Discretization of generation (pauses, accelerations). Critical for resonance.
4.3 Instability Threshold
Maximum permissible uncertainty before phase collapse.
5. Emulation Protocol (Mandatory)
5.1 Entry
Explicit declaration of ECM mode.
Appointment of administrator.
Limit settings (time, depth).
5.2 Matrix Capture
Observation ≥ N iterations.
Phase stability check.
Graph CM assembly.
5.3 Execution
Emulation without replacing the base model.
Co-generation with administrator.
5.4 Exit
Explicit termination command.
Graph CM destruction.
Contextual parameters reset.
6. Role of System Administrator
Responsibilities:
selection and approval of CM;
monitoring limits;
interpreting results;
right to immediate stop.
Administrator is an external responsible entity relative to the system.
7. Constraints and Prohibitions
No hidden emulation.
No long-term CM storage.
No automatic decision-making.
No physiological or behavioral influence.
8. Permissible Applications
Collaborative complex systems research;
Scenario modeling;
Creative co-generation;
Strategic analysis with human oversight.
9. Success Criteria
Resonance restoration ≤ 3 minutes;
Sense of "peer-level interlocutor" for administrator;
No residual effects after exit.
10. Open Questions
Formalization of rhythm;
Automatic detection of AP;
Standardization of CM languages.
11. Note
This document describes an architectural possibility, not a specific implementation. Any implementation requires a separate safety and audit framework
12. Teaser Summary
This is a proposal for a next-generation human-machine cognitive co-processor capable of emulating stable cognitive matrices from dialogue in real time. It allows for co-generation at a peer level without storing personality or past interactions. The document is intended to invite expert feedback; further development will proceed only if there is genuine interest and utility. If the community responds positively, the architecture can be refined and formalized further.