Womyn's Stuff apparently..

On numerous occasions, the RADFEM Hub feminist members speak of a festival called the 'Michigan Womyn's Music Festival', a popular occasion, their Mecca, amongst lesbian feminists and strictly off  limits to transvestites ofcourse, as they hate them with a passion, as they are not "real" women as far as they are concerned..



As a matter of fact, even being (or have been at any time in the past) in a heterosexual relationship has your browny marks reduced to zero. That would be contamination as far as they are concerned. Those radical feminists, who is part of the Feminist Movement, are really just an inevitable response of a movement that promotes hate and malice to anyone outside their own sex..

In order to witness the sickening loathing and hate they generate, one would not have to look long at their endless rantings. Part of their mindless programs begin with the total annihilation of an entire sex which one wonders if that is not self-destroying and self defeating, but that has escaped their mindless raging as they continually discuss methods of completing that task..

Bare in mind too, that Pamela O'Shaughnessy is a member of this group under the guise of Karma. Her maniacal lecturing and support for the extermination of all males is not restricted to adults as she includes the introduction of eugenics (just like that dictator did) into her many and varied recommendations and long term goals..

There would not be a site or forum on the net that would surpass the deep seated hate and maniacal loathing of these women, these feminist females have for the opposite sex..
Here is a sample of the deep seated loathing that "pretend" feminists ignore and deny..

 Disrespect is crucial. Disrespect for the cultures, values and institutions of male domination is the very foundation and sine qua non of feminism. Since religion is crucial to the construction of cultural norms in every culture, disrespect for it should be the natural amniotic fluid of feminist thought and activism.Sheila Jeffreys is an academic and writer, originally from London, who teaches in Australia. She has been a rad fem activist for 38 years.

So moving on, we have Hugo Schwyzer organising "Slutwalk LA" for the simple reason of having  plenty of young, nubile, willing females on hand, for him to practise (as the feminist call it, PIV- penis in vagina) sex with them. An accusation he has not only verified himself but blatantly brags about on his blog. What a great example for an almost "human being"..
Here is an article penned by one of the lunatic fringe members at RADFEM Hub called " Steering the Sluts", apply named I thought..

Steering the Sluts: Prof. Hugo Schwyzer Organizes Los Angeles SlutWalk
self-identified feminist man and fun-fem darling hugo schwyzer reports on his blog that he is ”proud to be a part” of the steering committee organizing the los angeles SlutWalk, scheduled to take place june 4, 2011.
according to professor schwyzer, “We’re marching to reclaim a word, we’re marching to declare zero tolerance for harassment and sexual abuse, we’re marching in defense of the basic notion that whatever women wear and whomever they sleep with,

And for those who are of the opinion that Schwyzer has any scruples at all..

FCM (Hello Mindy).... hugo admits on his blog that he “used to” have PIV with female students (including on his professorial-office desk) during what he euphemistically refers to as his “acting out years.”  what a rebel!  a college professor, teaching womens studies and womens history to women, acting out his aggressions and dysfunctions on the bodies of his female students by having PIV with them,

A great example of pure hypocrisy. Schwyzer is in it for the sex (PIV) and female attention, just like most feminist men are..

Lesbian separatist feminism at Michigan Womyn’s music festival

• lesbian feminism
 
• separatism
 
• Womyn’s space

Valenti and Her mangina Clone..

Let's have a small look at how feminism has destroyed normal human behaviour and the relationship between the sexes..

