Latest Posts
Showing posts with label bigot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bigot. Show all posts

Amanda Marcotte: The Perfect Feminist..

Amanda "Look at Me, ain't I just something else" Marcotte

Amanda fits in very nicely with the term "Party Girl", the ideal feminist as we can see and witness. Her dignity consists of having photos taken in all kinds of situations, to anyone else it would be  embarrassing. I suppose when you have thrown dignity, honour and any standard level of decent behaviour, as feminists do, out the door, then nothing is too extreme. Nothing is sacred and nothing is too outrageous..

This entitlement Princess has no bounds on it's behaviour. Here is example of her character..
My roommate says to me, “Oh, Amanda, I’ll hold your hand while you take a pregnancy test,” but that never happened. Then again, I never pushed it, because I am and always will be a loner. I called my sometimes-boyfriend, my inconstant lover and told him I was probably pregnant. I wanted him to offer to pay for the abortion. He offered instead to marry me. I nearly threw the phone against the wall. Instead, I told him it may not be his. He said he didn’t care.
So let's see what is involved here. We have the "Hugo Schwyzer" type confession with all of it's dirty linen exposed in public. We have a pregnant single female (must be difficult remembering those dozen or so "don't get pregnant" options). We have a future abortion on hand if the test are positive, we have a possible future desperate cuckolded feminised wimp willing to sacrifice his life, and we have a future privileged princess raging against the possibility that someone might actually want to help her out of a difficult position, most would welcome that. But, not good enough for Amanda, she's a feminist and feminists always demand the impossible and scold anyone on any minutiae that might offend them..

The deep and meaningful arguments that Marcotte likes to promote is not just limited to sex, drugs and boob fondling, nope. She is much deeper than that, one should not be shallow or an empty vassal, there were important issues to consider and promote..

Like this one..
Leave the Pajamas Alone! 
By Amanda MarcottePosted Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2012,  
Anyway, like with outdoor sex and eating oysters, there are those occasions when wearing pajamas in public is not only acceptable, but expected. 
One can already draw their own conclusions as to the character and general makeup of this individual, it's complete lack of venerability or even some level of admiration would be impossible. This female is one to be repulsed and ignored as she speaks from a limited sense of self only. Her inane rantings cover the general floss that society generates but prefers to ignore. Marcotte promotes and lives it on a daily basis. Shallowness and self interest are two character flaws that most would eventually hope to work out of their system as one grows up but Marcotte just focuses her entire existence on those flaws. nurtures and tries to find way of ingratiating herself to others via her own bitterness and hate
Twitter / Amanda Marcotte: @SoylentHHH Not an apt com ...SoylentHHH Not an apt comparison. Music is an art form, not a flavor of ice cream . It's more comparable to literature, TV, or art.
 One does wonder if this female had some problem in the past, where she may have been affected or afflicted with some type of disease or physiological/psychological trauma, I know that is a little trite, but are we looking here at the behaviour of a normal, rational, functioning mind ?

 Amanda Marcotte Says That You Want to Rape Her!

Fidelbogen's expose does put her behaviour into perspective as she is caught out once again sniping and seething on an issue where she can take another opportunity to promote her misandry and male bash, her favourite pastime.

Amanda Marcotte Has a Conniption Over the Rights of … Shemale Scouts?

The shallow behaviour continues as she raises more inane topics and subject, more for affect than educating, does not to get to the bottom of the subject. She thrives on goading, torment and harassment,..

Amanda Marcotte’s Ugly Prejudices

Buss interviewed women from 37 different cultures and found that in all 37 different cultures that women preferred to marry men with a lot of money. He felt that this was solid evidence for a gold-digging whore gene.
In those two sentences, she manages to make four errors. Buss, of course, didn’t interview women, but that’s a minor point, speaking more to her care about journalistic accuracy than anything substantive. 
The item she’s referring to was one in which subjects ranked the importance of various characteristics, in this case, “good financial prospect” for “someone you might marry.” In all but one of the 37 samples, there was a sex difference. (Spain was the exception.) And, most emphatically, Buss made no claim at all – let alone a claim about “solid evidence for” – about a putative “gold-digging whore gene.” In the conclusion, Buss writes, “Each of the five evolution-based predictions received some empirical support from these data” (p. 12), a far distance from the conclusion Marcotte hangs on him.
I am rather surprised that Marcotte is regarded or even assumed to be a "journalist", one would imagine that sniping and making inane, trite comments to be the actions of a child, it would not be part of the job description. A journalist would ensure that the facts were correct and accurate, where Marcotte survives solely on assumptions and strawman arguments that are assumed to be part of some "feminist interpretation" but in reality she just mimes her own opinion under that guise. One can already see how vacant and shallow Marcotte really is when it comes down to her character flaws, of which she has many.

