Showing posts with label Politics-Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics-Australia. Show all posts

Monday, 20 April 2026

"The blight of Pauline Hanson is that her dumb bigotry offers a fantasy."

Former Aus PM Paul Keating -- aka the Lizard of Oz -- has deservedly unloaded on the pathetic race-baiting of newish Aus Liberal Party leader Angus Taylor.  "Many people, me included, wished him well in fighting One Nation with a conservatism anchored in principles. How dispiriting is his cowardice."

The Liberal party, battling an extreme version of itself – One Nation – has again fallen back to its default political policy: racism.

Angus Taylor, announcing a policy at primary odds with an immigrant nation, says a Liberal government under his leadership will adopt Trump ICE-style policies to weed and “boot out” people who fail to adhere to “national values” and who are responsible for the erosion of national culture including the Balkanisation of communities.

And, to hammer the point, sitting beside Taylor at his policy launch was Mr Racial Opportunism himself, John Winston Howard, late of anti-Asian migration in 1988 – the picket fence suburban racism of his first round as Liberal leader, and the wilful anti-humanitarianism of his electorally-driven Tampa atrocity of 2001. ...

Angus Taylor came to the Liberal leadership with a reputation of being mainstream Liberal; that is, a keeper of the Liberal party’s best longer-term instincts both in social and economic policy.

And many people, myself included, wished him well in consolidating the Liberal base and in fighting One Nation with a conservatism anchored in principles. If not righteous, decent.

But by adopting racism with its shabby appeal to differentiation and primal instincts, Angus Taylor marks himself out as a political leader unworthy of the leadership of a party that has managed Australia for the greater part of the last century and which celebrated the country’s unifying values.

Racism is not simply immoral and abhorrent, it is absurd. The notion that some of us are in some way different to the rest of us – in some way born differently, of some alien biology. ...

The blight of Pauline Hanson is that her dumb bigotry offers a fantasy. The fantasy that Australia in the modern age can return to a monoculture. A monoculture which fails to acknowledge or accept that a continent of our scale is able to turn its back on the multilateralism of neighbouring states or on the vitality of their societies. And, more than that, shun them while disparaging any contribution they may make or bring to us as migrants.

How dispiriting for the rest of us is Angus Taylor’s cowardice in not even attempting to stand and argue for principles that have been integral to Australia’s strength – principles his party has long championed.

RELATED:

=>Welfare State Leaves Boat-People to Die

Thursday, 30 August 2001, 11:01 am | Libertarianz Party

"New Zealanders who wish the 434 Afghan refugees on board the Tampa moored off Christmas Island would just 'go away' are exposing the dark underbelly at the heart of the Welfare State," says Libertarianz Leader Peter Cresswell....

=>Better Way for Boat-People

Thursday, 30 August 2001, 11:06 am | Libertarianz Party

"There is a better way forward for politicians wrestling with a way to deal with the 434 homeless Afghan refugees that no country wants to admit," suggested Libertarianz leader Peter Cresswell today....

Tuesday, 3 March 2026

Not so sunny solar

I've been reading an 

RNZ investigation [that] has found that [Luxon's] ministers were presented with clear evidence [sic] that rooftop solar is now among the cheapest sources of electricity households can access; that upfront cost is the primary barrier to uptake; and that Australia's rapid expansion was driven by more than $11 billion in state subsidies. But [that] the coalition government [here] chose not to follow the same path. ...  
[The investigation says that] one in three Australian homes now ... [have solar panels installed] saving those families an average 40 percent on their electricity bills each year ...

As part of their work, officials prepared detailed material comparing New Zealand's approach with overseas subsidy regimes, particularly Australia's small-scale solar and battery incentives.

[Documents released to RNZ under the Official Information Act ] noted Australia's "solar revolution" was aided by $11.5 billion AUD in government grants, which reduced upfront costs by 30% and allowed the industry to achieve massive economies of scale.

