More Females Smacking each other, what else is New..

We have been raising the issue of female violence for a long time now as it hits plague proportions, as well as it being a topic that can longer be ignored. The problem with exposing female violence is ofcourse that it demonstrates what level of liars feminists really are as they have always claimed that women are never violent, never make false claims and ofcourse would never lay a finger on anyone, even their partners or spouses unless it was in self defence. Lairs that feminists are, will always be exposed as the truth stands on it's own and does not require the assistance of millions of dollars and PR spin to make it work..

So we have even more added to the "Women are Violent" database as time goes on. Maybe you have witnessed some of this type of behaviour, I know I have, which is why anyone alive failed to understand or comprehend it when the feminist hegemony promotes such an outright falsehood. But it's what they do..

Video here..

Schools probe video of girls in wild brawl

LYNN, Mass. -- Two girls, apparently with a grudge, wailed on each other in a Lynn park. Many people stood by and watched, even recording the fight. Police saw the fight online and alerted the mayor. “There will be consequences for this. Not only for the girls in the fight, but also for the ones who stood by and videotaped the fight. The ones who were complacent and watching the fight and the ones who were refereeing, for lack of a better term,” said Mayor Judith Kennedy Flanagan.

Now just in case you are wondering at what age they may start that type of behavior, well, it's birth actually but that has never been looked at either but we are aware that little girls do practise manipulating techniques at an early age and finely hone them as they age..

This next one would appear to be more of a precondition than as a result of the brawl as they are waiting for the autopsy report. But ofcourse one cannot fail to see that it was obviously the boy's fault that accounted for their behaviour as the headline suggests. We cannot have the obvious victims of their own behaviour being blamed..

11-Year-Old Girl Dies After Fight With Classmate Over Boy

ABC News

Health officials and police in Long Beach, Calif., are trying to determine how an 11-year-old girl died after getting into a fight with another girl over a boy.

Joanna Ramos, a fifth grader at Willard Elementary School, died Friday night in the hospital after complaining of a headache.

"She was so nice to me; she was like a sister to me," said classmate Stephanie Soltero, crying. "They were fighting over a boy, just for a boy. It's just stupid."

The two girls and seven onlookers went to an alley off campus after school on Friday, where they had planned to fight, according to Deputy Chief Robert Luna of the Long Beach Police Department. No weapons were used and no one was knocked to the ground.

Police are waiting for autopsy results to determine Ramos' cause of death.

For more video on females smacking the crap out of each other, just in case you are of the opinion that it's rare, have a look in the side bar, down the bottom, for a list of about a dozen or so videos. I personally derive no pleasure in having to expose this type of behaviour but it needs to be shown and demonstrated to stop the feminist lies and disinformation..

Female violence, society’s “dirty little secret,”..

The feminist dream is to malign and destroy man's credibility by making all females victims, regardless of the situation, and ensure that all males are held to be aggressors even though that great lie is finally being exposed..

Feminists, especially radical feminists, a group of toxic lesbians, have been guiding legislation and laws to ensure those laws victimise men and boys for any reason they see fit. Lawmakers have deliberately turned the other cheek by passing those biased and sexist laws without scrutiny, thereby creating a victim class for women and allocating copious funding while at the same time ignoring services to benefit men and boys. This routine has been ongoing for the last 40 years as white knights and cowards in the legislator deny the existence of abusive women, which ofcourse, much to their amazement, do actually exist..

But not according to majority of mainstream politicians. They have betrayed their constituency, granted carte blanche arrangement to feminists to introduce laws and services for women, against men, at will..

This has to stop, your vote can and will count. It is time to assess what those politicians stand for and if they have demonstrated that they have passed those sexist, biased laws, boot them from office. They have to go..

Female violence society’s “dirty little secret,” especially in Alberta
Beacon News | July 29, 2011
By Christopher Walsh,

Twenty years ago, a man named Earl was sitting alone in a mobile home, the oven door open, two propane tanks set on either side, when the phone rang. He wasn’t expecting the call, it just sort of came out of the blue as he readied to turn on the gas.

It was an acquaintance checking in to see how he was. It had been a tumultuous time. Forced to finally leave his wife and admit that he was the victim of female-perpetrated domestic violence was not an easy thing to do.

Not only was the issue not talked about, there were no support services to help men like Earl Silverman. He became a pariah, openly mocked and laughed at when he tried to explain his situation. Earl didn’t kill himself that day, but 20 years later, not a lot has changed.

“I’m still trying to find some services to help me deal with this experience and I can’t,” he says. “There’s nowhere I could go to talk about it. There’s an effort to ensure that the voice of male victims of domestic violence is not heard.

“They don’t want to admit that there’s a problem.”

