Latest Posts
Showing posts with label feminist bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminist bias. Show all posts

The Income Tax Rate Hurt Women the Most..

Fitted Humour..
I will pop onto a different topic next time but here is one that will again demonstrate, how women are suffering, as all and sundry plot against their wellbeing and every other issue they imagine they suffer from. I did live in the hope that this level of self aggrandizement and superficiality were going the way of the dodo but that would just be wishing the impossible..

Not only have they been given a free ride, have billions of dollars spent on them every year, but they do not want to pay for it. nope, that is someone else's task and guess which sex will have to once again carry the burden on his shoulders, again or is that, still. The more I look at this the more annoyed I get.

Here we have typical feminist behaviour, firstly, state how women are such victims, then go onto the false and fake claims that their lives were even worse back fifty years ago, and then make the ludicrous claim that feminism has improved their lives to the Utopian levelthat it is now even though it's no where to be seen and yet continue to ramp up the demands they have already made and just dump it in with the millions of other "claims pile", for future assessment and inevitable adjustment and still claim that women are victims because...(enter your own)
Women are still suffering fromoverly intrusive government. Improving the lot of American womenmeans lowering marginal tax rates, abolishing many workplaceregulations, increasing the number of low-skilled immigrants, andending the drug war.
Now according to this feminist -  Contributing Editor Veronique de Rugy is a senior researchfellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. -
Women are actually even more of a victim than they have ever been. They are actually locked up for breaking the law (gasp), what is the world coming to. That is apart from the fact that income tax hurts women the most, ofcourse..
The lingering tax penalty could partially explain why, despitethe fact that almost 80 percent of working mothers say they wouldprefer to work part time, almost two-thirds work full-time instead.Taxes on the money they earn are often too high to make part-timework financially viable.
High marginal rates and joint taxation are not the only elementsof the tax code that give married women disincentives to work.
The biggest surprise here is that this feminist not only promotes married females, whom, in their version, is really just a "kitchen slave", and kills that mantra in the process without even realising it. But also pushes the interests of single mothers. Now that is a topic all of it's own, debacle that it is..

Anyway, the article is just way too annoying for me to continue with, so have a look if you feel the need to self flagellate..
The link to this monstrosity is here..

Put down your drink and grab a tissue..

Only Girls Allowed..



Being a women is just so hard and difficult apparently, hard enough according to feminists that sexism and discriminating against men and boys is excusable and justified ofcourse. We have a sex that is so totally focused on itself that one is just words short, at trying to describe it. The actions by women is not only incomprehensible, it makes any action that feminists claim against our sex, pale into insignificance..

The sexism, discrimination and the anti-male vitriol is openly demonstrated on a daily basis and we have zero in the MSM even bothering to question their actions or even pose any questions apart from agreeing with it.

Since when does one determine which sex has the harder life and the other the easiest. Feminists have already ordained that their religious followers ensure that the female sex is always the victim, regardless of circumstances, in order to justify their misandry..

Here is just another example of their sexism and bias..

‘Only girls allowed' 

Plan UK’s campaign, which highlights the plight of the world’s poorest girls, launches a groundbreaking interactive ad on a bus stop in Oxford Street on February 22.
The ground-breaking advert can be seen at a bus stop on Oxford StreetThe advert uses facial recognition software with an HD camera to determine whether a man or woman is standing in front of the screen, and shows different content accordingly.
Passing shoppers can opt-in to view the ad and find out more about Plan’s work to help some of the world’s poorest girls. Men and boys are denied the choice to view the full content in order to highlight the fact that women and girls across the world are denied choices and opportunities on a daily basis due to poverty and discrimination.
Plan’s Because I am a Girl campaign aims to support four million girls in developing countries to have more choices about what they do with their life.

Link for more on the article..

Instead of taking the sex out of the argument, feminists go out of their way to ensure that only females are the sole target and will use that old and tired argument they have used in the past decades justifying their sexism and bias. They refuse to move on and they also flatly refuse to make any effort to calm the sex war but instead prefer to continually fan the flames to ensure the battle continues and the animosity grows and festers..

It is no longer necessary to claim that the feminist movement is a hate movement as they now so aptly demonstrate it very clearly themselves using your tax dollars to discriminate against you. To them, it's poetic justice..

Advert on Oxford Street shown only to women

Interactive advert  
The interactive screen will show the full 40-second advertisement only to women
An interactive hoarding at a London bus stop aims to show a 40-second advertisement only to women and girls.
The screen showing the short video campaign, by children's charity Plan UK, is located at a bus stop opposite Selfridges on Oxford Street.
A camera will measure facial features of the person standing at the screen to decide whether it is a man or a woman. It guesses right 90% of the time.
If it is a male, the screen will direct him to the charity's campaign website.