Total cost to Australians then, if subsidy covers only 30% of the cost of installing rooftop solar, is $38.3B billion AUD (a subsidy to wealthy home-owning Australians of almost $1000 per Australian taxpater).  Which the "investigation" says has reduced prices for those 1 in 3 subsidised Australian families by an average of 40%. Not a great return for all those billions, I would have said. 

Note that Australia's entire peak demand is roughly 35,000 MW. So at a typical capital cost of ~$1.5–2M per MW, if one were to spend that $38.3B on, say, a system of Combined Cycle Gas Turbine plants, then Australians could theoretically have built enough extra gas capacity to supply the whole country!

Or, maybe, spent those billions on something else. (For that money, going to those already wealthy enough to afford the cost of installation, you could have around 300 new schools, or 30 new hospitals, or one hell of a tax cut ... )

Meanwhile, in New South Wales, this morning, here is where power is coming from ...


What does this mean? It means that to have reliable power, Australians need to build duplicate capacity anyway for when the sun is not delivering. That's the main problem with unreliables.

So much for that "clear evidence."

Tuesday, 24 February 2026

"It is the opening that matters most."

 

"These reforms dismantled the import quotas and regulatory walls that had kept Australian manufacturers comfortable and unchallenged for the better part of a century. Industry had to compete with the world. Not because a regulator told firms to behave, but because Japanese cars and European appliances were suddenly on showroom floors, at prices local manufacturers could not match.

"Yes, competition law played a part. But the real transformation came from opening the economy.

"Take household appliances. During the reform period, the number of local manufacturers shrank and the industry became more concentrated. By the logic of competition law, this should have been a disaster. Fewer producers means less competition. Consumers should have suffered.

"They did not. Prices fell and choice exploded. Tariffs on refrigerators dropped from 47.5 per cent to 5 per cent. In 1999, the Productivity Commission studied what had happened. It attributed the gains to trade reforms that reduced “barriers to market entry,” not to competition law. Anyone in the world could now sell a fridge in Sydney.

"The economist Israel Kirzner, now 96 and long overdue for a Nobel Prize, spent his career at New York University making exactly this point. His work shaped my own doctoral research in the law and economics of competition.

"Kirzner’s central argument is that competition is not a snapshot of how many firms happen to sit in a market at any given moment. It is a process, driven by entrepreneurs spotting opportunities and entering markets to challenge incumbents. A market with two players can be fiercely competitive if both know a third could arrive tomorrow. A market with twenty can be sleepy if regulation keeps the twenty-first from showing up.

"Hawke and Keating grasped this, perhaps instinctively. The way to make an economy competitive is to open it up, let foreign goods in, let new businesses form and remove the barriers that protect incumbents from challenge. Competition law can help keep the game honest once the field is open.

"But it is the opening that matters most."
~ Oliver Hartwich from his post 'Dismantling the competition myth'

Monday, 15 December 2025

"They can call off the search for the 2026 Australian of the Year award. We have him already. His name is Ahmed al Ahmed."

"Every January, on Australia Day, someone is named Australian of the Year. They can call off the search for the 2026 award. We have him already. His name is Ahmed al Ahmed. He’s 43, a father of two and a shopkeeper. And today he stunned the world with an act of staggering heroism: he single-handedly tackled and disarmed one of the fascist filth who carried out the massacre of Jews at Bondi Beach in Sydney. ...

"There were other heroes, too. We’ve seen footage of Aussies tending to the wounded, breathing life back into the injured. ... Let us hope these Australians are commended and rewarded for taking such a valiant stand against the evil that visited the Jews of Sydney today. These men and women speak to the true spirit of Australia. ...

"These heroes also remind us that terrorists can be defeated. They can be disarmed. They can be stripped of their power, just like that.

"It won’t always be possible, of course. But where it is, we should strike. Too much official guidance tells us to scarper. ... too many people look the other way when tyranny strikes – or worse, stand and film it. ...