How to become a leading Democrat’s blogmaster; Updated/Correction–and more wit and wisdom of Amanda Marcotte
Whatever the case, Walter Olson, K.C. Johnson, LieStoppers, and Jon Ham all caught Marcotte trying to cover the unhinged tracks at her old blog. At some point before she started her new job, she deleted a screed about the Duke lacrosse players that she had posted at Pandagon on Jan. 21.
Here is some more of Marcotte's lunacy. These she deleted and tried to hide as well.
 Today’s “Jesus cries when women fuck” update by Amanda Marcotte
Well, the Texas House of Representatives got Republican Jesus and he reminded them that out of of all the things he hates, which are multitude, nothing incurs his wrath more than women’s sexuality.Don’t relegate yourself to the used cunt lotOf course, if you’re a perverted religious nut, the blood and the pain of “cherry”-breaking is probably a de riguer part of a woman’s life, both to give the man a cheap thrill of actual blood while enacting the sex-as-violent-possession construction that is part of virginity fetishization and to remind the woman of her religious teaching that womanhood is suffering (see: Genesis).
The claims about Marcotte being a racist, religion basher as well as being some kind of fetishist is covered in just one of her own paragraphs..
Here is her original eronous rant about the Duke incident. I have yet to see an apology but that would take character, decency and a dose of missing honour..


All the above articles were presented by sane and accountable people who would have at least carried out some studious activity to ensure their information was honest and without error or failing standard journalistic standards that one expects and demands..
When one compares the output of Amanda Marcotte to a normal functioning, rational journalist, one does have to wonder why the hell anyone would bother to publish her bogus, sullied and irrational scribblings, one has to ask why anyone would even bother to read it..

Amanda Marcotte is to journalism what feminism is to reality..

I could go on endlessly but it is just not worth the effort. I wanted to establish the fact that Marcotte can only be regarded as being a fake and a fraud. She promotes herself as a person who is supposed to be exposing some imaginary level of bias and discrimination when in reality, all she does is demonstrate precisely that she is everything she claims everyone else to be. A person more hypocritical, irrational, irrelevant or downright vindictive, would be hard to find..


Lisa Riniker: Bigot..

One does have to question the intelligence level and IQ of this bigot to try and comprehend why this sexist female would charge a six year old for playing doctor and nurses..

To any average human being, this action is beyond stupid. It registers along with eating kittens and killing fluffy little bunny rabbits. But this "claim for fame" egomaniac decided that her chances would be boosted in achieving a better position and a bigger wage packet if she destroys the lives of this six year old boy and bankrupts his family as well..

Here we have another example of what a wonderful world we would live in with women in charge..

