Latest Posts
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts

Attention ALL MALE FEMINISTS..YOU'RE OUT..



This is exactly what we have been saying all along and finally a confession straight from the horses mouth..

 "Radical feminists seek liberation from men and their system, not equality."

Read it for yourself. Male feminists are finished, not even feminists want them involved..

Finally a confession about the real intentions of feminists and their self confessed male hating stance and assigning that to ALL FEMINISTS..

Have a read as you finally comprehend what feminism is really all about..

Note to feminists - Try Denying the TRUTH now, Lying Hypocrites..

An Open Letter Regarding A Radical Profeminist and Other Would-Be Helpers”

This is an open letter about men who claim to be feminist and to the women who believe them. This letter is directed at women who — without any analysis or criteria — believe men who claim to be feminist. This letter is not directed at anybody else, so please ensure that you are indeed a member of the intended audience before replying. This letter has been written with the cooperation of 28 radical feminists, all of whom should be familiar to those who frequent radical feminist spaces. We are rather serious today, about a rather serious harm being committed with impunity.

First, you need to know why we have a valid reason for being concerned about the behavior of self-identified feminist men within feminist spaces, and our answer is simple: We have identified the subtle mechanisms utilized by pro-feminist men to “divide and conquer”, to erase the commonality from all women within feminist spaces and whose cumulative effect results in a gross marginalization of the radical feminist position. Nor are we are the only women to notice a problem. Megan Milanese brilliantly describes most of the tactics here — yet that list does not go far enough to analyze the extent of the problem.

So why should an erasure of the commonality inherent to all women matter to anyone besides radical feminists? Lucky Nickel makes the relevant connection for us.
Self-naming and self-identified labels mean nothing. There must be substance to the label they identify with and substance to who they claim to be. Otherwise folks can insist on calling a mouse a giraffe or claim rape is really love.
What I do think important to note is that liberals, lesbian separatists and radical feminists are all flying the radfem flag these days. The problem being, they are 3 separate and distinct political groups and ideologies, 2 of whom are inappropriately waving the radfem flag. It can get a bit tricky tho with lesbian separatists as radical feminists can also be lesbian separatists. But not all lesbians are radfems and not all radfems are lesbian separatists, or even lesbian for that matter. But in Julian Real’s case, that would be irrelevant. The dude is not a lesbian or radical feminist.

What the dude is, is liberal. And what he is attempting to do is appropriate the radical feminist label in order to inject liberal ideology. Equality politics are liberal politics, not radical feminist politics. Radical feminists seek liberation from men and their system, not equality. Liberals focus on differences between women. Radical feminists focus on the commonality of women. Needless to say, these 2 different ideologies conflict and clash. Which delights men like Julian Real to no end. Cuz if he keeps liberal women pitted against radical feminist women, it keeps women from unifying, which in turn keeps the heat off of pricks like him and men in general. Slick, no?[/indent]
In talking to each other privately, we have decided to collectively communicate the following message regarding Julian Real, Hugo Schwyzer, and other men like them who claim to be feminist allies. These men do not speak for women as well as we can speak for ourselves and we ask that you give radical feminist bloggers the respect of reading our words, joining the discussion in comments on our blogs, and contributing to our own community rather than giving energy to men like Julian & Hugo who seek to divide us on points which all feminists have in common. Men exhibiting these behaviors have inserted themselves into discussions among women when their participation was insidiously harmful in nature, and we ask that you not support that behavior nor make excuses for it.

Concordia, Survival and Chauvinism..



The Costa Concordia event appears to have opened a few eyes to the truth of the day. It also would appear that there will never be an opportunity missed to try on a new level of male bashing when the opportunity arises.
The recent articles stating that men pushed women aside is really "feminist gold", it's akin to the "See, what they are like" type hysteria (we came across on that radical feminist site), the issue they prefer to raise rather than trying to explain the ingrained, automatic actions of human survival, instead they pinpoint the reactions and responses for denigration purposes..

In the past, it has been those very same male haters, those feminist journalists who have taken any opportunity to malign and denigrate males, such was the case when fantacising about all those "Millions of Hookers" that failed to appear at the Football World Cup in Europe or at the Super Bowl. Those professionally presented exaggerations whenever there is some demonstrated evidence, however minute. It is their bread and butter,  if there is any indication that "women are victims", on the bandwagon they ride..

The obvious response would be "You got what you wanted, your very own version of equawlitee", just live with it. No more preferrential treatment granted, as was taken for granted and assumed to be the case in the past, even now. Reminds me of that tune, "Don't know what you got till it's gone". The irony lingers, it so magically sums up that entire situation..

