Warning: I’m going to spoil an important element of the plot that will
probably suggest most of the rest of the movie to some readers!
Teacher Simon Robinson (Nick Tate) comes to a small Australian outback town
to replace a predecessor who has seemingly disappeared from the face of the
Earth. Simon’s a bit put out by this, or rather by the complete disinterest
everyone in town shows towards the disappearance. Even the local policeman is
more interested in proper and correct car licenses than a guy gone missing. The
town’s a bit weird for Simon’s taste anyway, with a populace that mostly carries
various kinds of leers and sneers on their faces, and whose members lack even
the tiniest smidgen of politeness. Well, the female half (Geraldine Turner) of
the couple running his guest house (apparently the Australian term for boarding
house) wants to seduce him, and he being a 70s Australian film leading man isn’t
going to say no, but otherwise, it’s an unfriendly and slightly creepy place.
Why, even the kids he’s going to teach are greeting him with a fake hanging!
Given the general mood and the boredom that must come with the spirit of this
place, Simon begins to poke around the disappearance himself, quickly if not
verbally coming to the conclusion that some sort of foul play must have been
involved. At least in his mind, he does connect the disappearance to
Summerfield, an island separated from the rest of the area by water, a small
driveway and quite a high gate, where Sally Abbott (Michelle Jarman), one of his
students, lives with her mother Jenny (Elizabeth Alexander) and her uncle David
(John Waters). Because he does have a bit of a problem with his libido, he also
develops more than just a tiny crush on Jenny, which will not make the situation
better in the long run.
Ken Hannam’s Summerfield belongs to the not inconsiderable number of
Australian films that build their own little cinematic canon of the Australian
gothic. Quite a few of these films have an outsider coming (or sometimes
returning) to a small town in the outback where he or she encounters various
strange and unfriendly locals, the threat of violence expressed through more
sweaty faces than in a Spaghetti Western, and some kind of terrible secret of
the past one or more members of the want to keep buried, and which shapes the
places present and future.
In Summerfield’s case, the secret is incest, which, going by the way
various family portraits are shot, may have been going on for generations as
some sort of family tradition, but which at least in this contemporary case is
perfectly consensual (cue a discussion of how consensual sibling incest can ever
be in your own mind, if that floats your boat, imaginary reader). In something
of a clever twist, it’s not so much the hidden secrets bubbling to the surface
and the past taking control of the present that leads to the film’s very 70s
ending, but Simon not being willing (or able) to leave well enough alone; and as
the nasty little twist at the end suggests, he has set in motion the death of
three people for no good reason at all. But then, nothing Simon does during the
film suggests he is very good at thinking through the consequences of the things
he does, or trying to get into the heads of the country people he so clearly
dislikes. On the other hand, you only ever know if something should actually
be truly left alone or not once you’ve figured out what it is
about.
Hannam’s direction style is a bit dry sometimes, perhaps not too surprising
from someone working in TV more than in the movies, but there are also quite a
few scenes that really drive home the particularly Australian gothic mood of the
film. The film features quite a few dramatic shots of flat empty land that don’t
suggest a freedom of wide open spaces but the threat of being surrounded by
nothing (or nothing but people who just might be a bit crazy thanks to their
surroundings), close-ups of the sweaty faces of character actors who look as if
they are about to lose it every minute (but never really do), and other things
that suggest a Hammer movie but by day and with too much space. Summerfield as a
place is particularly great, like the idea of the traditional gothic manor
turned Australian and (70s) contemporary, its dwellers isolating themselves from
a part of the country that’s already too isolated for comfort, breeding
behaviours rather frowned upon in less isolated spaces.
Showing posts with label john waters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john waters. Show all posts
Sunday, July 7, 2019
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
In short: Serial Mom (1984)
In all honesty, I’ve never been much of a fan of John Waters’s films. I find
the campy shock the squares side of cult movies the man operates in generally
not terribly interesting – perhaps because I might be square but I’m mostly not
shocked by it and really don’t relate to the approach much. That doesn’t mean
I’m not happy Waters exists and makes films, mind you, for while his stuff may
usually not be my jam, it clearly is his, and last time I looked, directors
following their personal obsessions and interests is how it should be.
Serial Mom, however, does work for me quite well.
This serial killer comedy about a murderous suburban house wife played by Kathleen Turner is one of the films that came to pass when Waters somehow got the opportunity to work with actual Hollywood money. I can’t see that happening today, or rather, they’d probably try to get Waters to make a (serious) superhero movie. As it stands, Waters made great use of his budget, not just by hiring a cast of slightly higher profile actors than his usual posse (though some of them are in here too). Most impressive is how good the film looks. Waters is clearly putting to work everything he learned when making independent films to create a so-healthy-it-is-sickly (until it turns out it is actually sick) kind of suburban paradise/freak show that’s so bright and tasteless it is only natural it exclusively harbours people as unhinged as everyone in here is. As a satire, this is of course incredibly on the nose, but being unsubtle is one of the things Waters is clearly about, and here he is so imaginative in the escalation of, well, everything, that the unsubtle business filling the film can still be surprising.
The film also happens to contain one of the career best performances of Kathleen Turner. It may not be a nuanced one but then a nuanced performance would rather be missing the point, for what Turner needs to do is throw herself into every craziness, every indignity and every tasteless joke and own it completely, seeing as she’s not supposed to portray an actual human being but the over-the-top peak of everything that’s frightening (and kinda seductive) about suburban life, serial killers and the society that birthed them Waters is so lovingly skewering here. Which she does with such energy and conviction, with a complete lack of vanity she could probably have carried the film alone even if Waters hadn’t been as at the top of his game as he is here.
This serial killer comedy about a murderous suburban house wife played by Kathleen Turner is one of the films that came to pass when Waters somehow got the opportunity to work with actual Hollywood money. I can’t see that happening today, or rather, they’d probably try to get Waters to make a (serious) superhero movie. As it stands, Waters made great use of his budget, not just by hiring a cast of slightly higher profile actors than his usual posse (though some of them are in here too). Most impressive is how good the film looks. Waters is clearly putting to work everything he learned when making independent films to create a so-healthy-it-is-sickly (until it turns out it is actually sick) kind of suburban paradise/freak show that’s so bright and tasteless it is only natural it exclusively harbours people as unhinged as everyone in here is. As a satire, this is of course incredibly on the nose, but being unsubtle is one of the things Waters is clearly about, and here he is so imaginative in the escalation of, well, everything, that the unsubtle business filling the film can still be surprising.
The film also happens to contain one of the career best performances of Kathleen Turner. It may not be a nuanced one but then a nuanced performance would rather be missing the point, for what Turner needs to do is throw herself into every craziness, every indignity and every tasteless joke and own it completely, seeing as she’s not supposed to portray an actual human being but the over-the-top peak of everything that’s frightening (and kinda seductive) about suburban life, serial killers and the society that birthed them Waters is so lovingly skewering here. Which she does with such energy and conviction, with a complete lack of vanity she could probably have carried the film alone even if Waters hadn’t been as at the top of his game as he is here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)