Lawsuit Says Prosecutor Went Too Far In Charging Boy

Gag Order Prohibits Boy's Parents From Talking About Case

Updated: 2:16 pm CST November 23, 2011
Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker
Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker More Details
MADISON, Wis. -- A 6-year-old Grant County boy has been accused of first-degree sexual assault after playing "doctor" with two 5-year-old friends.
Now, a federal lawsuit has been filed against the prosecutor, who attorneys said is trying to force the boy to admit guilt.
The boy's parents had planned to speak with WISC-TV on Monday to discuss the emotional toll the prosecution has taken on their son. But the prosecutor, Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker, on Monday morning asked a judge for a gag order in the case and was granted it. The gag order prohibits the boy's parents from talking about the case.
But the attorneys for the parents in the federal suit, which names Riniker as a defendant, can aren't included in the gag order, and they spoke with WISC-TV from Chicago.
Attorneys for the parents of the 6-year-old, who is being referred to as "D," said that Riniker has gone too far by bringing a felony sex charge against a first-grader for touching a 5-year-old girl inappropriately while playing doctor last fall.
"That behavior by a prosecutor is outrageous," said Christopher Cooper, an attorney for the boy's parents.
Cooper and attorney David Sigale filed the federal suit last week, alleging that Riniker wants D to sign a consent decree admitting some level of guilt.
"We're certainly hoping to vindicate D in the eyes of the law," Sigale said.
"He (the boy) says he didn't do it, and the little girl says he didn't do it. The little girl says he touched the back of one of her buttocks," Cooper said.
LAWSUIT SAYS PROSECUTOR WENT TOO FAR IN CHARGING BOY
The attorneys are also asking for about $12 million in damages from Riniker and two co-defendants.
Cooper and Sigale said they are prepared to present evidence that D has been psychologically harmed by the court proceedings and is terrified of going to jail.
"She (Riniker) bypassed the parents and sent a 6-year-old boy a summons, on which is a threat that the 6-year-old will go to jail for failure to appear," Cooper said.
The attorneys said they have sought the opinion of many experts who said that children "playing doctor" is not a sex crime.

Nicole Fabian-Weber : The Stir and Update..

This is what a feminist looks like.. Fabian-Weber.
An update on Nicole Fabian Hyphen Weber, don't they just love those triple names, the last bigot used a triple as well but without the hyphen, I am almost disappointed..

The site "The Stir" is part of the cafemom network, has to also be held to account for promoting violence, hate, misandry in particular, so it is worth the effort to mark those comments as offensive and lodging a complaint. Easy enough to do. No waiting in line..
Cafemom guidelines as follows --
Slurs, stereotyping, and hate speech are not tolerated.
Slurs, hate speech, and attacks aimed at any race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation are not tolerated at all on CafeMom. Don't stereotype people. It isn't funny and it isn't acceptable.
Here are the people who own and run Cafemom..

To refresh the memory on this bigot, it is the feminist female who, just like Sharon Osbourne, had a really good laugh about a men having his penis severed and removed by some psychotic female. However, this piece of nastiness does not even bother commenting in response to the outrage from both man and woman regardless of her macabre topic and her vitriolic rage on that site..


Wife Cuts Off Husband's Penis & Chucks It in the River

Just like a child has no sense of dignity or honour or demonstrates some obvious acknowledgement of care, so are these women the same. When queried if the tables were turned and a man severed a breast or a clitoris and "chucked" that into the river, could we all have a good howler like those cretins on umpteen daily girly programs. What manner of animals are they where they delight in the suffering and violence of another human being. What manner of adult are you when you delight in the knowledge that someone has removed some part of another person's body and you just laugh about that. What level of sick human being does that..

So Nicole Fabian-Weber has definitely earned her place on the bigot list. This is not an honour and it should serve as being shameful and dishonourable but I doubt she is even capable of that..

So it gives me great pleasure in demonstrating where that nasty attitude ends up on Google and exposed even higher than most of her own grasping efforts for attention. Enjoy..

Let's have a look at one of the comments and the type of fan this nasty bit of work attracts..

Snarkymom ummm, where can i get scissors that are sharp enough to cut off a PENIS!!!
 on Oct 18, 2011 at 3:05 PM

Those woman are just pure class aren't they. I can understand why men are happy just being on their own and making their own way instead of putting up with another one of these weirdos..

Nicole Fabian-Weber : Another Bigot..

This is the result of the Google main search page on bigot number one taken just a half an hour ago, it demonstrates how affective the MRM is at exposing those male haters and there will be more coming, that's for sure. We have the major MRA sites listed in ManWomanMyth, AVfM, Register Her, Antimisandry and ofcourse this humble blog as the fifth entry. Well done All..


As you can see JMK has now been outed for the bigot she is and recorded in posterity and rightfully so. It would appear that other male haters are lining up with their usual male hating bigotry which has until now just been ignored. But no longer. We will do whatever it takes to expose those nasty violence and hate promoters and give them exactly what they deserve. Exposure..

Here is your part of the bargain..

