Latest Posts
Showing posts with label feminist agiprop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminist agiprop. Show all posts

Some issues regarding this article, has the general consensus just changed or what is going on here. We have for years proven beyond denial that females are as abusive as their partners are and we can even produce a study by Fiebert to prove just that.
But those facts have met a stone wall while feminists and their minions refuse to accept the proffered information and continue on their usual misinformed path of "all women are victims" and yet here we have additional proof that the same sex they claim to be major victims, are in actual fact perpetrators as well. When will that finally end up in recognised facts and figures and introduced into those biased government bodies and departments..

The entire Domestic Violence issue is just a gigantic farce as long as they deny that women are more than just victims..
 59 percent said they had perpetrated some kind of violence against a partner. Those rates were similar in boys and girls,
 but girls were much more likely to fear getting seriously injured,
she said. "We can't just focus on girls as victims."
Those statements of facts will go down like a ton of bricks where the feminised, pro-female, abuse industry is concerned, that would mean changing that latest "all men are guilty" recommendation that Obama's shrews just introduced into colleges and universities. That would be too hard I would imagine and it would also reduce the copious funding they receive from the federal government for pretending they give a damn..


Here is one of those unarguable studies that has been around for years and everyone in the abuse industry has chosen to ignore.  It just does not fit into their biased mindset. Cannot go about admitting they were wrong, how could they..




Martin S. Fiebert
Department of Psychology
California State University, Long Beach
 

Last updated: May 2011


SUMMARY:  This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800.

A few examples..LINK.



  "Anderson, K. L. (2002).  Perpetrator or victim?  Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being.  Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 851-863.  (Data consisted of 7,395 married and cohabiting heterosexual couples drawn from wave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households <NSFH-1>.  In terms of measures: subjects were asked "how many arguments during the past year resulted in 'you hitting, shoving or throwing things at a partner.'  They were also asked how many arguments ended with their partner, 'hitting, shoving or throwing things at you.'"  Author reports that, "victimization rates are slightly higher among men than women <9% vs 7%> and in cases that involve perpetration by only one partner, more women than men were identified as perpetrators <2% vs 1%>.")


   Archer, J. (2006).  Cross cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis.  Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 133-153.  (A review article which suggests that "women's empowerment is associated with lower victimisation rates from their partners."  Greater individualism and empowerment by women, however, are also associated with higher perpetration rates.)"

So, one wonders how long it will take this to filter through the corridors of denial and ignorance. That massive multibillion dollar monster that have decided the feminist doctrine is beyond questioning, for all it's lies and manufactured vilification against our sex, that was accepted as fact and not here-say. Taken up and accepted by those people who claim to give a damn and are paid accordingly. Fascinatingly, whenever we read these reports, the facts somehow get lost and the pro-female bias corrected, further up the pay chain it goes..

So we wait and wonder for the pretenders to stop and finally make a difference rather than just filling office space and placing bums on seats..


Dating violence common among teens in the ER: study

By Genevra Pittman
NEW YORK | Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:16pm GMT

