Latest Posts
Showing posts with label erotophilia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label erotophilia. Show all posts



The endless argument between Social Scientists, Behavioural Scientists and Evolutionary Psychologists (EP Scientists, are the scourge of the feminists and their inane disproven "product of your environment, not your sex" mentality) have been sampling, testing, pocking and prodding the population for a very long time. Issues like erotophilia are explored and answers are needed to determine whether or not the Feminist induced puppet scientists are actually capable of telling the truth. That would take an almighty effort as lying to feminists is akin to sucking oxygen on demand. Regardless of previous studies demonstrating clearly that the majority of behaviour has been accumulated over eons and fixed into our DNA, that is not their goal or aim, as it does not fit nicely into their gender, sexuality and behavioural mentality and biased doctrine..

They much prefer to wander into the unknown to demonstrate their newly found dyslexic interpretations than to actually find out the truth about human behaviour. A bit like those two cretin parents refusing to divulge the sex of their (son) child. They would be finding out about now precisely what his sex preferences are unless ofcourse they force him to behave like a girl, which rather defeats their inane intentions of not identifying as either sex. The greatest, riotous result would be for the lad to be expelled from school for aiming a gun shaped slice of pizza as some permanently offended plodder..



I digress.

Truth and Consequences: Using the Bogus Pipeline to Examine Sex Differences in Self-Reported Sexuality
Michele G. Alexander and Terri D. Fisher

Michelle and Terri wanted to have a look at why men claim to have more sex than women were prepared to admit to. That is basically the entire content and result of this study. It just really demonstrates that when the sexes are told that their response to specific questions regarding sex and sexual activities is being monitored, they tend to tell the truth more so than when asked the same questions face to face. Apparently, the girls lie about that as well and we have these two studious members of academia wondering why that is the case in the hope, I would imagine, to demonstrate that somehow the girls are really just victims of another imaginary slight.

Also, the attitude that women take when lying about humping is because it does not sit well with anyone knowing that riding the cock-carousal should be a favoured option and have determined that being called nasty names is not their end goal, better to lie about that. Even though fibbing about it all appears to be an irrelevancy. These two students of social discipline assumed that shaming anyone about being naughty behind everyone's back, was just another recently introduced methodology society uses to brow beat girls about their behaviour.
Claiming that men do not receive the same bias, boohoo. What was missing from the commentary was ofcourse the fact that women are more inclined to cane the piss out of each other and call each other sluts and whores than men normally do, as they compete for partners and deride each other if they determine them to be any competition as demonstrated by a previous study I posted a while back. But that outcome really had nothing to do with anything, apparently..

So, if you're into reading new words and spending an hour reading about the obvious, have a look by all mean (link in the title) otherwise the sun will still rise tomorrow and human nature will just be the same..

I just love the fact that every now and then, studies prove what total liars feminists are. It has now arrived at a stage that any researcher with a feminist bent, can be regarded as a compulsive liar, they  cannot be believed or be expected to behave honourably, in any shape or form, let alone apply actual academic standards to anything they do. Conforming to feminist ideology takes precedence over facts and reality. They are just compulsive liars and should be treated as such..

Here is one example. The study presented by Brizendine has been commented on by these researchers as being, well, for the want of a better word, codswallop.. The possibility of thinking about sex every 7 seconds would add up to about 8000 times a day, now how stupid is that and the media just keeps promoting it for the automatons they have already demonstrated they really are, with only a few exceptions..

Here is a link to feminist Louann Brizendine being her usual obnoxious self, bragging talking about the Male Brain..

The study in question covers the area of sex between males and females and delivers a totally different end result than previous biased and tainted studies on the same or similar subject have demonstrated earlier. Do they finally get it right ?
Sex on the Brain?: An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions
as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability



Terri D. Fisher, Zachary T. Moore, and Mary-Jo Pittenger
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University at Mansfield

Men think about sex once a minute while women think about it a maximum of three times per day? 


According to stereotype and the popular media, men think about sex much more than do women. This belief is illustrated by cartoons that depict the male brain as filled with little other than thoughts of sex, and is perpetuated by numerous jokes and wild claims in the popular literature media (Brizendine, 2006; ‘‘Men Think About Sex,’’ 2010). The statistic that men think about sex every seven seconds is so prevalent that it is even addressed at the popular debunking site, Snopes.com (Mikkelson,2007). 


In the scientific literature, studies that indicate that men think about sex much more often than do women have been used to support the conclusion that men have a more powerful sex drive than do women (Baumeister, Catanese, & Vohs, 2001). However, a careful look at the research literature indicates that research on sex differences in frequency of sexual cognitions has generally not been methodologically rigorous, leaving conclusions less than certain.
........
This study demonstrates that the sex difference insexual cognitions in college students is smaller than isgenerally believed and is also present in non-sexualneed-related cognitions. In addition, the results makeit clear that there can be individual factors such aserotophilia that are more powerful than biological sexin determining frequency of sexual cognitions. Thepattern of results and the correlations with social desirability responding also suggest that sex-role expectationshad an influence on the participants’ responses.This study yielded data indicating that the mediandaily tally count for men was less than 19 per day, whichis quite a bit less than the once every seven seconds (over8,000 thoughts in 16 waking hours) that is often touted.To better reflect reality, those cartoon drawings thatsuggest that men’s minds are filled with nothing butthoughts of sex need to be revised to include plenty ofspace for thoughts pertaining to food, sleep, and,presumably, a multitude of topics beyond the scope ofthis study.
Link to complete study..