Report Inappropriate Content

and let's see if we can have this bigot removed, permanently..

Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registry

According to her profile at Café Mom’s The Stir, Nicole Fabian-Weber, a “Mommy Blogger” with some spotty writing credentials, describes herself in the following way:
Not that long ago I moved to New York from Los Angeles, where I wrote and worked for shows like What I Like About You and The Big Bang Theory. I’ve written essays for McSweeney’s and Hackwriters, blogged for a bevy of websites, and even had a short-lived affair with copywriting.
I live in a dimly-lit Brooklyn brownstone with my husband and shih tzu.
Spend lots of time online. Don’t eat dairy. Big fan of puppies.
Sipping on: Gin and juice
Let’s add something else to her bio: Virulent bigot glorifying and promoting violence and sexual mutilation. Oh yeah, let’s also add her sorry ass to register-her.com.
In a post recently written on her blog space at The Stir, Fabian-Weber said the following:
A 29-year-old Vietnamese woman, only identified by her surname, Pan, was sick and tired of her husband’s philandering ways and his physical abuse. So she did what any scorned, ballsy woman would do: She waited until he was passed out from drugs and sleeping pills and cut off his penis — with a pair of scissors. Then she threw the severed member in a Taiwanese river like it ain’t no thang.
Afterward, she turned herself into police and allegedly told them that she felt no regret for what she did to her unemployed, drugged-out dirtbag of a husband. Bad. Ass.
There is so much glaringly wrong with this post. I need to point out first that drug addiction is a problem for which many people need help. I know, I spent a significant part of my adult life counseling people affected by drug addiction and alcoholism. I never considered sexual mutilation as a possible intervention, nor do I think most of my peers would have approved of that. Well, most of them.
But aside from that I would also have questioned the circumstances of any male client so unfortunate as to be connected with a woman capable of doing what Pan did.  Anyone capable of that, I assure you, was a terror in other ways long before she made this heinous attack. It is entirely possible that doing drugs and drinking was a coping mechanism the husband fell back on as a reaction to an abusive wife, and that his alleged violence, if it ever happened at all, was in self-defense.
In this I digress a bit, because it is Pan’s sick and disgusting American counterpart that is the real subject of this post. And I am not done with her yet.
After calling the victim of a sexual mutilation a “dirtbag of a husband,” and inferring that his lack of income was part of the rationale for severing his penis from his body and throwing it in a river, she further exposes her own psychopathology with the following:
Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long, and cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power seems like the best option. And it probably is.
Notwithstanding this depraved rationalization, the only proven physical abuse in this case thus far was from this woman, who waited till her husband was unconscious and defenseless, then savagely attacked and disfigured him.
And the post reflects, some female bigots, disabused of the notion that there are any real consequences for violence perpetrated by women (that much is true), are moving past just committing such acts on their own behalf, but into open advocacy in public forums.
At the end of her blog post, she queries her readers with the following:
Do you think cutting off a man’s penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?
It is clearly a question that this particular bigot wishes to be answered in the affirmative, as she illustrates with saying “I must admit, I’ve always admired a woman who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus. [sic]”
Fabian-Weber, in the spirit of Sharon Osborne and other low-rent versions of humanity everywhere, has just joined the ranks of violence advocates elevating their hatred into the public limelight.
Is this disgusting person going on to register-her.com? You bet your ass she is.  Are we going to have a protracted debate on whether to take her off that registry, should she decide to remove her post, or apologize? NO.
Nicole Fabian-Weber has volunteered to out herself as a hateful ideologue that supports the most deplorable forms of violence, against men, for whatever grievances women might allege to have. She will remain on the registry as long as that unfortunate man does not have a penis.

Written byPaul Elam

Jenna Myers Karvunidis: The Clayton Apology..

Just one last entry on Jenna Myers Karvunidis, from High Gloss and Sauce..


Article link here..So we have the Clayton's apology. That's the apology you have when not having an apology. What Karvunidus actually did, while being totally oblivious of, was denigrate all men and lobbed us all into being either pedophiles, rapists or child abusers, take your pick. It would not take much of a stretch of the imagination to determine that she did all three while at the same time making another privilege demand for her sex at the expense of all men..

