The Reality Blog

Making One's Choices..

Here we have a documentary, professional presentation, by a Norwegian journalist who goes about finding out what the differences are between males and females. What determines our behaviour, interests and life's choices, based on our sex..
Feminists have been lying to everyone in this regard by claiming that our sex has nothing to do with our behaviour, thought processes our choices, it's all influenced by our environment. Feminists have been claiming that "we are the product of our environment and NOT our sex"..
The Norwegian researchers the journalist first approaches, echo those exact same delusional believes and make those statements on camera and on audio recording equipment which he takes with him as he travels around the globe speaking to other specialists in their chosen fields in America and England..

All those specialists have spent their lives studying their specialty and produce studies and facts that they themselves have instigated and verified. One scientist explains a study done in 59 different countries and explains that there were no differences with the same sexes in their choices regarding work and lifestule. The sexes in those countries demonstrated that same level of interest in undertaking the same type of work in regards to their sex. Studies from the middle east, Asia, America and Europe all showed the same results..

Females choose work that ensured they had contact with people which they found fulfilling and males went into technical areas which satisfied their interests, there were the usual crossovers ofcourse but they were negligible. A flat line for both sexes across all the different countries. Rather fascinating but nothing new to anyone who has spent more than a few years on this planet..

But try and explain that to the ignorant tunnel visioned social scientists back in Norway. Even when they were confronted with the facts and studies via video they still refused to accept the evidence..

 Mind boggling ignorance is clearly demonstrated but then again what would you expect from ignorant feminists wearing their tunnel vision glasses. Incredible..

The video is extremely interesting, it is in Norwegian but has subtitles, it is also 38 minutes long but well worth a look..

Here is the link to the Video Site and here is the Password  hjernevask  (which means Brainwash)  to watch it on their site in Lounge Option (Full Screen) if you like..

Or Just enter the password into the Enter Section.. Password..   hjernevask


Brainwash 1:7 - The Gender Equality Paradox from Harald Eia on Vimeo.

It would appear that this book has caused some problems in the feminised land of Norway where the privileged princesses reign supreme and ofcourse, as with women in the western world, have every possible incentive, bonus, privilege and assistance imaginable and even more than they could ever require..

Click on the link to Amazon to view..

I have only read the Norwegian version of the book, so my review is based on this.

Let me first explain a thing or two about Norway. In Norway women are the holy cows of society. Women have so many exclusive rights because of their sex it is ridiculous. Earmarked leadership positions in all status jobs, earmarked scolarships, earmarked stimulus packages and so on.

All this is of course because men are BAD and supposedly have all the power in all levels of society, including male-female relationships. Then along comes Mads Larsen and puts on paper what every man (except Brad Pitt) feels every time he goes out trying to meet a girl - that this simply isn't true. In fact, when it comes to the most important part of life, sex, women have ALL the power. The power to have sex whenever they want, wherever they want, with whomever they want.

This of course led to an uproar from the feminist side of society, and acknowledgment from everybody else.

The cat was out of the bag and it changed the official Politically Correct Norwegian view about men, women and sex forever.

I'm sure it is as interesting a read in English as it is in Norwegian. Check it out.

Fascinating how feminists and their manginas are trying as hard as they can to try and align that lunatic in Norway with being an MRA. David from "ManTiTs" has decided that he could, if he tried really hard enough, close one eye and balanced on one of his oversized feet, maybe discredit the one group that is embarrassing his little childlike fantasy ridden, femi-world by pretending something. Desperation does do those things you know. It must have taken a couple of tries as well as an increase in medication to find that illusion can really be an imaginary fact..

Oh dear, he does try so hard..

So here is the flow-on affect from another feminist cretin, the misanthrope from the femmie site, feministe, who prefers the exotic approach, a touch of theatre for affect and, she hopes, a little drama. She gasps, hands thrown in the air and breathlessly spreading the lie like the infection she caught only recently but still contagious..

It bursts forth like a revelation even though the antibiotics didn't work and her temperatures is still rising..

Shocker: Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik is a racist and a misogynist, and his shooting rampage was inspired by his hatred of women, Muslims, and brown people. He uses a lot of the same tropes as Men’s Rights activists. He was encouraged by anti-Islam bloggers in the United States who routinely warn of the “Islamicization” of the West, including Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
It is unfair to say that websites like Spencer’s caused the violence in Norway. But I think this quote is pretty right-on:
Marc Sageman, a former C.I.A. officer and a consultant on terrorism, said it would be unfair to attribute Mr. Breivik’s violence to the writers who helped shape his world view. But at the same time, he said the counterjihad writers do argue that the fundamentalist Salafi branch of Islam “is the infrastructure from which Al Qaeda emerged. Well, they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged.”
“This rhetoric,” he added, “is not cost-free.”

The left wing feminist lunatics must drink from the same bath water just as I expected. Nothing is too insipid or sufficiently low enough for them to dredge. Desperation does that you know..

Why are Muslims the victims when non-Muslims were shot? 

Andrew Bolt
Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Mark Steyn wonders how a white Norwegian shooting 93 other Norwegians is an attack on Muslims: 
The opening sentence from USA Today:
Islamophobia has reached a mass murder level in Norway as the confessed killer claims he sought to combat encroachment by Muslims into his country and Europe.
So, if a blonde blue-eyed Aryan Scandinavian kills dozens of other blonde blue-eyed Aryan Scandinavians, that’s now an “Islamophobic” mass murder? As far as we know, not a single Muslim was among the victims. Islamophobia seems an eccentric perspective to apply to this atrocity, and comes close to making the actual dead mere bit players in their own murder. Yet the Associated Press is on board:
Security Beefed Up At UK Mosques After Norway Massacre.
But again: No mosque was targeted in Norway. A member of the country’s second political party gunned down members of its first. But, in the merest evolution of post-9/11 syndrome, Muslims are now the preferred victims even in a story in which they are entirely absent.
UPDATE
Brendan O’Neill says the London bombers and the mass murderer Breivik seem products of the same mulitcultural pathology:
Some commentators, including us at spiked, have argued that acts such as 7/7 are more an extreme expression of the multicultural outlook than they are a traditional form of Islamic fundamentalism. Multiculturalism’s celebration of identity over solidarity, its promotion of the politics of self-pity and victimhood, of a perception that minority identities are continually under threat from the post-colonial and xenophobic attitudes of both society’s rulers and its native masses, found its most fanatical expression in the London bombings. In the bombers’ extraordinary levels of self-pity, combined with their arrogant belief that their Muslim identity gave them the right to hector the British throng, we got a glimpse of how far the multicultural ethos can be pushed. Breivik, for all his anti-multicultural pretensions, is not that different. Indeed, it is remarkable how much his so-called critique of multiculturalism seems bound by the parameters of multiculturalism itself.
In his claim that he wanted to protect ‘white Christian identity’ from being overrun and crushed by an external powerful force - in this case Muslim immigrants - Breivik is merely indulging in an alternative form of multiculturalism. In different ways, both the 7/7 bombers and Breivik express the same sense of cultural paranoia, of cultural siege and victimhood.

It would appear that he may not be the only one suffering from the following condition..

Norway suspect may be insane: lawyer
Charles Onians
July 27, 2011

AFP

The lawyer for the Norwegian gunman who has claimed responsibility for killing 76 people in twin attacks last week said that everything about his client's case indicates he is "insane".

"This whole case indicates that he's insane," Geir Lippestad told journalists of Anders Behring Breivik, adding that a medical evaluation would take place to establish his psychiatric condition.