VAWA :If Feminists Had Only Been More Reasonable..



One of the many issues that I have had time to ponder would have to be situation that if the feminist's attitudes towards man and boy, had of been a little friendlier, than we would not have had any reason to mount any opposition. If feminists had of been more about "equality" than what they have so successfully demonstrated as being precisely the opposite, there would have been no argument. If they had of been a little more reasonable with their demands, we would have had nothing to fight. If they had of been a little more considerate about obvious issues that afflicts society, the MRM would have nothing to do. It would not have warranted it's existence at all..

But just like the spoilt child, that selfish individual who has tasted what power and control they had via it's screaming and hysterical demands, feminists have been in that exact period of childhood, but never realised that sooner or later, that type of behaviour would no longer be tolerated as it would draw attention to itself, from the same people who may have originally decided to give feminism it's full backing and support..

What has happened now is that they have called in that "Nanny", you know that program where some individual is called in to control the uncontrollable child. That child having already reached the limits of bad behaviour and it's behaviour has now become so toxic, that desperation now demands that something has to be done. The option of ignoring it or letting the child have it's own way is no longer an option. That is precisely where feminism is at today..

The efforts by the current group MP's in the American Parliament(Congress/Senate) demonstrated just that when they hit VAWA on it's head and put it's maliced and misandric impulses on the shelf for some more scrutiny. Whenever anyone bothers to have a closer look at VAWA, one becomes aware of the fact that hundreds of millions of dollars disappears into dark holes where no one is held accountable, no explanation is required and that money ends up in the pockets of those same rent seeking scum who control the domestic violence/Sexual Assault/All women are victims, industry. Needless to say that that same industry is responsible for those same establishments called "Women's Shelter", which have been demonstrated to do precisely the opposite of what they claim to do. For more information on that see Prof. Carey Roberts' expose of the goings on in that department..

The other major issues regarding VAWA is the total denial to any man or boy, after having any claim made against them, and I mean any claim, false or otherwise, with no proof required or witnesses or even a medical report. Any male is automatically deemed to be guilty because of their sex. Tell how this is not akin to the Communist party response to anyone not kowtowing the party line and sentenced to Siberia. The comparable outcome is the same. The methodology is the same..

Feminist Lackey..
VAWA also ensured a lot of other issues need to be raised. The one other issue that stands out from the use of VAWA's laws was the fact that an illegal Mexican female could and has made claims against American Male citizenry, by claiming false assault/abuse and thereby guaranteed access to a green card, accommodation, funds, legal advice and automatic citizenship application to the US. How is it possible for an illegal citizen, can make a false assualt/abuse claim, be guaranteed assistance, accommodation, free legal assistance against a citizen of the country they have entered illegally and yet win that claim with the help of that same government. How screwed up is that, how many other countries in the World does this apart from America ? NO ONE..

That is how far and deep VAWA runs and has reached and is acted upon and it's a piece of malice that feminists have installed in place solely to put more US male citizens in prison. The US has now the highest prison population per capita in the western world for this precise reason..

And feminists wonder why they have opposition !! 


Politicians have Ignored Men's Issues at their Own Peril..





Do you think that they might finally be paying attention to men's issues instead of swan-ing all over female entitlement. Politicians need to be put on notice as we are not going away and we will eventually become the force that will decide who gets into office and who will not. This is just the way it is going to be. Men, world-wide, are sick to death of feminists running the gauntlet over the legal system and that is going to change, one way or the other..


Politicians have ignored men's issues at their own peril..