(Reuters Health) - More than half of teens and young adults treated at an inner-city emergency room said they had experienced dating violence, either as a victim or a perpetrator, in a new study.
The abuse includes both physical and sexual violence, from hitting and kicking to forced sex.
Both girls and boys reported high rates of partner violence, but girls were much more likely to fear getting seriously injured, researchers reported in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
"We all know this exists, now what do you do about it?" said study author Dr. Bronwen Carroll, from Boston Medical Center, where the study was conducted.
She noted that many of the adolescents didn't think they needed help, and only a few followed up on resources for victims of violence provided by the researchers.
The findings point to a need for programs specifically designed to help teen violence victims and perpetrators, Carroll said, as well as for all adults -- teachers, parents and doctors -- to do more to recognize and prevent dating violence.
MOST EXPERIENCED VIOLENCE
Carroll and her colleagues conducted their study at an ER that sees mostly poor, African American kids and teens with government-funded insurance. They knew that many adolescents came in because of substance abuse, mental health problems or unplanned pregnancy -- all of which may be linked to partner violence.
So the researchers surveyed 327 adolescents between age 13 and 21, all of whom were or had been in a romantic or sexual relationship, about violence, aggression or coercion that had happened in those relationships.
About 55 percent of the adolescents said they had been the victim of physical or sexual violence, and 59 percent said they had perpetrated some kind of violence against a partner. Those rates were similar in boys and girls, though girls were more likely to report being physically violent toward a partner.
The researchers said the findings wouldn't necessarily apply to other groups of adolescents, and the rates of violence reported are higher than what other studies have shown in surveys of high school students, for example.
Donna Howard, who studies adolescent risk behavior at the University of Maryland in College Park but wasn't part of the current research team, pointed out that all adolescents in the study had a history of dating, and that this hospital sees vulnerable, at-risk patients with a high proportion of violent injuries. The average age of these adolescents -- almost 19 -- also means more are likely to report a history of dating violence at some point, she told Reuters Health in an email.
DIFFERENT KINDS OF VIOLENCE
Despite more girls reporting being physically violent themselves, 16 percent of all girls said they were scared of sustaining a serious injury as a result of dating violence, compared to just three percent of boys surveyed.
"Both boys and girls perpetrate violence and sometimes girls perpetrate more violence," Carroll said. But, she added, "It is an enormous mistake to fall into the trap of equating those types of violence."
"The violence that is perpetrated on girls is much more severe," agreed Dr. Brian Wagers, an emergency medicine doctor who studies dating violence at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. "The injuries sustained on girls are much more severe, much more frequent."
Still, that doesn't mean violence against boys should be ignored, said Wagers, who wasn't involved in the new study. Healthcare workers need to be aware that boys may be victims too, and encourage them to seek help, he told Reuters Health.
"When boys experience it, they need to realize that this is not something that's right."
Howard echoed that sentiment.
"The toll dating violence takes on male victims, both emotionally and physically, and the extent to which victimization experiences affect subsequent dating behavior, including dating violence perpetration during adolescence and into adulthood, needs more research attention," she said. "We can't just focus on girls as victims."
GETTING HELP
Carroll's team gave all victims of violence a list of local dating-violence services where they could get help. But a month after their ER visit, only four out of 127 who were contacted again said they'd reached out to any of those resources. And two-thirds of those who didn't told interviewers they didn't think they needed any help.
"What they said was that they didn't perceive themselves as having problems that need help, and that's really concerning. (That) speaks to how common this is, and I fear that there may be some degree of normalization and they may not realize what a healthy relationship looks like," Carroll told Reuters Health.
"This is quite alarming," Howard agreed.
Carroll said that many at-risk adolescents may look around and see adults and their peers involved in relationships where physical or sexual violence or coercion also occurs.
Because of that, it's even more important for not just pediatricians, but parents and teachers as well, to talk with teens about dating violence whenever it might be a concern.
"We need to be aware about this, we need to ask. My guess is that just a meaningful discussion for an adolescent with an adult that he or she trusts about, 'What does a healthy relationship look like?' can go a long way," Carroll said.
SOURCE: bit.ly/vv8Dka Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, online December 5, 2011



"Did you hear the one about"
Amazingly, I still come across sites that assesses feminism for what it really is in a scholarly fashion. I have found this to be rare but maybe I am not looking hard enough. There certainly are plenty of MM sites as our "movement" expands exponentially and for the right reasons. It is men per se who are more interested in good policy, honourable outcomes as well as introducing laws that have reasonable and just outcomes. Feminists have killed any idea of reasonability as they have skewed the majority of laws to favour women only and thereby ensured that the law is and will be held in contempt..

Those laws in place before feminist contamination were an extension of the Magna Carta which tried to ensure that you could not be thrown in prison at the whim of royalty or any dictator. Those laws have been bastardised by feminists to such a degree that even having one's day in court to answer false claims of abuse, regardless of severity, no longer happens, you are automatically guilty or you go through a process akin to the communist show trials. Common law has been assuaged to feminist doctrine to predetermine any man's outcome when faced with any charge, false or otherwise. Now it is automatically assumed that one is guilty (only requirement is a penis) as in their opinion, the false claim is the evidence as well as proof as far as the Courts/Universities are concerned. Bear in mind also that the majority of those reassigned laws were put into place by (feminist) women and that alone should give an indication why it is so damaged and biased..

