So, what are the people of
Metropolis, the people of
DC Earth, like?
Here's
one version:
That is from
The Essential Superman Encyclopedia (2012), by
Robert Greenberger and
Martin Pasko.
Boy, are they
naive idiots.
Here's one of the examples of criminals trying to tarnish heroes they talked about: the post-
Crisis mini-series,
Legends:
Of course, the public's turning on heroes was short lived, as it was soon revealed that
Darkseid (and
Glorious Godfrey) are behind it all:
But of course that didn't take, and that series served to relaunch the
Justice League, and establish the role of heroes in the new, post-Crisis universe. No,
seriously, people really loved their heroes!! Go figure!!
Today's DC, though? They've decided that they prefer the "
before" to the "
after," as they try to make their universe as unfriendly to heroes as the first issues of Legends were.
For example, from this week's
Action Comics #45:
Yes,
that's why I read comics...for the disapproving public opinion polls on heroes.
Even after
Superman saves a bunch of people from a storm...
It's not
just the man in the street, either:
Oh,
Perry White, you damned jerk.
Now, the last few weeks have revealed that there is some nebulous being called
Wrath in the background, making everyone angry and, well,
wrathful. The
nu52--for those who thought
Jack Kirby's villain names were too subtle!!
Another point we should note is that all of this (
recent round of) public hatred of Superman is not just because he's an alien--that's been
pubic knowledge for awhile (and how could it not be, with every other villain having "
ties" to
Krypton).
No, people are upset because they found out that Superman had been living amongst them, "
posing" as a mere human.
Now, it seems to me that a lot of fear and distrust could be cleared up by
Clark giving a TV interview--to
Oprah, say--explaining that he
wasn't "posing," he was living with the name he was given and raised with by his human foster parents--he's
always been Clark Kent, and Superman was the assumed identity. Not for nothing, this goes back to the Legends era, because that was the punchline of
Byrne's Man Of Steel relaunch:
But instead, DC has chosen to base their universe on the
fever-dream paranoia of
Pa Kent from the
Man Of Steel movie, where Pa
chose to kill himself rather than allow a hint that Clark existed, because he was convinced that society would hate him and try to destroy him. So congratulations, DC...you fulfilled the prophecies of a man who though Clark maybe should have let a busload of kids die, because being a hero is a really bad idea.
Speaking of the Kents, well, there was one more effect of Lois
doxxing Clark:
Yeah, because
that's the universe I want to follow--where the fearful government digs up the corpses of old couples because they're so terrified by the concept of someone who actually does good because it's the right thing.
To be fair, though, it's possible it
wasn't the government that exhumed the Kents' bodies. No, maybe they just
burnt up from the friction of spinning in their graves when they heard their son did this in last week's
Superman #44:
Yeah, I bitched about that last week. But it does show that
Kal-El himself has lost the mission in this dour and wretched reboot.
So that's why I'm dropping the Superman books. Even the "
good one," Action Comics, is forced to wallow in this dire plotline. Superman blackmailing erstwhile allies and blowing up hideouts? Clark without most of his supporting cast? An entire universe turned against heroes, not just as part of a mini-series to redefine what heroic is for a "new universe," but as a permanent condition? The news leads with polls showing him having lower public opinion polls than
Donald Trump? The man who has saved Earth
Rao knows how many times is wanted, despised, hunted? Former staunch allies turned on him? (Hey, Perry, if what he did is so bad, when are you giving back the
Pulitzers the
Daily Planet won for covering Superman?!? Huh?)
I don't mind anti-heroes, even if I don't care to follow most of them. It's a big fictional universe. But I
do mind when an entire fictional universe becomes anti-hero, and the people are portrayed as merely a collection of our baser instincts. I object when Superman is supposed to inspire others to be better, to do the best they can, and that message is rejected, forcefully, by the government, by his friends, by the vast majority of the American population.
That's the
Anti-Life Equation, folks.
That's the world that Darkseid was trying to create in Legends. And the folks running DC have
given it to him.
So I'm hopping off this trolley. I'm not asking, or expecting, anyone else to do the same--I'm just trying to explain why I'm not buying these books anymore, and why you'll be reading a lot less about nu52 Superman around here for awhile.
In the meantime, perhaps you can ask yourself,
which version of the DC Universe do you prefer--the one described in the paragraph I reprinted at the top of this post, or the one we've been given today?
[For a fuller, and much better, review of Action #45,
please go check out Anj's post. He's probably more rational than I am.]