Showing posts with label Justin Theroux. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justin Theroux. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Mulholland Drive Film Analysis



Some of David Lynch’s films use a more traditional storytelling method than others; sure Lynch is primarily known for his surrealism, but on that rare occasion, some of his films run on a linear fashion. Take for example The Elephant Man (1980), Blue Velvet (1986) and The Straight Story (1999), three of Lynch’s films that don’t get too dreamlike or surreal, they don’t jump time or go into trippy dream sequences, nope, these three films run on a more or less linear fashion; they tell their tale in a way that is digestible for anyone willing to take a crack at them. But then there’s the dark, dark side of Lynch. I’m talking about that group of films in Lynch’s fantastic filmography that dive wholeheartedly into the surreal, the non-linear and the open for interpretation; these are films that usually end up meaning something different to everyone. Lost Highway (1997) is a good example of this, and so is the film I’ll be analyzing today, Mulholland Dr. (2001).


Now here’s a film that I instantly wanted to see again the first time I saw it. I mean, literally, I saw it and immediately popped it back in and pushed play. I watched it twice, back to back! I was enthralled, amazed and transfixed by this film. It spooked me, it had this alluring aura to it that I devoured and became addicted to. Mulholland Dr. quickly turned into one of my favorite Lynch films, and it quite arguably is Lynch’s best film. Don’t know how many of you out there agree, but Mulholland Dr. to me was the apex of Lynch’s career, the pinnacle of his work, he took everything he knew about filmmaking up to that point put it in a blender and hit puree!  I don’t believe he’s done a film as good as this one again. 


When it was released, Mulholland Dr. got awards all over the place! Lynch was nominated for best director that year at the Academy Awards, he won the Best Director Prize at the Cannes Film Festival and Mulholland Dr. was named ‘Best Picture’ by the New York Film Critics Circle, amongst other awards. The film certainly got a reaction from audiences, more so than any other Lynch film, there was something special about this movie and audiences and critics picked up on it immediately. Now here’s the deal with Mulholland Dr, there are a myriad of interpretations of the film out there, but I got my personal one and seriously, it is solid! Air tight! So if you’ve never seen this movie, don’t read this article because I’m going to go into a deep analysis of the film, this is my take on one of Lynch’s most mysterious and alluring films, it’s like a puzzle you have to put together little by little. I’ve seen the movie many times and my take on it makes sense the more and more I watch it. What I’m going to do is actually deconstruct the film (which is told in a non-linear fashion) and retell it linearly, while trying to explain what the film means to me. Just remember, this is just my take on it, maybe you have your own take it on it too, which of course I urge you to share on the comments section! if you haven’t experienced Mulholland Dr. yet, what are you waiting for?


CHAPTER I
CAMILLA AND DIANE; TWO ACTRESSES TRYING TO MAKE IT

The whole story starts out with these two actresses waiting for their “big break” on a film project, their names are Camilla Rhodes and Diane Selwyn. In order to make ends meet, Diane works at the local ‘Winkies Diner’. To complicate things just a little bit more, they are in a relationship. Apparently, for Camilla the relationship is more sexual, while for Diane, being with Camilla is an obsession.


 CHAPTER 2
CAMILLA BECOMES FAMOUS, DIANE WALKS IN HER SHADOW

One thing leads to another and Camilla gets a big break on a film called The Sylvia North Story! Camilla actually gets a major role on the film! Unfortunately, while Camilla get’s to be a star, Diane gets NOTHING! Fortunately, Camilla uses her fame to get Diane bit parts in some of her films. For example, Camilla landed a role in a film from a young director called Adam Kesher whom Camilla ends up falling in love with while rehearsing a kissing scene. This romance that develops between Camilla and Adam Kesher obviously makes Diane insanely jealous because Diane is obsessed with Camilla; we can see the jealousy in Diane’s eyes when Camilla and Adam rehearse the kissing scene.


CHAPTER 3
ADAM BATTLES WITH PRODUCERS OVER WHO IS GOING TO STAR IN HIS MOVIE

Adam is trying to cast the right actress for a part in his film and he’s got a girl in mind, unfortunately, his producers don’t agree. They want another actress! This of course is this young director’s worst nightmare! Now this meeting is the most uncomfortable meeting ever, everyone is on the edge! The producer is portrayed as a man that’s so hard to please that no one can get him an adequate cup of coffee! He tastes a cup of espresso they bring him and he spits it out on a napkin! This of course is Lynch venting out his frustrations with movie producers and the business side of filmmaking. Producers often times clash with a directors artistic vision, especially with directors like Lynch who value art over commerce. Many of Adam’s problems probably mirror in one way or another Lynch’s own frustrations with the business side of filmmaking; starting with the hard to please producers. Adam hates this meeting because they are forcing him to choose an actress he doesn’t want, so he storms out of the meeting and vents out his frustrations by smashing the window of one of the producers limos!


CHAPTER 4
ADAM FINDS HIS WIFE CHEATING ON HIM, GETS A CALL FROM ‘THE COWBOY’

After the meeting with the producers, Adam goes home only to find his wife in bed with the pool man. To avenge this, he takes all her expensive jewelry and smothers it with pink paint, she tries to stop him, so he starts to fight with her at which point the pool man punches Adam in the face and kicks him out of his own home, Adam takes the hint and leaves. He then goes to stay at a cheap hotel in town, to hide away. Here he discovers that the studio has cut off his credit line and he is practically broke! He then receives a phone call to meet up with a character called “The Cowboy”. Just who is this cowboy? And what does he want with Adam?


