Latest Posts
Showing posts with label false accusers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false accusers. Show all posts

Society has daddy issues
How to screw hubby by organising a staged situation to benefit the woman..


In the latest bit of news highlighting the disgusting nature of American family law, Christopher Butler, a Californian PI, has come under investigation for using honey traps and DUI setups to give wives the edge in custody disputes. Setups are very common in divorce, and are usually aimed at guileless husbands. Manufacturing domestic violence “incidents” is very common, and quite easy when emotions run high. I’ve spoken with men who have noticed strangers staking out their houses when their wives came over, and I’ve personally been subject to provocation while being taped by third parties (it didn’t work). People get dirty in divorce.
However, in most cases setups are carried out by the individuals involved (and often their friends and family). Where this story is different is that a man was running a business and making good money by setting men up during divorces. Although it sounds shocking, I find it difficult to believe that this is an isolated case. Evidently, Mr. Butler would hire attractive women to ply men with drinks and then encourage them to drive somewhere, upon which he would tip off the police and have the men arrested for DUI.
Butler worked not only with the women, but their attorneys as well. His services proved effective in giving wives the advantages they sought in custody cases, which is where the real money comes into play:
Reporting from Martinez, Calif.— David Dutcher met Sharon on Match.com in late 2008, a few months after separating from his wife. “We had a lot in common,” he recalled. Sharon loved four-wheel-drive trucks and sports.
They met for coffee, then dinner. Sharon was tall, slender, blond and beautiful. She moaned that she had not had sex in a long time. She told him he had large, strong hands and wondered if that portended other things. She described his kisses as “yummy.”
[...]
On their second date, Sharon suggested they join one of her friends “who was partying because she had closed a real estate deal,” Dutcher said. They drove to an Italian restaurant in a suburb near San Francisco. Sharon’s friend, “Tash,” was a loud and raucous brunet who was pounding down shots.
[...]
Sharon had trouble finishing her tequila shots and asked Dutcher to help, he said. When the women went to the bathroom, two men at the other end of the bar peppered Dutcher with questions.
“Are you a celebrity?” they wanted to know.
The women suggested going to a house with a hot tub that Tash was housesitting, Dutcher said. He followed them in his truck. Within a few minutes, a flashing red light appeared in his rearview mirror. The officer said he had been swerving.
Three months later, Dutcher’s wife filed a motion in their divorce case, telling the court that her soon-to-be former husband had been arrested on suspicion of drunk driving and that she feared for their children’s safety. The judge ordered that Dutcher’s visits be supervised.
Yes, it is that easy for a man to lose normal access to his children. One mistake during a night out and he will be ordered to have “supervised custody,” which means the children are not allowed to be alone with their father, who is judged too dangerous to be around his own children.
Fortunately, a man who had previously worked for Butler cried foul and an investigation was opened. The FBI got involved, and it emerged that some cops had been taking bribes to arrest the hapless husbands. The women Butler hired were often prostitutes, so the cops may have been receiving sexual services as well.
Butler was flying high — even Dr. Phil promoted him:
In May, the FBI took over the probe, interviewing Dutcher and other ex-husbands arrested on suspicion of drunk driving. A federal grand jury indicted Butler and two of the officers in August and September. The charges included drug dealing, running a prostitution business and illegal possession of a weapon.
More indictments are expected. A third officer, implicated by Butler in the DUIs, faces state charges of accepting bribes to make arrests.
Stunned prosecutors combed through pending criminal cases and eventually dismissed charges in at least 20 DUI and vice crimes, tainted by the involvement of the accused officers. Two of them had once worked with Butler on the police force of the East Bay city of Antioch.
Butler also apparently hoodwinked reporters. His agency received national attention for employing gumshoe “housewives” who juggled soccer games with undercover spying. People magazine and Dr. Phil did stories. An East Bay magazine reporter who went on a ride-along with Butler later discovered that everything he had witnessed had been staged.
It would be hard to imagine a sleazier line of work than separating children from their fathers, but amazingly, in today’s America one can actually be celebrated for such efforts.
As the evidence is collected in the Butler case, hopefully people will become aware of the deep sickness that has come to characterize American family law.