"Bravery finds a way, though. The human instinct to help is not so easily crushed. One thinks of the men who hurled beer glasses and chairs at the three radical Islamists who went on a stabbing spree in London Bridge in 2017. Or Ignacio Echeverría, the Spanish national who used his skateboard to beat one of those London Bridge terrorists (sadly, he was subsequently killed). And now Ahmed al Ahmed, the forty-something conqueror of a modern-day Nazi. ...

["T]he violent loathing that shook Sydney today did not emerge in a vacuum. .. If more of us had ‘had a go’ earlier, perhaps we could have seen off, or at least tamed, this gravest menace in Western society.

"Don’t wait until it turns violent. ‘Have a go’ now. If you see someone carrying a placard calling Jews Nazis, get in their face. If you see a keffiyeh mob outside a synagogue, confront them. If you see a frothing Islamist or leftist harassing a Jew in public, put yourself between the scumbag and his victim. Don’t run, hide and tell – stand, fight and tell them to fuck off. Enough is enough. Get out there."


Monday, 18 August 2025

Prohibition works again. Oh, wait ...

"Australia’s illegal tobacco problem has made the proverbial transition from tragedy to farce.

"Illicit, excise-evading cigarettes now comprise half of the cancer-inducing products sold to Australia’s 2.7 million smokers. ...

"We can now conclude that the strategy of taxing and banning nicotine addiction out of existence is a complete failure.

"The result is that organised crime is making about $10 billion a year in revenue. ...

"It means Australia’s criminals are better paid than they have ever been, and the result is showing up in an explosion in both the amount of crime and its brazenness.

"And because the people engaged in this 'industry' are gangsters, competition is not met by price wars and the Competition and Consumer Commission, but by burning your competitor’s business to the ground, or, as happened last week, by allegedly murdering your competitor’s staff. ...

 
"Victoria's coat of arms bears the phrase "Peace and Prosperity", but there's a lot more of the latter in that state these days than the former, and that's not saying much.

"Violent robberies in Victoria have grown by more than 150 per cent since February 2024 due to tobacco-related crime.

"This is much worse than an unintended consequence of the effort to reduce smoking; it is a complete stuff-up."

Wednesday, 13 August 2025

"There has been Twitter speculation that all of this is about age-gating social media."

"On my drive in to work [earlier this week], RNZ's Corin Dann challenged the Prime Minister about one part of his meeting with Australian PM Albanese. They had apparently promised to work toward some kind of joint ID and driver license system. [AUDIO, 04:15]...

"The PM's talk had this as all being about mutual recognition of driver licences. Which is obviously a weird justification. We already recognise each other's licences. And if Oz and NZ makes it tough for bars to recognise each other's licenses as ID, that's far more easily solved by just letting bars use the other country's driver's licence. The rest of it isn't needed for that problem. ...

"There has been Twitter speculation that all of this is about age-gating social media. It looks like this push started well before anyone was talking about that. ... Australia is running trials on ID/age verification setups for social media age gating; it looks like a report is soon due. ...

"[So] - both countries are working toward digital IDs, both countries five years ago agreed that they'd recognise each other's digital IDs, and this seems just to be reaffirming that prior agreement. I'd love there to be more assurance around privacy being important in the design of any of these in NZ. Because there are very bad versions that should not be supported. ...

"When the first a lot of us would have heard about a government digital ID is in context of a trans-Tasman agreement for mutual recognition, in context of Australia wanting to age-gate social media, and nobody particularly trusting that the age-gate system isn't intended to result in the kind of censorship being seen in Australia - not so hot."
~ Eric Crampton from his post 'To what policy problem is this the solution?'

Monday, 12 May 2025

"Has the Australian Liberal Party moved too far left or too far right? This framing misses the real story: the forgotten Y axis of the political compass."

"Pundits and lackeys [have framed the Australian Liberal Party election] rout in the tired left versus right narrative – a progressive swing, a rejection of conservatism, too right-wing, not right-wing enough. In my view, this framing misses the real story: the forgotten Y axis of the political compass, the one that plots authoritarian versus libertarian. In 2025, liberty and small government was almost completely absent from the lower house ballot paper. ...