Even when it was all explained, ad nauseam, she still fails to comprehend it, refuses to accept it and still attaches herself to that same tired old assumption that many self-centred, privileged princesses cling to without ever bothering to find alternative opinions or even spare some thinking time and maybe even realising that their sexism and bias belongs back in the 60's rather than today..

It's women screaming for extra privileges while at the same time demanding that the rights of men be reduced, which may not be a direct demand but it is definitely it's side affect. Have a look at the total lack of male teachers in schools today as a result of women, as well as feminists, demanding their "rights" and at the same time claiming that all men are abusers and rapists. They justified that action just like Karvunidis did on her anti-male screed. It is incomprehensible to me but not apparently to those feminist enablers that everything to them in regards to our sex is justified by claiming one sexist demand after another..

Karvunidis is really just another feminist enabler as well as a female apologist, while at the same time claiming to be ignorant of the bias and hatred men face daily. What level of ignorance does one have to possess to miss that unless it is of no concern or interest. Typically, she behaves as most women do and that is if it does not affect her directly then it is of no concern or interest. If it does not garner attention or warrant adulation from her commentators, it has no place in her psyche..

As JTO states in his latest article on Why Bother with Bigots..

Stated simply, ideology attempts to conform reality to a believed state of affairs, whereas philosophy tries to understand the world in its current state. Ideology is rigid, and once fixed on certain beliefs, does not change its stance respective to change in the surrounding environment.
An ideologue is nothing more than a practitioner of this type of thinking. An individual who begins all inquiries already knowing “the truth,” and shaping observations and facts to support their doctrine. This is why attempts at reasoned discussion with a majority of feminists is an exercise in futility.
And also the response by Paul to that so called apology from Jenna Myers Karvunidis which has the sincerity of someone being caught in a lie who found it necessary to cover her tracks because she does not want her "credibility" to be tarnished in any way. She appears to be one of those females who has never been told the word "NO" and is now faced with how to deal with it with limited knowledge and capacity. Sincerity not being one of them..

If she had payed attention to those posters who pointed out that her information was incorrect and biased, had posted an apology and published some real scientific studies which blows those feminist lying studies out of the water, proceeded to write to that sexist school and withdrew that sexist reaction that she instigated or demonstrated that she would make some attempt to do so with backup date then she would have not been placed on register-her.com and this whole episode would just be another thought readjuster. But no, it had to make waves, abuse and threaten, lie consistently, claim the "I am just a poor victim" mentality and then when none of that worked, finally wrote a clayton's apology having the sincerity of letter from the bank about to foreclose on your mortgage..

An ambiguous apology, or just bullshit?

As anyone in the men’s movement not living under a rock is aware, there was a recent flurry of activity, not to mention anger, around a blog entry made by Jenna Myers Karvunidis on her blog space at ChicagoNow.com. In her article “Keep Dads out of Pre-school Potty Duty,” she had posted standard misandric fare implying that men, as a class of human beings, should be excluded from being in a bathroom with children at a preschool, as compared to women.
She was seemingly quite pleased with herself, celebrating an apparent victory in her own comments as she announced that the school had relented to pressures from her, and agreed to formulate policies based on her concerns.

Amanda Marcotte:the Dworkin Clone and the MRM in the MSM..

It is a grand day today, sun shining (well here anyway), soft warm breeze blowing and the MRM finally receiving the recognition it deserves by main stream media and the article (gasp..) actually quoting some of the people involved in the fight against misandry and malice. A good day indeed..

I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Amanda Marcotte for being sufficiently obnoxious enough to be included on the register-her.com site. To be included on this site is not an easy effort. One would have to clearly demonstrate that your "Dworkin" like "all men are rapists" cliched mentality be demonstrated and your daily behaviour must be sufficiently nasty, even more obnoxious than in order for one to be cast as an exemplary example of an ideal misandric bigot. So well done, it does not say much about your audience does it. It's akin to the Islamist "kill all infidels" or even that other bunch of lunatics who decided that we would no longer exist after a certain date last month, I think it was. Very forgettable just like Marcotte and just like other lunatics and their raging are.we could make a list and name it "losers in History" and her name would automatically be placed at the top or it. It will be the case once the MRM gets a little more mobile than it is now that things will change that should not be too long. Better brush up on your dishwashing skills, Amanduh..