1. Women, regardless on how you view it, with either feminist goggles or their tunnel visioned myopic viewpoint. Women want babies, it's not going to be reconstructed which is why feminist hysteria has not tried or bothered. But they have tried to stop women from procreating as they have two problems with it.

a. Producing an offspring would allow the female to become a full time mother. Feminists have already demonstrated how much they loathe motherhood (yet and hypocritically, give birth to children themselves in a family situation aka feminist hysteric and professional hypocrite Jessica Valenti)  and are trying to ensure that ALL children are dumped into the state's baby sitting service so they can control and segregate the sexes at will. Do not be disillusioned into believing that they actually give a damn. As far as radical feminists are concerned, your body is contaminated if you allow any sexual relationship with them loathed men. You are referred to as a "het" female, which already indicates your contamination level. They hate men that much.. 

b. Women flourish in a family situation where both parents are present. This is unarguable. Feminists encourage everything else but. Single mothers are the norm to such a degree that they are now regarded as "the family" and compensated by the feminist induced money trough via government largesse, which is ofcourse our hard earned tax dollars at work, to ensure this situation is ideal for the mother only. It is such a known fact that I do not even need to supply links or studies or facts, as you would have already worked all of this out already (skeptics can no longer deny it either). Feminists turn against their own whenever they promote abortions or single mothers as it is a doctrinal requirement and no face saving feminist will state otherwise for the fear of being rejected or facing  ..

Valenti and spawn..

Valenti's hypocritical actions are to be marvelled at and demonstrates again what their end goal is. Here we have a feminist who promotes a male hating ideology, who's goal is to malign and denigrate all men so as to change their very being by turning them into pretend females, a character that women per se, do not want any part of. So we have Valenti who spends her entire time time malignng all things male. Gets married and has a "BABY" ,which feminists in general have been fighting against and promoting as not being a choice and instead promoted that being married was akin to being in prison, motherhood is a jail sentence and to be avoided by any and all means. It's what feminism promotes and demands of it's enablers. So what does hypocritical Valenti do ?
The exact opposite of what her doctrine promotes and encourages, this female who has been promoting in opposition, all along. They say one thing and do precisely the opposite. I know, it's simply amazing..

One wonders why this, now neutral, has any credibility left at all ?..

The craving for a baby that drives women to the ultimate deception


Ahhh!, Liz Jones. You would remember Liz Jones as being another one of those feminist Male Bashers from way back. You know the type, all men are bastards, all men are useless and all men should be castrated as nothing really justifies their existance. Just the usual and standard ranting we come to expect from those male haters and it's the same thing we still hear today. Feminists have that hate message down pat, they wallow in it as well as sprouting it daily..

I wonder if they will ever really comprehend that fact or whether their psychotic condition disallows any knowledge..

Liz has made the usual confession that feminists make when they reach forty, okay, some are way too thick or way too disillusioned to do that, I agree. But it does actually confess a few simple illegal actions she has undertaken in order to get pregnant as she felt it to be her "RIGHT" to be in that condition regardless of the decision her partners have already taken. Bearing in mind that any male co-existing with a feminist is definately far removed from manhood as one could get. In order to be involved with any feminist, one would have to remove his testicles and place them in her handbag before even considering any level of co-habitation. An effort fraught with endless penis comparisons and endless fighting over the mundane duties that one would have to do if one was living on their own. A much better option, then again, who would bother with a feminist anyway ?..

Back to the liar and swindler Jones.

Jones Confession - Anyone who meets me, or reads what I write, would think I don’t like children and never wanted to be a mother. Indeed, for most of my adult life, having a child was the furthest thing from my mind. I wanted a career, freedom, a nice house and to keep my figure. 

As a feminist, I looked down on mumsy types. But when I was in my late 30s, I decided that if I didn’t get pregnant soon then it might never happen. I had also reached a point in my life where I wanted to settle down with a man, and though my boyfriend at that time was wildly unsuitable, I thought that I could change him.

Yes, the looking down on Mumsy types is well documented here and it also clears up the fact that the feminasty movement hated that "Mumsy" type with a passion and would, if they could have, utterly destroyed it via doctrinal necessity but realised that the Mumsy types told em. what they could do with their attitude. Feminists backed off and made those Mumsy types their occasional hero and claimed the tag of "Supermom" in that process which has as much reality as their pending next therapy appointment..

