It does not take any normal thinking human being too long to conclude what a useless, arrogant and ignorant rabble these feminists and their enablers really are. Their relentless attacks on the MM (Mens Movement) can only be seen as some pathetic attempt at refusing to even bother to justify or answer the most basic queries or questions that we put forward..
The have steadfastly refused to even consider or answer any grievance or bothered to answer any questions without so much as given any legitimate response. Their standard response is ridicule and the automatic assumption that those questions will just disappear or if they stall long enough and goad enough and bluster enough, they will not have to supply any coherent responses at all..

Instead they ignore their own level of malice and hate while trying to point  or accuse everyone else. They ignore their own hate language, while having the temerity to claim that we behave the same way they do. Their accusation of hate have never been justified but they have absolutely no issue what so ever about supporting their own hate speech. They promote and support radical feminists eugenics and murder, while never uttering a single word against it. They support hate by the very words their own leaders have stated, while never speaking out on one single occasion against it. Yet, we have left winged lunatics, who are the main supporters of the slut feminist hate movement, like Maher, sprouting his vile hate messages, while not one single member of that hate movement uttering a single word of condemnation or protest, while they continually claim members of the MM indulges in..

From JTO, AVfM

Open Letter: Thank-you feminists and ideologues

However, rather than logical rebuttals or evidence based arguments, the majority of oppositional rhetoric falls squarely into the category of ad-hominem and straw-man argument, along with other formal logical fallacy. One recent “cracked.com” article stated “no REAL MAN has ever come out as an MRA” [emphasis mine] as well as claiming that opposition to feminism is equivalent to burning down a house in response to an infestation of ghosts. The implication in that metaphor being possibly that feminism doesn’t actually exist?

Other commentary condemning the rising mens rights movement focuses in on the obvious and overwhelming privilege of white males, and the clear absurdity of any complaint about unequal treatment in the family court system, the criminal courts system, higher education, employment, homelessness, suicide, criminal victimization, prison rape, life expectancy, sexually-specific health funding, misrepresentation in domestic violence education, and general disposability based on sex.

Their baseless claims and endless inane rhetoric has and is becoming so repetitive and boring that one would have to wonder if they are just now on the "Repeat and Rinse" cycle. Could it well be the case that they are finally aware of the fact that they have lost the argument and are now just amusing themselves with their mundane repetitive actions, out of habit. Was that why they had the SPLC and Cracked sites instigate those attacks, out of desperation, one last attempt to shut the MM up..

As the MM grows and receives ever widening coverage, our coherent message begins to surface in the MSM (main stream media) as we can no longer be ignored, even after a concerted attack by those additional feminists sympathisers have raged over the past month or so..

So, keep up the good work..

Isn't It Romantic? Feminism's latest triumph: Boys are afraid of girls.
By JAMES TARANTO, Wall Street Journal.

At the same time, there is good reason for males (men as well as boys) to be more fearful of sex than females. Contemporary reproductive technology and law place all the burden for unwanted pregnancy on them. Between the pill and abortion, women have complete control over the reproductive process. They can avoid or end any unwanted pregnancy, and the man involved has no say in the matter. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court went so far as to hold that a married woman has the constitutional right to abort her husband's child without even telling him.

A woman's "reproductive rights" also include the right to carry a pregnancy to term. The crucial point here is that while the decision belongs entirely to her, in the event that a child is born the law assigns financial responsibility to the male involved. That is what the boy in her study means when he worries about being "screwed for the rest of my life." Short of sterilization, the only way for a male to be sure of avoiding this fate is to abstain from sex.

 If the MM is involved in, how those haters from the feminastie movement have falsely accused, why would a recognised journalist and a major news outlet like the Wall Street Journal and the WND even bother with any issues that the MM have raised. Would they not just write us off as you have tried to do. Now is the opportunity to give some thought to all those lies and all that misinformation you have spread and maybe create a conscience and show some dignity and honour, by actually answering obvious legitimate arguments instead of generating strawman arguments which you already know just does not work and only demonstrates your own bigotry, bias and sexism. If that does not dawn, then just keep up the good work as we need the additional exposure..

The majority of "Rich Women" derived their fortune via ludicrous divorce payments..

The standard practice slut-feminists follow is to introduce their version of important issues that they feel society should be discussing whenever the slightest sign of change is recognised and then inflate and promote it as a news item. That practice ofcourse just demonstrates their endless talent for lying and exaggeration. They never fail to continually promote that fact. Even when the lie they promote is that obvious that a child could spend three minutes checking it out, they persist. Issues they have generated in the past are ofcourse always for the promotion of their own sex and they never miss any opportunity maligning and male bashing as much as possible. A few come to mind and one is the "housework" issue which is ofcourse much more important than anything else at the time. The fact that studies have already demonstrated that the privileged sex do not actually do more work around the house or do more hours than men do, will never see the light of day as news as that would be counteractive to their lies and deceit..

