"Where's my sammich"..

Ah yes, Futrelle, the mammary gland specialist, who has on the odd occasion demonstrated it's jealousy regarding this site, so I am told. I don't bother with this type of riff-raff normally, as I find that it is akin to having to crawl under the house to remove a carcase. One has to remember that Futrelle is a male feminist. Now it's not for me to determine whether or not it imitates one for the sake of recognition or entitlement to attend their "vagina-ised"  functions, but did we not expose the fact that "male feminists" are not wanted in that female slut-feminist, hate movement, the gates to the Hegemony was closed..

Have not copious numbers of female slut-feminists exposed themselves and stated that male feminists are just not welcome, they were wasting their valuable snark and malice time and should just f*ck off. I am sure I have seen that stated quite a few times, but it appears that these male feminist drones, these whipped boys, just refuse to accept the wishes of their masters. They cling, beg and grovel in order to keep their place in the hegemony, (remember Schwyzer, anyone, anyone at all) while being continuously scolded and abused for their efforts. Now that effort would take a mammoth level of masochism, which they obviously do not lack. Think of that unwanted puppy that refuses to leave even after being rejected and snarled at. It truly does indicate what level of humiliation and denigration they are willing to tolerate just to be "present", to "help" the doctrine that refuses to recognise any of it's rights.  It really does border on the pathetic..
As a matter of fact I did this MP3 a few years back, my first solo attempt, about male feminists and the response they received from a feminist called "Girlbomb". She had a few things to say about them as well..




As follows..

Janice Earlbaum(Girlbomb): The Truth About Feminist Men

"Feminist Men": Oxymorons, or Simply Morons? 

Hannibal "Pass the loaf" Barca..

Lately, there's been a spate of "male feminists" posting at the BBs where I lurk. At first I saw them and I thought, great! I mean, I like feminists, and I like men, so you'd think I'd love this purported hybrid of the two. And yet, no, not so much, not so much at all.
As a matter of fact, it's caused me to realize that most of the men I've personally known who have made a huge hairy point of identifying as feminists have been either date rapists, mom fetishists, porn addicts, or bear daddies inflicting their frustrated pseudopaternal tendencies on women. They are some of the most passive-aggressive, patronizing, out-dishing without it-taking twerps on the planet, and they are poisoning the women's movement from the inside by sapping the hell out of everyone's goddamn energy.

Just brilliant..
I haven't laughed this much since they buried Daley and Dworkin..
Wait, there is more..

Is Futrelle Barca’s boy-toy?

When anyone has a difference of opinion regarding any issue, one would at least expect the courtesy of being able to discuss that difference of opinion in a civilised and practical way. If and when anyone agrees or disagrees, whether they either agree or disagree with said topic or article or opinion piece. It would be assumed that that opinion is at least heard rather than shouted down. That is normally how consensus is built and a positive outcome reached. Part of those processes are usually a compromise in order to reach some level of cohesion or workable idea and outcome..

It has always been the mainstay of the Men's Movement to succinctly put across considered and well thought out response and argument in pointing out why we are against certain aspects of the feminist rationale. Not purely for the reason of "because it's there" but because many in the MM realised that the way they presented their arguments and justification for their actions were plainly hypocritical, discriminatory as well as sexist, which they claimed they were supposedly working against..

In the past there have been quite a few efforts at engaging feminists, either by demand, suggestion or recommendation and on the odd occasion it was taken up and as usual it came to absolutely no practical outcome whatsoever. The reason for that negative outcome was solely due to the fact that feminists refused to budge from their blatant and obvious lies and hypocrisy. The case in point would be the Futrelle and Elam debate, which would have had a positive outcome if the male feminist had not introduced their own manufactured studied lies and misinformation, as proof of enforcing their viewpoint as sacrosanct. Bear in mind that a similar discussion eventuated between the MM and PUA(Pick Up Artist) community in which the debaters worked out differences and everyone walked away with a better outlook to both viewpoints. Differences were examined and discussed, worked out and all or most went away with a feeling or sense of a job well done. That use to be what discussions and debates were all about..

But with feminists, this is never the case. We have in the past witnessed their leaders demonstrate some minutiae of regret at the methods they used to discriminate against men and often women as well. But apart from that, their attitude is one of "We are Right and You are Wrong". Which does not give any hope of ever reaching some level of compromise as that attitude demands that one side must win over the other..

I can give you many examples on how feminists respond to legitimate attempts at discussing issues.Here are a few that I have come across personally..

MRA - Should the Education departments be concentrating on one sex and ignoring the other?

Feminist response - You're sexist.

MRA - Where VAWA is concerned, why is it possible for a foreign female to be able to make false assault claims against a citizen of that country and have the government help convict him?.

Feminist Response - You're racist.

MRA - How is it possible that a mother can deny access to the Father to see his children?

Feminist Response - You live in your mother's cellar and you have a small dick..

You may think that those comments are exaggerations, but anyone who has spent any time on feminist sites, posing similar questions, did and would have received those usual evasive personal attacks as standard feminist responses and behaviour. That type of action signifies precisely that feminists have no leg to stand on whenever they are faced with sincere questions quiring some of their doctrine or viewpoint. Even that outcome varies to such a degree that one would have to allow for the different types of feminists there are as each sector or segment of that movement has a differing viewpoint, opinion or explanation and not one single explanation is the same..