Everyone is well aware of the damage and death, a false rape claim can cause, while the false accuser walks away without so much as a slap on the wrist. This cycle of so called "justice" aimed specifically at all women has been so notorious and noticeable that it has received it's very own term "The Pussy Pass". This pass permits women to break any law at will without being held accountable, destroy someone's life without any consideration for the damage it causes the community, the family involved on both sides and the individual who in some cases will take his own life as society and "justice" will automatically hold him to be guilty (See Duke Uni Saga) without trial on the word of a lying female. This horrendous situation needs attention and needs to be stopped dead in it's tracks, whichever way possible. Here is the start..


Register-her.com goes worldwide
[This press release is now being distributed worldwide through PR Newswire.  Just the same, it will help our efforts significantly if individuals supporting this effort post this release in it's entirety to their blogs and social networking accounts. Thanks - PE]
Contact: Candice Howe
Phone: 832-506-4578
Email: Candice.howe@register-her.com 
REGISTER-HER.COM LAUNCHES NEW WEBSITENew Online Registry Targets False Accusers(Houston, Texas) September 13, 2011. Register-her.com, a public service website has been launched providing a registry of individuals who have been known to make false allegations of rape and other crimes.  The site creators point to the following information:
  • A study published in 1994 by Dr. Eugene Kanin of Purdue University concluded that 41% of rape allegations in North America are fabrications.[1] Kanin’s study covered a 9 year period and was conducted with the cooperation of civic government in cities surveyed.
  • The Orlando, Florida Police Department made a public appeal for false rape allegations to stop because they were putting a stress on police resources and creating a climate of undue fear in that community.[2]
  • The Baltimore Police Department reported that 30% of the reports of rape to they received proved to be without foundation when investigated.[3]
  • The Innocence Project reports that the number one crime for which they secure the release of wrongfully convicted individuals from prison is rape.[4] 153 of the 268 exonerations, or 57.1%, noted by the Innocence Project were convictions for rape.
“When someone is falsely accused of rape or abuse, the consequences are swift and severe,” says Dr Tara Palmatier, a clinical psychologist who has counseled victims of false allegations.
“Some of my clients have lost their jobs, homes and good reputations,” she adds. “Some have been blocked from spending time with their children. Those who are falsely accused of rape or abuse are immediately presumed guilty by society. They are publicly vilified while their accuser’s identity is protected. When allegations are proven false, it’s far too late: the damage has already been done. For the accuser there is rarely any downside risk.”
Frequently the false allegations go unpunished or under punished, with many of those who commit them being referred to counseling, community service or probation. [5][6][7][8].
The consequences for those accused are frequently severe; resulting in false imprisonment, damaged reputations, financial devastation, loss of employment and even suicide.[9][10][11] Dalton, Georgia police officer Paul Sparks killed himself after a rape allegation was leveled against him. The allegation proved to have no merit. Engineering student Olumide Fadayomi attempted suicide after being falsely accused of rape, and another student, falsely accused by the same woman in a separate incident, succeeded in taking his own life.
“This kind of public service is long overdue.” says Register-her.com spokesman Paul Elam, who added, “The devastation of these acts continues long after the false claims are disproven.”
Register-her.com was established to heighten awareness of this problem, and to help ensure community safety by creating a clearinghouse of information on known false accusers. It also provides a method for victims to put individuals who have falsely accused them on public display.
Register-her.com is a public service provided to heighten awareness of the false allegation problem and to publicly register individuals known to have made false criminal complaints. For more information please contact Candice Howe at 832-506-4578, or by email at Candice.howe@register-her.com
[1] http://blog.lib.umn.edu/jbs/maysession/KaninFalseRapeAllegations.pdf[2] http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-06-22/news/os-orlando-false-rape-20100622_1_false-rape-reports-jennifer-dritt-real-victims[3] http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-md-ci-rapes-20100519,0,5338041.story?page=1&track=rss[4] http://www.innocenceproject.org/[5]http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/26/nyregion/26hofstra.html[6] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-493352/Woman-falsely-cried-rape-EIGHT-times-spared-jail.html[7]http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004291649_false19e.html[8]http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/8788804.Woman_who_falsely_accused_husband_given_court_order/[9] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280926/Student-cleared-rape-emerges-second-man-committed-suicide-falsely-accused-woman.html[10] http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2010/mar/31/probe-finds-no-criminal-evidence-against-dalton-of/?breakingnews[11]http://www.thestar.com/Crime/article/705111

We have covered this before and they seem determined to falsely jail this man regardless of the facts he has already found not guilty, declared capable of having sole custody of his child..

