line on global warming, funded by, among others, the Department for the Environment (then in charge of government policy on climate change) and WWF, one of the leading warmist pressure groups.

More on those shameless crooks..

Here we have another one of them, according to Feminists, the rapist, a child molesting pedophile, one of those special privileged members of the patriarchy who deserves nothing better than to be put out of his misery..

 Another privileged member of society, who only has to flick his fingers to ensure all and sundry is automatically awarded him, solely due to the fact that he has a penis..

 I wonder how many of those male haters would have the courage or dignity or honesty to swap places with this guy or be able to grace this world with such dignity and humour..

 Any takers ?