The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958): If there’s any better way
to delight one’s inner child than this classic Ray Harryhausen effects
spectacular directed by dependable Nathan Juran, I don’t know it. There’s little
not to enjoy about this lovely piece of Hollywood Arabian Nights fluff.
Harryhausen’s effects are a joy (and would only get better in the future), while
also showing the typical variety of his work; from here on out Harryhausen
would seldom use one stop motion monster in more than two sequences when he
could create another one, and my imagination thanks him for it. Apart from the
effects (which are the star, obviously), this is an excellently paced, cracking
50s fantasy adventure with some choice scenery chewing by Torin Thatcher’s most
excellent villain with a decent enough hero in Kerwin Mathews, and photography
only a fool wouldn’t want to call colourful. Why, even Kathryn Grant’s Princess
Parisa does things in the film, not something you’ll encounter often in
this time and genre.
Against All Odds (1984): In theory, Taylor Hackford’s neo
noir is a remake of Jacques Tourneur’s brilliant Out of the Past, but
you wouldn’t really know watching it. Which is all for the better (the older
film does still exist after all), for Hackford certainly is not Tourneur. While
there’s nothing wrong with his direction – he’s actually perfectly decent in
suspense sequences - he does have a tendency for fluffing things up into TV
advertising style prettiness that never does anything as interesting as actually
contrasting with the supposedly dark script. But then, the script does tend to
make little sense - particular Rachel Ward’s Jessie (who never gets around to
being an actual femme fatale) seems to act exclusively in service of going where
the film wants her to be instead of where she has any kind of (even messed up)
reason to be. There’s a superficial quality to the whole production that
suggests a film going through certain surface motions of the noir but completely
uninterested in the genre’s philosophy. Jeff Bridges and James Woods are fine,
as far as the lack of substance lets them, but then, when aren’t they?
Band Aid (2017): Zoe Lister-Jones’s comedy about a
permanently squabbling and arguing couple (Lister-Jones herself and Adam Pally)
that decide to turn their fights into songs is a very nice surprise. While there
are a handful of moments that seem to come directly out of the quirky indie
comedy handbook, much of the film delights by being genuinely sweet, thoughtful
and funny, only to in the final act turn to a more serious tone. That switch
works out as well as it does because Lister-Jones first took her time to create
characters and a world a viewer can care for and believe in, and only after that
really aims for more obvious depths without ever betraying what was so enjoyable
about the film before. Thanks to this careful approach, the film also manages to
go from the specificity of the characters’ lives to the more abstract things the
writer/director has to say about being a woman in contemporary US society, the
life of couples and the emotional strain following a miscarriage. Which is
pretty fantastic for a quirky indie comedy.
Showing posts with label james woods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label james woods. Show all posts
Saturday, January 13, 2018
Saturday, May 27, 2017
Three Films Make A Post: Ruthless invaders. A defenseless planet. And a daring band of space adventurers fighting to save it.
Eyewitness (1981): This film by Peter Yates is a weird one:
part thriller, part dubious romance, full of fantastic actors being fantastic
(William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver, Christopher Plummer and James Woods in their
prime are certainly nothing to sneeze at), there’s also text and subtext about
the way the personal and the political intermingle that never quite comes
together coherently, and a load of scenes of stuff that seems
completely incidental to plot, characters or theme and just hangs there dragging
things down.
When the film is good, it is brilliant: the first attempts of Hurt’s character to get closer to his long-time crush TV news reporter Weaver are pathetic, creepy and even sweet in equal measures; some of the suspense scenes are taken right out of the Hitchcock handbook in the best possible way; and an American film actually talking about class is always to be praised.
Too bad that the bizarrely sugary ending seems to forget everything that was ambiguous, creepy or actually difficult in the proposed relationship between Hurt and Weaver, and that the film again and again stops in its tracks to run off in perfectly useless directions.
Shoot ‘Em Up (2007): Made in the same spirit as the Crank movies, but less annoying and with an actor (Clive Owen) instead of a persona in the lead, this one holds itself exactly to what its title promises. Then it adds an obsession with carrots (you will believe you can kill a man with a carrot), eye mutilation (also eye mutilation by carrot), a Monica Bellucci who is totally wasted in her role as lactating prostitute (hey, I didn’t write the movie, so don’t look at me) yet still awesome, Paul Giamatti eating all of the scenery (yes, even yours), and action scenes that reach from the absurd to the hilariously insane. Oh, and the right kind of rock music, too, because every act of cartoon violence is improved by adding “Ace of Spades” to it.
It’s stupid fun in the best way, says this carrot.
Sing Street (2016): This John Carney film about a young guy growing up poor in 1980s Dublin finding self respect and love, talent and hope when he founds a band to impress a girl does sound a bit too friendly and nice on paper, but in practice, Carney is a sharp observer of human ambiguities who can show the lies his characters tell themselves without looking down on them. Not looking down at his characters is one of Carney’s strengths in general: this is a director who lets his young characters say youthfully pretentious stuff, knows it is youthfully pretentious, but neither makes fun of them nor nods at them from a distance, taking their dreams seriously even though they aren’t his dreams anymore. Carney’s a bit of a music specialist, so it’ll come as no surprise that the music’s great too (and this is a musical in anything but name, and not just in the music video daydream scene) while also being the sort of music these characters in this time would believably make.
There’s so much genuine sympathy and warmth on screen here, only the most cynical will not to moved and charmed.
When the film is good, it is brilliant: the first attempts of Hurt’s character to get closer to his long-time crush TV news reporter Weaver are pathetic, creepy and even sweet in equal measures; some of the suspense scenes are taken right out of the Hitchcock handbook in the best possible way; and an American film actually talking about class is always to be praised.
Too bad that the bizarrely sugary ending seems to forget everything that was ambiguous, creepy or actually difficult in the proposed relationship between Hurt and Weaver, and that the film again and again stops in its tracks to run off in perfectly useless directions.
Shoot ‘Em Up (2007): Made in the same spirit as the Crank movies, but less annoying and with an actor (Clive Owen) instead of a persona in the lead, this one holds itself exactly to what its title promises. Then it adds an obsession with carrots (you will believe you can kill a man with a carrot), eye mutilation (also eye mutilation by carrot), a Monica Bellucci who is totally wasted in her role as lactating prostitute (hey, I didn’t write the movie, so don’t look at me) yet still awesome, Paul Giamatti eating all of the scenery (yes, even yours), and action scenes that reach from the absurd to the hilariously insane. Oh, and the right kind of rock music, too, because every act of cartoon violence is improved by adding “Ace of Spades” to it.
It’s stupid fun in the best way, says this carrot.
Sing Street (2016): This John Carney film about a young guy growing up poor in 1980s Dublin finding self respect and love, talent and hope when he founds a band to impress a girl does sound a bit too friendly and nice on paper, but in practice, Carney is a sharp observer of human ambiguities who can show the lies his characters tell themselves without looking down on them. Not looking down at his characters is one of Carney’s strengths in general: this is a director who lets his young characters say youthfully pretentious stuff, knows it is youthfully pretentious, but neither makes fun of them nor nods at them from a distance, taking their dreams seriously even though they aren’t his dreams anymore. Carney’s a bit of a music specialist, so it’ll come as no surprise that the music’s great too (and this is a musical in anything but name, and not just in the music video daydream scene) while also being the sort of music these characters in this time would believably make.
There’s so much genuine sympathy and warmth on screen here, only the most cynical will not to moved and charmed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)