Showing posts with label Olivia Pierson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Olivia Pierson. Show all posts

Friday, 24 August 2018

Never in the field of human interaction has civilised debate been so important....


Perhaps never in the field of human interaction has civilised debate been so important -- and so rare.  

Thank goodness then for Olivia Pierson's exciting project to change all that, which, as she explains in this guest post, deserves your support....


PSA: Your New Debate Forum: 'Dear Cicero'
Guest post By Olivia Pierson

Welcome!

I am now in the process of fundraising for an upscale forum to hold in-depth and entertaining debates in Auckland. New Zealand speakers for a New Zealand audience.

Dear Cicero Debate Forum seeks to become New Zealand's liveliest platform to debate ideas. They will be intelligent debates to indulge in our democracy's gift of freedom of speech and self-expression. A place where people can ride into battle, but only with their wits!

This will be a platform for clear thinkers and strong speakers to engage in classy, civilised debates and discussions on matters which are important to New Zealanders, both culturally and politically. Two or three debaters on each side of a stated motion will be hosted by an objective moderator. Well known speakers will be sourced from New Zealand's media, political landscape, academia and also from our speaking circuit.

The debates are to be filmed for internet & television (Face TV: Sky Channel 83), these will be in-depth debates with an interactive audience, created to enlighten, to inform and to entertain. They're to be done in a similar style to Intelligence Squared Debates overseas. First one to be held in early 2019.

Money raised will be spent on: venue hire, expenses pertaining to the speakers and moderators, security, filming for internet and for Face TV screening, ticketing and front of the house ushering and also for sound/audio expertise and live streaming.

Money left over from crowdfunding the first debate will go towards the second debate.

So please head on over to my PledgeMe page, and if you can contribute via crowdfunding to help me get this forum off the ground and regularly running amazing debates, I would be most grateful!

Why the name "Dear Cicero?" To find out more about who Marcus Tullius Cicero was, click here.

Once again, the PledgeMe page is here.



,

Thursday, 10 December 2015

The beautiful lady in the middle: Hypatia of Alexandria

image

Hypatia (above) was the last, great classical philosopher, reminds guest poster Olivia Pierson. Her murder signalled the end of free thought and the true beginning of the Dark Ages.

The Beautiful Lady in the Middle - Hypatia of Alexandria
by Olivia Pierson

When Raphael painted his famous classical work, School of Athens, he rendered the form of a beseeching figure in white robes who was the only female in the fresco.  She is also the only philosopher steadily gazing straight out of the work to make eye contact with the viewer. Her name is Hypatia of Alexandria (pronounced high-pay-shee-ah) and she was the victim of one of the most disgusting atrocities in human history.

The story of how Hypatia came to be in Raphael’s work is a fascinating one.

He was commissioned by the clergy to decorate the rooms of the Apostolic Palace in the Vatican.  The fresco took him two years to complete, between 1509 and 1511.  Raphael was required to show the patronising Bishop preliminary sketches of the fresco (a matter of painful frustration for any artist).  Raphael had placed Hypatia to the very centre left in the foreground, beneath Plato and Aristotle, on the marble steps.  Upon perusing the sketches, the Bishop asked, “Who is the beautiful lady in the middle?” Raphael replied, “She is Hypatia of Alexandria, the most famous student of the School of Athens. She was a professor of philosophy, mathematics and astronomy at the University of Alexandria and certainly one of the greatest thinkers ever.”

The Bishop at once commanded him to remove her.

Hypatia was a Greek woman who lived and worked 1600 years ago in the great beating heart of the intellectual world, the famous Library of Alexandria, in Egypt. Under Roman rule, Alexandria was then part of the Eastern Empire governed from Constantinople, not Rome. The library itself was part of the museum (the Temple of the Muses) and the centre of the university.  It had been built and patronised by the Ptolemaic dynasty, of which Cleopatra had been the last to rule.  It was created in the third century BC in the time of Alexander the Great, and was totally destroyed seven centuries later; its destruction is still a disputed and tragic semi-mystery. 