 CHAPTER 5
 DIANE AND CAMILLA BREAK UP 

Even though Camilla is romantically entangled with Adam Kesher, she still lives with Diane, and they still share intimacy. But Camilla wants to put an end to it, so one day, right in the middle of having sex with Diane, Camilla tells Diane “we can’t keep doing this”, meaning, let’s break up. Diane doesn’t like what she hears and replies “don’t say that, don’t ever say that” with an obsessive look on her face. Diane ends up kicking Camilla from their apartment. Camilla begs Diane not to make things harder than they are but Diane says she’s not going to make it easy, because it’s not easy for her either. Obviously, Diane’s attraction towards Camilla was obsessive. How so? Well, once Camilla has moved out Diane crumbles, she looks a mess, she’s obviously depressed. While walking through her apartment, she imagines that Camilla is talking to her. She speaks to the wind saying things like “Camilla, you’re back!” but there’s no one there. She’s alone. Camilla’s attraction was physical and not romantic, while Diane’s was obsessive.


CHAPTER 6
ADAM MEETS THE COWBOY

So Adam goes up to this corral up on a mountain to meet The Cowboy. Now this is a really mysterious character in the film: he knows everything and seems to have everything under control. Now if you ask me, The Cowboy is GOD, yup, not just symbolically, but literally. Why do I come to this conclusion? Well, according to the bible God knows everything, and this cowboy guy, well; he seems to know it all. He is one step ahead of Adam and the whole mess going on with Diane and Camilla. There are more symbolisms that let us see he is god. Adam must go to the top of the mountain to meet him, kind of like how Moses had to go to the top of the mountain to meet God and get the Ten Commandments, which is essentially what The Cowboy does with Adam, he gives him a commandment. When the Cowboy arrives, a light bulb on the corral mysteriously turns on, when he leaves, the light bulb mysteriously turns off, as if he’s presence emitted some kind of mystical energy, a common motif in Lynch’s films. The Cowboy tells Adam that he is the one in charge; that he’s the one “driving this buggy” and that Adam better do as he’s told. He tells Adam to choose the girl that his producers have chosen for him. Why does The Cowboy want Adam to choose this new girl? More on that later!


CHAPTER 7
CAMILLA AND ADAM GET BRUTALLY CRUEL WITH DIANE

So Camilla and Diane have an ugly break up, but apparently they are still in speaking terms because Camilla invites Diane to a dinner party at Adams home. On the dinner table, a conversation reveals to us just how Camilla and Diane met and how Diane has been living on the shadow of Camilla’s success. Diane also tells us a bit about how she won a Jitterbug Contest and that this is why she ended up trying to be an actress. We saw the Jitterbug Contest way back at the beginning of the movie, when we see all those dancers doing ‘The Jitterbug’ during the very first scenes of the film. While at this dinner table, we hear Adam talking about his ex-wife; he says that the judge decided that Adam would get the pool and that “she got the pool man”; which means they are now divorced and Adam got to keep the house. Things take a turn towards the brutally cruel when we see the blonde actress who The Cowboy told Adam to choose for the film kissing Camilla right in front of Diane’s face! This move is particularly cruel on Camilla’s part when we consider that she knows just how badly Diane took their break up. But the cruelty towards Diane does not stop there. Right on this very dinner table Camilla and Adam announce that they are going to get married!


CHAPTER 8
DIANE DECIDES TO KILL CAMILLA

After the particularly cruel night, Diane can’t take the loneliness and rejection. Being without Camilla proves to be just a bit too much for her. How do we know? Well, Diane masturbates as she cries, but masturbating just isn’t the same as being with Camilla. So, when Diane just can’t take it no more, she decides that she wants to kill Camilla, so she hires a hit man to do the job. Diane meets the hit man at the Winkies where she works at. She gives him a picture of Camilla, so that he knows who he’s got to kill. After she hands the hit man the money for the job, the hit man hands her a blue key. Now just what is this blue key she’s just received and why has she received it? What does it open?


CHAPTER 9
 THE BLUE BOX, THE BLUE KEY, DIANE COMMITS SUICIDE

 Here’s where we gotta stop and explain just what the blue box and key are. This is an important question in this film because when the blue key is used and the blue box is opened, people disappear!  They go somewhere; but where? Now If ‘The Cowboy’ is God, then there’s gotta be a Devil in this movie, and that Devil is this ugly bum/monster in the alley behind the Winkies, it is he who owns the Blue Box and Keys, so it is my belief that this blue box is essentially a door way to hell. In the film, you get a Blue Key only when you’ve done a heinous thing, like making arrangements to kill someone. When Diane receives The Blue Key from the hit man, we see The Bum Behind the Winkies (Satan) dropping the blue box and releasing these two evil looking old people that I see as demons from hell, I mean, one look at these old dudes and you’ll agree with me, they are demonic looking! It seems to me they’ve come to get Diane for the sins she’s committed! What was Diane’s sin? Attempting to get Camilla killed by paying the hit man! So we see the old demons chasing Diane to her bed room, once there, Diane grabs a gun from her night table and shoots herself in the head!