The anti-male saga continues as false claims by any WOMAN is automatically deemed to be 100 percent correct and does not require verification in any way, shape or form. The argument is that she must be correct as she made the claim. The evidence is in the claim as far as they are concerned. Regardless of the fact that there are studies demonstrating that women will lie about anything and everything at anytime or place they please..

Those studies apparently only have significance when it's used for other purposes I assume, like reality programs and fake interviews..


Vladek Filler: A political prisoner in America


Many of you will know the name of Vladek Filler.  Thanks in part to your help with drawing media attention to his case, and the fact that he was innocent, Filler was exonerated of the false rape charges against him.
He was, however, convicted falsely of assaulting his estranged wife, Ligia Filler, by putting a bruise on her arm. The court has scheduled Vladek’s sentencing hearing for August 10, 2011, at 9 am at Hancock County Superior Court in Maine, despite clear evidence that the assault conviction was based on fraud.

I am asking for help from MRAs to make their voices heard concerning the fraud and abuse inflicted on Vladek Filler and his children by Ligia Filler, ADA Mary Kellett, DA Bassano, ADA Paul Cavanaugh, and the local legal establishment which is determined to severely punish an innocent man because he fought for the custody of his sons and because he has defied their corrupt actions against him.
Vladek’s attorney not only filed an appeal for the assault conviction but went further and filed a post-trial motion asking the judge to acquit Vladek or order a new trial based on evidence of Vladek’s innocence.
Vladek Filler Motion for New Trial
Included in the motion is just a few irrefutable facts proving that Filler was wrongfully convicted, based on the evidence.  What the motion did not mention was that the original trial judge blocked a mountain of key evidence, including Police reports which explicitly stated that Ligia Filler changed her entire story days later after she materialized a fresh bruise on her arm. None of her prior transcribed statements about the incident were allowed at trial.
To date the judge has not ruled on the post-trial motion to acquit or set aside the conviction for a new trial.  Instead the establishment is rushing to use the wrongful misdemeanor conviction to harshly punish Vladek before blatant fraud and evidence suppression gets reviewed by a higher court.
Simply put, Filler’s insistence on defending himself against lies and corruption has made him a liability to the system.  They are pushing actively to put him in jail as quickly and quietly as possible.
As Thomas Ball faced certain court abuse and jail at his upcoming hearing, on August 10, 2011, Vladek will face what is, on its face, political imprisonment.
Prosecutor Paul Cavanaugh will argue for Filler to receive the maximum prison sentence (1 year). Yes, that is a year in prison for allegedly putting a bruise on a known liar’s arm that did not appear for four days after the “incident.” The judge allowed Vladek to remain free pending appeal, but required a $50K surety bail stating that it was “due to the seriousness,” of the allegations against him.  This treatment for a class D misdemeanor conviction with no prior record is unheard of.
The fix is in, people. They want to use this misdemeanor assault charge to make an example of Filler for speaking out; for filing a Bar Complaint against Kellett; for blowing the whistle on their crimes against men.
This is the same district and prosecutor (Paul Cavanaugh) who sought only 30 days in jail for a confessed female child molester.
Not only was she allowed to keep custody of her boys despite being convicted for molesting their friend, but the rationale used for her 30 day sentence was to allow her to be with the children.
No one seems to care that Vladek’s abused and traumatized sons will face more trauma and threats from both CPS and Ligia Filler if Vladek is imprisoned. Ligia Filler has a documented history of abusing her children.  Officials saw her treatment of them as serious enough to award Vladek full custody despite the fact that he was being prosecuted for rape and assault.