Those laws also indicates clearly what the world would be like if run by women. Those new laws are emotive rather then judgemental, based on theoretically emotive reactions and response rather than truth and facts, assumption of guilt rather than "innocent until proven". Biased towards prison time rather than rehabilitation. Biased also to allow women to shirk their accountability or make them answerable to no one..
Feminist/socialists have long believed that childbearing is the linch-pin of female oppression.
Here is one of those feminist leaders stating their usual hate message, as only they can..

Margaret Sanger, a Socialist and the founder of Planned Parenthood, once said, "The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." 
And I bet you always thought that feminism was all about "equality" instead of wanting to remove anyone that stands in it's draconian way..

Some of the topics on that site are usually just ignored or hidden under a barrel as it's outcome and discussion levels would ofcourse demonstrate the sexism and anti-male bias in feminist doctrine and the laws they have skewed..

How Abortion Affects American Men


How Abortion Affects American Men - A Psychodynamic-Relational View

Michael Simon, a clinical psychotherapist, has written a paper on "Male Partners and the Psychological Sequelæ of Abortion: A Psychodynamic-Relational View." 

He argues that abortion is a traumatic experience and therefore impacts on both male and female sense of self-integrity. The severity of the impact on one's psyche, he concludes, can lead to problems that have previously not been recognized in abortion research.

Simon acknowledges that any research on abortion is highly controversial because of the political aspects of abortion, and such research attracts great scrutiny from both pro- and anti-abortion supporters.

Simon looked at earlier research, especially studies done in the 1990s, and saw that while studies did acknowledge negative psychological sequelae of abortion for women, the majority of studies concluded that the negative sequelae of abortion was negligible from a public health perspective. He went on to say:

"Yet persistent anecdotal information -from colleagues in clinical practice doing individual, couples or family psychotherapy and from numerous friends who have experienced abortion- would suggest otherwise. The abortion experience is a profound one...with long-lasting effects for many. "

Simon pointed out that the difference between studies that show significant post-abortion effects and those that show only mild negative reactions to abortion, can be attributed to factors such as religious affiliation, ethnicity, culture and female partner attitudes. These are considered to help explain how men cope with and respond to their partner's abortion, as well as how men and women make abortion choices. 

Of those studies which indicate negative sequelae of abortion (in women or their male partners), conscious guilt is most often reported, however mild. 

Previous studies 
According to Simon the first serious research was Arthur Shostak and Gary McLouth's "groundbreaking 1984 sociological study 'Men and Abortion: Lessons, Losses and Love'. However, not much has been done since that work, and there are to date (1997) few theoretical or empirical researches either on the psychological sequelae of abortion, or on intrapsychic dynamics of the abortion experience for male partners."

Simon did a computer search which came up with less than 100 studies, reports or theoretical pieces which dealt even marginally with the male partner's responses to abortion. He found that even fewer represented theoretically-based research on the psychological sequelae of abortion in men. 

Shostak's research reports that about one-half of the women obtaining abortions are accompanied by their male partners to the procedure. Those males who do accompany their partner to the procedure, typically find that their experience is predominately characterised by waiting and isolation. Shostak says:

"Those who wish to offer comfort during the 15-minute abortion procedure (perhaps 70%) are generally barred from doing so. Those who wish to offer comfort during the hour-long recovery period, (perhaps 90%), are generally told this is not permitted. Since over half of all pregnancies (56%) are unintended, giving a cold shoulder to these waiting-room males could not be more mistaken."
Male response to abortion 
Studies have shown that while young adult males might support a woman's 'right to choose' to have an abortion, they also feel that it was "not appropriate for a woman to have an abortion if her male partner objected." 1Simon points out that this suggests that young males, while deferring to the woman's decision and having no legal rights in the abortion decision, have very strong feelings about the pregnancy and decision to terminate. This is borne out by other studies. 2 

According to Simon: "The present study argues that male responses to abortion are determined by a complex web of factors. One important factor is the degree to which the experience is perceived consciously and unconsciously as a relational experience, that is, as pertaining to one's partner, potential or existing children, one's family and to the society 

She also loves peroxide as well..
I have often wondered what life would be like if one lived with a feminist, not one of your average pretend types, a fully indoctrinated drone. One would have to assume quite a lot as I have never met a feminist although I have on good grounds, had one pointed out to me and guess what, it was a single mother, funny that and it does illustrate nicely the point that I am making..

