Showing posts with label Michael Newberry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Newberry. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 January 2022

"A unique aspect of art is that it represents the purpose of what one lives for. It represents the 'point' of life."

 

"Every civilisation has had artworks, including buildings, that represent that country's values. A unique aspect of art is that it represents the purpose of what one lives for. It represents the 'point' of life. In a similar way, the art* in major art institutions represent the soul of a culture or civilisation...."

~ artist Michael Newberry, from his 2001 article 'Pandoras Box,' written + published immediately after 9/11, and soon to reappear in his forthcoming book Pandora's Box + Other Essays

* Says he, in 2022: "It is obvious that Marcel Duchamp's Urinal is not part of any development by any standard, yet it was unanimously acclaimed as the most influential visual art work of the 20th century. Let that sink in, I'll wait ... "

Thursday, 9 September 2021

"It is art that lights the fire for us to push and grow..."





Artist Michael Newberry with a painting from his Eudaemonia series

“So many disciplines add to our evolution—philosophy, psychology, sciences. . .—but none of them are ends in themselves except for art. . . . It is art that lights the fire for us to push and grow, it is art that refuels our spirit when it is exhausted and can’t do more, and it is art that rewards us for a job well done and life well lived.”
~ Artist Michael Newberry, from his stunning new book Evolution Through Art 

Monday, 21 September 2020

"When I am dead let this be said of me: 'He belonged to no school, to no church, to no institution, to no academy, least of all to any régime except the régime of liberty.'”


Gustave Courbet, Woman with a Parrot, 1866

“I am fifty years old and I have always lived in freedom; let me end my life free; when I am dead let this be said of me: 'He belonged to no school, to no church, to no institution, to no academy, least of all to any régime except the régime of liberty.'”
~ Gustave Courbet

About Courbet's famous nude (his first to be accepted by the Paris Salon in 1866 after a previous entry in 1864 was rejected as indecent), artist Michael Newberry explains that Courbet
shows us a special moment of freedom where there is no baggage, no pain, and no suffering –– as if they had never existed. This is significant because it aligns with Aristotle's eudaemonia and it aligns with a healthy psychology, the concept of holding a vision as a guide to what we are living for, which painting and sculpture are the ideal mediums to show what these visions look like.
    Her skin is aglow with health; her body speaks of flowing generous proportions; her hands are sensuously elegant; and her head is gently rotated and lifted. Her eyes are half closed in a dreamy indulgence of the moment. The high note of the painting is the gorgeous shape of her left hand on which the parrot is perched. She is not holding the parrot back, rather her hand is an affectionate, soft support, inspiring the bird to enjoy her human connection. Notice how complementary the shapes of her fingers are in relationship with the bird's spread wings. There is also a subtle bit of balmy synthesia: notice the warmish brown coloring of the shadows around her crotch, breast, and particularly around her languid eyes the hue gives off the slightly moist scent of musk. She is undoubtedly slowly waking up from a very satisfying dusky afternoon siesta.
(Excerpt from Newberry's upcoming book Evolution Through Art.)
.

Saturday, 11 July 2020

"The aesthetic corollary to the Bill of Rights is the figurative nude in art. It is the visual voice of independence, of unrepeatable uniqueness, free of agendas and special status, and it is the voice of freedom." #QotD


Newberry, Anticipation, charcoal on Rives BFK paper, 18x24”, private collection
"The aesthetic corollary to the Bill of Rights is the figurative nude in art. It is the visual voice of independence, of unrepeatable uniqueness, free of agendas and special status, and it is the voice of freedom. The left’s culture is of postmodern art and the most powerful antidote to it is figurative art."
          ~ artist Michael Newberry
.

Thursday, 29 March 2018

Easter through art


What's the theme of Easter, and of Easter art? In a word, it's sacrifice: specifically human sacrifice. And more specifically, the sacrifice of the good to the appalling.

That's the Easter theme we're asked to respond to every year.

The theme starts early in religion with the bloke at the heart of three of the world's large religions, whose voices in his head (we're told) told him to cut his young son's throat and "offer him for a burnt offering." The son was saved only by some other voices in his head telling him to stop. 