While searching for support groups to help, Earl came to the conclusion that if the services weren’t there, he would try his best to provide them for other men. Twenty years ago, he began operating a helpline where men could call and talk to someone who understood and a couple years later, he opened the Men’s Alternative Safe House, or MASH 4077, to help men who experience female-perpetrated domestic violence.

“Sometimes part of the healing process is being a healer,” Earl says contemplatively. “Sometimes it isn’t.”

Although he has helped dozens of other men through the help line and safe house, he still hasn’t found the support he’s been looking for and has been unable to come to terms with the abuse he suffered. And while hearing back from men he’s helped over the years is fulfilling, it only goes so far.

“It does [feel good], for that moment,” Earl says. “Then I have to face the bias and all the other issues I typically face.”

Dr. Martin Fiebert, a professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach, who has been studying the issue of female-perpetrated domestic violence on men since the mid-1990s, says the problem is only now beginning to be accepted by law enforcement and other social agencies.

“It’s one of those dirty secrets,” he says. “There was an entrenched mindset that developed and I would say, a feminist viewpoint, that always viewed men as the perpetrators.

“Female perpetration is a taboo topic. People have written about that and [it was] considered politically incorrect to discuss it.”

Fiebert says research funding agencies have tended not to provide grants to study the issue, journals have been reluctant to publish studies (in one case a researcher was threatened by the public, Fiebert says), a lot of talk around domestic violence is female-centered and female violence has traditionally been viewed as self-defence. But one of the biggest reasons for the silence around the issue is that a lot of men do not want to talk about it.

“Men have been victimized too, but what usually happens is that a man is ridiculed when he’s victimized; a woman is sympathized with,” Fiebert says. “People will laugh at men who are beaten up by their wives. That’s a pretty strong stigma.”

A call to mothers to stop killing their children..

December 13, 2011Kyle LovettDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INDUSTRY, FEATURED

A call to mothers to stop killing their children

Iam sure by now you’ve all heard of the rather strange ‘White Ribbon Campaign’, which is also known as the ‘International Day for the Eradication of Violence Against Women.’ This campaign asks that men and boys take an oath in front of others that goes something like “I swear never to commit, excuse or remain silent about violence against women.”[1] In many cases, on college campuses around the world, groups of White Ribbon activists walk around with a basket of white pins, seeking out any man that passes their way, confronting them and then demand that they take this pledge.
Of course women are not expected to take a similar oath, even though in the Western world women are just as likely as men to commit domestic violence towards their partner, and women are three times more likely then men to physically abuse, neglect or murder children in their care.[2][3][4] Furthermore, men are almost six times more likely to be the victim of a violent assault and almost four times as likely to be the victim of a homicide.[5][6]
Since feminists seem to be pushing this campaign rather hard, and receiving so much media attention, I have a few questions that never seem to get answered. Why are men who are the victim of violence viewed as less as important than women who are the victim of violence? Why don’t we also have another ribbon campaign where women pledge not to abuse, neglect or murder their children? Why not also have them take a pledge to not commit domestic violence against men?
In an even more bizarre twist, a new organization has appeared that bills itself as ‘A Call to Men: Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’. On the front page of their professional website is what I can only describe as a bizarre picture, where a group of men, all wearing white shirts, stare blankly into the camera. Underneath this picture that is ‘straight out of a John Waters movie, is their mission and purpose statement:

To galvanize a national movement of men committed to ending violence and discrimination against women and girls.
To inﬂuence change in men’s behavior through a re-education and training process that promotes healthy manhood.
To shift social norms deﬁning manhood in our culture
A CALL TO MEN believes that preventing domestic and sexual violence is primarily the responsibility of men. Although historically it has been almost entirely women who have been at the forefront addressing this issue, we think it is essential that men play a primary role in the solution. To do that, well-meaning men…men who, for the most part don’t see themselves as part of the problem…need to get involved.[8]

A Call to Men’s 10 Step Program[7]