"At this election voters had a choice between Big Government in red, or Big Government in blue.

"Unfortunately, most of our media treats ideology as a one-dimensional line – or horizontal axis – from left to right, typically referring to either economic or social policy positions. They’ve over-simplified it. A more accurate analysis would consider the vertical axis, which typically refers to government control at one end, and political freedom on the other. The simple left-right frame ensures people don’t see, hear or consider the alternative. We’ve got our blinkers on, and now both major Australian political parties sit in the upper quadrants – favouring authority over liberty.

"By ignoring the authoritarian-libertarian spectrum, we’re holding open the gates to barbarians who seek to seize control of an all-powerful state and use it to impose their top-down vision of how we should live our lives. Big Government proponents can hide behind labels like “moderate” or “centrist” if we fail to measure them against the Y axis to determine where they truly sit. ...
"Increasingly, both major parties subscribe to the view that more government is the solution to every problem. It’s become the default, it’s reflexive; if there’s a problem, the solution is a new law, a new tax or a new, bureaucratic department. Australia’s political class is united in expanding Canberra’s reach, regardless of the colour of the flag they fly. The result? Uniparty.

"No Liberal Party frontbencher stood up in 2025 to argue that maybe, just maybe, government should do less, spend less, control less.

"We must demand that the authoritarian-libertarian axis be part of the conversation."

~ Steve Holland from his post 'Liberty Can’t Win If It’s Not on the Ballot'

Wednesday, 30 April 2025

"Nationalism is often its own worst enemy"

"I’ve been very discouraged by the global rise in nationalism. But there is one glimmer of hope. Nationalism is often its own worst enemy. ...

"In yesterday’s election in Canada, we saw an almost perfect example of ... the internal contradictions of global nationalism.

“'[Conservative leader Pierre] Poilievre had been running a disciplined and effective campaign which had him with a 25-point lead in our final poll of 2024, ... But suddenly everything was 'radically disrupted' by several factors ... the 'most important' disruption for Poilievre was the 'visceral recoil' Canadians felt when they heard Trump talk about annexation. ...

"'A wave of nationalism swept the country, with Canadians booing the American national anthem at hockey games, boycotting U.S. products, and all but abandoning cross-border travel.

"'This put Poilievre in a near-impossible position. Much of his base—including many of his MPs—admire Trump. But with Trump openly attacking Canada, and with Poilievre’s own anti-woke rhetoric and disdain for the mainstream media, he found himself trapped. Attempts to distance himself from Trump could alienate core supporters, while embracing the American president would push away everyone else.'

"I would argue that the single most consequential action of President Trump’s first 100 days (for better or worse) was his trade war with Canada, which clearly prevented the election of a Conservative administration. Before the trade war, the Conservatives were set to win by a historic landslide.

"Next up, Australia: ... [where] the prospect of conservative opposition leader Peter Dutton winning power was 'very frightening' [said one voter], after seeing the disruption caused by Donald Trump in the United States'."

~ Scott Sumner, composite quote from his posts 'Global nationalism?' and 'Global nationalism: Part 2'

Friday, 21 March 2025

“What is happening with the vandals in the White House is similar to what happened to Austral[as]ia in 1942 with the fall of Singapore.

“What is happening with the vandals in the White House is similar to what happened to Australia in 1942 with the fall of Singapore. I don’t consider America to be a reliable ally, as I used to.
    “Frankly, I think it is time we reconsidered our priorities and think carefully about our defence needs, now that we are having a more independent posture... Our future is now in a much more precarious state than it was on 19 January.
    “Trump 1.0 was bad enough. But Trump 2.0 is irrecoverable.”