CHAPTER 10
THE COWBOY RESURRECTS DIANE

So Diane has committed a sin, sure, she has to pay for it, so this is why demons from hell came for her. But what if God considers the events that led to her death unjust? The all knowing, omnipresent Cowboy (Omnipresence being another trait that God possesses) apparently decides that Diane has had a rough life, that the events that led to her suicide where unjust, so he decides to give her a break. So this is essentially a battle between God and Satan for Diane and Camilla’s soul! God things she deserves a break while the Devil wants her to pay for what she’s done. This is the reason why after Diane dies, the Cowboy walks into her room and tells her “time to wake up”, who else can wake people from the dead but God? This type of action lets us see that The Cowboy is indeed a character that is supernatural in nature and why I conclude that he is God. In the film, he is like a watcher, he is always lurking somewhere in the background, observing what is going on. During the cruel dinner scene, he was there seeing the events unfold, if you pay attention, you’ll see him walking in the background. So it is my belief that The Cowboy saw what was done to Diane, saw how these cruel acts made her commit suicide so he decided to give Diane a second chance; so now Diane is going to live again. Will her life be better this time around?  

   
CHAPTER 11
DIANE’S SHINNY NEW LIFE

So Diane does get to come back to life, only this time, things are happier, scratch that, things are perfect! On this second chance at life Diane’s new name is Betty Elms. She’s just arrived at Los Angeles, the name of the city itself an allusion to the fact that this is really Diane, coming back from the afterlife. If you pay attention, when she’s coming down the escalator at the airport, Lynch focuses on the words “City of Angels” and on the walls, we see little designs of clouds, as if she was coming down from heaven.  This time, the two demonic old people that had come out of the Blue Box and tortured her till she killed herself seem angelically nice. Betty says she just met them on the plane, and we kind of get the idea that they function as guardian angels to Betty.  This time around Betty/Diane is still an aspiring actress, but things are different. Her attitude has changed! She’s all positive about her prospects as an actress and we gotta remember, one of the things the Cowboy told Adam was that our attitude in life determines the kind of life we will live. So anyhow, Betty’s aunt Ruth is letting her stay in her house so that she can go to a big audition. Everything seems perfect this time around, even the way Lynch shot the scenes, everything’s colorful and brightly lit as opposed to Diane’s previous life which was all dark, grey and depressive. Could this new life be The Cowboys way of giving Diane a chance at living a better life, a happier life? Maybe he figures she suffered enough and deserves a shot at happiness? Apparently so because when Dianne goes to an audition for a film it goes splendidly well! The producer and director love her! Apparently she’s going to get the part!


CHAPETER 12
BETTY ALMOST MEETS ADAM KESHER…AGAIN!

After her splendid audition, a casting director decides to take Betty to meet a hot young film director whom she considers better. This young filmmaker as fate would have it ends up being none other than Adam Kesher! Here’s where we understand why The Cowboy (God) wanted Adam Kesher to choose another girl! If Adam hadn’t chosen somebody else, Betty would have auditioned for Kesher’s film and she would have ended up meeting Kesher and Camilla again! Kesher might have recognized her from when he knew her as Diane, Camilla’s obsessive girlfriend! But Betty is not Diane anymore, she’s Betty! Had Kesher not chose another actress, Betty would have ended up right back with Camilla and Kesher, the two people who psychologically tortured her and made her commit suicide! To avoid all this, The Cowboy made sure that Kesher chose somebody else. Still, for a brief second Adam and Betty do see each other from afar, but apparently, Kesher can’t recognize her. Thankfully, Betty remembers she has to meet Rita and so she leaves before she can actually meet Kesher. Phew!  Crisis averted!  


CHAPTER 13
CAMILLA AVOIDS HER OWN DEATH, LOOSES MEMORY

Diane is dead, and she’s come back as innocent and happy Betty, but we gotta remember that Diane paid a hit man to kill Camilla and said hit man is still out to kill Camilla! And so, as Camilla rides a Limo, she doesn’t know it, but she’s about to get shot by the drivers, who are the hit men. These are the hit men that Diane paid for in her previous life! Anyways, suddenly, a freak car accident sets her free from being murdered! The hit men die in the accident and Camilla manages to escape, but there’s a catch, the concussion that Camilla receives makes her forget who she was! So now Camilla doesn’t know she’s Camilla, she doesn’t know Adam or Diane, she can’t remember a thing! So she begins to wander aimlessly through city of Los Angeles, not knowing who she is or where to go to.  


CHAPTER 14
CAMILLA RE-ENCOUNTERS DIANNE IN THE FORM OF BETTY

Eventually Camilla, in her disorientation, finds an empty apartment and decides to hide in it. She doesn’t know it yet, but this is the same apartment that Betty/Diane is staying in! Yup, as fate would have it, Camilla aimlessly wonders right back into Diane’s second chance at life! These two women who had been lovers in a previous life have now re-encountered each other, the only problem is that neither one of them recognizes each other. Camilla can’t remember who Diane is because she’s lost her memory and Diane can’t remember Camilla because she can’t remember anything from her previous life! So they both treat each other like perfect strangers! Camilla can’t remember her name so she gives Betty the first name she sees on a movie poster which is Rita. So on this second go, Camilla is now known as Rita and Diane is now Betty. Betty ends up pitying Rita and wanting to help her, perhaps because the attraction and feelings she had for Camilla in her previous life are still there somehow. To me it always seemed like their love, their attraction for each other was so strong that even now, on this second life their souls end up converging. “Perhaps we’ll meet again in another life” is a common phrase; I think we could apply it here. 