Wait, what? Shouldn’t ending violence be the responsibility of both sexes; I mean isn’t violence a human problem? Furthermore, why should some organization take it upon themselves to tell me that I need to redefine my manhood in order to stop harming women? I’ve never abused a man nor a woman in my life, and indeed most men in our society haven’t abused anyone either. Not only am I supposed to take an oath to not commit a criminal act just because I am a man, they think I need to be “re-educated” about how I define myself as a man, and go through a “training process” to show me what a “healthy manhood” is like. If this isn’t some radical misandric garbage, then I don’t know what is.
Here is what I think about all this. First, these groups, the White Ribbon Campaign and A Call to Men, should go to the grave sides of the 12,000 men who are murdered in the US each year, and give an oath to remember that their lives were just as precious and just as valuable as any other life. Next, since they insist on making this issue about sex, rather than the criminals that perpetrate the violence, I’d ask these groups, as well as the people who passed the various Violence Against Women’s Acts around the world, to go to the grave sides of all the children murdered by their mothers and make an oath to remember that women can be just as violent and deadly as men.
Furthermore, they should track down the endless numbers of men who were, or are, being abused in a relationship by a women, but are too afraid to come forward because society doesn’t think men are as valuable as women, and take an oath to them that their physical and emotional pain is just as imp0rtant as the pain of women. Oh, and don’t forget the tens of thousands of men who are raped in prison each year, but receive neither justice nor physical or emotional support.
I don’t need any organization, government nor university to attempt to define who I am as a man, and I certainly don’t need to be guilted into taking an oath to NOT become a criminal. All human life is valuable, and one sex is NOT more expendable than the other sex. Men are human beings for God’s sake, not some problem that needs to be solved.
***A Call to Men is run by an organization calling itself the ‘National Association of Men and Women Committed to Ending Violence Against Women’ and is part of a larger group called ‘Tides’. Tides is a very large and well funded foundation that considers itself a group that works toward “positive social change.”[9]

[1]http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2011/white-ribbon-day-my-oath/
[2]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table4_5.htm
[3]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/table5_1.htm
[4]http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/natl_incid/reports/natl_incid/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf
[5]http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/gender.cfm
[6]http://www.infoplease.com/us/statistics/murder-victims.html
[7]http://www.acalltomen.com/page.php?id=51
[8]http://www.acalltomen.com/index.php
[9]http://www.tides.org/about/board/

Written byKyle Lovett

Violent Women Are Good..

Quite a few feminists have come out of the woodwork to claim that violence is the answer whenever it's instigated by a "woman". As a matter of fact, even that hypocritical "register of news" the New York Times", a feminist apologist, supporter and enabler ran a story stating precisely that. It was not apparently enough that Sharon ~~Tate~~ Osbourne laughed at the severed penis abuse while the women in the audience rolled around on the floor, high fiving each other, joining in on the frivolity (so much for the "caring" female image, it's been shot to hell). The New York Times article refers to "Women as violent characters" and it takes copious amount of explanation to justify that lunacy and to support it as the feminised, limp-wristed, dysfunctional writer (a precondition for employment on the New York Times) is more than happy to demonstrate..

No sane person talks like this..

I just don’t believe that scene where her character pulls out a rifle to protect the wagon train’s Indian prisoner — or should I say when she takes possession of the symbolic phallus.

aaaandd....

This frontier proto-feminism

Bingo..

The main issues I have is they always show some waif, some thin 45-50 kilo female who would fall over if she sneezed too hard and present her on the screen as some type of heroine who can and does drop any male, regardless of size, without raising sweat (still waiting to see that in "real"life). The other issue also is that the reason these so called "delusional harbingers of crime" are completely justified by their actions for reasons that only their own sex can comprehend, understand and justify or the directors/writes/accountants will make up a specific situation that, in their opinion, justifies their violence although whenever a member of that sex participates in violence it should never and is never seen for the violence she undertakes. Like most women who murder others, be it male or female, always presents some emotive or psychological reason for doing so. If men killed for the same reason they would be ridiculed and laughed at so the sexism and bias is more than just below the surface these days, it's full blown, head on hypocrisy..

Equality should be just that. When women receive a lesser sentence or no sentence at all for a crime she commits that lands a man in jail who has undertaken that exact crime, then the question of equality is just laughable and can easily be termed as anti-male bias. To suggest that women only ever commit crime because of desperation is not only farcical but it is the aim of feminists for it to be recognised as such and we all know that whenever feminists join in on any issue, lies will be the order of the day and mixed with their usual liberal doses of denial and hypocrisy to create another mantra..

I have only ever seen a movie where a female got a smack across the chops and put on her backside. Once. One single time over the last ten years and I am hoping that others have witnessed it more often as the opposite of kicking men in the balls appears to be standard behaviour. One to be ridiculed and laughed at. It would appear to be the case that no series or movie should go without demonstrating this abusive behaviour by women but change the sex and kick a female in the same place and wait for the same hypocrites to rage hysterically about abusive behaviour and the need to jail more men for being violent..

This is the world of hypocrisy we now live in, promoted by feminists and encouraged by women whose only goal in life appears to be to cause as much pain and suffering to my sex as possible and then turn around and wonder why no one wants a bar of them..

Abuse a "woman", Huge: Abuse a Man: Don't Care..

