The Evolution of the Phone..

The possession of a querying mind does permit one to wander, discover and assimilate a plethora of information. Occasionally, one comes across a discussion or argument or points, that either reaffirms or poses other interesting questions, where those bigger questions arise that have been mauled over for generations. As one seeks more knowledge, it is also a good practice to view information with an open mind, rather that maintaining one's irrational "everyone else is wrong" mindset. The pursuit of knowledge should never be limited by only ensuring that the information one peruses is only applicable to one's political outlook or one's own ignorance of other information being available..

Sadly it is the mindset of quite a few, particularly on the web, where they can argue and try to sustain that ignorance by introducing false information or just outright lies, without reliable quantification. It happens constantly and one has to be aware. The feminastie movement is the number one, prime example of that process. A process that has destroyed factual and verifiable information and encouraged ignorance as well as obvious stupidity to reign supreme..

Here are some examples of what I mean..

Cardinal George Pell was challenged in his Q&A debate with atheist Richard Dawkins:

Charles Darwin was claimed as a theist by the cardinal, because Darwin ‘’couldn’t believe that the immense cosmos and all the beautiful things in the world came about either by chance or out of necessity’’ - a claim disputed by Professor Dawkins as ‘’just not true’’.

Cardinal Pell won applause when he shot back: ‘’It’s on page 92 of his autobiography. Go and have a look.’’

From Darwin’s autobiography:

Another source of conviction in the existence of God, connected with the reason and not with the feelings, impresses me as having much more weight. This follows from the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man with his capacity of looking far backwards and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist.

UPDATE
A point is given against Pell by an Age reporter too inclined to jeer at reasoned challenges to his own prejudices and assumptions:

Pell’s argument during an exchange over evolution was downright baffling. He started by saying he “probably” accepts that humans descended from Neanderthals.

“Neanderthals?” piped up Dawkins, jumping disdainfully on the slip. ”They were our cousins. We can’t be descended from our cousins.”

Well, we can, actually:

WHEN the first modern humans left Africa they were ill-equipped to cope with unfamiliar diseases. But by interbreeding with the local hominins, it seems they picked up genes that protected them and helped them eventually spread across the planet.
The publication of the Neanderthal genome last year offered proof that Homo sapiens bred with Neanderthals after leaving Africa. There is also evidence that suggests they enjoyed intimate relations with other hominins including the Denisovans, a species identified last year from a Siberian fossil.

More on that interesting article...

Both Feminists, both screwing the country into the ground

Another fine example of what happens when women are in power. Not only do they abuse it's privilege but they "feel" they are irreplaceable, blameless and without accountability. .Slut-Feminism have been promoting that ridiculous statement that women in power will indeed make the world spin better and even faster. That their caring and ability is that great that everyone will be singing the kumbaya tune and joining hands in no time at all. They have informed all who want to listen and accept the lie, that a "woman" are far more capable of unifying society as well as steering the way to a new Utopian future..
Well guess what ? They are lying again and this case as Bligh demonstrates without any assistance, a spiteful, obnoxious, smearing and nasty individual that has in reality acted just like any woman does when she "feels" scorned. It is really just standard expected behaviour which makes the slut-feminists false claim all the more ridiculous..
Every single prediction that slut-feminists have made about women's superiority, women themselves have clearly demonstrated as being a total and complete lie. A woman in power is only interested in staying there regardless of what it takes but they are only ever interested in looking after their own. They are just incapable of seeing the whole picture or outside of their own sex..

Sad but true and continuously demonstrate that fact..

Another fine example of womanhood, failed again..

 Bligh’s calumny explodes in her face
By Andrew Bolt
 March
 23
 2012
(7:45am)

Queensland Premier Anna Bligh’s attempt to smear Campbell Newman as corrupt has backfired so badly that he’ll now romp it in Ashgrove, according to the Galaxy poll:

Party insiders believe Anna Bligh’s recent admission that she did not have the “material” evidence against Mr Newman was a critical turning point in the Ashgrove campaign.