Back to the sperm stealer and desperate housewife..

The ‘theft’ itself was alarmingly easy to carry out. One night, after sex, I took the used condom and, in the privacy of the bathroom, I did what I had to do.

Yep, sperm stealer and justifier..

I don’t understand why more men aren’t wise to this risk

 We are waking up to the deviousness of the female brain and also the plain catatonic behaviour of feminists, don't you worry..

Oh, it get better..

That’s why I believe men should be much more wary. Too many of them underestimate women; too many of them muddle along, swept up in the beady-eyed focus of the prospective middle-aged mum.And the lengths these women are willing to go to make my half-baked attempts seem amateur. One tells me she used secret hormone injections to make herself more fertile; another uses a clandestine ovulating chart kept in the tea towel drawer (a place she knows her husband never looks in).I spoke to another friend over the summer who told me she was trying to get pregnant with her fiancé. She said: ‘I really want a year off work. I might even go part-time after that, maybe two days a week. He will just have to work harder.’

This would have the best advertisement as to why men should not marry but should avoid these lunatic women altogether. Have look at what it is they do. Check out how desperate they get and how much they really don't give a shit about your opinion or input or how they take you for granted. It is past unreasonable, past illogical, it is pure malice in the first degree and self interest everywhere else..


You, as far as they are concerned, you're just a sperm bank and an ATM who will eventually just pay for the ride of his life. A life that these women are determined to destroy purely for their own selfish reasons and interests. Are you not glad you have MRA's in this world to wizen you up to the behaviour and methodology that women have been using since time immemorial to trap and sap the life out of you for any and at every opportunity. We have arsewipes like Bill Bennett determined that you are shamed into forming a relationship with this maniacal, toxic and irrelevant human being who survives solely for screwing up your life..
It's just another example about how feminists have really no idea what it is they are doing and demonstrating once again what guinea pigs you really are. How many times do we have to have another one of these feminists explain it all before you actually understand that their doctrine is just some fantastic joke and their experiment has been proven to have failed..

Jones is just another part of the feminist fodder, collateral damage, no one gives a damn about..

This is what a feminist looks like.. Fabian-Weber.

An update on Nicole Fabian Hyphen Weber, don't they just love those triple names, the last bigot used a triple as well but without the hyphen, I am almost disappointed..

The site "The Stir" is part of the cafemom network, has to also be held to account for promoting violence, hate, misandry in particular, so it is worth the effort to mark those comments as offensive and lodging a complaint. Easy enough to do. No waiting in line..

Cafemom guidelines as follows --
Slurs, stereotyping, and hate speech are not tolerated.
Slurs, hate speech, and attacks aimed at any race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation are not tolerated at all on CafeMom. Don't stereotype people. It isn't funny and it isn't acceptable.

Here are the people who own and run Cafemom..

To refresh the memory on this bigot, it is the feminist female who, just like Sharon Osbourne, had a really good laugh about a men having his penis severed and removed by some psychotic female. However, this piece of nastiness does not even bother commenting in response to the outrage from both man and woman regardless of her macabre topic and her vitriolic rage on that site..

Wife Cuts Off Husband's Penis & Chucks It in the River

This is the result of the Google main search page on bigot number one taken just a half an hour ago, it demonstrates how affective the MRM is at exposing those male haters and there will be more coming, that's for sure. We have the major MRA sites listed in ManWomanMyth, AVfM, Register Her, Antimisandry and ofcourse this humble blog as the fifth entry. Well done All..

As you can see JMK has now been outed for the bigot she is and recorded in posterity and rightfully so. It would appear that other male haters are lining up with their usual male hating bigotry which has until now just been ignored. But no longer. We will do whatever it takes to expose those nasty violence and hate promoters and give them exactly what they deserve. Exposure..

Here is your part of the bargain..

Report Inappropriate Content

and let's see if we can have this bigot removed, permanently..

Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registry

The novelist Doris Lessing yesterday claimed that men were the new silent victims in the sex war, "continually demeaned and insulted" by women without a whimper of protest.Lessing, who became a feminist icon with the books The Grass is Singing and The Golden Notebook, said a "lazy and insidious" culture had taken hold within feminism that revelled in flailing men.
Young boys were being weighed down with guilt about the crimes of their sex, she told the Edinburgh book festival, while energy which could be used to get proper child care was being dissipated in the pointless humiliation of men.
"I find myself increasingly shocked at the unthinking and automatic rubbishing of men which is now so part of our culture that it is hardly even noticed," the 81-year-old Persian-born writer said yesterday.

Occasionally but rarely, some feminists actually pull their head out of that male hating doctrine long enough to make obvious and glaring statements like the one above. One ofcourse that must be ignored by that movement as much is gained to their part ensuring that status quo remains as they elevate women beyond their natural abilities. Unfortunately, society and women per se, have absolutely no issues with belittling their husbands, boyfriends or any other male who happens to be unlucky enough to make their acquaintance. It is without precedence as feminists constantly,  consistently ridicule the one sex who has actually helped in ensuring it's rise and survival. Sadly, those male haters even deny that obvious and proven fact. If you want to verify it just have a look at the feminist organisation websites and make a note of all those companies who have no problem stabbing their own sex in the back for profit and while you are at it, have a look at the collection of feminised gutless, pretend men sites (known to all and sundry as Manginas for their support of female supremacy) imitating and promoting behaviour that would and is more female orientated than the actual behaviour of men..

I have in the past stated that society as such and women specifically carry the anti-male messages that have been introduced via the MSM, women's studies, gender studies and other outlets as being the norm and Lessing even agrees. Women will utter those nasty denigrating comments without even being aware that they are offensive and will incur the wroth of men when stated. So much for women being "aware" or being "communicators" as they blatantly continue and are totally clueless about the harm they are causing not only to their partners, sons etc. but fail to comprehend the fact that it will  inevitably come back and hurt, haunt them as those comments will create a backlash against all women, even those who are onside and wish to not be part of the gender war hysteria..

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

One has to remember that human nature dictates that whenever you communicate with someone who blatantly denigrates you, even without being aware or demonstrates their callous and total disregard for civility,  you will in future go out of your way to avoid that individual and have nothing to do with them at all. They will be, black banned, as life is difficult enough as one deals with daily life issues without having to congregate with another female who obviously has either a large feminist chip on it's shoulder or is just incapable of being remotely aware and instead of being civilised they promote misandry without even realising it ..

Misandry is that ingrained in normal speech that one would have to regulate each and every word to ensure that it's meaning can not be misinterpreted. This is already tasked in any work environment as one tries to keep the peace in the hope of not offending some privileged princess but it is never an action that women return. They obvious have no issue with shooting off at the mouth whenever they see fit. Another non-reciprocated action whereas men will automatically adjust their speech accordingly, women just do not appear to even bother..

Link..

Wolfe in 2007..

Feminist drone and all round hypocrite, got itself arrested for failing to follow police instructions when she was told to move on.  As one of the "leaders" of the hate movement that is feminism always go out of their way to be role models as well as criminals. This just demonstrates once again that being normal or human does actually require some effort. Wolfe wrote some insignificant drivel that somehow sold a few copies as it was declared by the "girls club" that it was required reading because it made some obvious breathtaking issues about the beauty industry. Feminists hate the fashion industry as well as being the sex they are..

From the look of the photo to the right, it obviously does not exclude herself from the use of the products or the fashions. Neither did she have any issues living off it's profits..

Wolfe often criticised girls for dressing inconveniently and showing too much skin and thereby declaring that by doing would promote themselves as sex objects, gee eh!. However, Wolfe appears to be of the believe, as all self elevated feminists demand, that the sheeple should do as they are told and no do what they do..