Vladek and son Andrew
But it gets even more insane in Salem Village. Filler was criminally charged with this fake assault solely by Ligia Filler’s over the phone complaint. That’s right, the police never even responded to the “scene of the crime.”  They simply had a warrant issued for his arrest based on an allegation an alleged victim made on the telephone.
Evidence shows the police chief, Guy Wycoff, helped Ligia Filler concoct her story days later. By contrast, the police department and Kellett’s office refuse to allow criminal charges against Ligia Filler for well substantiated domestic abuse, harassment, or even for being caught by the police causing over $10,000 of theft and destruction to Vladek’s awarded property.
Instead, on August 10, Ligia Filler and the same strangers who coached her to cry to be more believable, and helped her destroy Vladek’s life and lives of his children, will be allowed to address the Court and call for his imprisonment. Ligia Filler will be allowed to make her demands for his punishment for a misdemeanor assault by using her absurd and false rape accusations. Vladek’s sentencing is being turned into a public stoning by the villagers.
The witch trials must end. As I write this, still another false sexual assault case is being readied for trial by Mary Kellett against another father desperately fighting for his children with his wife. And there is also the recent event that Kellett conned a woman in another case to not testify on behalf of her estranged husband by convincing her he had killed his first wife.  That case was thrown out on Kellett’s misconduct when the judge found out what she did.  More on both of these cases later.
But right now I am calling for help from MRAs to speak out against this gross abuse of due process and civil rights.  As Thomas Ball faced certain court abuse and jail at his upcoming hearing, on August 10, 2011, Vladek will face what is, on its face, political imprisonment.
We need as many messages of support as possible before the sentencing hearing.  The letters will be considered directly by the trial judge and will allow Vladek’s supporters to have direct access to the judge.  We need people to call for Vladek’s acquittal or new trial.  We need people to demand justice for Vladek and his children – not more abuse and imprisonment.
Respectful emails for Judge Robert Murray of the Hancock County Superior Court, who is presiding over the case, can be sent  to free.vladek@gmail.com  They will be forwarded to his office. You might also e-mail their letters to the local media and the Governor’s office.
Footnote: All AVfM Action Alerts may be distributed freely, with link back, to any website without advance permission.

Debbie Smith, False accuser..
Well, we all knew that the ludicrous and ridiculous laws that feminists like Harman introduced into being in England were always going to be a negative when women start taking advantage via their natural greed for money. By their actions they will eventually make it impossible to employ them as the constant threat of false claims would be paramount in the minds of anyone silly enough to employ them..

She's been taught a lesson, big time: Tycoon's joy at £100,000 bill for false accuser


The following comment is rather standard as companies will admit to being whatever the female gold digger accuses them of rather then paying those over the top fees that lawyers are so happy to open their hand for..
Most companies, even when they are in the right, which I would submit tends to be the majority of the time, settle such disputes because of the spiralling cost of fighting them.
Exactly, and thereby allow feminists to lie and exaggerate about work conditions and claim that there is "more work to be done", which basically means that not all companies are not run by women and there are still males out there, breathing..
She's been taught a lesson, big time: Tycoon's joy at £100,000 bill for false accuser. A businessman has been awarded record costs of £100,000 against a former employee who made false allegations of sexual harassment. Mr Watts, 62, said: ‘These vexatious spongers have to be taught a lesson. And she has been, big time. 

‘Like many others, Debbie Smith no doubt thought she could secure an easy bung. Most companies, even when they are in the right, which I would submit tends to be the majority of the time, settle such disputes because of the spiralling cost of fighting them.‘Not me. I have never taken a backward step in my life. My reputation means everything to me, and I wasn’t having it. I wanted the truth to come out. And it did.’ 

Mother-of-three Mrs Smith was sacked as the £90,000-a-year managing director of a subsidiary of Pertemps, P Investments, after it lost £250,000. She sued for sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and victimisation. Mr Watts maintained there was no truth in the allegations, which he said were made in ‘pique and anger’ following Mrs Smith’s dismissal, and the claims were branded ‘vexatious and frivolous’ by a Birmingham tribunal in March.It ruled that 50-year-old Mrs Smith had been ‘out to get’ Mr Watts, and said she made her allegations to try to force a payout after the ‘catastrophic’ failure of the subsidiary venture. 
Last month the tribunal ordered Mrs Smith to pay P Investments £100,000. Mr Watts had initially claimed £250,000, but settled for less than half that rather than see his accuser go bankrupt.The previous highest costs award is thought to be £67,000.Mr Watts, whose fortune is estimated at £35million, said small firms and charities were ‘groaning under the burden of complying with employment law that encourages employees to misrepresent themselves as victims of discrimination whenever their poor performance or behaviour is tackled’.He added: ‘The Debbie Smiths of this world should never get to the starting block.’



This is how the anti-male hysteria all started, by lying cows just like this, and it has not stopped since..

Twenty Years Ago Today: The Imaginary Rape That Prompted Calls for a Curfew for Men and Boys

Today is the twentieth anniversary of something that didn't happen, an imaginary rape that turned the teenage boys of the bucolic college town of Davis, California into creatures more loathsome than pariahs.