 The impact has lead to Mr Newman’s primary support jumping from 45 per cent to 52 per cent in a fortnight, meaning he will win on election night without preferences…

 On a two-party preferred basis, Mr Newman would win 55 per cent to 45 per cent.

 Let us hope that this sordid campaign is a warning to politicians everywhere to ditch the smears and stick to the policies.

 (Thanks to reader The Old and Unimproved Dave.)

Another false assault claim, just like in every other western nation on the planet where ludicrous laws have been introduced by slut-feminists to ensure that anyone who has the temerity to reject the advances of any female will have to suffer the backlash. Woman scorned and all that but meanwhile she walks away from court after ruining several peoples' lives, a free girl, blameless..

Holding women accountable will be something new and amazing when it finally surfaces, won't it..

Another fine example of today's "New Woman", no wonder they're avoided..

I have long worried about the offence industry - especially in some areas where to doubt is to risk being slimed as racist or sexist.
And as you read this, remember that two innocent men have been publicly vilified and their employer has paid huge legal costs it is unlikely to get back:

A SEXUAL harassment claim against senior members of the Commonwealth Bank by a former female employee has been dismissed by a Federal Court judge as being “without any factual foundation or legal substance”, comparing her account of events to a “novel”.
Vivienne Dye ... claimed in 2008 that two senior CBA officers, Michael Blomfield and Angus Patterson, had sexually harassed her, that the bank had discriminated against her because of her gender and disability, and victimised her because of the complaints she had made.
But in a stinging judgment yesterday, Federal Court judge John Buchanan found Ms Dye’s allegations against the bankers were false and ordered her to pay costs… Both men have since left the bank in unrelated circumstances.
Ms Dye also claimed she was sexually assaulted by Mr Patterson, a claim that was investigated and dismissed by NSW police.
But Justice Buchanan found Ms Dye to be unreliable in the evidence given to the court. “Ms Dye’s written account of matters has, over the years, been progressively altered, re-recorded, edited, polished, embellished and even substantially changed as though it was a novel. She has added events, omitted events and changed the dates on which events occurred in a bewildering fashion. She has rewritten a version of some events on a number of occasions so that their very character and significance altered completely....”
In 2008, Ms Dye’s claim to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission was first leaked to Sydney newspapers The Daily Telegraph and The Sydney Morning Herald, in what Justice Buchanan said was an attempt to elicit support for her allegations and were “the result of of a strategy devised by Ms Dye and her advisers”.

It sounds like a case of Fatal Attraction:

In fact, it was Ms Dye who made advances towards Mr Blomfield, hoping for a ‘’close and intimate relationship’’ with him, Justice Buchanan found.

When Mr Blomfield, then the executive general manager in charge of local business banking, rebuffed her, Ms Dye ‘’turned from seeking his attention to a desire to be revenged on him’’.

Mr Patterson testified that in 2007, Ms Dye told him she was taking out a sexual harassment case against Mr Blomfield, saying: ‘’I’m going to get that c---, and I’m going to f---ing destroy him and his family.’’

When Mr Patterson, who was her friend and confidant, declined to assist her against Mr Blomfield, Ms Dye turned on him, claiming Mr Patterson violently sexually assaulted her.

Some of the evidence that blew Dye’s claims apart.
One reason other such baseless claims are made is that it is almost always cheaper and less painful for the innocent target to pay off their accusers than fight them in court. So this is rare:

Both Mr Patterson and Mr Blomfield have since left Commonwealth Bank and Justice Buchanan congratulated the bank for fighting to clear their names, rather than taking the cheaper option to settle the case.

Some law reform is needed here.

Champion Mudslinger and totally inept Bligh, a role model for slut-feminists..

One would have to say that this description is definitely a first for me and for most. I have never before heard this type of description used to describe any government in office, ever..

But it takes a woman to bring out the best..

Needless to say it's a slut-feminist to boot..