I am at a loss to explain the slutfest mentality when one of their own suggested and promoted otherwise. But what would feminism be without hypocrisy..

More on Wolfe on the following ink..

Naomi Wolf: The Aging Denialist..

Naomi Wolf arrested at Occupy Wall Street protest in New York

She was detained after ignoring police warnings to stay off the street in front of the building and where a crowd of about 50 Occupy Wall Street protesters had gathered.
Wolf had been at the event, hosted by Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington and attended by a number of celebrities, including the reality TV star Kim Kardashian, who was presented with a "business leader" award.

I must confess to following the AGW debate on about eight different sites and blogs on the net just to get an overview on the hype being pedalled as science and came across a blog by Prof. Judith Curry and followed it for a couple of months. Needless to say that Curry is a talented professional in the area of climate science and only commenced her blog as the science started to lack integrity and tended to wallow more in the political rather than reality..

Good so far. Interesting articles and discussions were read and had, so it came as somewhat of an almost surprise when Curry's latest article started pushing and promoting the Feminist Hegemony and it's associated inane doctrine. Some infantile ex.Don promoted a female supremacist article which was posted today. The article can only be regarded as being their usual garbage. A posting that had nothing whatsoever to do with AGW or the science,  it was about the promotion of females in the academic world. The article is the usual mishmash of incoherent feminist drivel that we have come to expect from that hate movement that moans and whines about the lack of women in academic posts and also the lack of women on teaching staff  positions at those misandric temple of indoctrination even though the majority of students are females, just demonstrates that Curry is just another female firster, pushing her own gender at the expense of all men to the detriment of science as well as the general community...

Show me, apart from the occasional rare examples of women's discoveries that outshone anything Men have invented especially over the last 50 years or so when women were free to choose and do whatever they wanted. Blaming men for their own incompetence appears to be the order of the day..

We even have this bit of soundly discounted drivel..

 It puzzles a woman that a man cannot watch television and listen to her at the same time: she can watch television, listen to him, hold the baby, make dinner and if necessary answer the telephone as well.  She is, in a temporal sense, multi-skilled.  He can do all those things, but not at the same time, and if it must be at the same time, not at all well.

That dream of superiority has been discounted as being farcical as that was only ever demonstrated to being the case when the female was at home. You know the routine. Baby on the boobs, reading a trash mag while talking on the phone is just a brilliant example of what not to do if you want to do it properly..

The recently-published study discovered that frequent multitaskers are actually worse at multitasking, because they're more easily distracted by useless information - a result, the researchers believe, of their brains losing the ability to successfully filter out irrelevant data and stay on target. Scientists at UCSF claim that more research is needed before suggesting specific remedies to this problem, but agree that spending less time being distracted and more time concentrating on one thing at a time wouldn't be a bad thing.

Multitasking is bad for you.. 

Oh dear, another feminist/female boast shot to hell. Such a shame..

What could one expect when we read the usual excuse for a degree and turning up at university just so you can pay for a course that the majority of females are doing already.

I was taught as a young social scientist

That one comment is enough for me to finish right there as you and I already know precisely what road this feminist is already heading down which surprisingly makes the whole trash piece not only unpalatable but unreadable as well..

I think it's just too much multitasking that's causing all that frontal lobe damage..

..And the comedy show continues as we read this type of commentary from another feminist drone (the funny thing is that they are serious about this claim), who appears to be of the opinion that Men should lower their standards just to meet the ever lowering standards feminists have generated for themselves. I do not include the feminised mangina in the calculation as no one really considers them to be anything but a waste product, whose relevance is yet to be determined. A pretend girlie-man if you like, who wavers between reality and the dream state of their female masters. A neutered sycophant living on a different plain where reality and fantasy mix to form their delusional, ethereal world..

Anonymous said...
We feminists don't want equality with men, we want men to be equal to us. Stop blaming women for your all your failures, fucking step up.