To demonstrate how that whole scenario panned out without any assistance from the MM, just standard responses from men and women around the world regarding that ocean liner keeling over, a few automatic, natural responses that reflects the general tone of all involved..

As Joanna T. commented on her listing in the right hand column, concerning the rise of friction between the sexes, " what went wrong", that is a good question and that may have to be looked at in a little more detail..

From here, these are the first ten comments..

confused Posted at 10:35 AM January 16, 2012 I guess chivalry is dead then.Comment 1 of 92

Jack Off of Nanny State Posted at 10:38 AM January 16, 2012 Men pushing women aside? discrimination against men again, according to the women's Lib, we are all equal.Comment 2 of 92

Grumbleduke Posted at 10:38 AM January 16, 2012 Men pushing away women? So? It just shows that you have the equality you want. No need for men to be chivalrous about things anymore, you can push just as hard as the guys remember?Comment 3 of 92

The Green Eye of Western Australia Posted at 10:47 AM January 16, 2012 Such is life. Disgusting ain't it.Comment 4 of 92

nk of Perth Posted at 10:49 AM January 16, 2012 What does everyone expect? to start playing the Violin with your mates. This ain't 1912 & it is no the moviesComment 5 of 92

someone of Roleystone Posted at 10:49 AM January 16, 2012 yes chivalry is dead. Individuals equality has made sure of this. Sad factComment 6 of 92

Bert of Mandurah Posted at 10:53 AM January 16, 2012 Eat and be eaten.....Stay alive in the process applies for all of us.PS.As none of yours been on the ship and experienced what it is really like to fight for your life at that moment. SHUT UPComment 7 of 92

ME FIRST! of Perth Posted at 10:53 AM January 16, 2012 Welcome to the 21st Century people - era of selfComment 8 of 92

joan of fremantle Posted at 10:54 AM January 16, 2012 You want equality,, sounds like you got it! I wonder if these were men in gay marriages?Comment 9 of 92

M&M's of OZ Posted at 10:54 AM January 16, 2012 Well what do you really seriously expect in such a situation, after all the phrase > its every man for himself > wasn't coined for no reason!Comment 10 of 92

Politicians have Ignored Men's Issues at their Own Peril..





Do you think that they might finally be paying attention to men's issues instead of swan-ing all over female entitlement. Politicians need to be put on notice as we are not going away and we will eventually become the force that will decide who gets into office and who will not. This is just the way it is going to be. Men, world-wide, are sick to death of feminists running the gauntlet over the legal system and that is going to change, one way or the other..


Politicians have ignored men's issues at their own peril..

New kind of male activism emerging in UK says BBC   Leave a comment

A new kind of male activism is beginning to emerge in the UK according to BBC political reporter, Anita Anand, who looked at the issue of ‘the men’s vote’ on Radio 4′s Beyond Westminster program – click here for details.
The following quotes are taken from the programme:
Anita Anand:
“For some time [political] parties have been falling over themselves to woo the women. But what about the other side of that equation – is anyone particularly bothered about the male vote?
“A new kind of male activism is beginning to bubble up. There are men out there who feel they are being ignored and frankly they’re sick of it.
“The Men’s Network in Brighton supports various bonding activities for men and their children, but also seeks to give a voice to particularly male concerns – issues like mental health, education, paternity leave.
“This is not a movement that seeks confrontation, organisiers say its more about lobbying for change and membership is diverse, the men might be divorced or happily married, they come from all walks of life and they have a strong sense of their distinctive needs and maleness.”
Glen Poole, The Men’s Network:
“Men’s issues would be things like boys in education, they’d be male suicide, they’d be poor male health , they’d be fathers trying to be involved in their kids lives, they’d be lack of male role models those kinds of things and the question is how do we get a new conversation around gender that includes everybody because there’s stills loads of really important issues for women that need to be focussed on , it’s that they’re often focussed on in a way that excludes men.
“They’re focused on as women or women or children’s issues and yet women and women and children don’t live in isolation from men. We’ve all got fathers, many of us have got partners, we’ve got brothers, we’ve got uncles, we’ve got sons. Men and women live in families and communities together.
“There’s an assumption that if you’re talking about men’s issues you must be anti women. And I think that’s the shift we’re starting to see as people are becoming more and more comfortable in talking about men’s issues in a way that doesn’t assume it’ss in opposition to women.”
Anita Anand:
“But maybe [politicians] also feel that isn’t PC to got out of their way to woo the male vote. Would it alienate women too much? Is that too much of a risk to take? There are those though who feel the risks are much more dangerous if the men feel ignored.
“The Men’s Network recently held a national conference, bringing together disparate men’s groups from around the country. Their aim was to have some political muscle, particularly when it comes to influencing both local authorities and NHS policy makers.
“Alex Bailey was there, in the past he’s worked as a Chief Executive and strategist for Brighton local authority. These days he is heavily involved with a group called abandofbrothers.
“This organisation seeks to provide young men, who have often been in trouble, with strong male role models. It wants to confront the lack of structure , discipline as well as understanding that it believes fuelled many of the rampaging young men in last summer’s riots.
“I asked Alex Bailey if he thought……there will be a time when a policy maker will sit down and say we are going to have now a male agenda and a female agenda that we will pursue with equal zeal?”
Alex Bailey, abandofbrothers:
“It may not be as simple as that, but in exactly the same way that dealing with a range of issues from a female perspective, has provided a very useful, I would say, lens, to look at issues – and potentially a tool to open opportunity.
“I think exactly the same thing is beginning to happen with men’s issues.
“If we take example the riots last summer in the UK, my recollection is 92/93% of those convicted were men Now that throws into quite stark focus the issue of if you neglect certain male issues, you do actually store up some quite considerable problems for yourself, problems in economic and social terms. Be that in men’s physical health, men’s mental health, criminal justice, education, there are a whole range of issues right across a range of all those spectrums., where actually not intervening early, not addressing some of those issues early on, young boys being excluded from school for example….
“If you look at the GCSE and A Level attainments we’re seeing a marked difference between girls and boys . Now there’s something going on here I think it’s fair to say and unless we start as policy makers to address those things I think in probably a generation’s time we’re going to see some pretty stark consequences of it.”
To read more about the Beyond Westminster programme on “the men’s vote” click here now.

