Yeah, yeah, golf season is pretty much over. I know.
But we never let mere facts deter us for our Friday Night Fights!!
Brenda Banks, lovely heiress, has noticed some shenanigans at the local country club. Fortunately, she's not just an heiress...
Yes, she's Lady Luck!!
First, there's our obligatory pre-Code cheesecake:
Hubba, hubba!
And now, Lady Luck is ready to tee off on these skulking scalawags!
See, they had been hiding stolen jewelry in the holes on the golf course...
Take that, Tiger Woods!!
But before we finish our tale...more cheesecake!!
Hubba hubba!!
Spacebooger remembers Geoff Johns announcing 4 years ago that Lady Luck was joining the Justice League. Still waiting...
Lady Luck swings a mean club in Lady Luck #87 (1950). Our scripter is unknown, pencils and inks by Fred Schwab, who was ghosting for Klaus Nordling.
Now is the time for you to go and vote for my fight. Why? Because if I win, maybe Geoff Johns will notice and get around to that story he promised us 51 months ago!! So go vote!!
Showing posts with label Lady Luck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lady Luck. Show all posts
Friday, October 16, 2015
Friday, July 29, 2011
Credit Where Credit Is Due
Hey, DC threw me a bone!
Up to now, my reaction to the whole Flushpoint "New 52" has been one of faint ennui, because after all of DC's declarations of "history making" and "reshaping the industry," it seemed to me as if most of the "new" books we got were mostly same old, same old.
25% of the output Bat-books? That's taking a chance.
Deathstroke? Yeah, he was edgy...30 years ago, and he just had his own team a month ago.
A team led by the Demon? Yes, because we haven't had the Demon star in any titles over the past decade.
Wildstorm characters in the DC Universe?? Well, let's see--those titles and/or characters were all created by the man who is DC's "co-publisher," so yeah, real risky. It would have been a far bigger surprise if Grifter et. al. hadn't been incorporated.
No, despite all the chatter about "we really want to inject new life in our characters and line," 95% of the "new" 52 is the exact same characters they were already publishing, just with new clothes and botox and all adult relationships stripped away.
But then, at SDCC, Geoff Johns revealed who one of the "mystery" characters in Justice League was: Lady Luck!
Now, I've written about Lady Luck before, so I won't bore you with the details...
Oh, hell I won't!
Lady Luck was created by Will Eisner, and ran as a regular back-up in the Spirit newspaper insert. Quality Comics began reprinting those stories, and for 5 glorious issues, she took over Smash Comics as the title character!! (And then the mag was cancelled. Ah, well...)
Of course, Quality never seemed able to settle on a slogan for Lady Luck. From the covers of her 5 issues:




A few more issues, and I think they would have had it!!
Anyway, even though this new Lady Luck sounds like she has pretty much nothing to do with the Golden Ager except for the name (and hopefully her taste in lingerie), I see it as vaguely promising. It's an example of DC's brain trust actually thinking outside the box for 5 seconds, the first concept from the New 52 that wasn't created by one of their Golden Boys or an attempt to latch onto 80s or 90s nostalgia. A small thing, yes...but something.
One of DC's greatest but most under-utilized strengths is the ridiculously ENORMOUS amount of characters they have buried in their vault after absorbing Quality and Fawcett and Fox and...well, virtually everyone. But since Roy Thomas stepped away, there's been almost no attempt to revive/recreate any of these properties...except for cameos and name drops in Starman, or to be gratuitously slaughtered off in JSA so we'd understand that Nazis were evil.
But just look back at my Golden Age Idol series. Hell, just look back at Fawcett 1941 Week or Quality 1941 Week earlier this month to see dozens of characters from just one month's comics that are lying around, unused, even though DC (theoretically) owns the rights to them.
So props to DC for finally extending their institutional memory past the books they read when they were adolescents. It's a small step, but one that should be applauded.
Especially if it leads to reviving this guy.
Up to now, my reaction to the whole Flushpoint "New 52" has been one of faint ennui, because after all of DC's declarations of "history making" and "reshaping the industry," it seemed to me as if most of the "new" books we got were mostly same old, same old.
25% of the output Bat-books? That's taking a chance.
Deathstroke? Yeah, he was edgy...30 years ago, and he just had his own team a month ago.
A team led by the Demon? Yes, because we haven't had the Demon star in any titles over the past decade.
Wildstorm characters in the DC Universe?? Well, let's see--those titles and/or characters were all created by the man who is DC's "co-publisher," so yeah, real risky. It would have been a far bigger surprise if Grifter et. al. hadn't been incorporated.
No, despite all the chatter about "we really want to inject new life in our characters and line," 95% of the "new" 52 is the exact same characters they were already publishing, just with new clothes and botox and all adult relationships stripped away.
But then, at SDCC, Geoff Johns revealed who one of the "mystery" characters in Justice League was: Lady Luck!
Now, I've written about Lady Luck before, so I won't bore you with the details...
Oh, hell I won't!
Of course, Quality never seemed able to settle on a slogan for Lady Luck. From the covers of her 5 issues:
Anyway, even though this new Lady Luck sounds like she has pretty much nothing to do with the Golden Ager except for the name (and hopefully her taste in lingerie), I see it as vaguely promising. It's an example of DC's brain trust actually thinking outside the box for 5 seconds, the first concept from the New 52 that wasn't created by one of their Golden Boys or an attempt to latch onto 80s or 90s nostalgia. A small thing, yes...but something.
One of DC's greatest but most under-utilized strengths is the ridiculously ENORMOUS amount of characters they have buried in their vault after absorbing Quality and Fawcett and Fox and...well, virtually everyone. But since Roy Thomas stepped away, there's been almost no attempt to revive/recreate any of these properties...except for cameos and name drops in Starman, or to be gratuitously slaughtered off in JSA so we'd understand that Nazis were evil.
But just look back at my Golden Age Idol series. Hell, just look back at Fawcett 1941 Week or Quality 1941 Week earlier this month to see dozens of characters from just one month's comics that are lying around, unused, even though DC (theoretically) owns the rights to them.
So props to DC for finally extending their institutional memory past the books they read when they were adolescents. It's a small step, but one that should be applauded.
Especially if it leads to reviving this guy.
Posted by
snell
at
8:00 AM
3
comments
Labels:
DC,
Flushpoint,
Golden Age,
Golden Age Idol,
Justice League,
Lady Luck
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Now That's A Mouthful
It's pretty cool when a hero has a motto or a slogan. Big Ben was "The Man With No Time For Crime." The Fantastic Four was "The World's Greatest Comic Magazine." The Doom Patrol were "The World's Strangest Heroes."
Sometimes, though, attempts at a slogan...just don't work. For example:
Wha' the?!? "The Masked Deb Who Makes A Four Leaf Clover Mean Poison Ivy To Crime"?????????
OK, how about in context (if not in less clumsy syntax):
Lady Luck? Who she??
Well, she was created by Will Eisner, and she was one of the "other" features in the Spirit insert. Her stories were reprinted in Quality's Smash Comics, and eventually they changed the title of Smash to Lady Luck, with all new stories written, drawn and inked by Klaus Nordling.
But who was she??
Oh, that explains everything. Sounds like she dated Bruce Wayne or Tony Stark a couple of times.
She had no powers...just a diaphanous gown, a translucent veil (which apparently no one besides the reader could see through), and lots of pluck.
Here's Brenda...
Damn, that's erudite. Maybe they should have let her come up with the book's slogan...
This leads to one of the more...interesting...costume changes of all time:
Oh, pre-Code books, how I love you.
Lady Luck #86 was published in 1949.
Sometimes, though, attempts at a slogan...just don't work. For example:
OK, how about in context (if not in less clumsy syntax):
Well, she was created by Will Eisner, and she was one of the "other" features in the Spirit insert. Her stories were reprinted in Quality's Smash Comics, and eventually they changed the title of Smash to Lady Luck, with all new stories written, drawn and inked by Klaus Nordling.
But who was she??
She had no powers...just a diaphanous gown, a translucent veil (which apparently no one besides the reader could see through), and lots of pluck.
Here's Brenda...
This leads to one of the more...interesting...costume changes of all time:
Lady Luck #86 was published in 1949.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)