Feminism Diagnosed as Mental Illness

Imagine for a moment, an individual whose mind is so saturated with the muddle of feminist doctrine and it's associated, ignorantly derived, mantras. Imagine also an individual who really has no business being a feminist as all their goals and aims in the western world has come to fruition. There is basically no reason for it's existence apart from creating additional privileges for the already over privileged female in western society. Even they cannot refute that blatant and obvious fact. This fact can be and has been substantiated by their own behaviour because they are now talking about bastardising other countries and cultures in the middle east with their poison..


It is no longer reasonable to say that as a group, women are worse off than men...


So we have a single feminist female in a relationship with, say, a normal decent guy who is unaware of this lunatic's politics. He is of the opinion that she is normal. She has hidden her condition well..

The characters here while I wax lyrical are - Femmie - Spoilt, selfish, self serving, maniacal feminist,  educated via copious "wimmins studies, gender studies lessons and majored in both, also in the process of totally screwing up it's life by entering university to further contaminate itself with even more of the same..
Man - mangina, sufficiently gullible and appropriately trained to believe that the sun rises on the pedestaled sirens without actually being aware of what sirens is capable of or what they are all about..

One can imagine the daily amusing banter commencing from the time she decides to wake up. Questions will need to be answered and decisions to be made. First in line would be to shave or not to shave, that is the question. It is better..Oops wrong one..
Should she turn her back on her lesbian sisters and remove the stubble or should she sacrifice her higher ethical rendering towards cleanliness, self respect and smell reduction, it's just so hard.
What will she wear. In the past it was a lot simpler as she could just go and have one of those butch bitch haircuts and throw on the jacket with huge shoulder pads to demonstrate her penis envy state of mind, just like her sisters in the hood..
So, scratching her crutch as that's their interpretation of manly because her lesbian friend told her so, she wanders over to the wardrobe wondering what to wear. In the past she could slip into a pair of blokey designer overalls and work boots just to maintain that image but now it's even more complicated because if she wears a low top and show some cleavage, she has to spend a lot of time abusing anyone who dares to look. But if she dresses up in something less revealing, no one takes any notice and you may as well not exist, oh decisions, decisions. She thought she could dress up like she did last week when she joined a few of her like minded sheeple at the slut-walk lingerie party but next time she would use removable marker though as "get your hands off my arse" did not sit well with the man, but that would not go down too well at work because they were all fussy and expected everyone to be conformist and dress respectable like. They even asked if she had a bitch stamp, the nerve of some people and no chewing gum either..


Women: The Major Instigator of Family Feuding..

Today was a special day though because they were going to the beach, swimming and you know, stuff like that..
In walks man.. and requests that she makes the sandwiches while he gets the 4 wheel drive ready for the trip.
"WHAT !!!, why do I have to do the kitchen thing, is it because you think it's woman's work ?".
This was the first outburst he had heard since they moved in together the previous week, he was still getting over the felt penned writing on her arse. Man responded with "Okay then, I will make them and you fix up the vehicle, okay". Off they went to do their perspective acts of labour..
Twenty minites later, Femmie returns and Man says "I have made the sandwiches, whipped up some coleslaw, cut up the chicken and put it all  with the bottle of champers I put in the fridge last night, put it all in the esky, ready to go." She declares that she could not move the two spare tyres and rims from the back of the vehicle,  neither could she move the large petrol container he keeps for backup, just in case, as they were too heavy to lift..