So, what are the chances of dialogue or constructive discussions with that irrational hate movement ? absolutely none. That is unless and when they decide to grow up and stop behaving like spoilt children who continually demand their own way and everyone else is ignored or demeaned as and treated as irrelevant..

One does have to wonder why we have those endless attacks by the feminasties against MRA(Men's Rights Activists) or in my case a "Male Renaissance Agitator" ( a phrase coined by Fidelbogen ).

Renaissance - Origin: 1830–40; < French, Middle French: rebirth, equivalent to renaiss- (stem of renaistre to be born again < Latin renāscī; re- re- + nāscī to be born) + -ance -ance

Appropriate, as MRA's existed in the early 19th Century for the same reason we exist today. That being,  that we refuse to be trodden underfoot, discarded as cannon fodder and relegated to third class citizenry. The ongoing attacks by "Male" feminists like Futrelle et al, really is something to behold. Let me show you why..

Futrelle - When I started my blog Man Boobz around six months ago, I intended to mostly discuss the issues motivating those in the Men’s Rights Movement, and to highlight some of the sillier misogynist emanations from men’s rights activists (MRAs). But the more I delved into the movement online, the more convinced I became that, for most of those involved in it, the movement isn’t really about the issues at all.

" the movement isn’t really about the issues at all." That statement, made me think of something written in the past, I have grave doubts that it was intentional, as that would require some knowledge of history and those malcontents are already too busy trying to rewrite it. The line that came to mind was a reference to Bill Shakespeare's "Much ado about nothing"..

I wonder why they feel so threatened by MRA's ?

The "..movement isn't really about about much at all" contradicts the author as Futreelle spends most of his time, just like Hugo, writing about issues that in their opinion, is really about nothing. One does have to wonder if he can actually detect any irony in his own comments, one also wonders if he is capable. I know the girls have a similar problem understanding irony, so one has to wonder if there have been changes underfoot or under boob!

 For number two, includes an obvious lie, we have this remark -

"I intended to mostly discuss the issues motivating those in the Men’s Rights Movement"

That statement is as far from the truth as anything can be. Futtrele's  ulterior motive has always been  solely motivated by his hate of any resistance to the feminist hegemony. He continually produces any   remarks or comments made by any individual, that he perceives to be a member or claims to be or assumes to be and selects the most offensive comment he can find (by scanning/monitoring selected forums, blogs and sites), even though the individual, making the comment may not even be a member or remotely regarded as such or could even been a deliberate plant, an impostor/troll in order to produce  grist for his slander mill, creating new headlines he elevates as being representative or being the general attitude of the MM and/or MRAs. I and many others have witnessed these trolls on quite a few occasions. I definitely would not put it past these opponents to introduce someone in order to play or enhance the vitriol they constantly spew at the slightest excuse.

This is precisely what this recalcitrants indulges in, locating tripe and trivia, blowing it out of proportion and exposing it as the latest "News" release and introducing imaginary issue..

This is normal behavior for any feminist, I expected this dishonesty and highly questionable behavior. I have come to expect nothing less. In order for anyone to become a feminist, one must shred their integrity, abdicate their honesty and throw their dignity out the door. It appears to be standard operating procedure, you cannot be a feminist and have a conscience at the same time..

Their mantra should contain "Eat, Drink, Cheat and Lie", it would be more accurate..

What's Wrong with David Futrelle: A Comprehensive List

What Futtrelle avoids mentioning is ofcourse the sound thrashing he received at the hands of Paul Elam, when Paul threw down the gauntlet and challenged this ranting, raging Lothario  they debated those "Issues" that he claims to want to discuss, remember those "issues motivating those.." in the men's movement. The debate did not last long at all. The lothario gathered up what was left of his hubris and headed home, dragging his teddy behind..
Sad to say, well actually not really, that Manboobs took some time to recover, as his little spot in the corner, where he was licking his wounds and denying his medication, had to come to an end, sooner or later he would have to face reality again as he was actually starting to loose weight..

Feminists peeing standing Up, whoopie..

The problem that Frutthelle has ofcourse is the fact that feminists have built their argument on lies, exaggerations and half-truthes, no one is going to win any argument with that as their foundation. Add to that the copious examples of old feminists, their leaders like Friedan and Dworkin and the "female Pedophile" Greer, these women were seriously afflicted, either deranged (Dworkin), affected by psychological issues(Friedan) or demonstrated their warped outlook to the world with delusional, imaginary, greatly exaggerated books, going against their own beliefs (Greer, will not release her doctorate thesis as it would totally contradict her book "The  Female Eunuch"), when asked about her childhood, it was her mother who had greatly abused her)..

When one looks at the overall standard of people who promote that feminist Movement, the "leading" feminists, most are authors of male-bashing, male denigrating books and studies and preach their hate on lecture tours disguised as growth opportunities. You can see why feminists are impossible to deal with. On most occasions, whenever you look at any prominent feminists on the web and delve into their background, you will inevitably find major issues in their own lives, either psychological or physiological (sexual deviance and lesbianism) issues and they use feminism and it's doctrine of hate to rage against everyone and that includes both Men and Women..