New kind of male activism emerging in UK says BBC   Leave a comment

A new kind of male activism is beginning to emerge in the UK according to BBC political reporter, Anita Anand, who looked at the issue of ‘the men’s vote’ on Radio 4′s Beyond Westminster program – click here for details.
The following quotes are taken from the programme:
Anita Anand:
“For some time [political] parties have been falling over themselves to woo the women. But what about the other side of that equation – is anyone particularly bothered about the male vote?
“A new kind of male activism is beginning to bubble up. There are men out there who feel they are being ignored and frankly they’re sick of it.
“The Men’s Network in Brighton supports various bonding activities for men and their children, but also seeks to give a voice to particularly male concerns – issues like mental health, education, paternity leave.
“This is not a movement that seeks confrontation, organisiers say its more about lobbying for change and membership is diverse, the men might be divorced or happily married, they come from all walks of life and they have a strong sense of their distinctive needs and maleness.”
Glen Poole, The Men’s Network:
“Men’s issues would be things like boys in education, they’d be male suicide, they’d be poor male health , they’d be fathers trying to be involved in their kids lives, they’d be lack of male role models those kinds of things and the question is how do we get a new conversation around gender that includes everybody because there’s stills loads of really important issues for women that need to be focussed on , it’s that they’re often focussed on in a way that excludes men.
“They’re focused on as women or women or children’s issues and yet women and women and children don’t live in isolation from men. We’ve all got fathers, many of us have got partners, we’ve got brothers, we’ve got uncles, we’ve got sons. Men and women live in families and communities together.
“There’s an assumption that if you’re talking about men’s issues you must be anti women. And I think that’s the shift we’re starting to see as people are becoming more and more comfortable in talking about men’s issues in a way that doesn’t assume it’ss in opposition to women.”
Anita Anand:
“But maybe [politicians] also feel that isn’t PC to got out of their way to woo the male vote. Would it alienate women too much? Is that too much of a risk to take? There are those though who feel the risks are much more dangerous if the men feel ignored.
“The Men’s Network recently held a national conference, bringing together disparate men’s groups from around the country. Their aim was to have some political muscle, particularly when it comes to influencing both local authorities and NHS policy makers.
“Alex Bailey was there, in the past he’s worked as a Chief Executive and strategist for Brighton local authority. These days he is heavily involved with a group called abandofbrothers.
“This organisation seeks to provide young men, who have often been in trouble, with strong male role models. It wants to confront the lack of structure , discipline as well as understanding that it believes fuelled many of the rampaging young men in last summer’s riots.
“I asked Alex Bailey if he thought……there will be a time when a policy maker will sit down and say we are going to have now a male agenda and a female agenda that we will pursue with equal zeal?”
Alex Bailey, abandofbrothers:
“It may not be as simple as that, but in exactly the same way that dealing with a range of issues from a female perspective, has provided a very useful, I would say, lens, to look at issues – and potentially a tool to open opportunity.
“I think exactly the same thing is beginning to happen with men’s issues.
“If we take example the riots last summer in the UK, my recollection is 92/93% of those convicted were men Now that throws into quite stark focus the issue of if you neglect certain male issues, you do actually store up some quite considerable problems for yourself, problems in economic and social terms. Be that in men’s physical health, men’s mental health, criminal justice, education, there are a whole range of issues right across a range of all those spectrums., where actually not intervening early, not addressing some of those issues early on, young boys being excluded from school for example….
“If you look at the GCSE and A Level attainments we’re seeing a marked difference between girls and boys . Now there’s something going on here I think it’s fair to say and unless we start as policy makers to address those things I think in probably a generation’s time we’re going to see some pretty stark consequences of it.”
To read more about the Beyond Westminster programme on “the men’s vote” click here now.

Confessions of an Actual Man

The Iraqis say “Women want roasted ice.” Maybe we underestimate Moslem civilizations.