The following evening was going to be party night as they had invited a few friends around for a night of fun and frolicking but on the way back from the beach the discussion focussed on the alcohol when she demanded that beer was not on the menu because it was regarded as a man's drink and that it should not be seen at her their party as she would not tolerate it, when man objected, she erupted and remained that way until they arrived back home when she finally demonstrated some civility and a small dose of humanity. Man thought, after that carry on over the beer, he had better also skip the Bloody Marys as well..

feminists, when confronted with a reality that conflicts with their ideology, will stick to the ideology, digging themselves deeper into a fantasy..


So one can easily wax lyrical about any relationship any feminist might be in if they are in any at all that is and wonder how the hell it works and how could she co-exist with another human when suffering from a recognised mental illness. One does have to wonder..
How is it possible to be in an relationship when every word that gushes forth is critically analysed to make sure it was not deemed, or indicate, or suggest, or imply, or has any possibility that it may in one way or another transgress their doctrines, teachings (either implied or yet to be implied or yet to be introduced), matras in anyway, shape or form. What a life that would be. It would make life in the salt mines appear positively beneficial as well as preferential..
It would also make MGTOW a fine alternative as well..

This feminist fantasy has been going on for way too long as even the most guillable would question the cataistics claimed by the ever fictional feminists and their mangina supporters..

If 18-year-old girls were in fact walking into such a grotesque maelstrom of sexual violence when they first picked up their dormitory room key, parents and students alike would have demanded a radical restructuring of college life years ago.
What level of intelligence would you have to possess to believe this hysteria and how come with every student carrying cameras, why have we not seen all those assaults on YouTube, splashed on the web or even lied about in the MSM (Mammary Streamed Mirth)...

See what I mean about being too thick..

Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted?  
 April 5, 2011 4:00 A.M.
The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie. 

Imagine that there were a “terrible and alarming trend” of sexual violence on college campuses against female students. Imagine that 20 percent of college women were victims of rape or attempted rape — a rate of sexual assault astronomically higher than anything seen in America’s most violent cities (in Detroit, for example, there were 36.8 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009, a rate of 0.037 percent). If 18-year-old girls were in fact walking into such a grotesque maelstrom of sexual violence when they first picked up their dormitory room key, parents and students alike would have demanded a radical restructuring of college life years ago. There would have been a huge surge in all-girls colleges to protect female students from these outrageous levels of sexual violence; those colleges that did still admit boys and girls together would have been forced to prove to worried parents that the boys they were admitting were not rapists — perhaps allowing parents to interview these aspiring monks before they were accepted. Just to be on the safe side, administrators would provide round-the-clock protection for their female students.
Instead, over the last decade or so, the proportion of female students in co-ed colleges has skyrocketed, so that there are now more girls than boys in most of the nation’s co-ed schools. Parents relentlessly push their daughters into the most prestigious schools they can get into; competition among female students to enroll in co-ed colleges has never been higher. None of those girls demand bodyguards as a condition of acceptance; instead, their parents feel fortunate to cough up tens of thousands of dollars a year to keep their daughters on campus, where they are free to boogie through as many drunken frat parties as they can before passing out from overinhalation of Kahlua and Crème.
And yet, according to Vice President Joe Biden, the Justice Department, and the Education Department’s Office of Civil Rights, college is in fact a nightmarish gauntlet of sexual violence and abuse. “There is a terrible and alarming trend in the country of sexual violence [on campuses],” Russlynn H. Ali, assistant secretary of education, told the New York Times. Ali’s Office of Civil Rights is investigating Yale for maintaining a “sexually hostile environment.” Somehow that sexually hostile environment did not discourage thousands of the country’s most academically gifted females from beating down the doors to get in; the acceptance rate at Yale this year was 7.35 percent, the lowest rate ever.
The White House claims that one in five female students has been victims of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault while at college. Such bogus statistics have been the mainstay of campus-rape-epidemic propaganda for years. They are generated by a variety of clever techniques, but the most important is this: The survey-taker, rather than the female respondent, decides whether the latter has been raped or not. When you ask the girls directly whether they view themselves as victims of rape, the answer overwhelmingly comes in: No.
Biden has just announced more college red tape on the laughable ground that schools ignore sexual violence. In fact, virtually every campus has a robust sexual-violence bureaucracy which sits idle, waiting for the shell-shocked casualties of rape to crawl through their doors. The victims never come — because they don’t exist. But pressure from the feds will undoubtedly give those lonely college rape counselors further clout to push for increased funding, even as schools cut their German and Latin programs for lack of money. Meanwhile, the parallel campus sex bureaucracy — the Sex Toy Dispensary and Good Vibe Advice Office — continues to do record business, while the occasional professor even offers live XXX shows. 
Here is the reality on campuses, which the free-love baby-boomer college deans and provosts will never acknowledge: The sexual revolution and the disappearance of adult moral authority on campus have resulted in a booze-filled sexual free-for-all, in which testosterone-charged boys act boorishly, and the girls compete to match them in reckless promiscuity. (Only disrespect for “diversity” causes the deans and provosts to exercise any moral oversight over their students.) Yes, there are plenty of drunken hook-ups that result in the proverbial “roll and scream”: “You roll over the next morning so horrified at what you find next to you that you scream,” as Laura Sessions Stepp reported in Unhooked. A small percentage of those next-day regretters view themselves as having been raped; most think that they acted stupidly and irresponsibly.
There are a few, simple antidotes to the alleged campus-rape crisis: Don’t drink yourself blotto. Don’t get into bed with one of your fellow drunken revelers. Keep your clothes on. If every girl practiced those elementary rules, poor Ms. Ali might be out of a well-paying government job.
— Heather Mac Donald is the John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute and co-author of The Immigration Solution.
http://www.nationalr...her-mac-donald# 