Not one whit less than Bligh deserves

Andrew Bolt March 17 2012 (8:40am)

As with all socialists, communists and regressors who claim the upper level of all philosophical, intellectual and historical (hysterical) awareness, that appears to be straight out of Orwell's 1984 tome. As far as I can tell, it's their bible, their holy script (they have nothing else) as we witness their continual abeyance to emulate and introduce precisely what Orwell was warning against. Copious examples are already visible in not only feminism and it's lies and false information but also in the AGW saga and hoax, where forgery, cheating, stealing and dishonesty is now hailed as the norm and the opposite claimed to be just what it isn't. Orwell's warning of the "truth will be lies and the lies will become the truth" has surfaced as well as his warning about rewriting history to suit the current doctrine is a normal function for feminists and AGW scientists alike, world-wide..

But as with the majority in power, those mere words have to be ignored as all those deceitful actions can be undertaken if is claimed to be for  "The Greater Good", Hotfuzz anyone..

 As for the arbitrary figure below, that would put this blog off the web as this blog does more than that per week. This site has almost achieved that total in (15,000) one single day, thanks to all of you..

The report acknowledges the threshold of “15,000 hits” is arbitrary, but maintains a ”a line must be drawn somewhere”.

The left wing lunatics are offended by the truth and are offended about everything that does not proceed out of their own deceitful mouths. How childish is that. Why don't people grow up..

I have lost count on the amount of times that this blog has been maligned, threatened, tried to shut it down and continually harassed which is why I was forced to change the commenting procedure as the traffic and abuse was just beyond the pale. So the hypocrisy continues..

Even an online site read just by your relatives is threatened

Andrew Bolt – Saturday, March 03, 12 (09:21 am)

Gillard being escorted away from the rioting mob that her own office staff instigated..

One does have to wonder how it is possible for any Prime Minister, in any country, can get away with this level of dishonesty and still be in office. This Prime Minister's claim is that it's "because she's a woman" (another copout), she is being "mistreated" and yet, every since she gouged her way into office, not voted in but knifed the previous leader to obtain office and then stayed in office by making deals with independent members of parliament, those deals she has just trashed as well, now claims that she is being hard done by..

Never before have we witnessed a more incompetent, self serving, inept, liar. The writing is on the wall and she will have to go. But the current Labor (eq.democrat) party do not have anyone in their ranks to replace it (Rudd is not an option). Meanwhile her rating as leader, prime minister, has been rated as the worst in the history of Australia. Her maniacal incompetence and inability to be honest can be witnessed on a daily basis..

Meanwhile it has driven Australia into the worst debt crises by blowing 20 Billion in the bank when it took over and now has a further deficit of over 250 Billion +, wasted on incompetent policy decisions, none of which has benefited anyone except the money suppliers..

She has to go..

Feminist Gillard is the prime example of disabusing the feminist's claim that world would be a better place with a woman in charge and in this case, we have yet to witness that in Australia..

More exposure coming..




Column - Is your Prime Minister a liar?

Andrew Bolt
Wednesday, February 15, 2012


THE question we now face: Is the Prime Minister of Australia a liar?

Her Four Corners disaster on Monday night is part of a pattern.

Julia Gillard deceives and, I suspect, lies. And what’s killing her is that she does it so badly.

Here are my seven deadliest examples.

The first: Just a “part-time” typist

The Socialist Forum was a radical group that helped to bring former members of the Communist Party into the Labor Party.

In 2007, asked about her involvement, Gillard said “many a long year ago” - mostly when “I was a university student” - she’d merely done “part-time clerical and administrative work” for this “debating society”.

In fact, she’d been on the forum’s management committee, organising events and giving speeches. The parliamentary register of interests states she was still a member from 1998 to 2002.


The second: “I did not say that”

On July 6, 2010, Gillard announced she’d talked to East Timor’s President about her plan for a detention centre for boat people.

Her Immigration Minister said our “unauthorised boat arrivals will be returned to East Timor”.

On July 8, after East Timor’s Prime Minister said “what plan?”, Gillard rewrote history: “I did not say that ... I’m not going to leave undisturbed the impression that I made an announcement about a specific location.”

On July 9, mocked for flip-flopping, she conceded: “I said in my speech that one possibility was a centre in East Timor.”

The third: “There will be no carbon tax”

Days before the 2010 election, Gillard promised: “There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.”

A year later, Parliament passed her carbon tax.