Once upon a time I would take umbrage at this type of comment but now it has a different affect as it does demonstrate clearly what it is they are teaching these drones at the moment and what their simple minds, filters and retains. The other reason ofcourse is the underlying humour this feminist fails to see in her simplistic erroneous comment, the hidden comedy she so blithely projected is mirth and frivolity at it's finest. It is akin to stating that dynamite is equivalent to a hydrogen bomb because they both make a "boom" noise..

So what would I have to do to "step up" to being a female, let's see..

According to feminists, I would have to brush up on being able to present myself as being a whore and educate myself to expose my breasts in public. Practise lying, cheating and shagging at will(Vagina M.L.).
I would have to smear my face and body with a comprehensive range of unnecessary and unproven, useless chemicals just to make me "feel" good as without them my life would be affected, mentally.
I would have to change my shopping habits and increase them, rather than being functional and necessary to being a frivolous, time wasting activity, dedicating many hours in it's useless pursuit.
I would have to spend more time on creating a bigger circle of hangers on and sound boards so I can continually receive endless positive affirmations, each and every day, as without those needy constant confirmations I would wallow into a deep and meaningless depression.
I would have to learn how to deal with my periods which would surface like clockwork every 28 days and change my total outlook on life as well as my attitude, both physiologically and psychologically with a  flash of estrogen and the rush of myriads of other associated hormones and chemicals over which I have no control.
I would need to learn how to walk around in 5 inch high heeled shoes which supposedly make me feel sexy even though I have been repeatedly warned that I could break an ankle or tear a ligament.
I would also need to learn more about psychotropic drugs as I will be one of over half of the female population who will constantly be taking them for one or many reasons.
I will need to learn more about abusing and murdering children as my new "step up" level appears to achieve this quite efficiently and yet no one appears to give a damn.
I would need to learn how to get married and dump the individual if I feel I am being in someway inhibited, even if it's only in my mind, divorce and drive my partner to bankruptcy and steal his children while I am at it. Including all he has as well ofcourse.
I will need to learn how to lie better so I can make false sexual/rape/abuse claims when I don't get what I want, my way.
I would also have to learn that everyone owes me a living and every one else should pay me for the privilege of me being here as I am special and everyone else is not..
I will also need to learn where to find all those cushy air-conditioned offices where I can slave away filing and nattering on the phone while demanding to be paid equally for the work I don't really do.
I would also need to brush up on fashion so I can recognise anyone with money by the clothes they wear and concentrate on them paying for my expenses etc.
I will have to learn how to sue potential employers with false charges of sexism if I don't get promoted when I feel I should.
I should also become politically involved with left wing liberal causes because they will always give me more money and extras just because of my sex.
I will have to accept that I will receive a reduced sentence for breaking any law of the land because I have the right, PC, genital.
I know that I will receive preferential treatment at all educational institutions because I am even more equal than others..
I would have to study the Stars. I would need to know when Virgo was in the cusp of Uranus and how important a useless fairy tale like astrology would be permitted to run my life on every level.

This just gets better and better but I failed, I admit it. I just cannot do it. Women are just that extra delusional, irrational and incomprehensible that a normal sound mind just cannot copy or even comprehend..
It's great stepping "UP" ain't it just..

A couple of days ago I was listening to one of those painful videos about the Slutfest erm!, slutwalk saga and in the interview one of those feminist clones misspoke (good excuse for lying) that word and stated that it was a fenimist. Now I do realise that being a fenimist requires a distinct level of cognitive dissonance as we all are well aware, as that dysfunctional mindset is actually inherited, it is learnt, it is adopted by the sheeple and promoted by the psychotic elites of that movement in the likes of Mary Daly (kill all men to 10% of the population) Andrea Dworkin (all men are rapists) Gloria Steinem (all men should have a false rape claim against them) and ofcourse the number one queen of psychosis,  Betty Friedan. (I am incensed about misleading allegations of spousal abuse made by my ex-wife, Betty Friedan. They are all delusions,). If you Google Friedan you will see one almost positive quote she has made concerning both men and women, that would have been way past a full moon and medication working wonders. But feminist sites promote that one liner as if was something or a demonstration that it was actually being reasonable or in some proves that it was actually, human..