Confessions of an Actual Man

Very Sincere Too

October 25, 2011
The Bra Girl from Slutwalk..
Of the various books I have inflicted on the world, my favorite is Au Phuc Dup and Nowhere to Go, the print version of which is a mess. The Kindle version is fine. Should anyone be interested, a sample chapter, clickable, is available under the cover on the right-hand side of your screen.
Like a wolverine digging at a rabbit's hole, this column seeks truth, wherever it lies. (Of course, if truth lies, how can you trust it? These are deep waters.) To this end, I have been reading feminists about what slugs men are, and bandits, and slaves of vanity, and cause loose fillings and sunspots and roach infestations. In the past I dismissed these tiresome viragos as mere creatures of bile and ill-breeding. This time, I thought, maybe I should listen to them. After all, ugly short-haired unmarried women are people too. Pretty close anyway.
AsI pondered, I was overcome by the consciousness of sin. Yes, I thought, it is true. We men are the slaves of vanity. I wanted to deny it, but I could not. The facts cannot be evaded: We, sorry male malfeasors all, are hopelessly vain.
Confess it, fellows: Men spend millions on boob jobs, on moisteurining lipstick that gives us the freshness of the roses of morn, on perky push-up bras that divide and lift at the same time. Yes, we do. Television groans under ads for new, new shampos that make our thinning hair swirl like corn silk in gentle zephyrs. Whole generations of Africans have died in the diamond mines of Kimberly so that we men could have gauds and baubles and dingly-dangles to put in our ears. Oh, the shame of it.
Women, far more sensible, are happy with scuba gear, a big-bore Kaw, and two-for-one Coors. Maybe a Ruger Redhawk.
It is not just vanity that corrupts men and makes us a burden on a suffering world. No. There is worse. We do not play well with others. No one can doubt it.
I have often read that women cooperate, quietly working together to get the job done, while men are aggressive and need to butt heads, trying to be the alpha male. This must be true, I reflected. Sociologists say so. There can be no greater fountain of truth than pigeon-chested academic worms in psuedo-universities. That's what I think, anyway.
Sure enough, the evidence is there. If you peer into the sordid sprawl of history, you find that you can hardly swing a pool cue without hitting a civilization founded by cooperating women. Sumeria, Rome, the Tang Dynasty, the Raj—all built by women working quietly and maturely together, while men fussed and fumed and did their nails. The NFL, the space program, Microsoft and Google, all products of cooperating women.
There is yet more. Men need to bear up, be brave and mature, and face truth: Women are more practical than men. Someone said that men are romantics pretending to be realists, and women, realists pretending to be romantic. Yes. Honesty compels us to grant it. Men are like little boys, always wanting to go higher and faster, to explore jungles and invent exotic aircraft. Always childlike, we love to race alone across the late-afternoon deserts of Arizona on a Harley, with the air furnace-hot and sunset burning out from incandescent reds to rolling waves of oranges on celestial beaches, the night rising from behind distant mountains. Women want granite counter-tops. These last, and are easy to clean.
This practicality of the distaff wing of our race of nuclear-armed primates is pervasive, profound, and probably of remote evolutionary origin. For example, women are attracted to money, than which there is nothing more practical. In fact, money is the only aphrodisiac that gets the job done. Ask any sailor who has spent shore leave in the Philipppines.
It works like a charm blessed by the Seventh Orisha. I am an ugly man of sixty-five years with thick glasses that make me look like a poorly-designed frog. But give me a Ferrari Testarossa, a flashy suit with an Italian name like Giovani or Armani, and a roll of hundred-dollar bills to tip for beers at pricey restautrants. Gorgeous groupies of twenty-five will crawl in their hundreds through my windows. Practical, they are. Very.
Men are ever impractical. In countries where I have lived, such as Vietnam, Mexico, and Thailand, the difference is unmistakable. If an American man encounters a Thai lass who is cute, smart, kind, funny, and a hell of a lot of fun, he will marry her, support her without the least resentment, and think he has prospered mightily. He is a man, and thus a romantic. No practicality. If an American woman has ever married a Thai below her social class in the expectation of maintaning him, this has not been recorded. It just isn't a paying proposition.
An evil misogynist or anyone rational would call this racism. It would be terribly unfair. I'm just not sure why.
The sexes approach problems differently. A friend once worked at a computer help-desk for a large association of realtors, who apparently are not any brighter than they need to be. She said that about twelve people, evenly divided between men and women, worked in this pit of reparative cybernicity. She further said that she had noticed that the women worked from a list of possible answers. Is it plugged in? Is the power on? And so on. Some of the questions were technical, and the women were not stupid, but they worked from a list and, if nothing applied, they threw up their hands. The guys by contrast regarded computers as really neat puzzles, controllable complexity of the sort that fascinates men, and liked to solve crazy new problems.
This difference is why a female bureaucrat will just say, “Nope, can't do it. Sez so here,” while a man will think, “How can we get around this sumbitch rule?” It's much more practical and efficient just to say, “Nope. No can do.”
Male immaturity. Always fiddleing with high-by-pass turbofans or III-V semiconductors instead of working quietly from lists.
Like a six-year-old, a man has to know how everything works. This defect of the male psyche is close to universal. A woman wants her refrigerator to cool her yogurt, her stereo to play the BeeGees, her car to run and not make funny noises. Ever practical, she isn't interested in thingy-whichies, in the compression-cooling-expansion cycle, or source-gate-drain of transistors, or what a valve train is. It isn't that she couldn't learn these things easily enough, but that she has no practical reason for learning them.
I reckon women are just more complicated than men can understand. It could drive us to drink, if we needed driving. There is a subtlty that we men, with our blunt-trauma minds, can't get our fingers around. Women want to get married, but they don't want to get married, and they are furious at men but want to be loved, which presents technical problems. It's too many for us. The Iraqis say “Women want roasted ice.” Maybe we underestimate Moslem civilizations.
Now, from experience, I know that feminists will be madder than wet hornets, this being their only condition, because I have spread this repast of understanding on the tablecloth of the internet. If I weren't so charitable, I might suggest that they dish it out much better than they take it, that they feel entitled in perpetuity to distemper —but I am the soul of charity, and won't even hint at it, though it's God's truth.