~ former chief of the Australian Defence Force Admiral Chris Barrie, from the artic le '‘Vandals in the White House’ no longer reliable allies of Australia, former defence force chief says'
“'The US is utterly not a reliable ally. No one could see it in those terms ... [President] Trump is wilful and cavalier and so is his heir-apparent, JD Vance: they are laughing at alliance partners, whom they’ve almost studiously disowned.'
    "America had been fundamentally altered by Trump’s second administration and that American leadership of a rules-based international order was 'not returning'.
    "“'The speed of America disowning allies to embrace a new world order where it cuts deals with Russia and China has been so astonishing that people are struggling to grasp it, especially in this country, where people just cannot contemplate a world where America treats so lightly its alliance with Australia'.”

~ former Australian foreign affairs minister Bob Carr, from the article 'Bob Carr says Aukus a ‘colossal surrender of sovereignty’ if submarines do not arrive under Australian control'

Tuesday, 3 September 2024

And it goes for us too.


"Australia’s federal treasurer Jim Chalmers has criticised the Reserve Bank for raising interest rates, instead of taking responsibility for the green inflation he and his fellow incompetents unleashed. ...
    "'[A]s the government braces for more weak economic figures due this week ... Chalmers said the government was focused on walking the tightrope of bringing down inflation without further pressuring people “already being hammered by higher interest rates”. ... '
    "The failure of Chalmers and his fellow incompetents to address grid instability, plummeting dispatchable capacity, and unpredictable price spikes is particularly reprehensible, given that all they need to do to fix this problem is ditch all their green energy mandates, and encourage the construction of enough new coal plants to stabilise the grid.
    "In my opinion Australia is now all but un-investable. With an uncertain electricity grid, spiralling prices, crumbling wage restraint, rampant inflation and soaring interest rates, and an incompetent government which is more focussed on shooting the messenger than addressing the underlying economic problems, who in their right mind would risk investing in Australia?"

~ Eric Worrall from his post 'Aussie Green Economy Blame Storm Gathers Momentum'



Friday, 26 January 2024

A rum reason to raise a glass on Australia's Day



The only successful armed takeover of government in Australian history happened in 1808, on the same day in the calendar that Australia marks its "Day." During the 19th century, it was widely referred to as the Great Rebellion. As Lawrence Reed explains in this guest post, it started with a mutiny around rum, and it featured a certain Captain Bligh — and it gives us at least two reasons to hoist a glass of rum today ...

Today—January 26—marks Australia's Day [still worth celebrating, argues Adrian Nguyen], still special in the sunburned land, and for at least two reasons. 

First, it was on this date in 1788 that the last of 11 ships in a British fleet landed at what is now Port Jackson near the mouth of Sydney Harbor. Their arrival is commemorated as the founding date of modern Australia.

Second, it was also on January 26 (but 20 years later, in 1808) that the one and only military coup in Aussie history occurred. Known as the Rum Rebellion, it underscores the importance to Australia of the liquor made from fermenting and distilling sugar cane juice.

More than a few Aussies will hoist a glass of rum when they offer a toast to their country on this day.  It’s impossible to do justice to the nation’s history without a generous mention of the stuff. Use of rum as currency in the Australian state of New South Wales even preceded the introduction of metallic coinage. Behind whisky, it’s the #2 spirit beverage there and presently enjoying a spike in popularity.

Partially because of cheap sugar, rum by the late 18th century had become the drink of choice (replacing gin) for two groups of Brits—the poor and sailors in the Royal Navy. The 11 ships that landed at Port Jackson on January 26, 1788, carried lots of both, including 750 convicts and 1,600 liters of rum. It’s no exaggeration to note that Australia was founded as a penal colony by crooks, their booze, and the sailors who escorted them.

(From 1787 to 1868, thousands of convicted felons in Britain were “sentenced to transportation,” which usually meant they were exiled to Australia instead of to a prison or a hanging).

In modern Australia’s first 20 years, “the population of Sydney was divided into two classes,” wrote historian George Mackaness (cited in Matt Murphy’s excellent book, Rum: A Distilled History of Australia), “those who sold rum and those who drank it.” The new colony descended into widespread drunkenness and dependence specifically upon rum. “Sunday, or the Sabbath,” writes Murphy, “was not a day for the Lord; it was a day for drinking, and rum became the new holy water.”

A regiment of the British Army called the New South Wales Corps (better known as the Rum Corps) assumed governance of the new colony and was in full control by the end of 1792. It soon established a government-protected monopoly by buying most or all imported rum and outlawing local stills and rum production not under its control. Less than three years later, Murphy tells us,
…the colony’s population…was about 3200, 1900 of whom were convicts. Most of them, settlers and convicts alike, were idle, living in deplorable poverty, and chronically drunk. Unless they were associated with the Rum Corps, in which case they were corrupt, comparatively wealthy, and chronically drunk.
The Rum Corps was far less interested in running a colony than its officers were in running a rum racket, and in keeping the populace dependent on them for their addiction. Orders from London to stop the nonsense went unheeded. When somebody did go to jail for an offense, his friends simply burned the jail down—including the main one in Sydney. As rum flowed into the colony, the Rum Corps would buy or seize it, then distribute some to its members, and sell the rest at high prices to the colonists. Even an attempt to get the colonists to drink peach cider instead of rum proved (pardon the pun) fruitless.


Enter William Bligh, the very same man of Mutiny on the Bounty fame. Appointed by London as the fourth Governor of the Australian colony, he arrived in Sydney in August 1806 with orders to clean the place up. He aimed to end the corrupt monopoly of the Rum Corps and its self-serving, haphazard effort at government. Tensions rose steadily between Bligh, the legitimate authority, and the officers who resented his moves against their land schemes and liquor trade. When Bligh attempted to arrest one of the Corps’ principal rum racketeers, John Macarthur, the Corps turned on Bligh and arrested him instead. It was Australia’s first and only military coup.

For the next two years, confusion reigned over whose authority oversaw the colony of New South Wales. Writing in The Sydney Morning Herald in January 2008, jurist James Spigelman looked back on this time and asserted,
[T]he colony was controlled by an illegal government. Every appointment, including to judicial office, was invalid. So was every governmental decision, including every exercise of judicial power. Uncertainty was ubiquitous. Personal and property rights were insecure.
Then in January 1810, Britain’s Colonial Office ordered the recall of the Rum Corps back to London and replaced it with a new regiment. Its commander, Major-General Lachlan Macquarie, became the new Governor, and he quickly dismantled the regime and brought long-overdue good sense and public order to the colony.

The coup was over, the rule of law restored. Macarthur was kicked out of New South Wales and could not return before 1817. Bligh was promoted to the post of rear admiral and died of cancer a few years later.

Growth, entrepreneurship, and opportunity followed in the 19th Century. At the Eureka Stockade in 1854, gold miners famously fought for democratic values and property rights and helped ensure freedom. In 1901, the six British colonies of the continent formed a federation and called it the Commonwealth of Australia. [New Zealand rejected the invitation to join. — Ed.]

I love Australia. It’s a beautiful place with a rich history, a country free and inviting. The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom last year ranked Australia as the world’s 13th freest economy, just ahead of Germany and right behind Norway. The U.S. comes in at #25.

Ron Manners is founder of the Mannkal Economic Education Foundation, headquartered in Perth in the state of Western Australia. He and his foundation work tirelessly to educate their fellow Aussies about the importance of freedom and free markets. When I recently asked him why he’s proud of his country, he wrote me this:
There are so many reasons to celebrate Australia as one of the few countries that the world’s displaced persons seek to flee to. That is the ultimate measure of a nation’s success, and this thought should be pondered by the “leaders” of the many countries from which people flee.
On Australia's Day, I plan to raise a glass of rum in tribute ....

For additional information, see:
Lawrence Reed is President of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE), Humphreys Family Senior Fellow, and Ron Manners Global Ambassador for Liberty. Prior to becoming FEE’s president, he served for 21 years as president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, Michigan. He also taught economics full-time from 1977 to 1984 at Northwood University in Michigan and chaired its department of economics from 1982 to 1984.
    A champion for liberty, Reed has authored nearly 2,000 newspaper columns and articles and dozens of articles in magazines and journals in the United States and abroad, and has authored or coauthored eight books. 
    His post first appeared at the FEE blog.




Wednesday, 24 January 2024

"The differences between how the two pandemics — HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 — were managed are probably quite instructive"


"Still, Dr Turville is acutely aware of the vitriol frequently directed at people who promote COVID safety.... This both puzzles and amuses him. ...
    "Then again, the differences between how the two pandemics — HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 — were managed ... are probably quite instructive, says Dr Turville. With HIV, experts and health ministers collectively built a strong public health strategy that they strove to protect from politics. 'When we look at COVID, it was political from the start and continues to be,' he says. We also now lack a 'mid to long-term plan to navigate us through' this next phase of COVID-19: 'Some argue that we are no longer in the emergency phase and need to gear down or simply stop,' he says. 'But should we stop, and if not, what do we gear down to as a longer-term plan?'..
    "'I think there's a lot of patting on the back at the moment — job well done. And that's nice, but I think it's somewhat job well done, there goes the rug,' he says. 'I think it's the apathy that's the concern. And I think it's coming top-down ... I just don't understand why, like we had with HIV, there can't be a mid-term strategy'."

~ from the article 'The COVID-safe strategies Australian scientists are using to protect themselves from the virus'

Wednesday, 26 April 2023

"PM Hipkins’ romanticisation is of a provincial New Zealand outlook and expectation. We can’t even call it cultural nationalism; rather it is provincial populism."


"[Prime Minister Chris] Hipkins’ romanticisation* is of a provincial New Zealand outlook and expectation. Hipkins’ ‘New Zealand’ is really one of the small town, small minded New Zealand of the 1950s. It’s food, focus and values that are increasingly out of step with most urban, educated, ambitious , entrepreneurial New Zealanders living in a multicultural society.
    "It’s as if the past 40 years never happened.
    "We can’t even call it cultural nationalism; rather it is provincial populism. Hipkins’ sausage roll scoffing small town social democracy is one many New Zealanders increasingly want to leave behind, figuratively, societally and increasingly, literally.
    "As such this provides a problematic correction to Muldoon’s claim [in the 1980s that 'NZers who leave for Australia raise the IQ of both countries.'] Those who choose to stay in this country for Hipkins’ reasons probably lower the IQ of New Zealand – while we lose the best and brightest, the entrepreneurial, the innovators, the trained and talented, the ambitious, to Australia."
~ Mike Grimshaw from his post 'Lowering the IQ of One Country'

* HIPKINS: "I’m absolutely confident that New Zealanders living and making a life in New Zealand want to continue to stay with the home of the All Blacks, the true home of the pavlova and the lamington. There’s plenty of reasons for them to stay back home in New Zealand.”


Saturday, 10 December 2022

"Stand your ground."


"In November 2020, accompanying its import bans, China produced a list of 14 grievances and demanded that Australia 'correct' its behaviour.
    "Mr Morrison ignored the demand, and took China to the WTO over its barley and wine bans. Yet now China has relented. This was consistent with Mr Xi’s broader charm offensive in Bali. And no doubt the advent of Mr Albanese, a less abrasive prime minister, provided cover for the climbdown. At bottom, though, Australia’s refusal to bend meant the Chinese approach was just not working. It is a lesson, says Malcolm Turnbull, Australia’s prime minister from 2015 to 2018, universally applicable to victims of bullying: 'Stand your ground'.”
~ from the Economist article 'Australia Emerges from Chinese Doghouse' [hat tip Scott Sumner]

 

Thursday, 1 December 2022

"It’s a miracle": Cash to UN 'heals' healthy Great Barrier Reef


"It’s a miracle. It’s only six months since they were elected but the Australian Labor Party says the Great Barrier Reef is OK now....
    "Apparently the UN uses the 'in danger' listing a form of coercion to squeeze more money for their favourite causes. It’s nothing about the actual reef. Nothing about what Australians want. And it was never about 'The Science.' ... UN labels are just a form of foreign interference to drum up money for friends which benefit from 'climate money'– like the Bankers who invest in renewables, or the Chinese Communist Party that sells us the windmills and solar panels."

~ Jo Nova, from her post 'UN shakedown: Threats to list healthy reef as in danger just a way to extort “climate” money'

Tuesday, 2 August 2022

"If a nation of engineers like Germany can’t make renewables work ... nobody can"


"Aussie PM Anthony Albanese [is] testing to destruction the fallacy that renewable energy can reduce power bills [as news comes that] 'Electricity prices rose to their highest on record – and the nightmare is set to continue'...
    "[The] Prime Minister’s response to this crisis is to stand by his modelling that renewables will bring down power prices. But even if renewables were capable of bringing down power prices, which they aren’t, by staying the course [the] PM is condemning ordinary Australians to years of excruciating electricity bills.
    "Remembers those coal plants various Aussie governments celebrated shutting down? Any of them could have taken the edge off today’s spiralling energy prices.
    "Remember those nuclear plants Australia refused to consider building? Nuclear plants are immune from short term price fluctuations, they only have to be refuelled every two years, and the next batch of fuel can be prepared ahead of time, ready for use. Australia has vast reserves of Uranium.
    "The one thing that won’t save [Australians] is renewables. If a nation of engineers like Germany can’t make renewables work, if Germany can’t sever their dependency on Russian gas through all the billions they have invested into renewables, nobody can."

Monday, 14 September 2020

"The problem with Australia is not that it is a nation descended from convicts, it's that it's a nation descended from prison guards." #QotD

 

Melbourne's Queen Victoria Market, yesterday ...

"The problem with Australia is not that it is a nation descended from convicts, it's that it's a nation descended from prison guards." 

            ~ David Moore

.

Friday, 17 January 2020

"The word unprecedented is applied to almost every bad thing that happens at the moment. The historical evidence, however, indicates fires have burnt very large areas before, and it has been hotter." #QotD


"The word unprecedented is applied to almost every bad thing that happens at the moment, as though particular events could not have been predicted, and have never happened before at such a scale or intensity. This is creating so much anxiety, because it follows logically that we are living in uncertain time: that there really is a climate emergency.
    "The historical evidence, however, indicates fires have burnt very large areas before, and it has been hotter."

~ Jennifer Marohasy, 'It has been hotter, fires have burnt larger areas,' from Vinay Kolhatkar's post 'The reason “green ideology” can light catastrophic fires in Australia'
.

Tuesday, 23 October 2018

Bonus QotD: "The Australian Labor Party now represents the rich and the welfare dependent. The Liberals represent the Deplorable worker and what’s left of the Middle Class and there aren’t many of those in the seat of Wentworth."


"The flipping of Wentworth* just marks a the morphing of the two major parties which started long ago. 
    "The Australian Labor Party now represents the rich and the welfare dependent. The Liberals represent the Deplorable worker and what’s left of the Middle Class and there aren’t many of those in the seat of Wentworth. 
     "[Former PM] Malcolm Turnbull was the perfect fit for the seat as it transited from being a safe Conservative Seat to a safe Collectivist-Virtue-Signalling Seat. He was the Labor-guy badged as a Liberal. Kerryn Phelps is the 'ideal' replacement — the Labor-Green candidate badged as an Independent. This made it easier for doctors-wives, lawyers and journalists to vote for an option which was essentially Labor-Green, but had the appearance of being 'smarter' and above all the riff-raff. 
        ~ Jo Nova on last weekend's seismic Wentworth by-election in Sydney's wealthy Eastern Suburbs.