I must confess to being physically and emotively moved whenever I read anything like this as it happens so often these days and the plethora of hidden abuse has yet to fully surface as men are still too embarrassed to come forward and confess to having been abused by the opposite sex. It does affect their wellbeing more than the actual abuse that has taken place, not in most cases ofcourse as some example we read is just beyond comprehension..

Sometimes it just appears unachievable..

Society in this day and age is solely interested in the female victimhood story and any damage or harm that sex has inflicted on copious amount of children and partners, appears to be irrelevant. The female mind has apparently of it's own accord elevated itself past these petty problems as they continue on their abusive ways with the help of the Judiciary and law makers. One indication of this "head in the clouds" mentality was witnessed last year or so, when a "woman" demanded a reduction in her sentence (24 years for cutting up hubby and serving him to the kids as a casserole) solely due to the fact that she possessed a vagina, I kid you not, I could not make this stuff up (on this blog somewhere). Their self elevation to sainthood requires no further embellishment as far as they are concerned..

So, we come to this post from "Through Hell and Back". I ofcourse see it all through a third party perspective and I can see that Craig is trying his hardest to work things out the best way possible and I would imagine that Dr T on a shrink4men may be able to open or at least explain some of that inexplicable, obnoxious and vengeful behaviour..

I certainly wish Craig all the best in his efforts..

Should I or shouldn’t I?

by Craig BennoI have been talking to a number of people who have shared with me their story of being abused. Within the framework of those discussions its been often mentioned that its not to late to have the abuser charged with the abuse and they be punished for it. Within the law system of NSW there is no statue of limitations regarding such events.
I have been been tossing and turning the last few nights and thinking about the issue of taking your own medicine or following the advice given to others and having my ex charged regarding her past abuse. Certainly there has been no acknowledgement of this on her behalf and much manipulation of the children regarding such abuse.
One such issue is the fact that a couple of years ago my then 7 year old son witnessed and was distressed when a member of the family threatened to get a knife and stab me with it. Last night during a phone call he was saying “Dad – you have to build a bridge and get over it” that the person in question was only joking at the time….and that he was worried about it- he was only 7 at the time and didn’t understand that it was a joke….but now he is 9 he does understand it was a joke.
It was no joke at the time and his distress over that event also was no joke. It’s a common practice of abusers to turn something nasty into a form of a joke. To turn and abusive situation into something that they thought was funny. During the phone call my son said to me …Dad you didn’t have to sleep in your van…you could have stayed at your mums…I could hear his mum coaching him to say what he was saying in the background…
Yes its true, perhaps during that 6 week period, when I was sleeping in my van I could have stayed at my mums…but -during the previous 16 months I had been repeatedly told that even my family wanted nothing to do with me and knew I was mentally ill…. that sort of mental / emotional abuse does play havoc with your mind and as a result I wan’t able to go and stay at my mums during that time.
I have been advised and am seriously thinking that I need to have my ex wife charged with the crime of physical, emotional, mental, verbal and spiritual abuse. For abuse is a crime. And my ex wife committed those crimes of abuse. So the question arises….what should I do?

A Woman Attacks Another for Looking Like Casey Anthony..

Oh good, Another entry in the feminist annals concerning their claim that "Women are not Violent" even though every single member of the population on this Planet already knows that to be a blatant lie. But feminists keep supporting that claim and have also ensured that whenever these "Non-violent Woman" are finally hauled in front of the courts, she will only receive a fraction of the sentence a man would get when charged with the exact same crime..

It would be laughable and indeed funny, if it was not the serious miscarriage of justice instituted via feminist jurisprudence..

Woman Physically Attacked For Looking Like Casey Anthony
Whitney Jefferson—
Oklahoma Woman Physically Attacked For Looking Like Casey Anthony

Convenience store clerk Sammay Blackwell was attacked by a creepy customer who looked up while paying for her gas and told her, stone-faced, "You look like Casey Anthony." After Blackwell's shift ended, she left the store and got into her car — where she noticed the same woman was staring at her from inside of her own vehicle. Blackwell left the premises and began to drive home — until after a few miles, the woman appeared behind her and rammed into the back of her car. Blackwell continued driving until she pulled over onto a parking lot, where the woman hit her again, this time causing her car to flip twice into the air.
Convenience store clerk Sammay Blackwell was attacked by a creepy customer who looked up while paying for her gas and told her, stone-faced, "You look like Casey Anthony." After Blackwell's shift ended, she left the store and got into her car — where she noticed the same woman was staring at her from inside of her own vehicle. Blackwell left the premises and began to drive home — until after a few miles, the woman appeared behind her and rammed into the back of her car. Blackwell continued driving until she pulled over onto a parking lot, where the woman hit her again, this time causing her car to flip twice into the air.

The Reality Blog