On August 2, 1991, Janet Berger, 44, who was then a circulation manager for a local Davis newspaper, falsely claimed she had been raped on July 29, 1991 at 10 p.m. by five skateboarding boys in one of the city's park-like greenbelts.

Berger said the supposed rape was in retaliation for her act of accidentally brushing up against one of the youths on her bicycle earlier in the evening. On her return trip along the same path, she claimed that a wilding gang of skateboarding teen males in tank tops, ages 13-17, wrestled her from her bike and proceeded to rape her.

Two weeks later, Berger told a rape counselor and police that it was a lie: she had merely fallen from her bicycle and had made up the rape story. She furnished neither an explanation nor a motive.

But it's what happened during those two weeks to one particular class of citizens -- the teen male skateboarding community -- that makes this story so instructive.  Immediately following the spurious allegation, the news media took the woman at her word. One headline solemnly announced: "Rape shatters illusions in Davis."

Anonymous flyers were circulated calling for a curfew for all men and boys.

Threatening, anti-male graffiti was scrawled on an overpass favored by skateboarders. It read: "Dead Boys Don't Rape."

Other graffiti repeated the "Curfew for All Men" sentiment; still other graffiti demanded: "Get the Skateboard Rapists."

Apoplectic women's groups ran out of synonyms for the word "shock."

The newspaper where Berger worked reported that a rally was planned in "support of the rape victim and other rape victims." But then the rally was canceled at Berger's request.

A local chapter of the National Organization for Women held a news conference to denounce the alleged crime. And townsfolk demanded arrests, even though the only evidence of the putative assault was the word of one then-unidentified woman whom the townsfolk knew nothing about.

Police questioned 75 completely innocent boys in connection with the rape that never happened.

Skateboarders kept a low profile once the woman's story became public. "After it happened, there wasn't a skateboarder in town," said Bill Gray, a Yolo County youth counselor at Davis High School.

One of the innocent boys taken in for questioning was then-16-year-old Josh Fernandez, who is now a mid-30s married man and a writer. Josh, then an avid skateboarder, knew as soon as he heard the allegation that he and his friends would be targeted.

"Once, when we were taking a break from skateboarding in the parking lot of Carl’s Jr.," Josh recalled, "a car pulled up. In the car was a man, about 40, who had a ratlike face with a patchy mustache. 'Hey, you fucking rapists,' he said, with his window rolled halfway down. He tried to spit on me, but the saliva didn’t quite make it out of his car."

Josh told the man, "Fuck you," but was glad that the man sped off, "because, frankly, he would have pummeled me to death with his white-trash methamphetamine arms."

This was typical, according to Josh: "For a couple of weeks, wherever we went, something of that nature would happen: A truck full of UC Davis jocks threw a dozen soda cans at us and screamed, 'Rapists!'; Butchy Davis women in hemp dresses glared us down with their murderous eyes as we rolled past on the sidewalk—and so on."

"I don’t know about my friends," Josh wrote last year, "but there were moments that summer when—even in my gangly, 5-foot frame—I felt like a big, lumbering, greasy rapist."

Finally, police decided Berger's story was filled with holes, so they confronted her with inconsistencies. One key failing in her story was her refusal to reveal the name of a doctor she claimed examined her.

"The reason I can't give you a doctor," Berger finally told police, "is because there is none."

Police officers and a rape counselor spoke to her for 3 1/2-hours, and she finally acknowledged the fabrication.

Davis Police Chief Phil Coleman called a news conference to announce the jig was up. Flanked by politicians, two detectives, and two rape counselors, the Chief said the rape never occurred.

Mayor Maynard Skinner offered an olive branch to the skateboarders, calling them "an important group in our community." He announced that the city planned to open a skateboard park.

The mayor also called on the woman, Jan Berger, 44, to publicly apologize. (I can find no indication whether she did.)

Councilwoman Lois Wolk said: "It's a tragedy for this community, We were very ready to point fingers and make accusations and stereotype groups--men (and) skateboarders."   But then Wolk proceeded to call Berger a "victim," and said she hoped Berger would receive therapy.

Some local women identified as feminists would not accept the fact that a rape did not occur, and they worried that rape victims might not come forward because people did not believe a rape occurred. "I don't think any one of us (is) convinced that it didn't happen," said feminist Sherilyn Adams. "It's not uncommon for women to recant out of fear of retaliation . . . or denial--make this thing go away."