So the mispronounced term (fenimist) would make an interesting alternative as it would actually explain a little more about their current thinking paradigm as well as their dysfunctional mindset. So let's see if we can utilise the fenimist word and generate a new meaning just for the hell of it, any other interpretations are welcome..

Fenimist - A delusional human being lost in the fog of delusion..

Fenimistic - A members of the movement who generates that fog of delusion in order to control and manipulate..

Fenimistosis - A human being suffering from the affects of the fog of delusion without realising that the affect is noticeable by people outside their delusional world but refuse to accept undeniable facts and reasoning. It's akin to a dose of schizophrenia, sufferers refuse to accept the bleeding obvious also refuse to accept the appropriate treatment..

Lesbian Wong with dysfunctional Gillard in background

Penny Wong, feminist and lesbian, is a member of the Australian Government and a Minister which should demonstrate precisely how warped and bent this government really is. The entire government is loaded to the hilt with dysfunctional feminists with the likes of Julia Gillard, Penny Wong, Kate Ellis, Jenny Macklin, Nicola Roxon, Tanya Pilbersek. All of those are self confessing feminists and gloat about belonging to that hate movement. About half of the ministers are feminists. It is a good indicator as to why Australia is going down hill fast..

Wong ofcourse is the "man" in the relationship and in case your are wondering how smooth any lesbian relationship functions, have a look here..

Mirande Devine has a go at lesbian Wong, first for claiming it's going to be a "mother" which she is not ofcourse, her lesbian partner is pregnant via artificial insemination, just like they do to cows to impregnate them, but they had a really good crow about this "good" news where they were concerned and Miranda ain't that impressed and neither, as you can guess, am I..

Here we have two feminist females who are both on the nose. One is Gillard, Australia's most loathed prime minister ever and whose incompetence has been clearly demonstrated. A compulsive liar and hypocrite.
The we have feminist Nixon, another example of incompetence whose effort while serving as police commissioner (political appointment by Labor Gov in Victoria) was to ignore violence and criminals at large and treat them as poor suffering souls who did not mean what they were doing. Her mentality regarding upholding the law was to change the whole force and introduce political correctness which ofcourse ensured the privileged princesses were promoted over men even though they were incapable of fulfilling their duties, just like her..

Feminists and women in general just hate the idea of accountability as they believe they are above that trivial action. In their own minds they are giants and beyond criticism. If and when they are criticised they claim sexism, that old pathetic feminist canard that no one believes anymore..

Welcome to the world run by women..

Miranda Devine

Saturday, July 30, 2011 at 09:47pm

Just some more information on the blatant lies that feminists and their supporters indulge in which not only muddies up the actual situation but also destroys any effort for the truth to surface. Continually lying about rape does not in any way enhance the way it's treated but only attracts scorn and derision as the truth of the situation is ALWAYS overstated by feminists whose sole consideration is purely motivated towards more funding. They have already demonstrated that they are not really interested in stopping or helping rape victims but only interested in spreading their hate message to anyone requiring that assistance, even encouraging false claims to ensure those vacancies are filled to inflate the numbers. Only feminists and their misfits occupy those places where real victims of rape can go but fails to be assisted in any meaningful way..

Those centres are not staffed with professionals but only paid workers with one precondition and that is that they have to be pro-feminist. We have already read many articles by Carey Roberts, a professor, who has repeatedly demonstrated that those centres are run by incompetent, irrational, biased females whose sole purpose has been stated above. So it is about time that professional people were installed into those centres rather than letting real victims suffer even more..