CHAPTER 15
BETTY AND RITA BECOME DETECTIVES

Rita came into Betty’s apartment with a purse that had two things:  a Blue Key and a large amount of money. What was the money for? Perhaps Camilla was going to get someone killed as well? At any rate, Camilla must have done a seriously evil deed in order to receive the dreaded blue key. So anyhow, Betty wants to help Rita remember who she is, so she calls the cops trying to figure out what happened at the scene of the accident. Rita suddenly remembers a name ‘Diane Selwyn’! Betty doesn’t realize it, but Rita is talking about Betty’s past self! Rita/Camilla is starting to remember who Diane was! Then Betty decides to look up Diane Selwyn in the yellow pages, they find out there’s only one Diane Selwyn, they call her but get a recorded message; when Camilla hears the message she recognizes the voice and says “I know that voice!” Of course, she recognizes it because Diane use to be her lover and roommate! Next they decide to go see where this Diane Selwyn lives. When they get there, they walk into the empty apartment and start exploring it until a hideous smell leads them to the bedroom where they discover Diane Selwyn, dead on her bed! In other words: Betty discovers the body she used to inhabit in her previous life! With her brains blown out! The body decayed! The horror! She doesn’t recognize herself though because the body is so decayed.


CHAPTER 16
BETTY AND RITA GET IT ON...AGAIN!

Rita is horrified after having discovered the dead body; she decides she wants to cut all ties with who she was, so she puts on a blonde wig. Now Betty and Rita look like two blond twins or something. So anyways, one thing leads to another and Rita and Betty end up naked on the same bed, their previous passions resurface and voila! They end up making out. Funny how Betty asks Rita “have you done this before?” and Rita replies “I don’t know”, in reality, they’d both been lovers before, they just can’t remember! In the midst of the passion Betty tells Rita she loves her, but Rita doesn’t say the same, which kind of mirrors their previous relationship which was only physical, at least from Rita’s side. On a personal note, this is one of the most erotic love scenes ever filmed! So after their make out session, while they are both sound asleep, suddenly Rita starts saying “Silencio!” which means ‘silence’ in Spanish, then she says “No hay banda” which means “There is no band!”.  When you first see the film, this is a really spooky moment because it’s like, suddenly Rita can speak Spanish? What else don’t we know about Rita? So right there and then, at 2 in the a.m., Rita begs Betty to come with her somewhere. That somewhere is a place called “Club Silencio”, a place that apparently Rita frequented.


CHAPTER 17
CLUB SILENCIO

Now here’s a scene in which many of the films themes are accentuated. Club Silencio is a theater in which we see performers doing illusions on stage. First we see an illusionist come up on stage and tell us that “there is no band”. We hear a trumpet, we hear a trombone, but it’s all recorded, nothing is real, the overall message is that everything is an illusion. The phrase “life is but a dream” or “life is an illusion” applies here. To me the Illusionist is the same character as the bum behind the Winkies, he is Satan coming to claim these girls souls. Both have done horrible deeds, and both must pay for what they have done, I mean, just the guys face let’s you know he is evil. When the illusionist stares at Betty, we hear thunder and blue light and Betty starts shaking uncontrollably. To me what’s happening here is that the illusionist is placing the Blue Box (which is essentially a doorway to Hell) on Betty’s purse. He recognizes these two souls as souls who have eluded him when they should have gone to hell to pay for their sins. When the blue light fades and the smoke disappears, the Illusionist is also gone from the stage. Suddenly, Betty realizes that the Blue Box is in her purse. After that we here Rebecca del Rio sing a Spanish version of Roy Orbison’s ‘Crying’ a song that applies perfectly to Diane’s unrequited love for Camilla. Read these lines from the song and you’ll see what I mean:

“When you said “so long” left me standing there all alone, alone and crying”

”I thought that I was over you, But it’s true, oh so true, I love you even more, than I did before”

”But darling what can I do? For you don’t love me, and I’ll always be crying over you”

After Rita and Betty give a good cry together they both know what they have to do with the Blue Key that they’d found in Rita’s purse! They have to use it on the Blue Box that magically appeared in Betty’s purse! Again, this sudden appearance of the Blue Box in Betty’s purse alludes to supernatural events happening which is why I go with the God/Satan angle with this movie.  It’s really the angle that makes the most sense.


CHAPTER  18
FINALLY RITA AND BETTY USE THE BLUE KEY ON THE BLUE BOX

After Club Silencio, Betty and Rita go back to Aunt Ruth’s apartment, look for the Blue Key and put it in the Blue Box; we see the camera zooming into the box, as Betty and Rita are sucked into it, then they disappear! We know what’s happened; they’ve both been sucked into hell! Then, Lynch ends the film with this mysterious old lady with blue hair looking at the camera. She looks at us from high above in a theater balcony of Club Silencio and whispers the words “Silencio”, then the movie fades to black and we’re left wondering what the hell we just saw. Of course, if you ask me I say that old lady with the blue hair is also God, the cowboy in another form, same as the devil took the form of the magician. God looks at us from high above amusing himself with the theater of life, because as the saying goes “all life is a stage”


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

American Psycho Film and Book Analysis


The character of Patrick Bateman is a character who sulks in a deeply rooted hatred of himself. He hates himself because he knows exactly the kind of shallow, empty person that he’s become and he recognizes the kind of shallow empty society he is a part of. Bateman is depicted as the epitome of the soulless Yuppie from the 80’s, the kind that had money to burn, and things to buy, buy, buy! The kind that only cares about being in tune with the height of fashion, wearing the latest trends, the most expensive brands, the best of the best.

Yuppie in deed!

This fantastic character was first presented in Bret Easton Ellis’ novel ‘American Psycho’ a novel that was equal times hated and equal times revered. The book presents us with a savage portrayal of a 27 year old man who makes his living working on Wall Street in a company called Pierce and Pierce. He’s into “merger’s and acquisitions”, though when he’s hitting on girls in clubs he tells them he’s into ‘murders and mutilations’, a comment that falls on deaf ears because nobody really listens to themselves in this shallow society, they’re just going through the motions. The book is a wild satire, and when read with the right mindset can be seen as a hilarious commentary on consumerist society.

