The Reality Blog

Getting rid of the body and evidence, standard feminist coven practise.

The saga concerning Schwyzer really is a sad and sorry sight to behold. The sad part about all of this is that now the feminist hordes are just demonstrating what total hypocrites and sexists they really are. We have a so-called upper echelon member of the feminist hegemony, a male feminist, being castigated and marooned by the very church that he has attended for most of his life..

Schwyzer has spent years preaching the feminist doctrine, it's deconstruction theories. He even  turned against his own sex in order to assimilate feminist aims and goals and apply them in real life. A task that is ofcourse impossible as feminist theories are based on assumptions and lies. Try living a lie and it will sooner than later, catch up with you. Schwyzer's mistake was to confess some wrongdoings, for which he was hoping to achieve some or any level of forgiveness. He was hoping that if he opened up and confessed his sins that the feminist church would expunge his past evils, he would pay for indulgences and move onto greener pastures..

What Hugo failed to comprehend a few simple things that he should have known right from the start. In order for forgiveness to be given, the feminist congregation he appealed to would have to have some level of compassion, (error number one), some indications of  dignity within themselves,(error number two) some level of honour that had to be upheld(error number three) and a contriteness that the flock would have to share(error number four). They had to actually have some original level of compassion for it to be overcome..

He forgot about the mentality of the gathered assassins who had already determined that there must be someone who must  pay in order for their order to continue. They decided that the transgression was just too wicked to be ignored and the price must be paid..

Remove Schwyzer, he is a male.

Imagine for a moment if Hugo had of been a Hugeena, how proud feminists would have been at her efforts. At her "power" to overcome what must have been a totally evil situation. Imagine the praise and glory she would have received from the same bunch of feminist hypocrites as they  toss Schwyzer out because of his sex.Feminists will forgive anything female but a male is on borrowed time

We have stated all along that male feminists are only there at the whim of the "movement", while they prostrate themselves sufficiently and pay homage to their superior idols.

Out came the priesteses who consisted of same minded people as Hugo -

Here are some statement from Jill at the feministe site stating the obvious ofcourse..

Hugo to be banned from Feministe, link removed and comments denied..

 Feministe is a community that centers on women and feminist thought..the decision to not link or promote Hugo’s work is one that all of the Feministe editors have agreed on.

.. I am committed to developing a feminist-centered and responsive, responsible community here, which means not linking or promoting Hugo.

No feminist has yet claimed any responsibility for the negative effects of the poison they spreead and promote which makes the above statement from feministe rather superfluous....

Also this comment regarding Feministe -

When I saw people were demanding Marcotte be banned from Feministe because she was friends with Schwyzer, that’s when I knew mob mentality had overtaken legitimate criticisms of Schwyzer.

What was that you were saying about building a "responsible Community" again Jill ?

So we have a group of people who are highly positioned and involved in the feminist hegemony and they are as follows -

Hugo Schwyzer who is a self confessed drug user, abuser and brags about having sex with young students. Regarded as one of the leading lights in the feminist movement who is aided and abetted by Amanda Marcotte, who of her own accord promotes hate and misandry..

We have -

Ginmar, who is on full disability and taking anti psychotic meds. she is a regular commenter on Feministe and feminists sites promoting the feminist hegemony and doctrine.

We also have

Male feminist Jeff (All MRA's are rapists) Fecke stabbing Schwyzer in the back in order to maintain some level of popularity, also prominant in the feminist hegemony pecking order..  "am going to find it awfully hard to link to him". One of Hugo's friends

And here we have another nail in Schwyzer's coffin or should that be another match for the pyre. Scarleteen (a sex education site) removing all of Hugo's articles and banning him completely..

Previously unknown information about this writer and his history has recently been made available to Scarleteen with which we have very serious conflicts, including conflict because Hugo chose not to disclose these things to us prior to working with us. For the benefit of the safe environment we always aim to create for our users, and in accordance with the ethics and practices of our organization as a whole, Scarleteen no longer wishes to be associated with him or his work, which is why his contribution was removed.

Seats will need to be booked as there will be a rush of bookings expected for the final removal of all rights and privileges, ofcourse..