Equality and Fairness Directly Opposed..

A very good video on work practices, the so called "pay gap" and feminist attitudes towards all things males do etc. Well worth a look..



Female Soldiers: Half the Effort for Equal Pay..

So the past two posts have clearly demonstrated that women in the Police Force and as Firefighters are more of a liability then help. But they are there at the behest of the feminist "equality" doctrine, regardless of the fact that their efforts and input are inferior to men, while at the same time demanding equal pay for half the effort..

This is typical discrimination at work. Women are and have been installed, nay, forced into these services at the behest of feminists who claim that "a woman can do anything a man can", but when it is definitely the case their inferior efforts are demonstrated, they are still promoted, awarded medals and paid the same for an effort that any 16 year old boy could do..

Delusion and incompetence is now the accepted standard, as regulations, rules and accountability are thrown out the door to ensure that those privileged princesses can claim "equality" but only at the risk and harm of the men who are forced to bear the extra burden that is imposed whenever a woman is thrown in the mix..

Another example of the sexism introduced and sanctioned by those service leaders who are putting men at risk just to promote the feminist feel good doctrine. They wonder why women have a credibility issue ?



Female Police: Same Money, Half the Work..

I should not be here..

A fine example of the blatant sexism against men and the entitlement, automatically granted to women. This amazing video on the English Police Force once again reinforces the extras that women demand as they are in their own mind, are worth it..

Apart from the fact that men are discriminated against in every section of the public service where "special" laws are in place to ensure that women are selected instead of men and yet are incapable of performing their duties and are always reliant on men to assist and help. The image that is projected about women in the police service is a laughable representation of what actually happens..

A real hero with male back up..






As hollywood and the english film industry depict women are the "hero", we have witnessed on numerous occasions that they always seem to disappear when the hard work needs to be done. Women in the force demand the same pay and bonuses even though they do not earn it or deserve it. The sexism and discrimination in place was put there by the male hating feminists whose delusional claim, that women do the same work, just like Wimbledon Tennis finals, do half the work and demand the same payment..

For a sex who demands equality and yet only does half the work for equal pay is laughable as well as borders on the pathetic. It echoes the false claim about all those special privileges they claim they don't receive..

And they wonder why women have a credibility problem..


Equality Hurts Women the Most..

Hang on, I haven't finished laughing yet....................


I did read a couple of years back when someone made the comment that "in order to get rid of alimony payments, all you to do is to make women pay it". Never a truer word spoken. Watch now, as they howl and scream about the unfairness of a system that actually demands (gulp) women pay their way. I know, it's a first, but they had better get use to it.
The fact that men get stripped of their assets on a daily basis and reamed by a "female friendly" family court is apparently totally irrelevant again. We are apparently not following the "women are more equal" rule and changes will have to be made to readjust everyone's "misogynistic" misogyny, as well as attitude..