Amanda Marcotte placed on offenders registry

ATTN: BOMB POST !

FROM REGISTER-HER.COM

Register-her.com is dedicated to exposing not only the epidemic of false allegations in western culture, but also in identifying government officials, politicians and gender ideologues that exacerbate the false allegation problem through their own conduct.  For these individuals we have created separate categories that fall outside the realm of direct offenders.
One of those categories is that of “Bigot” and it refers usually to gender ideologues who have sufficient exposure in mainstream media to influence public opinion, policy makers, or both, in a negative way, due to the promotion of bigoted and sexist ideology.
Amanda Marcotte is one such ideologue and she is placed on the registry here because she is an individual who uses her influence in the public sphere in a way that promotes false accusations and fosters denial about the problem.


When commenting on the Duke rape case, after it became increasingly clear that Crystal Gayle Mangum had lied about the incident and that then District Attorney Mike Nifong had long pursued the case knowing that his only witness lacked credibility, Marcotte had this to say:
“In the meantime, I’ve been sort of casually listening to CNN blaring throughout the waiting area and good fucking god is that channel pure evil. For a while, I had to listen to how the poor dear lacrosse players at Duke are being persecuted just because they held someone down and fucked her against her will—not rape, of course, because the charges have been thrown out. Can’t a few white boys sexually assault a black woman anymore without people getting all wound up about it? So unfair.”
She also declared on her blog that people who defended the wrongly accused Duke students were “rape-loving scum.”
These types of statements seek to normalize the assumption of guilt when a rape allegation is made, and also seeks to demonize anyone advocating for the long held legal tradition of due process.  The epithets marking Marcotte’s speech are one indication of bigotry, but this was not her first or only incident of such conduct.
She was forced to resign her position as blog master for the John Edwards presidential campaign after making strings of anti-Christian comments. Bill Donohue of the Catholic League publicly demanded that the Edwards campaign terminate Marcotte’s appointment, calling her a “vulgar trash-talking” bigot. The editorial staff of register-her.com agrees.

Written by Paul Elam

Marcotte got her obnoxious self some additional exposure by the register her site was named and linked..

The article is well worth a read as it does finally present a reasonable summation of the aims and goals of the MRM. We still have a lot of educating to do but we are finally getting the attention we have been struggling and aiming for, a long time now..

Frozen
October 12, 2011 A Voice For Men, Featured, Men's Rights

World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra’s, thousands shocked

Lucifer must be lacing up his ice skates. A prominent, mainstream conservative website, worldnetdaily.com, has done an article on the men’s movement, and the author, Phil Elmore, made some groundbreaking changes from the standard blue pill fare we are so used to being served up with Cheese Covered Wacky Fries and a side of bullshit.
One, the article was written with a good measure of objectivity. Yes, that is OB-JEC-TIV-I-TY.  You will need to practice saying this in the same sentence with the word mainstream.
Second, you will find that Elmore actually talked to MRA’s to gather quotes for the piece.  Yes, let me say that again for those shell-shocked. Elmore actually talked to MRA’s to gather quotes for the piece. You will see quotes from myself, Bernard Chapin, and Dr. T, with a mention of John the Other, as well as the much beloved Angry Harry. Not a trace to be found of Michael Kimmel or any other badly cloaked feminist ideologue purporting to speak to the issues of men.
If there is water in hell it will stay in its liquid state, and if not it will be frozen as solid as Harry’s nose.
Read the article here, and I expect we can predict a significant amount of commenting on the piece.  I am quite sure most of you won’t want the voices of raging fembots and shaming white knights to be the only ones there.

Written by Paul Elam

Relationships, feminism and Bigot Marcotte..

Bill from The Spearhead as many others having been involved in a toxic marriage would agree that some people just do not deserve to be married as their interpretation is that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence and once you get there, alone and without any chance of a relationship, that green grass was just an illusion that feminists created in order to destroy the good relationships that men and women had carved out for each other over aeons. A method that worked really well until feminist lies and exaggerations were screamed from lofty heights to inform all women that the life that you are enjoying at the moment is not really a life at all. So the feminist hegemony went to work destroying that compatibility with outrageous lies and continue to this day to malign and denigrate both sexes for having the temerity to actually co-exist with a member of the opposite sex and enjoying that, just not on.