Caravaggio makes the crime real:




Family values, huh.

Keep reminding yourself: this would-be child-killer is revered by Islam, Christianity and Judaism. You wonder why (Greater evil hath no man than this, that he is willing to kill his own son for God.) The only other notable thing he is ever said to have done to be revered is to marry his own sister, and to offer up his foreskin to his god. Yes, really.) But the other two religions only revered him; Christianity then upped the ante by founding a whole new religion on the thing he was discouraged to do!

Think about that: to the extent you believe the story, the greatest being in the universe is sacrificing his most beloved son to a world (in their description) filled with sin and deformity (all His own work, ironically) and to a species one Christian saint described as a mass of ordure, filth and corruption. (A working definition of Sacrifice being: the surrender of a higher value for a lower one. Or even to nothing at all; sacrifice just because.)

This perversion is brilliantly captured in Dali's Christus Hypercubus, below, in which the figure at left -- infinitely smaller than the Ideal Man pinned up on the stylised crucifix -- looks up at the blindingly bright Christ figure with a look not simply of curiosity or sadness, but of literal man-worship. If we have questions here, when looking at a man – not just any man, but our ideal man – nailed up to a piece of wood like this, they might be along these lines:
"How can you worship the destruction of your ideal man?” 
“Why would you celebrate his torture?” 
“Why is suffering so damned central to your mythology?”
Fair questions, especially when confronted with priests quietly sacrificing young children to their own misbegotten lusts, and splatter-fests like Mel Gibson’s Passion that so lovingly depict every act of torture and every drop of blood in high-definition Technicolor as their Ideal Man is delivered up to the mob. (They mightn’t watch the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, but how many good and gentle Christians will be searching on Netflix this Easter for the chance to see their hero graphically beaten and slayed?)



Christus Hypercubus, Salvador Dali.

You have to believe a lot of (literally) fantastic nonsense to explain this stuff away, let alone worship it. Han's Holbein's painting Christ After Crucixion helps makes plain both the reality of the sacrifice, and the precise amount of fantasy you would have to believe to swallow this stuff. Holbein's interrogation brings you up short. It tells you: This is reality. This is a dead body. It It is never going to walk again. 




A Christian Confronts Reality, Hans Holbein

Holbein's is no ideal man. It is a painting from the morgue. It is a man as he would be several days after a brutal death; decaying, rigid, gone, departed. Its features drawn, its muscles limp, its skin already decomposing. I've labelled it as Dostoyevesky did when confronted with this battered Christian corpse: when he was first brought face to decaying jowl with the gruesome reality of death and sacrifice crucifixion and its results. Dostoyevsky was immediately struck when first seeing the piece by the importance of this confrontation for his faith, and inspired to dramatise in his next novel the full importance what that confrontation meant. As described by his wife,
The figure of Christ taken from the cross, whose body already showed signs of decomposition, haunted him like a horrible nightmare. In his notes to [his novel] 'The Idiot' and in the novel itself he returns again and again to his theme.
Dostoyevsky describes in The Idiot one character's questioning:
His body on the cross was therefore fully and entirely subject to the laws of nature. In the picture the face is terribly smashed with blows, swollen, covered with terrible, swollen, and bloodstained bruises, the eyes open and squinting; the large, open whites of the eyes have a sort of dead and glassy glint. . . .
    Looking at that picture, you get the impression of nature as some enormous, implacable, and dumb beast, or, to put it more correctly, much more correctly, though it may seem strange, as some huge engine of the latest design, which has senselessly seized, cut to pieces, and swallowed up–impassively and unfeelingly–a great and priceless Being, a Being worth the whole of nature and all its laws, worth the entire earth, which was perhaps created solely for the coming of that Being!
Holbein confronts the Christian viewer with the starkest of choices: One must either believe the fantasy that God somehow repaired and raised this ravaged body from the dead, and that the Christian myth, therefore, “offers hope for humanity beyond this life”; or else you must accept that the dead stay dead, that such an event did not and could not occur, that reality is what it is – not fodder for this nastiness -- and begin making a life and an ethics from there. Dostoyevsky's Idiot crystallises the challenge. Holbein's art makes it possible.