Hymowitz, not her best shot..
Hyperwitch, Hymowitz has some grovelling to do as she did a typical feminist male-bashing article and so called study where she accused men of being boys and refusing to "man-up" to service the privileged princesses in America and elsewhere according their narcisstic requirements. Needless to say that she received a plethora of negative articles telling her what she could do with her sexist interpretation and it even encouraged me to produce an MP3 just to tell her the same thing..

What do feminists have to do with informing all men what they should be doing is beyond my comprehension as it is basically none of their damn business what men do as normally they are only interested in female supremacy and they should just leave men to their own end and means. Getting them to mind their own business is something that is long overdue as they continue to harp, bitch and moan about how the world of women is so unbearable that only men are capable of fixing it. One does have to ask the question as to why would we even bother as if they are unhappy then they can damn well fix it themselves instead of relying on the sex that they so loathe and love to hate. The hypocrisy is outstanding, to comprehend feminist doctrine one would have to be able to exclude one sex and yet include it to pay the bills and elevate their incomprehensible doctrine..

The feminist miasma continues on it's nonsensical path as it demonstrates that it's doctrine is just the pterotic bone, in the side of the MRM. One that is imagined rather than being functional..

KAY S. HYMOWITZ
Why the Gender Gap Won’t Go Away. Ever.
Women prefer the mommy track.
Early this past spring, the White House Council on Women and Girls released a much-anticipated report called Women in America. One of its conclusions struck a familiar note: today, as President Obama said in describing the document, “women still earn on average only about 75 cents for every dollar a man earns. That’s a huge discrepancy.”
It is a huge discrepancy. It’s also an exquisite example of what journalist Charles Seife has dubbed “proofiness.” Proofiness is the use of misleading statistics to confirm what you already believe. Indeed, the 75-cent meme depends on a panoply of apple-to-orange comparisons that support a variety of feminist policy initiatives, from the Paycheck Fairness Act to universal child care, while telling us next to nothing about the well-being of women.
This isn’t to say that all is gender-equal in the labor market. It is not. It also isn’t to imply that discrimination against women doesn’t exist or that employers shouldn’t get more creative in adapting to the large number of mothers in the workplace. It does and they should. But by severely overstating and sensationalizing what is a universal predicament (I’m looking at you, Sweden and Iceland!), proofers encourage resentment-fueled demands that no government anywhere has ever fulfilled—and that no government ever will.