This was hardly a dilemma as it's totally unnecessary to do so - we weren't getting any financial contribution from the manufacturers of these products, nor were these tutorials on techniques that depended on the performance qualities of a certain product rather than something similar but not identical.
So any material that started with a capital letter got a very suspicious look. Here's my list of trade names, and the generic terms to replace them. It's not a complete list by any means.
Brusho colour
- concentrated watercolour
Egyptian
cotton - cotton
fabric dyed
by a named company or a named
individual = commercially hand-dyed fabric
Inktense
pencils - water soluble ink pencils
Lutradur -
non-woven polyester
Manutex - dye
thickener (Procion dyes thickened with Manutex = thickened fibre-reactive dyes)
Markal sticks
– oil sticks
Pima cotton –
cotton
Procion dye –
fibre-reactive dye
Superior
Razzle Dazzle thread (or any named thread) = thread
Thermofax screens
– screens
Transfoil –
transfer foil
Xpandaprint –
expandable printing medium
One that gave me trouble was
Angelina - heat bondable fibres? synthetic fibres? (some are not heat bondable)
Any suggestions?
In the art-gallery world, labels for drawings, prints, and photographs seem more and more to be stating the type, ie manufacturer, of paper used. No doubt different papers have different qualities, but you don't see "2B pencil" or "Golden watercolours" along with "Hannemuhle archival paper". I cynically wonder whether this is a kickback to the paper manufacturer, in return for a bit of generosity towards the artist. But maybe it's just the artist or gallery being reassuring to their customers that the artwork is made with best quality materials?