Bret Easton Ellis

Still, there’s no denying that this is essentially a book about a guy who goes around killing innocent people because he doesn’t agree with who they are. It’s a book about a guy who hates himself and the world he lives in so much, that he simply has to murder all those whom he considers a detriment to society. And when he kills people, the descriptions in the book are truly awful. I mean this guy really goes down on his chosen victims. Perhaps you’ve seen the film and know a bit of what I’m talking about, but the book is so much more graphic then the film ever was. There are certain differences from book to film; for example, in the film Bateman’s apartment is squeaky clean, in the book his apartment is filled with human parts all over the place, bodies decaying, blood splattered on the walls…on the film they minimized this in favor of augmenting the characters obsessive cleanliness. We do see a severed head inside of his refrigerator, and he does have a couple of bodies decaying at Paul Allen’s apartment, but it’s not like in the book where it’s Bateman’s apartment that is the center of all the mayhem. In fact, in the book he has an extra apartment in Hell’s Kitchen where he decomposes bodies in acid. I did like how in the film Bateman mentions the Hell’s Kitchen apartment, though it is never shown on the film, it kind of let us know that the filmmakers knew the book very well, they just couldn’t film everything.

Director Mary Harron and Christian Bale talk out a scene

In fact, fans of the book might get a kick at how even though the film doesn’t show ever single situation and murder committed in the book, at the very least they are referenced and alluded to all through out the film. For example in one scene Bateman mentions that he killed “some old fagot with a dog” which is one of the more graphic and controversial deaths in the book. When Jean, Bateman’s receptionist finds a notebook that Bateman scribbles and doodles on, if you freeze frame those scenes, you can see that the doodles Bateman’s made on his little notebook are doodles of the murders that actually happen in the book, but we don’t see on film. Obviously they were too horrible to appear in the film, and I get that. It’s true, some of the murders described in the book are way too graphic and over the top. After all, we are talking about a novel that’s been banned in many countries, never sold to anyone under 18 in others, and sold only in shrink wrap in others!  I don’t blame the people of Germany for considering this book to be “harmful to minors”; this my friends is a truly violent book!


But were not talking about a simple slasher film here that makes heroes out of the bad guys, this is a film that means to comment on real issues dealing with the world were living in. The book and the film never show Bateman’s behavior as being good or positive or as something to emulate or admire; in fact, it is made quite clear that he is loosing it, that he is psychotic and dangerous to society and to himself, bottom line is, this is not a happy man. On more than one occasion the character actually recognizes his psychotic behavior. During a pivotal scene of the film he admits to his lawyer that he is a “pretty sick guy”, and during another scene he tells someone “I like to dissect girls. Did you know I’m utterly insane?”  Bateman actually recognizes the fact that he is going insane, but it’s as if he could do nothing to stop it from happening. So it’s not like the film is making Bateman into some sort of a hero. What he is in my opinion, is a victim of the world he lives in. Society has created a monster, it’s driven him insane with its blatant consumerism, the racism that he’s been brought up in and the superficiality of society; the importance given to physical beauty as opposed to internal beauty and countless other things that make up the world we live in. Patrick Bateman -the monster- is loose on the streets of Manhattan and it wants payback for what he’s been turned into! Another way to look at this character is that he is judging society for what it has become. This is the kind of film where we don’t side with the protagonist; what we’re meant to do is watch him degenerate and descend into madness and then learn from the reasons that sent him there.

Going utterly insane!

Various things drive Bateman insane, among them his intense hatred for homosexuals. Though this was ignored in the film, he murders an old gay guy who starts hitting on him while walking through Central Park. By the way, Bateman also kills the old mans dog by strangling it to death. Maybe Bateman would be happier if he’d been taught to co-exist with different kinds of people? He is also portrayed as a hippy hater, always considering them to be less than him, the less fortunate are that way because they want to be, he has no sympathy at all for others. He makes fun of other ethnicity's when he considers them lower than him. One moment in the book has Bateman going into a club and making fun of a group of black people by trying to talk the way he thinks they talk; it’s safe to say that part of Batemans unhappiness comes from his blatant racism. Bateman hates the homeless for not doing something about their lives; again, no sympathy. He hates how fake his co-workers are. They never call him by his real name, a common theme through out both the book and the movie. This is the kind of world in which people don’t really know people, so they never really know each others names! They keep confusing each other with other people, which gels perfectly well with the fact that Bateman feels he has no actual distinguishable personality. He knows Huey Lewis and the News entire discography, he knows everything about Genesis and Whitney Houston (whole chapters of the book are dedicated to this knowledge) but he doesn’t know himself, he doesn’t know who he is. He is physically fit, but not emotionally or psychologically mature.


Bateman tries finding love in his life, but all he can achieve is sex, and he manages to turn even that into a sick and twisted affair of the most aberrant kind. In the film Batemans sexual encounters are not as graphic because again: what’s described in the book is way to visceral to film. Same as the violence, the sexual situations described in the book are totally out there and described in detail. Bateman actually ends up having sex with a dismembered head if you can believe it! The sexual elements are so strong in the book, that the filmmakers had to edit 18 seconds out of a scene involving a threesome just so it could get an ‘R’ rating instead of an ‘NC-17’; if they had actually filmed the sexual situations seen in the book, the film would have never seen the light of day. Reading those sequences was like watching a sick twisted porn flick where all those involved get dismembered in the end.  Hell, in the novel Bateman actually eats some of his victims! This is yet another big difference between the film and the book. In the film they only allude to Batemans cannibalism, while on the book it is described in splendid detail.