The fourth: Fooling Andrew Wilkie

In 2010, independent MP Andrew Wilkie agreed to make Gillard prime minister after she promised to make all poker machines have mandatory pre-commitment.

Last month, scared of the backlash, Gillard broke her promise.

The fifth: “A bit of a lark”

In 2010, ABC journalist Annabel Crabb told a story of deception that must have come from Gillard.

In 2004, Gillard was Labor’s health spokeswoman, and “one night ...fired off a despairing text message to a friend, confessing exasperatedly that health was too confusing for her”.

To her horror, she accidentally sent the message to Tony Abbott, then the health minister. Fearing he’d embarrass her, she arranged to talk to a regional radio station.

“During the interview she laughingly confessed to having sent tongue-in-cheek text messages to her opponent feigning frustration with the minefield of health reform.

“Had (her email) been raised in Parliament, she would musically have read aloud from the transcript, demonstrating that the whole thing was a bit of a lark.”

The sixth: “The Marriage Act will stay unchanged”

Gillard before the 2010 election promised not to allow same-sex marriage.

“We have determined as a Labor Party the Marriage Act will stay unchanged,” she said.

“And that’s what you should expect to see from the Gillard Labor Government if we’re re-elected.”

A Labor MP this week introduced a private member’s bill to allow same-sex marriage, which the Labor Party now supports.

Says Gillard: “The undertakings I gave to the churches are undertakings that I’m abiding by ... There won’t be a government bill.”

The seventh: I did not plot

Gillard yesterday said she’d never plotted to remove Kevin Rudd as prime minister.

“I made a decision to run for prime minister on the day I walked into Kevin Rudd’s office and asked him for a ballot,” she said.

But on Monday came her embarrassing exchange with Four Corners reporter Andrew Fowler.

Fowler: Did you know that people in your office, two weeks before Kevin Rudd was removed as prime minister, were preparing a (victory) speech that you subsequently delivered?

Gillard: Uh well, I did not ask for a speech to be prepared.

Fowler: My question was simply whether or not you knew.

Gillard: I heard your question and I’ve answered it.

My list does not include many of Gillard’s broken promises or false claims about her “carbon tax”.

No, I’ve listed only the seven deceptions I think damn her most.

So, is your Prime Minister a liar?

Sunrise over the last Planet..

There have been several claims that editors on Wikipedia have been changing facts in order to foment and introduce their own purview of their particular biased or demented world view. Here is a major scientist, a warmist, deciding that the facts were just way too inconvenient. In order to promote their own warmist hoax, decided that the facts had to go and the smearing of legitimate scientists had to be the order of the day..

As we have already witnessed, telling the truth has become the new lie (Orwell anyone), as they practise precisely what they claim to be paramount. The attack on liberty, honesty and truth has once again been demonstrated on one of the main information sites on the planet. Their (Wikipedia) again demonstrates their lackadaisical attitude at maintaining the integrity of the information and facts, they claim to be legitimate, by allowing anyone to volunteer and thereby giving them carte blanche over the input of information..

Does anyone ever check any input for errors at all, factual integrity or verification via cross checking reputable information available or do they just trust anyone to supply any information as fact, as they see fit. One just cannot trust Wikipedia to present the truth anymore. Even scientific information has been corrupted and contaminated..


The sliming of a sceptic is finally too much for even Wikipedia

Andrew Bolt – Monday, October 18, 10 (01:05 pm)

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/

Professor Hal Lewis has been vilfied by warmists since writing a stinging letter of resignation from the American Physical Society in protest at its underhanded attempts to stifle sceptics of the theory of apocalyptic man-made warming.

Lewis described the warming hysteria as “the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist”.

James Delingpole describes the sliming - and how a Wikipedia editor, William Connelley, tried to hide the evidence of Lewis’s heresy:

Here is Connolley in action on his blog, scrabbling for dirt:

So, where are the papers? You can’t have a scientific career without papers. There are some early ones – The Multiple Production of Mesons from 1948 with Oppenheimer, no less. Or Multiple Scattering in an Infinite Medium, 1950 – worthy maths-ish thing, I’d guess. But past the late-50’s early 60’s it suddenly gets very thin indeed. I’d guess, without knowing more, that he gave up science and moved into admin.