So they convinced women in particular that they should become wage slaves just like them men, sacrifice your life in the pursuit of money and lower the wage level in the process. A method heartily supported by business leaders who saw an opportunity to lower wage bills, increase turnover as a broken homes requires more stuff, donated millions of dollars to the feminist hegemony on the condition that they ensure men and women work their butts off and not have a life. Did that work or what ?

Meanwhile, it took some women a while to catch onto that plot, they actually realised that nothing is gained without the cost being paid. Also, some men noticed their lifestyle totally destroyed by maniacal divorce court judges who cowtowed to the feminist utopia. It is a lot easier giving away someone else's money than your own. It was the right thing to do ofcourse. Women ofcourse came under scrutiny as well as they fell victim to that same lunacy that men had already faced for many years, and when they faced the same hypocrisy and lies that divorce courts allow as well as the family courts when deciding "for the sake of the children" they also came to the realisation that this system sucked. Not only did it discriminate against all men which was just fine as far as they were concerned but when the same thing happens to them by a doctrine that claims to be for equality only then did it open some eyes and women started moaning and whining out loud, how is it possible for the fallacy that is feminism, destroy both financially and psychological the sex that it was supposed to help..

Feminism screwed up in major fashion. Those middle class dysfunctional, self interested, white females actually got it wrong. Now they have enemies on all sides as they start to duck for cover and hope they don't face well deserved charges of crimes against humanity..

Meanwhile back at the ranch -

Marriage Reform Page Up by W.F. PriceIn the first step in my effort to make a positive change, I’ve started collecting and linking material relevant to marriage reform. I’d like to invite others who have some interest in the issue, especially those who have written on the subject, to visit the page and post links. Attorneys with experience writing prenups or simply in contract law are also very much welcome.
The goal is to give people who want a better form of marriage the guidance and tools to make it possible. Default civil marriage as it exists today has become an evil and destructive institution that must be changed. People who remain in civil marriages do so despite the incentives to divorce and engage in gender warfare. For the weaker and less sensible it is too often a disaster that literally ruins lives, including those of the most innocent — our children.
Feminism may have done a wrecking job on the Western family, but I am optimistic that this can be turned around. The fight against feminists must continue, but it’s time to start discussing reconstruction, and reforming the devastated institution of marriage is where it should begin.
I have yet to meet any female who does not regret the divorces they have introduced and still claim to "love" the former partner and also make the claim that it was the worst decision they have ever made..
There are people who would have been better off not indulging in marriage and for proper reasons. Some people just do not get along and that is just fine, I have no problem with sparring partners finally calling it quits but I do have a major issue with women (make 70% of divorces happen) making decisions on "feelings" and according to the "sage" advice of their hypocritical (yes I am not married) sisters who are determined that she should be as miserable as her. So recommends accordingly. They have swallowed the feminist lies and wallowed in the "you can have it all" mantra and all indications today show that women are starting to wake up and decided that in order to stay married you have to work at it and not take it for granted. "You don't know what you've got till it's gone", has to be the most profound statement applicable to that situation..

So, just to ensure total dysfunctionality, we have Amanda Marcotte (feminist Bigot and Male Hater) tosses in her usual cognitive dissonance into the fray. It akin to someone spitting into a waterfall and as usual with Marcotte, it has the same affect even if you can understand or even detect the reason for the post for which it is paid, for crying out load..
Amanda Marcotte 
Women, on the other hand, are the sellers in the heterosexual economy.  Our job is to make sure the product is worth buying.  We are no more entitled to partner sex than a company is entitled to move all its widgets when customers aren't buying.
Dating advice tends to get gendered along these lines.  When women aren't getting any action, it's pretty much standard to tell them to look at themselves and see if they're charging too high a price for the product they have on offer.  The advice from there is to either improve the quality of the product or lower the price.  Granted, upbeat American society being what it is, most of the advice industry aimed at women is about improving the quality of the product.