Everyone already knows that a woman's money is her own and that a man's money is a women's money because if a man's money was already the woman's money then there would be no issue at all, so there is no confusion at all. See, logical..

The rise of manimony: Meet the women making huge sacrifices to pay thousands in alimony to their former husbands.


Wait, let me get the tissues first - The ever reliable, consistently lying feminists come to the party once again with their usual hypocritical commentary as they ramp up the "women are such victims" hysteria once again. I thought the "Gravity Affects Women the Most" was funnier, but stay with me here..

When novelist Milly Johnson divorced her  husband it was an apparently straightforward split. She kept the family home, got custody of their young sons and her maintenance payments came to about £1,000 a month.A fairly modest sum, you might think, when you factor in the expense of clothing, feeding and raising two boys.Except this was not money Milly received from her husband, but financial support she was paying to him. The 47-year-old mother of two found herself in the unexpected, but increasingly common, position of having to pay alimony — or ‘manimony’ as it has been dubbed — to her cash-strapped ex-husband after their marriage broke down.
I won't bore you with the rest as I will leave it up to you to check it out further if you like. But the surprising response here is that I actually could not give a damn about the entire issue, to be perfectly honest. I am so sick to death about "women having it hard" that my "don't give a stuff" meter is buzzing and amazingly enough, I would think that society in general has had a gut-full of it as well. Well the more intelligent one's that is. Those magazines are filled with this type of rubbish and they will still be purchased, sold and read..


All they need to do now is to "Woman Up"..


I rest my case..

So Who Pays for the Night Out ?..

“Feminists have a hard time finding guys who want to date them,” a classmate in my Social Psychology class expressed this sentiment one day during a discussion on stereotype.
Gee, who would have thought that ?
Not Happening is it..
The argument about who pays for dates arose once again and it does appear to create a lot of discussion which flows either one or the other depending on whether or not you're a women or a feminist. I have been informed lately that women on dating sites go out of their way to state that they are not feminists which says a lot about that movement and how women do not support that hate movement but go out of their way to ensure that there is no doubt that anyone can misconstrue their non-allegiance. They must realise that any suggestion of being associated must be anathema for any female whenever any male is checking out their "look at me" rant page..

Paying for dates is a rather interesting argument as it appears that women as well as feminists (those strong and independent) types demand that men pay where even one feminist claimed that they should because she bothered to turn up which is sufficient excuse for the extortion demand. It would appear that women have gone through the imaginary lists of demands and picked out all the positives and just dropped any item where they would have their ego impinged which ofcourse would be the case if they have to part with any of their money. I suppose they look at it as parting with that new dress, shoes, make-up, massage, boob job, face lift or other nefarious requirements that women indulge in,  As those items or options would not be available if they decided to pay for their own food and Martini..

The hypocrisy is rampant and there for all to witness, they actually make the same income as you and in some cases even make more depending which city you live in. I did a recent post on the habits of women going to bars where they suck in guys to buy them a drink and just simply wander off once they achieve that act of thievery without so much as a backward glance and that is the same attitude women have when they demand you pay for them to free-load a meal and booze at your expense for no particular benefit coming back your way. The question must arise "what's in it for me" and don't tell me it's sparkling conversation or just turning up because that just ain't reason enough..

We have some incomprehensive comments from the feminasties who appear to be incapable of detecting their own hypocrisy or even their own stupidity, like this one..
All these men are plain cheap and I would feel bad for any woman that dates them. I have never paid for a first date...
There you go..
Manipulative, who me ?
This fairly typical response that appeared at the Seattle Post Intelligencer website: “Sorry ladies. In the age of PlayStation 3s, 24-hours-a-day sports channels, and free Internet porn, you are now obsolete. All that nagging, whining, and stealing our hard earned cash have finally caught up to you."
Even Hymowitz has a go at explaining the aversion..
Shocked? I wasn t. During the last few years researching this age group, I’ve stumbled onto a powerful underground current of male bitterness that has nothing to do with outsourcing, the Mancession, or any of the other issues we usually associate with contemporary male discontent. No, this is bitterness from guys who find the young women they might have hoped to hang out with entitled, dishonest, self-involved, slutty, manipulative, shallow, controlling—and did I mention gold-digging?
So there you go and it would appear that when they finally snare some sucker desperate enough to take them out to dinner, they demand he foots the bill even though she would probably have more cash in her pocket than he has..
What goes round comes round ladies. Your ever increasing demands and your compliance to the feminist hate movement has removed you from the heart of any perspective suitor. So rather than complaining about who pays for the meal maybe you should just order that take away in, again..