Fascinating how feminists and their manginas are trying as hard as they can to try and align that lunatic in Norway with being an MRA. David from "ManTiTs" has decided that he could, if he tried really hard enough, close one eye and balanced on one of his oversized feet, maybe discredit the one group that is embarrassing his little childlike fantasy ridden, femi-world by pretending something. Desperation does do those things you know. It must have taken a couple of tries as well as an increase in medication to find that illusion can really be an imaginary fact..

Oh dear, he does try so hard..

So here is the flow-on affect from another feminist cretin, the misanthrope from the femmie site, feministe, who prefers the exotic approach, a touch of theatre for affect and, she hopes, a little drama. She gasps, hands thrown in the air and breathlessly spreading the lie like the infection she caught only recently but still contagious..

It bursts forth like a revelation even though the antibiotics didn't work and her temperatures is still rising..

Shocker: Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik is a racist and a misogynist, and his shooting rampage was inspired by his hatred of women, Muslims, and brown people. He uses a lot of the same tropes as Men’s Rights activists. He was encouraged by anti-Islam bloggers in the United States who routinely warn of the “Islamicization” of the West, including Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
It is unfair to say that websites like Spencer’s caused the violence in Norway. But I think this quote is pretty right-on:
Marc Sageman, a former C.I.A. officer and a consultant on terrorism, said it would be unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik’s violence to the writers who helped shape his world view. But at the same time, he said the counterjihad writers do argue that the fundamentalist Salafi branch of Islam “is the infrastructure from which Al Qaeda emerged. Well, they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged.”
“This rhetoric,” he added, “is not cost-free.”

The left wing feminist lunatics must drink from the same bath water just as I expected. Nothing is too insipid or sufficiently low enough for them to dredge. Desperation does that you know..

Why are Muslims the victims when non-Muslims were shot? 

Andrew Bolt
Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Mark Steyn wonders how a white Norwegian shooting 93 other Norwegians is an attack on Muslims: 
The opening sentence from USA Today:
Islamophobia has reached a mass murder level in Norway as the confessed killer claims he sought to combat encroachment by Muslims into his country and Europe.
So, if a blonde blue-eyed Aryan Scandinavian kills dozens of other blonde blue-eyed Aryan Scandinavians, that’s now an “Islamophobic” mass murder? As far as we know, not a single Muslim was among the victims. Islamophobia seems an eccentric perspective to apply to this atrocity, and comes close to making the actual dead mere bit players in their own murder. Yet the Associated Press is on board:
Security Beefed Up At UK Mosques After Norway Massacre.
But again: No mosque was targeted in Norway. A member of the country’s second political party gunned down members of its first. But, in the merest evolution of post-9/11 syndrome, Muslims are now the preferred victims even in a story in which they are entirely absent.
UPDATE
Brendan O’Neill says the London bombers and the mass murderer Breivik seem products of the same mulitcultural pathology:
Some commentators, including us at spiked, have argued that acts such as 7/7 are more an extreme expression of the multicultural outlook than they are a traditional form of Islamic fundamentalism. Multiculturalism’s celebration of identity over solidarity, its promotion of the politics of self-pity and victimhood, of a perception that minority identities are continually under threat from the post-colonial and xenophobic attitudes of both society’s rulers and its native masses, found its most fanatical expression in the London bombings. In the bombers’ extraordinary levels of self-pity, combined with their arrogant belief that their Muslim identity gave them the right to hector the British throng, we got a glimpse of how far the multicultural ethos can be pushed. Breivik, for all his anti-multicultural pretensions, is not that different. Indeed, it is remarkable how much his so-called critique of multiculturalism seems bound by the parameters of multiculturalism itself.
In his claim that he wanted to protect ‘white Christian identity’ from being overrun and crushed by an external powerful force - in this case Muslim immigrants - Breivik is merely indulging in an alternative form of multiculturalism. In different ways, both the 7/7 bombers and Breivik express the same sense of cultural paranoia, of cultural siege and victimhood.

It would appear that he may not be the only one suffering from the following condition..

Norway suspect may be insane: lawyer
Charles Onians
July 27, 2011

AFP

The lawyer for the Norwegian gunman who has claimed responsibility for killing 76 people in twin attacks last week said that everything about his client's case indicates he is "insane".

"This whole case indicates that he's insane," Geir Lippestad told journalists of Anders Behring Breivik, adding that a medical evaluation would take place to establish his psychiatric condition.