And here he is, in his role as a Wikipedia editor caught by Watts Up With That doctoring Professor Lewis’s Wikipedia entry so as to edit out that all-important resignation letter.

William Connolley – a green party activist – has form in this regard. Lots of form – as I first reported here last year – drawing on Lawrence Solomon’s definitive National Post expose ”How Wikipedia’s green doctor rewrote 5,428 climate articles”.

Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph. He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band. Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions… In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.

Anyway, Connolley’s latest escapade has proved to be the straw that broke the camel’s back for the Wiki administrators. He has now been
banned from writing on “Climate Change” for Wikipedia.

Akin to the general consensus from feminists, we have this article from Andrew Bolt as he states the obvious in relation to free speech, that feminists hate as well. Their endless meanderings regard any comments made by anyone regarding anything female as either misogynists or sexist, take your pick. Any attempt at free speech or discussions ,where they are concerned, has to be banned. Sound familiar..

You’re too evil to speak

The Australian public have been treated to another example of the moronic drivel that feminists contemplate on a daily basis. So desperate are they to keep the worst Prime Minister in Australia's History in power, Julie Gillard, that all stops have been pulled in an all out effort to malign the next PM of Aus. if the polls stays they way they are now. As a matter of fact, it will be a landslide of ginormous proportions which should just about witness the end of the Labour Party as we know it. No members of parliament, no money for their re-election.To me it's just another example of what happens when you put a feminist female in office who is way over her head. It has no experience and was not voted in by the Aus. public as she knifed the former leader to get at the position. It really is a case of good riddence to bad rubbish..

And so the comedy continues..

Miranda Devine also joins in the fray against the feminasties..

Women see Abbott as "a relic of an old-style male: pugnacious, aggressive, arrogant. Very few women find it appealing. They have been subjugated and disempowered by such men for too long".Seriously. Anyone who knows Abbott knows he is far from a misogynist. A loving husband and father of three girls, he has two sisters, and a mother who love him, and women in key roles in his office. 

When it comes to opinion polls, the leader with woman-trouble is Julia Gillard. She has lost the female vote by eight percentage points, from 38 per cent to 30 per cent, in the past three months, according to Newspoll.Blokey Abbott is more popular with women by five points.Female Abbott-haters are a particular type. Like Mitchell, they cling to a 1970s view of feminism, still resent the patriarchy, and sneer at red-blooded blokes. The photograph on the cover of Mitchell's book, of Abbott barbecuing sausages, encapsulates what they loathe. 

A muscular, sweaty meat-eater wielding tongs. Ugh. Her book is the first shot by the progressive Left to stop Abbott taking office.They fear that his confident conservatism, mellowed by time in office, is beginning to resonate with an electorate that thinks much like he does, and is fed up with political correctness.They fear that his combination of good-natured, unpretentious authenticity and ferocious intellect will have wide appeal as soon as it gets clear air.

One of the few commentators in the Aus. media who doesn't stand for the feminist propaganda and the usual agitprop they mouth..

The point of the discussion (about 3/4 of the way through the broadcast) shows how feminists always claim that any criticism aimed at women is due to their sex, which is a total lie. They are criticised because they are liars, incompetent and should not hold the positions they do. Kirner, Gillard and Nixon are all feminists and they are just a pathetic lot of rent seeking scum whose only claim to fame is ensuring their income is sustained in any which way they can while demonstrating their inability to do the job at hand..

Andrew Bolt
Andrew Bolt's columns appear in Melbourne's Herald Sun, Sydney's Daily Telegraph and Adelaide's Advertiser. He runs the most-read political blog in Australia and hosts Channel 10’s The Bolt Report each Sunday at 10am and 4.30pm. He appears on Melbourne’s MTR 1377 each weekday at 8am. His book 'Still Not Sorry' was released in 2006.
On our MTR 1377 show today:
- Former Victorian Premier Joan Kirner blames sexism for the criticism of Julia Gillard and Chrstine Nixon. She’s got to be kidding.