What would this film be without Christian Bale? I mean, I don’t think a better actor could have been chosen. Do you think Di Caprio could have pulled this film off with as much vulnerability and rage and insanity as Bale did? I seriously doubt it, but Di Caprio was considered for the role. What's great about Bales performance is that he really goes nuts in some scenes, my personal favorite is the one where he does his phone confession, he really talks and acts as if he was crazy. He also plays it with this sense of comedy, you kind of get the feeling that Bateman is actually making fun of people through out his life, mocking them, which in my opinion he is. Aside from Batemans stone cold performance, we have Willem Defoe playing a New York detective who has a hunch that Bateman might be the one behind all the killings. Dafoe's character was expanded for the film, he isn’t in the book as much. Chloe Sevigny plays Batemans innocent and naïve receptionist, she is so in love with Bateman that she doesn’t even see his dark side or she chooses to ignore it. The whole cast of young actors that make up Batemans body of co-workers is fantastic as well: Jared Leto, Justin Theroux, Josh Lucas, all great in my book. They really captured that fake superficial lifestyle and attitude. Reese Witherspoon plays the gloriously ditzy air head of a girlfriend that Bateman has. She ignores that their relationship is non existent and instead chooses to plan their wedding.


All in all, I’d say the film captures very well the essence of the book. Though it does leave a lot of things out, it is completely understandable considering just how graphic the book can be. I mean, one moment in the book has Bateman actually capturing a kid in a zoo and killing him in the shadows! He later accepts that there is no joy in killing a child because the child has no history or life experiences to extinguish, which is the pleasure he gets from killing adults. But damn, even I say that moment was a bit too much! So the film is basically a more “controlled” version of the book that manages to say what the book has to say as well, it comments on the same issues, but it does so in a slightly more constrained manner. Still, the movie does have its extremely bloody, violent and sexual moments, just not as graphic as in Ellis’ novel. Director Mary Harron delivered a stylish and slick looking film, appropriately cold looking. She squeezed out a magnificent performance from Bale! And kudos to Harron, this is a woman directing a film about a guy who treats woman with complete disdain; it took guts for a woman to make this film. I also applaud Easton Ellis for writing such a great yet misunderstood book, the themes and issues commented on the book needed to be addressed and Ellis was not afraid to do it; here’s a writer with some true guts to say what has to be said about the kind of society we’ve turned into. Can we look at our collective fractured psyches and fix things up a bit?  

Rating for the Book: 5 out of 5
Rating for the Film: 5 out of 5  


Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Your Highness (2010)


Title: Your Highness (2010)

Director: David Gordon Green

Cast: Danny Mc Bride, James Franco, Natalie Portman, Justin Theroux

Review:

I had high hopes for Your Highness for various reasons. One of them was that David Gordon Green was directing. Green is a director who’s mainly known for directing indie dramas like George Washington (2000) and Undertow (2004). But in 2008 David Gordon Green decided to break out of his indie drama mold and ventured into big budget commercial comedy territory, the result was Pineapple Express. A film that ended up being a good stoner comedy in my book. So I kept that in mind, also noting the fact that Your Highness was a Pineapple Express re-union of sorts. It had the same director (David Gordon Green) and it reunited James Franco and Danny McBride both of which had worked together on Pineapple Express. So I was feeling confident about this movie. Add to that the fact that it now had Oscar winner Natalie Portman along for the ride and I was sold! And it was a stoner comedy! And it had magic and monsters! And Justin Theroux was playing the bad guy! I mean, this movie had all the makings of an awesome movie! So why did this film end up being such an atrociously unfunny disaster?


The sad part is that Your Highness is Danny McBride’s first attempt at carrying a big budget theatrical release on his shoulders. He is the lead, it’s his movie. He wrote it. Should this film fly or get shot down, all fingers will point to him. That type of thing tends to be a decisive moment in an up and coming actors career. This type of thing can either make or break your future in Hollywood. It reminded me of the time I first saw Ace Ventura in theaters, way back in 1994. That moment was magical; I have never seen an audience laugh so hard in my whole life as a film enthusiast. From then on, I knew Jim Carrey was going to make it big. And he did, it was one of those things where the film was so funny, that you just knew he was going to make it. Sadly, Your Highness was to be Danny McBride’s Ace Ventura. This was to be the film where McBride was going to show the world that he is a funny guy, and that he can continue making us laugh for years to come. Sadly, if I was to judge Danny McBride’s future in films based on Your Highness alone, I would have to say that he is dead on arrival. It’s a sad thing too because Danny McBride is one of those actors that always got second billing in comedies where he was funny enough for people to say “this guy is funny, he should be making his own movies!” Well, he finally got his chance to prove himself to audiences in a film where he is the main star. He’s been given the keys to the kingdom; did he make the best of it? Hell no he didn’t!