Hypatia was a scientist, physicist, mathematician and astronomer, but her primary role was Head of the Neoplatonic School of Philosophy. This was a time when women were still considered to be mere property with little or no prospects, yet under the protection and guidance of her devoted father, Theon, the last head of the Museum of Alexandria, Hypatia was able to move freely and confidently about the city, teach science and philosophy to men, debate politics and the finer points of classical literature, whilst arrayed in the dignified robes of a scholar.  Surviving accounts stand testimony to her natural beauty.
Socrates Scholasticus, a fifth century historian wrote of her:

“There was a woman at Alexandria named Hypatia, daughter of the philosopher Theon, who made such attainments in literature and science, as to far surpass all the philosophers of her own time. Having succeeded to the school of Plato and Plotinus, she explained the principles of philosophy to her auditors, many of whom came from a distance to receive her instructions. On account of the self-possession and ease of manner which she had acquired in consequence of the cultivation of her mind, she not infrequently appeared in public in the presence of the magistrates. Neither did she feel abashed in going to an assembly of men. For all men on account of her extraordinary dignity and virtue admired her the more.”

Hypatia wasn’t just extraordinary because she was a female philosopher; she was known during her time to be the greatest philosopher of Alexandria. She taught Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy, she edited her father’s work on Euclidean geometry, she taught Pythagorean mathematics, and wrote her own works on astronomy and geometry – alas now lost to us.  She invented certain scientific instruments: an astrolabe for measuring the positions of the sun, moon and planets, an apparatus for distilling water, and a graduated brass hydrometer for measuring the specific gravity of liquid.

She believed that all boys and girls should be educated and that superstition was the greatest obstacle to true knowledge and learning.  She once wrote:

“Fables should be taught as fables, myths as myths, and miracles as poetic fancies. To teach superstitions as truth is one of the most terrible things. The mind of a child accepts them, and only through great pain, perhaps even tragedy can the child be relieved of them.”

We have only fragments and small excerpts of Hypatia’s teachings, but it is obvious that she was no friend of religion.  She wrote:

“No priests should be allowed to force their beliefs on you and rob you of your right to evolve your own way of life.”

And:

“All formal dogmatic religions are fallacious and must never be accepted by self-respecting persons as final.”

Her father had invested in her as would any father of the time invest in the future of a son.  Hypatia’s influence and fame eclipsed that of her father, indeed eclipsed the fame of any man of her city. Her bearing was one of a confident and beautiful woman, secure in the ability of her mind and practical abilities.  She did not want to marry and rejected many suitors, perhaps fearing that a traditional union would limit her freedom of movement and accomplishment.

During her time, Christianity was evolving strongly into theocratic rule (often violent) and she found herself at the very epicentre of a clash between civilisation and barbarism. Barbarism won. She inspired hatred in Cyril the Archbishop, who sought to stamp out any “pagan” influence in politics and culture in Alexandria. This hatred was also the result of her abiding friendship with Cyril’s main enemy, Orestes, the Roman Prefect, who often sought Hypatia’s counsel in matters of political and philosophical importance.
According to Damascius, the last head of the School of Athens, writing one hundred years after Hypatia’s death, this hatred was also borne of some jealousy:

"Hypatia’s style was like this: she was not only well-versed in rhetoric and in dialectic, but she was as well wise in practical affairs and motivated by civic-mindedness. Thus she came to be widely and deeply trusted throughout the city, accorded welcome and addressed with honor. Furthermore, when an archon was elected to office, his first call was to her, just as was also the practice in Athens…Now the following event took place. Cyril the bishop of the opposite sect was passing Hypatia’s house and noticed a hubbub at the door, “a confusion of horses and of men,” some coming, others going and yet others standing and waiting. He asked what was the meaning of the gathering and why there was a commotion at the house. Then he heard from his attendants that they were there to greet the philosopher Hypatia and that this house was hers. This information gave his heart such a prick that he at once plotted her murder.

In the year 415 AD, as Hypatia continued to lecture, invent and write, she was in her chariot on her way to the university when a fanatical mob of Christians and desert monks, called into the city by Cyril, assaulted her. They stripped her naked and dragged her through the city to a church where she was beaten and then flayed alive with razor-sharp oyster shells until her flesh had been torn from her body.  They dismembered her then burned her mutilated corpse for all to see.  Her works were burned with the remains of her body.  Alexandria succumbed to Christian theocratic rule and the beginning of the Dark Ages ensued. Soon after her death, the Alexandrian Library, museum and university were obliterated.

Henceforth the memory of Hypatia, her achievements and teachings were deemed to be an enemy of Christianity.  In reality, she was the last, great, classical philosopher standing between an age of free intellectual inquiry and the looming shadows of dogmatic intellectual slavery. This descending darkness was to bind free thought in a mental prison for another 1300 years, until the Renaissance and 18th Century Enlightenment thinking would again light a path to liberty.

No one was ever brought to justice for Hypatia's brutal torture and death—but Cyril the Archbishop was later canonised by the church as a saint.

And so 1100 years later, Renaissance artist Raphael, commanded by a bishop to remove Hypatia from his great School of Athens fresco, committed a wonderful act of bold deception.  He moved her from the centre to the left, between Pythagoras and Parmenides, he lightened her skin to be many shades more pale than a Greco-Alexandrian woman’s skin would have been, and he disguised her features to resemble that of the ruling Pope’s most beloved nephew.  Thus Hypatia was resurrected in art and stands among history’s most exceptional minds in Raphael’s timeless work.

When I study her in this extraordinary work of art my heart always sets a little to aching. All the other philosophers are busy studying their works, discussing matters of great importance and buzzing with the energy of instructing some of their students. But Hypatia stands alone in her white martyr’s robes, side-on with her solitary gaze on us, the spectators. Her beautiful eyes silently, but assuredly, entreat us not to forget - as history almost did - that she too deserves to be in this venerable gathering of philosophy's greatest men.

RELATED POSTS:

  • “WE NEXT ENCOUNTER CHRISTIANITY’S “war against the mind,” building upon Judaic irrationality and adding ingredients of their own. (At least Judaism never imagined a hell.)  The Christian rejection was complete, best symbolised by the Christian mob, “including monks led by a member of the local bishop’s staff,” burning the Great Library of Alexandria to the ground in 415AD and murdering the brilliant Greek mathematician, Hypatia.
        “The burning of irreplaceable manuscripts continued for centuries (seen in the fate of writing and work by Sappho, Johns Scotus Erigena, Peter Abelard, and even Aristotle himself, and well portrayed in films like Agora and Name of the Rose.)”
    “So, How Come You Keep Bashing Religion?” – NOT PC
  • “Vinay Kolhatkar at Romanticism Watch recommends the recent blockbuster film Agora –and he was right to. Through the microcosm of the ancient world’s greatest and most intellectual city, and history’s most famous woman philosopher, Hypatia, it illustrates how the collapse of thought preceded the collapse of the ancient world, bringing with it a millennia of darkness and religious oppression – and how the coming of Christianity did for the ancient world what the Taleban did for Afghanistan.”
    Super-Atheist Gorgeous Epic Film: Agora (2009) – COMMON SENSE ATHEISM (Warning: contains spoilers in the second half)

image


Olivia's pictureOlivia Pierson is an Auckland writer.

She is the author of the philosophical handbook for children: To Love Wisdom, “an introduction to philosophy for intermediate-aged young people interested in big thoughts.”

Visit her at her blog OliviaPierson.Org, where this post first appeared.

 

image

Pics by Wikipedia Commons

Thursday, 19 November 2015

Multiculturalism's Treachery

Guest post by Olivia Pierson

What do North Korea, Russia, Iran, Syria – and the Zealots of Multiculturalism all have in common?

Communism? No.

Religion? No.

Totalitarianism? Close.

Answer: It is hatred of the West.

Since 1776 America has stood as the great symbol of Western ideals; Reason, Freedom & Democracy. More specifically, these ideals have evolved into becoming the hallmarks of all modern democracies in the Anglosphere and Europe; separation of religion from state (religious tolerance), the emancipation of women and children, a commitment to scientific discovery, freedom of speech and of the press, and the right to self-determination.

I challenge anyone in the world to point to a group of human beings anywhere who stand for anything nobler than the above political and cultural achievements. If Socrates’ words “know thyself” mean anything to us, then we in the West must be clear about what defines our civilisation’s daily character, for its creation is exceptional in the affairs of humankind.

Multiculturalism’s overarching dogma is that all cultures are equal regardless of the diverse practices of those cultures. Yet it is only in the West, and cultures heavily influenced by western values, where diverse cultures actually have the freedom to do their own thing unmolested.

Try living as an openly gay man in Russia and see how that works out for you. Try practising Christianity in North Korea, or wearing a mini-skirt in Iran -- or divorcing a violent husband in Syria. While you’re at it, try telling a multiculturalist that Islam is a backward and primitive anti-ideology that no civilised mind should have any truck with if we are serious about human development.

North Korea, Iran, Russia, Syria – and of course ISIS, are brutally working against western influence in the world, and they will smite it if they get their way. But they would not stand even the slightest chance of making a dent if it were not for the militant multiculturalists systematically undermining western exceptionalism from within.

All cultures are not equal.


Olivia's picture

 

Olivia Pierson is an Auckland writer. 
Follow her commentary at her blog: OliviaPierson.Org

Monday, 12 January 2015

Unity through Diversity Equals Cultural Death

Guest post by Olivia Pierson

Cultural pluralism is as old as the hills – or at least as old as the Babylonian Empire on whose riverbank shores even the captive Jews were tolerated to sit and weep. Multiculturalism, on the other hand, is a 20th Century bastardisation of tolerance, which the United Nations invented to socially engineer Western democracies to cope with overwhelming immigration, mostly from Third World slave-pens. The pious and politically correct preachers of “diversity” and “equality” raised multiculturalism in the West to the status of a new religion, as if the world needed yet another one of those.

With the truth emerging after murderous events in Paris, can there still be any doubt that multiculturalism has epically failed in the West? In the last five years Angela Merkel has admitted its failure; so have Nicolas Sarkozy and David Cameron.

But how has it failed so?

Monday, 18 August 2014

Stability over insanity in Iraq...yeah, right

With New Zealand wanting a seat on the UN Security Council, it can't just stay quiet about ISIS, says Olivia Pierson in this Guest Post.

Before 2003, when Saddam Hussein tyrannised Iraq with his secret police, torture chambers and death squads, many, if not most in the west, claimed that he was still the best man for the job "because he kept stability in the region."

In fact, he was the brutal dictator of a psychopathic regime left to dehumanise Iraqi citizens, systematically breaking their hearts and minds over a thirty year time-line. That is until the coalition forces led by America and Britain finally deposed him, resulting in his long-overdue execution. Iraq never was, and will not be in the near future, anything close to stable, unless your idea of stable is tormented and tyrannised.

In the wake of the burgeoning cruelty dished out by the new Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, ISIS, NZ Prime Minister John Key said that he wouldn’t want to put NZ troops into Iraq, "because this is a civil war between two groups, Sunni and Shi’ite." He echoes the same sentiments as do his idols, Barack Obama and David Cameron.

The thing that John Key and the boys don’t get is that ISIS is a Sunni-led terrorist corporation, with 2 billion dollars at its disposal thanks to its backers in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and its looting of Iraqi banks. They are Sunni Muslims hell-bent on becoming a full-blown medieval Islamic Caliphate, who are butchering members of all other sects, including other Sunni Muslims. This is not just a civil war between two Muslim enclaves; this is an attempt by jihadists to wipe out any form of Islam that doesn’t impose Sharia Law, along with all Jews, Christians and infidels worldwide.

ISIS seeks to remake the world in its own pathological image. Through clever branding, technological savvy, a single-minded purpose, overwhelming violence and the primal call for all true Muslims around the world to join their crusade of death, their numbers are swelling. They have already taken the North-East of Syria and a third of Iraq, including the Mosul dam, which itself can be used as a terror-tool to drown hundreds-of-thousands of Iraqis, if they so choose. They have set up terror-training camps where they are teaching young Muslims who have responded to their call, from all parts of the world including Europe, America and Australia, how to kill, rape, maim, crucify and behead civilians, including children. These radicals will return to their home countries to inflict their "holy cause" on western civilian life, otherwise known as infidels.

Welcome to the harsh reality that Islam is a political ideology, not merely a religion – and there's no reformation in sight!

John Key has brought New Zealand back into NATO and is seeking a seat on the UN Security Council. Former Prime Minister Helen Clark is in the running to hold the top UN position currently occupied by Ban Ki-Moon. That places NZ in an important position regarding its voice on geopolitical issues. John Key has stated that he supports the US air-strikes over Northern Iraq in order to aid the brutalized Yazidis and Kurdish forces on the frontline against ISIS. But this is not enough. As the Islamic State swells its ranks, they will be able to overwhelm resistance.

This is the moment jihadists have been anticipating for many years, if not decades. It is estimated that there are 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, seven percent of whom are conservatively deemed "radical"; that’s 112 million. If only one percent of said radicals respond to the call of the new Caliphate, that is a fighting force of 1.12 million deadly terrorists.

With full knowledge of the idea being utterly unappealing, I submit that troops on the ground are inevitable – the alternative is the spreading of pure hell. Considering that all modern countries will be affected by the despicable tactics of the new Islamic State, it would be prudent, though not attractive, to step forward firmly on the offensive, in concert, to send a clear message to Islam around the world that their jihadist’s agenda will be vanquished.

John Key and Helen Clark ought to stay open to all options, no matter how unedifying, instead of making statements about not supporting intervention in the form of ground troops. The well-signposted withdrawal of American troops from Iraq helped bring about this alarmingly swift catastrophe. After an eleven-year campaign and a very wobbly government, such an act was a betrayal of the Iraqi people, barely able to stand after the spirit-crushing abuses of Saddam. And now this.

* * * *

Olivia Pierson is an Auckland screenwriter.

 

UPDATE: Kurdish soldiers launch ground offensive to free Mosul dam

Monday, 8 November 2010

Rending the Barbarian Curtain - The New Perigo Show [update 2]

_Olivia Guest post by Olivia Pierson

For a long time now I have wanted to see Lindsay Perigo have his own television show regularly screening on the New Zealand air-waves, but the task has seemed nigh-on impossible due to the Barbarian Curtain militantly shutting out the most radiant faces and voices which could help prevent civilisation's final fall.

Three days ago Lindsay flew up from our country’s capital to join me in an all-out effort to rend that curtain from top to bottom.

lindsay_perigo_photo_01With seventeen highly-accomplished guests, we hosted a sumptuous lunch in Auckland’s finest restaurant, Antoine’s of Parnell. Our guests were a delightful mix of private business owners, journalists, television and advertising executives, one veteran captain of industry and one gentleman who very nearly became our new Prime Minister in the 2005 general election.

Lindsay pitched his vision of a new television show—one produced by me—then with his usual intense eloquence and unmatched humour, he gave one of the most rousing speeches ever about the kinds of quality he will be vehemently fighting to maintain on his show: namely, Reason & Freedom.

He ended with a quote from Tennyson’s Ulysses:

“Come my friends,
'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Push off, and sitting well in order smite the sounding furrows;
For my purpose holds to sail beyond the sunset,
and the baths of all the western stars, until I die.
It may be the gulfs will wash us down,
It may be we shall touch the Happy Isles,
And see the great Achilles, whom we knew.
Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and tho’
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.”

Our guests were absolutely mesmerised.

We all spent the rest of the afternoon enjoying the buzz of something new and exciting about to transpire and we genuinely enjoyed the quality of company and the convivial discourse.

The upshot is that we now have a new TV show on the horizon!

We have the owner of a private television channel fully behind us and an executive producer offering us his total support. Our playing field is robustly wide-open and largely outside the shackles of State control. The project is to be fully funded by private interests. Lindsay will be conducting in-depth interviews every week with not only our nation’s leaders (both actuals and wanna-bes) but also those who live among us whom we consider to be tall-poppies within their chosen paths – sports people, capitalists, artists, musicians and comedians, those who meet the criteria of being a truly interesting human being. Our show will be a haven for those who value achievement, high-culture, intelligent political debate and passion.

We plan to come to air in February/March 2011. Our biggest hurdle is going to be funding.

Of course, we will win some sponsorship and advertisers from among our guests and other people who come on board as the show grows in popularity. My aim is to make sure that we have full rights on placing each episode on the internet, according to our own discretion, and also to promote it to private channels and websites around the world who would like to buy quality material for their own purposes.

At this early start-up phase, if any of you could see your way clear to making monetary contributions your generosity would be most welcome... more than most welcome.... it would be absolutely bloody brilliant! Smiling If you email me I can take it from there.

Clearly, a dearly-held dream which I've been pursuing for some time is beginning to materialize for Lindsay and me. Any support from our ideological friends will be greatly appreciated beyond words.

Regards
Olivia
opierson@xtra.co.nz

[Cross-posted at SOLO]