A Christian Confronts Reality (detail), Hans Holbein

Remember here that good art need not be a thing of beauty, but it must have something to say. This -- both Holbein’s painting and Dostoyevsky’s novel -- certainly do that.

But why celebrate sacrifice anyway? Why wait, as the fantasy demands, for happiness in some supernatural realm? Why accept the nonsense that the whole of nature and all its laws were created for the sake of a fantastic and gruesome story?

Maybe, instead, we could reject the absurd, and with that embrace instead this earth and our life upon it. This is what artist Michael Newberry asks of us in his powerful reclamation of two mythological traditions.



Icarus Landing, acrylic on linen, 55x36 inches.

This is man reclaiming mythology, and embracing this earth. 

In the artist's words, 
Happy Easter!
Wouldn't it be great if we could be transformed while alive?
And evolve with plenty of time to share the wonder?
And to look towards Earth for our paradise?
Wouldn’t it just. And wouldn’t that transform lives.

Happy Easter everyone!

Have some chocolate, have some fun, and if you have to watch a movie, then make it Life of Brian.
.

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

QotD: What art does


"The experience of the sublime is to be looked for in art. Art integrates senses, emotions, and thought. The sublime in art elevates our sensory experience, heightens and taps our emotional potential, and furthers our knowledge. The sublime in art can also give us a moral, a stance towards living. At its best, the sublime in art inspires awe in our human potential and gives us a path to evolve as a whole being and as a species."~ a new definition of the sublime in art, by one of my favourite living artists Michael Newberry
.

Thursday, 31 March 2016

‘Icarus Landing, by Michael Newberry

 

12321448_10206437076666870_7653744564400183027_n
Icarus Landing
, acrylic on linen, 55x36 inches.

It’s a bit late for Easter, but there you go: the artist just reposted it, so I can, saying:

Happy Easter!
Wouldn't it be great if we could be transformed while alive?
And evolve with plenty of time to share the wonder?
And to look towards Earth for our paradise?

Wouldn’t it just. And wouldn’t that transform lives.

.

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Quote of the Day: On being an artist


Light of Mine, by Michael Newberry

“Your personal vision is something to handle with great
care, like holding a point of light in the cradle of your hand.”

~ Artist Michael Newberry, from his post
Being an Artist: Approach Art Like a Child

[Hat tip Stephen Hicks]

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

The "no graven image” virus


Venus, by Michael Newberry,
2008, oil on linen, 48 x 48 inches

Guest post by Michael Newberry

Big in the news this week is the draw Mohammad Contest, and I couldn't be more proud of Bosch Fawstin aka Pig Man. He is a hero for risking his life to fight for free speech. The hoopla surrounding the issue is rooted in the Muslim, Christian, and Jewish commandment that "... thou shall not make graven images..." I know everyone has heard about that concept, but I doubt people understand how it is a virus designed to destroy your love, unique individuality, freedom, and the highest calling of art.

One of my goals in reaching for the sublime in art is to show a radical alternative to the repressive controlling doctrine of "no graven images." One of the birth concepts of my Venus was to answer this sacrilegious tripe, not with a painting about how stupid they are but with the positive direction of where humanity should be going.
Religions want to have power over you but it is impossible to have power over anyone that trusts their own passion, uniqueness, and right to be free. So they have systematically undercut you as a youth by getting you to reserve your most serious, highest, most noble and deepest feelings for religious ideals. Making your other personal passions seem insignificant by comparison.

Serious figurative art is the technology of the soul. Religious are afraid of that, because once people profoundly embrace and substitute high art as the sublime, religions have zero hold. Catholicism made a huge and hypocritical mistake when they tried to integrate secular humanism with Christianity in the Renaissance - humanism almost completely toppled it.

Bill O'Reilly and other "but'ers" will never defend freedom as its root because they are stuck in their belief that freedom is of secondary importance. They are compromised by the "no graven image virus."

No enemy is going to kill me because of making Venus, but that is because they don't have the wits to understand that the god-like nude in high art is the ultimate symbol of freedom, individuality, and passion - and disdain for hypocrites and mob mentalities.


Michael NewberryMichael Newberry  is an internationally-recognised artist whose work combines the colour of the Impressionists and the clarity of Rembrandt with the heroism embodied in romantic music.
Visit him regularly at MichaelNewberry.Com.


PS: For a related read, and possibly the best summary of the issues around and arising from the armed attack on the Texas Draw Mohammed event,

Sample quote: Have you noticed how “all the arty types who say we need "artists" with the "courage" to "explore" "transgressive" "ideas" fold like a cheap Bedouin tent when it comes to Islam …”

Friday, 7 December 2012

‘Dancer,’ study, by Degas

image

Look how ingeniously the master painter makes a whole figure with just a few lines in pastel and chalk on coloured paper.

[Hat tip Michael Newberry]

Monday, 27 August 2012

Thursday, 17 February 2011

The making of ‘Denouement,’ by Michael Newberry

denoument Denouement, 1987, oil on linen, 54×78 inches.

Denouement is one of artist Michael Newberry’s masterpieces. He began it when he was twenty-seven.  Of it he says, “There is a beacon of love, light, and color that excites my whole being. Denouement is the expression of that existence.”

Go “backstage” with Michael and discover how he gave birth to this masterpiece.

Thursday, 14 October 2010

The Man Exalted (aka, God Releasing Stars Into the Universe), by Michael Newberry

emStars (1) The Man Exalted (aka, God Releasing Stars Into the Universe),
oil on linen, 7' x 5'
Michael Newberry,1993-2000

Here’s something that makes concrete the exaltation I’m sure we’re all feeling at the rescue of the miners, and with the Silver Ferns’ last-second win in Delhi.

Stephen Hicks describes the work:

_Quote This is a big composition that is in transition from black and white underground painting to color overlay. The subject is a man on his outspread knees, with his eyes and mouth open wide, and his outreaching hands extended in an ecstatic gesture. The man is releasing a current of fantastic light that weaves and curves through the night space. There are rocks in the foreground and underneath him. In the background there is indication of mountains to come. The artist is only beginning to apply color to his black and white underground work but the vibrations of light and shadow are already perceptible.
    The man is naked, unaffected, pure. And he becomes one with the energy. The man is a physical catalyst for the expression of the light; the light is the man’s nature.

Friday, 9 July 2010

‘Pursuit’ – Michael Newberry

Pursuit
Pursuit, 1984
oil on linen, 80 x 60 inches
What a stunning piece of art! Just who is pursuing whom, and for what? Perhaps the artist's explanation might help. . .
_Quote With a passion bordering on insane somnambulism I poured everything I had into pursuing the furthest reaches of my art. It was wild. I worked 16 hours a day for six months, somewhere I remember the crunch of ice outside under my shoes. I worked to integrate: the fantastic dramatic spotlight affect of Rembrandt; the wet-clothe technique of ancient Greek sculptures; the romantic themes of Delacroix; and the pure vibrant contrasting colors of the Impressionists (the painting has no black). I made more studies than I can remember. And it slowly took form. Once, for this piece, I went into Wall Street late at night to make a pastel color study of the granite wall of a skyscraper; got very curious looks from a patrol... Pursuit is the work I am most proud of.”
Visit the artist’s blog here, and tell him how much you love it. He’ll love you for it.

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

‘Himalayan Flight’ - Michael Newberry

himalayan Michael Newberry, Himalayan Flight, 2010, oil on linen, 36 x 48 inches

Just finished and just “signed,” this still life by Newberry was completed just in time for his gallery’s 'Symbolic Still Life' exhibition which opened Saturday.

For myself, I love the dramatic diagonals and white-on-red of the composition—and the contrasting perspectives of the two bowls which highlight the “ascent” up the snow-coloured scarf.

Now, still-lifes aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, but this brief description by Sherri Tracinski of a still-life involving a suitcase and a vase comes as close as any explanation I’ve seen to explaining their appeal:

    "These fine details and contrasts of texture surround us in the world everyday, in the objects of our everyday lives. It is the invaluable skill of the still-life painter to highlight those contrasts, to heighten our awareness of them, and to show us all of the beauty the objects in this world have to offer."

Explaining  this one above, the excited Newberry says (hell, why wouldn‘t he be excited when he’s just finished a piece like this),

    “The Tibetan white silk prayer scarf was given to me from my friend Jennifer Jordan, she wrote and produced the National Geographic special, The Woman of K2. Like the mountain climbers that reach for the highest peeks, freedom comes with a cost of blood.”

And just quietly, being “signed” today means it’s on the market today . . .

Friday, 9 April 2010

‘Revolution is in the Air’- Michael Newberry

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Michael Newberry, Revolution is in the Air, 2010, charcoal and pastel on Rives BFK, 25 x 18 inches

Says Michael of this simple gem,

    “I planned this using symbols of color: white for purity and idealism; red for blood and passion; and black for oppression. They converge in the individual and transparent glass–which only has air inside.”

One of a collection of piece in a 'Symbolic Still Life' Group Show at the Newberry Gallery in Santa Monica, coming soon.

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Art Mini-Tutorial: ‘Zoom!’

Haman

The Punishment of Haman (detail) - Michelangelo

How does an artist create a three-dimensional figure on a two-dimensional canvas?  And a related question: how does an artist create movement in what is essentially a static medium?

    _quote The key [says artist Michael Newberry] is to re-create the physiological visual sense of movement by atmospheric spatial depth. In other words, give the viewer a sense of zooming through space.”

Check out his mini-tutorial on how artists use the technique of  ‘zoom’ to bring their two-dimensional works alive in the third dimension.

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Sketch: ‘Olivia’ – Michael Newberry

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

Can good art be political art?

I’ve enjoyed reading the debate over this painting below that I posted here last week, and I’ve been very careful (though tempted) to wade in myself.

I haven’t, but I will now.

The painting was done by the Soviets’ leading figurative painter, showing Russian fighters defending the Soviet city of Sebastopol from Nazi invaders. The question I posed when posting it was: does heroic art like this supersede the politics it celebrates? In other words, is good art didactic, or something else?

While you’re considering that yourself, add this sculpture to your mix if you like, a piece of Soviet agit-prop called ‘A Cobblestone Is the Weapon of the Proletariat,’ which got no comment at all when I first posted it:

Or this piece of music (part one of three). It was said to be Hitler’s most-loved piece—by the composer most-played by the Nazis—and played over German radio the day of his death.

 

So does painting, sculpture and music such as this supersede the politics it celebrates (or in the latter case was used to celebrate)? Simon contends it can’t, especially (as he contends with the painting above) if the art was done by a slave to celebrate a slave state.  He says, “Generally some knowledge of the subject matter is helpful in that you might understand the art better.” That’s true, it’s helpful – especially if there’s some obscure symbolism or something going on. But I agree with other commenters in saying with good art that while it’s helpful to know more, it’s certainly not essential.

Because a piece of art stands on its own. What we see with that sculpture above, for example, is primarily the theme of determined resistance. The young man’s brows are furrowed, his eyes focussed on his goal, his whole (slightly lumpen) being coiled into one super-human action. He could just as easily be resisting Czarist cossacks, Soviet tanks, British redcoats or Iranian militia – the key qua art is that he is resisting.  And not without hope. In essence, the piece says that goal-directed resistance has power in our universe.

That’s a theme that transcends ideology, and even politics. (Compare it with the look in the eyes and face of the Michelangelo and Bernini Davids, however, two other examples that could be used here, to see a very different conception of where human goal-direction starts.  Do you see it?)

Anyway, that in a nutshell is why good art transcends its politics—and why so much purely “didactic art” is so bad; why so much so-called didactic “art” is generally more the former than it is the latter.  As Ayn Rand concludes:

_quote Art is not the means to any didactic end. This is the difference between a work of art and a morality play or a propaganda poster. The greater a work of art, the more profoundly universal its theme. Art is not the means of literal transcription. This is the difference between a work of art and a news story or a photograph.”

A piece of art stands on its own. If it’s good art that expresses its theme superlatively (which is the job of every artist, no matter his theme) then it says to the observant viewer that this is what the artist sees as essential in the universe, as fundamentally “metaphysically” important—and it’s on that basis that you respond. Either with a “values swoon” (if you agree), or with loathing (if you don’t).

In this context, Painter Michael Newberry argues that the important point in understanding a painting, for example, is to grasp that “the canvas is the universe”:

_quoteIn art criticism one should analyze the artwork without outside considerations. This means that the theme of a painting, for instance, should make its message clear without any prior knowledge of what the painting is about. We have to be like detectives and look for clues within the painting itself.”

For help in seeing what he means, and in detecting value judgements in paintings without any prior knowledge of the subject itself, you can’t go past Michael’s own excellent piece ‘Detecting Value Judgments in Painting,’ which is chock full of examples, and itself stands on its own as the best practical description of the skill that I’ve seen.

 

NewberryDenouement

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

‘Koi’ by AJ Nesselrod

16570_1181708144014_1267526600_30546557_1771928_n Koi by AJ Nesselrod, oil on panel, 20 x 12 inches.

I first saw this and thought: “It’s Monet without the fog!” And it is.  And it’s stunning.

And it sold recently for a good price at the Newberry Gallery. Eat your heart out, Monet.

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

‘Promethia’ - Michael Newberry


Promethia

 Promethia, 1982, oil on linen,
78 x 58 inches (198.1 x 147.3 cm) Available

Artist Michael Newberry explains why this painting is so special to him:

    I completed Promethia in 1982, when I was 26 years old, while living in Staten Island. The painting is about honoring truth, one’s goodness, and beauty.
    It’s a large painting, over six feet, and I worked, non-stop, for about a year on it. This is one of my most important works because it marks my transition from painting what I saw to what I envisioned. The painting began from my imagination as a concept sketch on a tiny bit of paper – my ideal landscape of architecture, sculpture, and site. I had to merge four completely different subjects into an integrated whole: the landscape background was taken from a study of the desert near Palm Springs; the building is the U.C.S.D. library in La Jolla, California (its original setting was a forest of eucalyptus trees); a marble figurative sculpture (which never existed); and creating the image of the sculpture from a living model.
    I loved modern architecture’s ability to solve complex problems of living requirements, traffic patterns, form follows function, and it’s integration to the site. But I didn’t see modern architecture having much to do with the limited expression of abstract sculpture, so I wanted to show what I would love to see: a beautiful, expressive figurative sculpture set against a stunning and monumental building. Marble doesn’t do to well with the grime and soot of cities, so I chose to have a vast natural landscape of the arid drama of the California desert.
    A dear friend, Jennifer Trainer, posed for this. She brought a lot of character, intelligence, and sincerity to the project. Promethia is the female version of Prometheus with a twist. He was punished for giving the knowledge of fire to humanity, but I wanted change that outcome to show that self-esteem or pride in oneself protects one from being downtrodden – hence her very erect posture and level lift of her face.
    At that time in my life, I was working incredibly hard to excel in figurative art. Yet I couldn’t find, either in Los Angeles, or in Holland, other artists that were ahead of me in this direction, or even some artists working in this direction. I remember that in the early ’80’s no one bought contemporary representational work. It felt like I was the only one that believed in beautiful paintings with vision. Promethia is now (in 2009) 27 years old. And the painting is just as meaningful and beautiful to me as the day I finished it.

Michael Newberry

PS: Promethia will be on display in the Landscape with a Modern Edge exhibition at the Newberry Gallery in Santa Monica, October 17 – November 21, 2009. It will be her first public appearance in 25 years.

Visit Michael here at his website, or his new gallery – or his blog.  (He’s everywhere, he’s irrepressible.)  And here he is again: in a neat 44 seconds film spot on him, his work, and his gallery/studio.