The main problem with Your Highness is that it just isn’t funny. I watched it in a theater filled with people who like me, decided to give it a chance, probably expecting McBride to be as funny as he has been in other movies where he wasn’t the main star. At the very least, he should have been as funny as he is in his own show, Eastbound & Down. Unfortunately, this was not the case. I giggled once or twice, but most of the time I was cringing at what I was seeing on screen. I remember the words “this is not funny” popping up in my head on various occasions. McBride and crew seem to think that saying the word fuck every five seconds is a funny thing. It isn’t. Curse words are to be used sparingly, like a bit of salt on your favorite food. If you over do it, you mess things up. Then it just becomes irritating every time you hear it. Maybe on a Gangster movie it would have been okay, cause Im sure gangsters say “motherfucker” every five seconds; but not on a fantasy film. And trust me; you’ll hear the word fuck and all of its derivatives every five seconds in this movie. On top of that, they chose to include these really crude sexual jokes, like having to give a hand job to a wizard so he can help them on their quest, or showing a Minotaur’s erection, I mean, literally, you can see the Minotaur’s erect member. I just typed that. Great. Thank you very much Your Highness.


And here’s the other thing, I love fantasy movies! I love movies about magic, monsters, dragons, swords and all that jazz. I was actually looking forward to seeing warlocks and wizards using their magic powers. I was thinking this was a great opportunity to spoof films like the Lord of the Rings trilogy. And yes, I did enjoy those moments where we have warlocks and witches using all these fantastical magic powers, showcasing some nifty special effects. I enjoyed all the creatures we get to meet in the film, the Cyclops, the Minotaur, The Wizard. You kind of get the feeling that McBride watched Princess Bride (1987), Labyrinth (1986), Legend (1985), Robin Hood Men in Tights (1993), History of the World Part I (1981) and Monty Python’s Holy Grail (1975) and wanted elements from all those films on this one. I have to hand it to the guy, he had his influences in the right place. Unfortunately, he didn’t quite get there. I mean, this was a 60 million dollar big budget production. These guys had all the resources needed to make a decent fantasy film; unfortunately, the result wasn’t a very good one. That’s one thing I always enjoyed about Mel Brook’s films, they were raunchy, and had sexual jokes in them, but they were never super offensive, they knew just how far to take it. Your Highness doesn’t just want to make sex jokes, they want to offend you with them. Shock you with them. Hence the Minotaur’s schlong in the film.

Justin Theroux as the evil wizard Lazaar

And I speak of Mel Brook’s films because he was obviously a major influence on this film. Right down to having Natalie Portman wear a chastity belt. But I think that McBride and Green forgot one very important thing that Mel Brooks got right most of the time. You can spoof a film, but you also have to make a good film within the genre you are spoofing. This didn’t always work for Mel Brooks (just look at Dracula Dead and Loving It) but more often then not, it did work. Take for example Young Frankenstein (1974). It was not only a great (actually genius) spoof of all Frankenstein films; it was also an excellent Frankenstein film on its own right. Same goes for Spaceballs (1987). A great spoof, but also, a good sci-fi film. I guess the big difference between Your Highness and the films I’ve mentioned is that Mel Brook’s spoof’s had good scripts. Hell, Young Frankenstein was nominated for a freaking Oscar for its screenplay! Not the case with the script for Your Highness which was written by McBride himself, who really hasn’t proven himself as much of a writer save for having written the script for The Foot Fist Way (2006). According to David Gordon Green himself, most of the dialog was improvised during shooting; a trick that can work if you are working with a cast of comedic geniuses. I mean Jim Carrey, Mike Myers, Will Ferrell, they’ll work wonders with improvisation. Doesn’t always work with everyone, apparently, it didn’t work with the cast on Your Highness.


Weird thing is, I have seen McBride being funny. He just wasn’t entirely ‘on’ for this film. Now, if Hollywood has taught us anything, it’s that it does not forgive gargantuan multi million dollar failures. You make them loose some moolah instead of making it for them, and it’s adios to you amigo. I hope this won’t be the case with McBride. I think the guy has potential to be one of the greats; he just needs a project that will really go with his personality and style of comedy. Something tells me that a fantasy farce simply wasn’t the way to go with McBride, he seemed to think so. I mean he wrote the damned thing. Sadly, he didn’t even write a good role for himself. He is the lead in the film, yet he isn’t the hero, James Franco is. And speaking of that cast! What the hell. Okay, Franco was obviously there to re-live the good times he had while making Pineapple Express, but Natalie Portman sticks out like a sore thumb in this movie! I guess she was on this production to lighten things up after having made the dark and brooding Black Swan (2010). Plus, they convinced her to show us her ass to sell the movie, sadly, even that old trick failed. This movie cost 60 million dollars and barely made 20 million at the box office! That’s a 40 million dollar loss my friends! That is something that Hollywood won’t easily forgive, I just know it. I’ve seen it happen. But who knows, maybe McBride will do a better film next time, one that fits his style of humor better. Actually, his next film up is called 30 Minutes or Less (2011) and it looks like the kind of project that’s right up his alley. Let’s hope that it will actually be funny. And that it will actually make its money back, if not, I fear we won’t be seeing much of McBride in the near future. Here’s hoping we do!

Rating: 1 ½ out of 5

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Iron Man 2 (2010)


Title: Iron Man 2 (2010)

Director: Jon Favreau

Writer: Justin Theroux

Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Mickey Rourke, Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, Sam Rockwell

Review:

The first Iron Man (2008) film was an incredible box office success. It was a hit for Marvel Comics Productions, a company that has been producing some of the best (and worst) superhero movies ever. Iron Man was one of their really good ones. Jon Favreau brought together an excellent cast and production team, the end result was pure superhero magic. Not to mention the film single handedly brought Robert Downey Jr. back into the spotlight, making one of the best comebacks in recent history. And of course, after such an incredible success, a sequel just had to be churned out. I mean the name of the game with commercial films such as this one is making money. Was Favreau able to catch lightning in a bottle again?


This time around, Iron Man has become something of a celebrity, everyone knows who he is, he has brought world peace to the planet and has essentially become something of a god on planet earth. Righteous and invincible. But what happens when ever one individual gets to powerful and too successful on his own? The Government wants a piece of him now! That’s right, government is salivating at getting their hands on Tony Starks Iron Man armor. They want to use it for military applications, while Tony Stark is interested in using it to keep world peace, and since no one can challenge the awesome power of the Iron Man suit, well then, Iron Man remains the protector of the planet. Or at least of the United States. But the question that comes into play with this movie is: Is Tony Stark the right man to wear this powerful armor?


Expectations for this movie are high for various reasons. It’s a sequel to a very successful film that many loved. The original made so many millions at the box office, that it is expected that for a sequel, Hollywood would treat its new cash cow with some respect and made sure they delivered a decent superhero film. So a huge budget and big stars is something to be expected with this sequel. In my opinion Hollywood delivered. This film has lush production values and a impeccable cast! Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell as villains? That’s a winning combination right there! Scarlett Johansson and Gwyneth Paltrow as the hot super hero babes? Double knock out! Don Cheadle as the sidekick who is awesome on his own? The Icing on the cake! So at least casting wise this movie headed in the right direction. In thing that I found kind of funny is how Jon Favreau gave himself a bigger role this time around. On the first film he was just Tony Starks limo driver. On this sequel he still plays Starks limo driver/body guard, only thing is this time around he actually ends up kicking some ass and serving as comedy relief in an action scene. I guess being the director has its privileges.  


Script wise, the film develops at just the right pace in my opinion. Many people complained that theres not enough action, but I don’t think I agree with these comments. Sometimes people complaint that there isn’t enough character development in a film, that the film is hollow and has no heart, but then when they give them a movie that fills those gaps, they complain that there isn’t enough action. If you ask me, this movie had the perfect balance between awesome action sequences and good character development. The film was written by Justin Theroux who wrote the super funny comedy Tropic Thunder a couple of years ago and has also acted himself on a couple of films like David Lynch's Inland Empire and Mullholand Drive. I think he wrote a good superhero film. It explores its characters and doesnt only concentrate on action and special effects. We get to know Tony Stark a little better this time around. We get to know about his past, his father, how he grew up, why he is who he is.   


In my book the flaws on Iron Man 2 were not many. The only thing that I can complaint about is that I wished the ending had been just a tad more elaborate and spectacular. Destruction had to be on gargantuan levels, yet they never peeked with the climactic action sequence. It is a good and extended action sequence, but it needed a little extra oomph to take it into epic and spectacular levels. It needed to be a bit closer, more in your face. More visceral. We needed to see Iron Man getting into bigger trouble, be in more peril. As it is, during the last action sequence you never feel the hero is in peril. Whenever he has his suit on, the guy is invincible. This guy’s body armor is indestructible, nothing harms it. Iron Man's invincibility takes away the tension, the peril. The final fight with Whiplash (Rourke) needed to be something that would wow us, instead, it ends with a whimper. This is really the one and only problem I had with the movie.


The rest of the film is fantastic in my opinion. It explores Iron Mans darker side when we see Tony Stark getting drunk in a party while wearing the Iron Man suit. This is an element that I loved in the movie because it comes straight out of the comics. I mean, Iron Man has always been a hero that’s had to battle with his drinking problem. There was a story arc called "Demon in a Bottle" which showed us a Tony Stark going into drunk rages, going all sorts of evil and crazy, kind of like that time that Superman turns into "evil Superman" in Superman III. They translated that struggle in the film really well. It offers us one of the movies funniest moments. Robert Downey Jr. is a pleasure to watch in the role of Tony Stark, he is lively, funny, and spontaneous so it never gets boring whenever he is on the screen. Mickey Rourke pulled off a pretty convincing Russian accent in the film, which can be a problem when not done well. Speaking of his character, he looks bad ass with those electrical whiplashes; the scene in the middle of the car race is awesome. If only they had more of that awesomeness during the films last frames and the movie might have been perfect.

Iron Man going on one of his drunken rages, it gets pretty ugly in the comics

The biggest draw about this movie is the introduction of the War Machine character, played by Don Cheadle. I have to say that it was pulled off very well. The character looks exactly the way he does in the comics. I loved how he serves as Tony Starks conscience, telling him things like “you are not worthy of wearing that armor!” The teaming up of the two in the ending is awesome, if only it had been more complex than getting chased around by a couple of flying drones!


The thing about reading Marvel Comics (or any comic series for that matter) is that they usually leave you with a cliffhanger; they always have some sort of continuity to them to get you involved so you can come back next week for the next issue. This element of reading comic books has been effectively translated to the silver screen with films based on Marvel characters. Samuel L. Jackson returns as Nick Fury agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. I love how he has been a constant through out all these movies…lets just hope that that Avengers movie thats coming in a few years (supposedly Josh Whedon will be directing) lets him truly shine in the role. Samuel Jackson has a more elaborate participation on this film, but his performance in Iron Man 2 remains an extended cameo of sorts. So was Iron Man 2 better then the first? Well, I had fun with it. It has excellent production values, the effects and action sequences were great. I really dont have anything bad to say about this movie save for the short fight between hero and villain in the climax. A fun summer blockbuster, made better because its excellent cast. As with most Marvel Comics movies, theres a little something extra after the credits. Hint: it has something to do with Mjollnir!

Rating: 3 out of 5

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails