The Reality Blog

I can relate to Alcuin's explanation of the male feminist and their need for acceptance by the female sex. They actually remind me of Elliot's wish at being "The most sensitive man in the world"in Bedazzled.

One can also imagine a male feminist as being one of those overweight, scruffy malcontents, stumbling blindly down some darkened back street, staying in the shade, using chopping motions with their hands and muttering to themselves, secretly ofcourse, so no one else can be party to their imaginary revelations.  Being of the opinion that only they have been given the insight into feminism's Utopia, their holy grail and only they are the select few, proudly chosen to determine it's outcome, it's inevitable theoretical destination and they will be proudly counted as the semi elect, appointed to the position of altar boy in subservience to their high priestesses..

Affirming

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: One of the more irritating things about the matriarchy is the endless stream of manginas trying to talk some matriarchal sense into you, peacocking their own politically correct horseshit in front of the staffroom Frauen.

These men are desperate for outer affirmation, so try to get qualified as a feminist. One way they do that is with the this is what a feminist looks like game, where they publicly build their feminist portfolios through public shaming of men like you and me, men who don't need that same level of affirmation.

Public humiliation is not to be considered as a negative to their enlightened mindset. They are the blessed, they are the chosen, not bypassed as they eagerly volunteered their services by enhancing their cognitive dissonance levels, suitably enhanced to entertain their delusional lofty positions..

First, they are hungry for affirmation because they have the personality of a woman and therefore need some outer force or authority telling them what's what. While we all need this at times and to a certain extent, these guys need it as much as women do rather than the occasional pat on the back.

Second, they were brought up in a feminized environment, and tend to see the woman's point of view rather than their own. They have been brainwashed by the feminist educational system, in other words. Or traumatized. Masculine men, non-compliants, make them uneasy.

Third, they like to talk about their feelings about as much as women do. They particularly love the intoxication of getting angry over some cause. They crave that anger like the lassies do. They want and need the sanctimony. These guys have little on the inside, so fill it with emotions. Notice that emotional types tend not to be big thinkers, though they think of themselves as such. Instead of reasoning through a problem or a belief, they emote and sentimentalize their way through, which leads to useless or childish conclusions.

One can be left in no doubt at all that they are happy and content in their newly appointed positions, they no longer have to behave like a man but only be the pretend version, as long as it is interspersed with Elliot's sensitivity factor and continual obeisance to the female superior. Wishing above all that they will assume the female psyche just like they did back in the Hellenistic period.  They too will be able to assuage the Hellenistic personification of the soul of female, just like they have always dreamed and fantasized..
What ofcourse they do not realise or even comprehend is that there is a different aspect to their groveling abeyance..

The ladies sit back and chuckle to themselves, both at the loser they've manipulated into fighting their fight even though he gains only in his own mind, and at the man presently between the pathetic sights of the peacock.

The self absorption of the male feminist is that intense that they have failed to listen to the command of their masters, their very own feminist female leaders, who have repeatedly informed them to "fecke" off. But their only response is in their in utter disbelieve as they mutter "Hugo", as if that would have some magic affect. They hope they can use that chant to castaway any negatives they may have witnessed their masters have already undertaken. But it won't work, it's just not working, as that echo rebounds and only reminds them where they actually stand in the Matriarchy.. 

Fifth, being second-hand means being a useful idiot, because some puppeteer is pulling the strings. These guys like being the furniture mover for die Frauen because they believe in chivalry. Again, it's about shaky identity: I'm a nice guy, they need to tell themselves - even though, in fact, they practice knifing other men, strong self-formative men, in the back, and in public as part of their public campaign to belong to the cause.

The back-stabbing highlights the lack of honor they have, the fifth reason these guys are like this. A mangina has no honor. Matriarchy has no honor.

They will be remembered and history will align them to others of equal behaviour and treat them with that same disgust, distaste and repugnance..

One does have to wonder how far back one can trace the early beginnings of feminism and where the hell they got their insane demands and ideas from. One would have imagined that the lunacy feminists have forced onto society would have conjured up by the current batch of lunatics as they have certainly scripted a sufficient amount of books and rants for that to be the case..

Apparently not. The "I am Woman" fantasy is not new and neither is the "women should not be held  accountable" gibberish either. The year is 1913 and the topic is ofcourse the privileged princesses..

The Fraud of Feminism's Introduction, a dynamite observation:

By Modern Feminism I understand a certain attitude of mind towards the female sex. This attitude of mind is often self-contradictory and illogical. While on the one hand it will claim, on the ground of the intellectual and moral equality of women and men, the concession of female suffrage, and commonly, in addition thereto, the admission of women to all professions, offices and functions of public life; on the other it will strenuously champion the preservation and intensification of the privileges and immunities before the law, criminal and civil, in favour of women, which have grown up in the course of the nineteenth century.

So the hypocrisy eventuated way back then, the double standards also surfaced as did the special privileges that women today have at the expense of all men and boys. This gets funnier as it goes along..

                                PREFACE
    The present volume aims at furnishing a succinct ex-posure of the pretensions of the Modern Feminist Move-ment.  It aims at presenting the case against it with anespecial view to tracking down and gibbetting the in-famous falsehoods, the conventional statements, which arenot merely perversions of the truth, but which are directlyand categorically contrary to the truth, but which passmuster by sheer force of uncontradicted repetition.  It isby this kind of bluff that the claims of Feminism aresustained.  The following is a fair example of the state-ments of Feminist writers:-- "As for accusing the world at large of fatuous indulgence for womanhood in general,the idea is too preposterous for words.  The true ' legends of the Old Bailey [ Central Criminal Court]' tell, not of womenabsurdly acquitted, but of miserable girls sent to the gallows formurders committed in half delirious dread of the ruthless-ness of hypocritical Society."  Now it is this sort of legendthat it is one of the chief objects of the following pagesto explode.  Of course the "fatuous indulgence" for"womanhood in general," practised by the "world atlarge," is precisely one of the most conspicuous features                             1
of our time, and the person who denies it, if he is notdeliberately prevaricating, must be a veritable Rip vanWinkle awakening out of a sleep lasting at least twogenerations.

So in reality, the lying feminists back in 1913 were spreading precisely the same lies and exaggerations the current range of women are spreading right now. This should and does indicate quite a few issues and the main one being that regardless of the special treatment and privileges that women have received, even way back then, they are still neither content or happy with their own lot in life and hanker after some imaginary fantasy that neither exists nor will ever exist..

More in this book at Angryharry.com
H/t to Alcuin for a good find..

The sheer joy of pointing out the negative affect of feminism just gets better daily. Here is another version on how feminists hate women for the simple reason that they hate femininity. You know, being and behaving like a female does not sit too well with feminists as they prefer women to be male imitators as they suffer from a severe case of penis envy as we all know..

It was for this reason, as I mentioned in previous posts, why feminists wanted to dress women up to look like men with their short cropped bitch haircuts and elevated shoulder pads. They coerced women into competing directly with men at work (in all those air-con places only ofcourse) and if that did not work they would find some way to make their effort more noticeable by suing employers and claiming victimisation when none really occurred. They made employing women a game of Russian Roulette while at the same time government legislation forced companies to employ women and promote them regardless of ability, experience or track record. If it was female, it had to be treated special..

The Feminist Hatred of Women 

by Alcuin 

Many feminists are angry at men because, having given up their femininity, they compete with us in being masculine. They aim to beat us at our own masculinity. They lift weights, practice martial arts, talk and act like men, walk around with a backpack and man's shoes. They are jealous of our masculinity - which for us is natural and well-fitting.
A masculine woman never looks good, whatever the reason for her rejection of her femininity. Add to this her aggressive disdain, based on jealousy, towards men, and we have a lot of unattractive, beastly witches on our hands. It's not even worth bothering with them, in fact.
A feminine woman leaves men to be a men, to do "men's things", and doesn't judge males for that. She is confident and comfortable in her shoes, and wants a man not to be like her, just as she doesn't want to be like him.
This complementarity keeps a couple together. Competition will break a man and a woman apart, and off she'll go, looking for another man with whom to compete. Good luck to Husband #2.
Feminism has asked women to give up their femininity and adopt a masculine norm because feminists hate women. Feminists are the biggest misogynists in world history. They hate women for being feminine, and think that masculinity is the norm for all humans, when in fact it is the norm for men only.
As feminism grows ever-deeper, so women grow farther away from their feminine roots, and thereby become more and more shallow and unhappy. They sense something is wrong, but don't have the courage or the intelligence to examine feminism, with which they have been miseducated by teachers, aunties, older sisters, friends, the Internet, their mothers, and the media. So we sink deeper and deeper into intolerant feminazi culture, leading many people to lead bewildered lives.

This post by Alcuin would just about sum up the entire reason for the existence of the MRM (Mens Rights Movement)..

Sadly, all men in the past were hoodwinked by this lying and dishonest doctrine. Were it not for the men promoting this, it would never have eventuated. But now, after their lies and dishonesty have been soundly demonstrated and their end goal recognised, why are people still promoting it and why are there the odd younger members of society even considering this blatantly toxic and unworkable doctrine as some form of salve that will end their imaginary fixations ?..

Feminist Steps to Power 

by Alcuin 

Feminist logic works backwards. Start with the end, then find out how you can pull it off.
The end: Encaged, powerless men serving women. Everything defined by women's needs. Female emotions define the truth. Men serve that truth. Women do not have to justify themselves, their actions, or their emotions, whereas men never can justify themselves, and have value only in relation to how they serve women.
Intermediate steps: Eliminate fairness; hand everything to women, and prevent men from opportunity.
Construct female victimhood. Carry out an endless smear campaign against men while pedestalizing women. In short, demonize men as deadbeat dads, wife batterers, pedophiles, corrupt businessmen, rapists, idiotic Everybody Loves Raymond types. Ignore the heroic services of men: Say "firefighters", not "firemen", for example, or "miners trapped down a hole" rather than "men trapped down a hole". When there's a tragedy, and 30 men die and one woman, say "one woman among the dead" to highlight how tragic and significant a woman's death is in comparison to the ho-hum event of the death of men. It is to be expected, in other words, that men will die in service to women. Male death is not significant.
Hide the real aims of feminism behind aspirational, idealistic language, such as talk about rights and equality. These, never the real goals, are intermediate steps that, in zero-sum thinking, take away "power" and "rights" from men. Men will not be allowed to have such powers and rights.
Make women's demands seem innocuous enough. Make people presume that women are innocent, passive, never manipulative or in control.
Keyster in the Comments at The Spearhead said it best:
Ignore the truth. Change the truth. Make the truth conform to the ideology. Make reality serve the ideology. Then eventually the ideology, however deceitful and satanic, becomes the reality. Step-by-step, no one realizes it. People become accustomed to it, and then you move on, to the next step.

I am as incredulous as Alcuin in regards to the total and unexplainable apathy that men in general demonstrate consistently without thought or reason..

And still, most men don't oppose this in some way. Fucking amazing.

Why would anyone not fight against injustice, fight against losing your basic human rights, fight against the insane Family Law court laws and decisions, fight against the unsustainable billions spent on the privileged sex and then just allow yourself to be relegated to subhuman, third class citizens and not even utter a word in protest. To me that is totally incomprehensible..

Normalization 

by Alcuin

If you were surprised by Sharon Osbourne's comments, then you have been living on the moon. This is the sort of man-hatred with which most men grow up. Judging by the vast numbers of manginas out there, it is an attitude with which most men live in their daily lives as well. Countless men have accepted it, unfortunately. This hatred forms the background music, the air we breathe - which is what feminazis want.
Normalized contempt. That is what Sharon Osbourne and her crew represent. It's tiring to once again repeat the mantra, "If male TV personalities had been talking about a woman who had had her breasts cut off, they would have been fired almost immediately - after a vicious public media lynching (and who knows how many marches)." It's tiring to repeat: "No one seems to care about the castrated man and the man-hatred that the action has brought out of the woodwork."
It's tiring because no one cares because it's normalized malice.
This normalization goes back a few decades for myself personally, and for all men in general. Family members, including sisters, and teachers, professors, co-workers have all talked like this countless times in my presence, enjoying the thought of a castrated men the way we enjoy the thought of a fine wine, or great cheese.
Misandry runs deeply in our culture. Even family is no escape from the animus towards men.
The entire sick adventure, from the story of another castrated man, another violent, psychotic woman, Katherine Kieu Becker, to the Osbourne-sponsored guffaws, possesses a certain trivialization, a ho-humness.
The hatred of men is normalized, paralleling the normalization of the destruction of fatherhood. It's a daily fact in our culture that men are ruined by Eat Pray Love-inspired bitches. This universalization of misandry and the actions it inspires reflects feminism's massive triumph.
And still, most men don't oppose this in some way. Fucking amazing.