Police confirmed a report that Berger ran a small day-care center that was shuttered after children were molested there in 1986. She was never prosecuted for the crimes, but felt responsible. Before she recanted her rape lie, she told a detective "what happened now [the supposed rape] was punishment for what had happened" at the day-care center.

A rape counselor, who told reporters that she only uses her first name (Cheryl), said that Berger did not "act out of malice." Rather, she had experienced unspecified traumas in her life. "She does deserve a great deal of compassion."

There is no indication that the newspapers were at all interested in Josh Fernandez's back-story, or that of the other 74 boys picked up for questioning by police.

For Berger's lie, for pitting an entire community against a group of some of its most vulnerable citizens--children--Berger was charged with a misdemeanor of filing a false police report, carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $500 fine. (The newspapers aren't clear if she was convicted.)

The boys questioned by the police seemed to have bounced back and put it behind them, but they didn't forget. Josh Fernandez, the writer, and his skateboarding friends who were also questioned by police, have done pretty well for themselves. One is an ophthalmologist; another writes jokes for Jay Leno; another is a chemist.

When Josh got married last year, he got the old gang together to be his groomsmen, and they skipped the traditional bachelor party. Josh rented out an indoor skate park, and these guys now in their mid-30s--who, 20 years ago, were taken to the police station to be questioned for a rape that never happened just because they were skateboarders--skated like they were 16 again.

Sources:
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-20/news/mn-1241_1_davis-enterprise

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/skateboard-bachelor-party/content?oid=1810692

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=lpszAAAAIBAJ&sjid=sjIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=5152,4943016&dq=skateboard+and+rape&hl=en

http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-30/news/mn-1507_1_false-police-report

Give me a "YouGoGirrrllll"..
Another for the "Women are not violent" file as this canard that feminist ignorantly promote once again demonstrates their "economical with the truth" ability. Their other canard is ofcourse that "women do not lie about rape" and we already have plenty of information, facts and studies which demonstrates clearly that feminists are just plain liars. Feminists have demonstrated already that lying is just a consequence of their efforts at utilising oxygen and thereby it can only be regarded an automatic involuntary muscular response..

from Dr. Tara's site (Shrink 4 Men)..


Woman Physically Assaults Judge During Divorce Hearing
On July 13, 2011, Melissa Harvick, a Wayne County, Kentucky woman, attempted to physically assault Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards during a domestic violence hearing for a complaint filed by Harvick’s estranged husband.
Harvick received the contempt order and accompanying 10-day jail sentence from Judge Edwards because she talked over her ex and continuously interrupted him and the judge during the proceedings.
Upon receiving the contempt order and jail sentence, Harvick leapt over the bench at Judge Edwards. Three deputies were required to restrain Harvick and remove her from the courtroom.
WKYT reports:
Judge Jennifer Upchurch Edwards was hearing a domestic violence complaint against Melissa Harvick from her estranged husband.
“Things have been escalating since the first of the year,” the woman’s ex-husband is heard saying in the courtroom recording, obtained by 27 NEWSFIRST.
Not long after that is said, Harvick is both seen and heard arguing with the judge.
“That’s got nothing to do with it,” said Harvick during the July 13 family court hearing, referring to her estranged husband’s comments about their personal life.
“Ms. Harvick, you will be held in contempt of court,” Judge Edwards told Harvick, after several profanities were said by Harvick.
“I don’t care. I haven’t done anything to this court,” Harvick said. “Haven’t done anything to him.”
“She’ll be held in contempt,” said Judge Edwards.
Harvick is then seen jumping over the bench, in what appears to be an attempt to physically attack Judge Edwards.
Three deputies are then seen grabbing Harvick and pushing her to the floor. She was then taken away in handcuffs, allegedly threatening the judge as she was being taken out of the courtroom.
“You’ll be sad when it happens, Jennifer!” Harvick is heard saying.
Harvick is in jail on contempt of court charges now, but officials say more will be added.
Harvick seemed to feel empowered enough by the judicial system to argue with a judge, to physically attack a judge and then, as she was being forcibly dragged from the courtroom, to threaten a judge.
Wow. Wonder who created this Frankenstein’s monster?
Here’s some video of the kerfuffle: