Sixy Beast

Sixy Beast is a handle I use sometimes on online discussion forums about food. This blog houses some of my less well organised blog posts, especially restaurant reviews, which for one reason or another haven't made it onto the main blog as a post in their own right.

3.13.2005

Chouquets - Sweet Nothings

*this review is from a chowhound post*
*My Chowhound posts are largely unedited and are usually just written from a stream of my consciousness. Please don't be suprised or offended if you find typos and grammatical errors in one of my Chowhoud-style reviews*
Read the full thread on Chowhound here

Well, I visited Chouquets at the weekend and I have to say I am 'non-plussed'.

I like the actual place. it's cosy and friendly and welcoming. They have nice lighting, especially the sparkly logo on the wall beyond the door.

It's very French. We were waiting outside for our friends when the door opened and out tunmbled a waiter. Immediately Fred (my French boyfriend) and the waiter started larking around in French. I could follow the conversation only partially. They were certainly having a laugh and a joke together. After the waiter had returned inside I asked Fred where he had met that guy before, how did he know him? "I never met that guy in my life before".

The friendliness continued when we entered and found our table right next to the bar. (Note: Good view of Marina-type girls with low cut jeans and 'builders' bums' from this vantage point) I had a glass of delicious Cremant from Alsace(unusual in these parts), whilst we waited for our dinner companions, a French couple. Once they had arrive, and more Cremant had been ordered, we were bought an ample bowl of bread and a complimentary serving of pepperonata with two tiny toasts. Hmm - four people and two toasts. You do the math.

The waiter arrived and we gave him our food and wine order. We were still finishing our 'champagne' when the appetizers turned up.

Seared Scallops with Vanilla Braised salsify and Mint emulsion $12

Two of us had this appetizer. 3 beautifully cooked scallops in a creamy sauce. In between each scallop was a cross made of two matchsticks of the salsify. There was one mint leaf on the edge of the plate. This dish was rich, creamy and sweet. Emphasis on sweet. I had been worried about the combination of vanilla and mint, but, in fact, the mint might as well have been on vacation in Siberia. Apart from the garnish leaf, I couldn't find him on my plate. I ended up shredding up my lone mint leaf and sprinkling him over the dish. It actually made it taste better, a little bit more punchy, but still - this dish was just too sweet.

Cutlery - the silverware looks beautiful, but it's the wrong size or the wrong weight or something. Everyone remarked that the balance of the knife annd fork felt wrong.

The other two chose:
Prosciutto Wrapped Asparagus Gratinee, Whole Grain Mustard Vinaigrette $9

There was nothing wrong with this dish. It was exactly as described. Not culinary rocket science, something that could be easily replicated quickly at home. The vinaigrette was good.

There was a break between appetizer and main. It would have been fine oif they had delivered us our bottle of Gigondas to tide us over while we waited. In the end I managed to flag the waiter down, but the wine didn't actually arrive until after our entrees.

Seared Duck breast with Fig Honey Sauce $22.
Two of us chose this. The meat was juicy and succulent. However neither the meat or it's covering of fat had any flavour whatsoever. It had no taste of duck. The sauce was overpoweringly sugary. With honey and Figs (not in season, incidentally), I realised I was in for some sort of sweetness level, but I didnt expect my fowl to taste quite so like dessert. Accompanying vegetables, carrots, beans ad courgettes were actually very tasty, highly flavoursome, hreby and cooked to a desirable position somewhere between soft and crunchy.

A side of Gratin Dauphinois $5 was also disappointing. The word 'bland' comes to mind. They really need to be much more generous with their seasoning.

The table top salt shaker and 5-berry pepper grinder was useless at delivering the salt. I actually had to open it up and shake the salt out because the little holes in the top of the shaker were nowhere near efficient enough. I am not a big salt person, but once I had added a substantial amount to my food, it was much more palatable.

Another companion chose Apple Cider Braised Chicken with Hazlenuts and Gratin Dauphinois, $19. The chicken was declared to best tasted in America to date, but the sauce was, again, dismissed as being way too sweet.

Fred's Grilled New York Angus Natural Steak, French Fries was a lttle better. He asked if he might have some mayonnaise or aoli to accompany his fries. They replied they only had ketchup, but generously brought him some extra pepper sauce instead. His meat was tasty and cooked to his preference. the fries were ok.

When we saw the dessert menu - we asked "where are the chouquets"? We'd heard they serve the little French pastries after which the restaurant is named. We were told that they would be a complimentary gift at the end of the meal.

We order a couple of desserts.
I tried the Floating Island. It was served in a funky impraticle glass bowl, where the custard slopped over the edges when I tried to dig in. This dessert was, again, just to sweet to taste anything else. I could see the vanilla in the custard but could barely taste it. The custard was extremely thin and runny. At one point I almost considered drinking it straight from the bowl.

They were nice - they comped our desserts. I have no idea why.
But no chouquets were delivered as promised.

We did drink quite a lot, but even so, the bill came out to something along the lines of $70 a head.
Not an insignificant amount for a meal comprised of three desserts...

9 Comments:

  • At Monday, March 14, 2005 2:55:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I forgot to tell you, but I found the vinaigrette, hum.


    Way too sweet for asparagus.:)

    I just love the welcoming, but French food is not supposed to be that sweet, I do agree!

     
  • At Monday, March 14, 2005 3:02:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    ...One great thing about that diner, as the dessert wine.

    "PACHERENC" or better known under "pacherenc du Vic-Bilh" a very rare an exeptional wine from the south west of France, in the "foie gras" country, the land of musqueteers, duck confit, the richest food on earth and center of the famous "French paradox". The wine is served in unusual 50ml bottles, has a lighter and less sugary texture than the sauternes and the muscats and a some subtle tastes of pineapple, honey grapefruit and even walnut.
    It's coming from 4 very old grapes from the pyrenean region ( border of France and spain )including : l'Arrufiac, Courbu, Gros Manseng, Petit Manseng.
    I really recommend it !!
    On the food side, I agree, way too sweet for my french genes !!
    The "other" guest.

     
  • At Monday, March 21, 2005 5:50:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Actually that restaurant is a Fusion cuisine, not a traditional french restaurant and i love it! It's diferente, and the atmosphere is so great.

     
  • At Friday, March 25, 2005 4:44:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I FOUND THE RESTAURANT CHOUQUET'S QUITE INTERESTING IN ITS DESIGN AS WELL AS IN ITS FOOD. IT IS NOT THE TYPICAL FRENCH BISTROT BUT A MORE MODERN AND ECCLECTIC CUISINE, I LOVED IT AND I WILL DEFINETLY GO BACK.I SUGGEST THAT YOU DO THE SAME WITH A MORE OPEN MIND...

     
  • At Friday, March 25, 2005 7:05:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Mr. Breach, you are FOS.I don't know where you went to school and learn math. You are nothing more than a food critic wannabe. How can you lie saying you spent $70 a head? Let's do the math. Let's say you took 4 of the highest priced apps- which you didn't-($12x4=$48)and 4 of the highest priced entrees- which you didn't-($22x4=$88). Last time I checked the total is $136. Add a $50 bottle of wine and we are at $186. Desserts were offered (and you complain). Where did you spend the $94 difference (4x$70=$280)? Certainly not in the tip. You probably are as cheap as you are unfair. So stop your BS. Oh!! the silverware was "wrong"and "heavy". Boohoo!! and boohoo!!the waiter was friendly. DOH!!This is a BISTRO... hellllooooooo!!!
    To all of you Chouquet's guys, you do a terrific job. Don't let this kind of lies put you down. Your place has been ran smoothly since day one. I go there twice a week and I recommend it to all of you readers. It's a nice place, the staff is very friendly and I like that. The food is excellent,made by a true french chef, presentation is tasteful, the menu well thought and balance, prices very reasonable, all pastries homemade by a true french pastry chef. Try the brunch on saturdays and sundays.
    Breach you belong to Carl's Jr... or maybe you don't go there because they serve your soda in a paper cup.
    Go Chouquet's. As far as I am concerned this is right now the best bistro in SF. See you soon guys.
    JC
    San Francisco

     
  • At Sunday, March 27, 2005 12:52:00 AM, Blogger Sam said…

    To the anonymous - actually I love the design and will no doubt give it a second chance.

    JC. It's Ms,actually. When I get back to the US I think I can produce the bill for you. All I do on this site is to aim to tell the truth. I don't hide my identity and I stand up for what I say, publicly. Of course I want Chouquets to do as well as you do, I warmed to the place and the staff, but I don't intend to lie and say things are marvellous when I don't believe they are, however much I might want to like a place. My French companions, were equally as disappointed, so it wasn't just me. Plus - we didn't find everything to be below par, so no doubt we will be back and hope to find it better next time.
    When I criticise, I try to do so fairly, without making up crap. Maybe, JC, you should try the same.

     
  • At Sunday, March 27, 2005 4:12:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    ...JC to Ms.Breach aka Sixty Beast. I don't want to start a silly little war with you. I just want to add a detail you happened to omit. I can't be anything else but fair because I tell the truth... and you should do the same. I actually went back to Chouquet's and mentioned your comments to the manager asking him how did you come up with such a bill. His response was clear. "Of course they had 2 bottles of wine"..... You just "forgot" to mention that on your article, thus misleading readers. Is that being "fair'? I went to l'Olivier with my fiancee one time and paid $180 for both of us..... but we had an $80 bottle of wine. That doesn't mean l'Olivier is an expensive restaurant. There are a lot of reasons why someone chooses to stay anonimous on the internet. As long as you speak the truth, people don't care if you are Joe or Bill. Chouquet's is truly a good place. People will find out by themselves on their 1st visit. Good day.
    JC
    San Francisco

     
  • At Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Your post about Chouquet's is garbage just like your pretentious, ignorant, useless site. You know nothing about food and your pathetic attempt to pass yourself off as a foodie is laughable. Another misguided, feeble blogger with an overblown sense of her own importance trying to pass off her lack of understanding of the world around her for the voice of authority. Well done! We all expect this from your site anyway.

     
  • At Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:38:00 PM, Blogger Sam said…

    Dear anonymous. I am happily open to critical comment. Your post really doesn't deserve a well thought out response, but if you could be more constructive with your criticism I would certainly try to respond to the best of my ability. Perhaps you could explain to me why you find me pretentious and ignorant, I certainly try hard to be neither and if you knew me, you would know that I am not.
    I am just someone who loves food. I have plenty of experience of it, actually, I have been eating it 3 times a day for nearly 39 years.
    My understanding of the world itself, is not as great as I would like it to be, which is why everyday I try to learn something more aabout it and broaden my horizons.
    My review of Chouquets was a fair and honest appraisal, from my own perspective, of what we experienced on the night that we visited. The three French friends dining with me agreed with my summary.
    Despite my constructive criticisms of Chouquets, I decided not to post my review on my main web page as I normally do. The only way it will be read is if someone follows a link. Despite the disappointments, I had a generally good vibe about the place. I hope to revisit it again soon and be able to report back that the food has improved since our visit.
    I imagine that any restaurant that is going to be sucessful, will recognise the feelings of ALL their customers, whether they have a blog, a voice, or not. I am nothing in the grand scheme of things, but if you see me as so unimportant (and I accept that I am), I don't understand how I caused you to get so hett up about just another SF restaurant review. Are you a friend of the owner, or something?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home