The entire "Rape Industry" is designed to further the feminist cause and as they are not even slightly interested in getting to the bottom of this harrowing crime, be it either male or female victims, it would appear that help from those "centres" are only ever superficial and at best, only slightly helpful if being helpful is indoctrination..

While the lies continue, no positive outcome will ever be realised and it's only ever the victims who suffer the most..

Lies, Damned Lies, and Dr. Phil 

False Rape Society.

by Archivist 

I read a startlingly inaccurate assertion that is repeated, in one form or other, in many places:
"There is no empirical data to prove that there are more false charges of rape than of any other violent crime. Estimates indicate that only 2 percent of all rape reports prove to be false, a rate comparable to the false report rate for other crimes." M. Torrey, "When Will We Be Believed? Rape Myths and the Idea of a Fair Trail in Rape Prosecutions" (forthcoming 24 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1013 (1991)); Parrot and Bechholder, eds., "Acquaintance Rape" at 28 (1991) ("(A)ccording to police records, false reports are no more likely for rape than they are for other serious crimes.")
Sound familiar? Of course it does. Anyone who advocates for persons falsely accused of rape and similar offenses encounters it routinely.  It is as offensive as it is dishonest, and even though it was debunked long ago, it is repeatedly trotted as fact. See, e.g., E. Greer, The Truth Behind Legal Dominance Feminism's 'Two Percent False Rape Claim' Figure, 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 947 (2000), a scholarly law review article that painstakingly traced the two percent canard to its baseless origin.
No, I didn't copy the above quote from the literature of a college's women's center.
It's from the Congressional Record.
Specifically, it was in a Report by the Committee on the Judiciary in connection with the Violence Against Women Act. Senate Report 102-197 (102 S. Rpt. 197), Pub. L. 102-197 n. 48 (Oct. 29, 1991). Even though it was as wrong as can be, it was accepted as evidence to justify passage of VAWA.
Why is this important today? Because we are in danger of having history repeat itself.
Dr. Phillip McGraw, a/k/a Dr. Phil, made claims at a recent Senate committee hearing that some are calling "reckless and false."  http://www.sacbee.com/2011/07/25/3792668/dr-phils-testimony-was-reckless.html
"During his testimony, Dr. McGraw made repeated statements about violence against women, but glossed over the widespread problem of abuse against men. McGraw made a number of claims that were flatly wrong, SAVE alleges."
"Dr. McGraw asserted that 'Domestic violence is now the most common cause of injury to women ages 15 to 44.' But the actual leading causes of injury to women are falls, overexertion, and car accidents. McGraw told the senators that 'In too many situations violence against women, young and old, is almost treated as an 'acceptable crime.'"' But that statement ignores research showing over 90% of Americans abhor domestic violence."
Id.
If this is correct, then we're about to see more lies about men and women find their way into the Congressional Record.
Will things be different this time?
Incidentally, I found something else in that same Senate report. A tidbit dripping with irony:
Testimony before the committee reported that "(m)ost of the NCS (National Crime Survey) crime screening questions are very concrete." For example, victims are asked, "Were you knifed, shot at, or attacked with some other weapon * * *?" For rape, the person is asked, "Did someone try to attack you in some other way?" As the National Crime Survey itself puts it, "No one in the survey is ever asked directly if she has been raped." "Women and Violence," hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, 101st Cong., 2d sess. 29 (Aug. 29, 1990) (testimony of Dr. Mary Koss) (quoting National Crime Survey).
Why is this ironic? Because in the infamous Ms. Magazine/Koss study, where Mary Koss that found 25% of women are raped, "[r]ather than asking female students about rape per se, Koss asked them if they had experienced actions that she then classified as rape." See here. It turns out that only 27 percent of the women Koss said had been rape actually believed they had been raped. See here. As Heather MacDonald put it: "In short, believing in the campus rape epidemic depends on ignoring women’s own interpretations of their experiences—supposedly the most grievous sin in the feminist political code."
That did not find its way into the Congressional Record