Their first LOVE..

The other inane and childish issue they raised was the "toilet seat" drama that obviously took up most of the day's thought processes as that too, was so important. Hours and days were spent discussing this huge problem while simultaneously bashing males in the process as apparently it was all our fault, again. The Germans were actually thinking about installing a verbal message system, a computer chip under toilet seats,  that would inform any recalcitrant male when he lifted the seat to have a pea, to put it back down and sit down to have one. That is how important that issue was to the slut-feminist hate movement. They persisted with it to such a degree that it actually become an issue between partners, when in actual fact it was never really a problem to begin with. But it gave those harridans another topic to male bash and that was all they were interested in..

So what do you think would be the next topic they could malign and humiliate all men with next. Surely they could "wrack their brain cell" and come up with something that enormous, that the world would just about stop spinning..

Oh, Oh I know.. The female income issue, bingo. How about we make spurious claims that men actually give a shit about a woman's income when choosing a partner. I mean, what they really think about it. Let's see if we can accuse men of being gold diggers just like the majority of women already appear to be,(women mostly marry up and that decision is mainly about the income of the male), surely that mud will stick..

I will leave Bernard to fill you in on the details..

Fitted Humour..

I will pop onto a different topic next time but here is one that will again demonstrate, how women are suffering, as all and sundry plot against their wellbeing and every other issue they imagine they suffer from. I did live in the hope that this level of self aggrandizement and superficiality were going the way of the dodo but that would just be wishing the impossible..

Not only have they been given a free ride, have billions of dollars spent on them every year, but they do not want to pay for it. nope, that is someone else's task and guess which sex will have to once again carry the burden on his shoulders, again or is that, still. The more I look at this the more annoyed I get.

Here we have typical feminist behaviour, firstly, state how women are such victims, then go onto the false and fake claims that their lives were even worse back fifty years ago, and then make the ludicrous claim that feminism has improved their lives to the Utopian levelthat it is now even though it's no where to be seen and yet continue to ramp up the demands they have already made and just dump it in with the millions of other "claims pile", for future assessment and inevitable adjustment and still claim that women are victims because...(enter your own)

Women are still suffering fromoverly intrusive government. Improving the lot of American womenmeans lowering marginal tax rates, abolishing many workplaceregulations, increasing the number of low-skilled immigrants, andending the drug war.

Now according to this feminist -  Contributing Editor Veronique de Rugy is a senior researchfellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. -
Women are actually even more of a victim than they have ever been. They are actually locked up for breaking the law (gasp), what is the world coming to. That is apart from the fact that income tax hurts women the most, ofcourse..

The lingering tax penalty could partially explain why, despitethe fact that almost 80 percent of working mothers say they wouldprefer to work part time, almost two-thirds work full-time instead.Taxes on the money they earn are often too high to make part-timework financially viable.
High marginal rates and joint taxation are not the only elementsof the tax code that give married women disincentives to work.

The biggest surprise here is that this feminist not only promotes married females, whom, in their version, is really just a "kitchen slave", and kills that mantra in the process without even realising it. But also pushes the interests of single mothers. Now that is a topic all of it's own, debacle that it is..

Anyway, the article is just way too annoying for me to continue with, so have a look if you feel the need to self flagellate..
The link to this monstrosity is here..

Put down your drink and grab a tissue..

The feminist dream is to malign and destroy man's credibility by making all females victims, regardless of the situation, and ensure that all males are held to be aggressors even though that great lie is finally being exposed..

Feminists, especially radical feminists, a group of toxic lesbians, have been guiding legislation and laws to ensure those laws victimise men and boys for any reason they see fit. Lawmakers have deliberately turned the other cheek by passing those biased and sexist laws without scrutiny, thereby creating a victim class for women and allocating copious funding while at the same time ignoring services to benefit men and boys. This routine has been ongoing for the last 40 years as white knights and cowards in the legislator deny the existence of abusive women, which ofcourse, much to their amazement, do actually exist..

But not according to majority of mainstream politicians. They have betrayed their constituency, granted carte blanche arrangement to feminists to introduce laws and services for women, against men, at will..

This has to stop, your vote can and will count. It is time to assess what those politicians stand for and if they have demonstrated that they have passed those sexist, biased laws, boot them from office. They have to go..


Female violence society’s “dirty little secret,” especially in Alberta 
Beacon News | July 29, 2011 
By Christopher Walsh, 

Twenty years ago, a man named Earl was sitting alone in a mobile home, the oven door open, two propane tanks set on either side, when the phone rang. He wasn’t expecting the call, it just sort of came out of the blue as he readied to turn on the gas.