Sin City 2: A Dame to Kill For (2014)
Director: Robert Rodriguez
Cast: Mickey Rourke, Josh Brolin, Eva Green, Joseph Gordon
Levitt, Powers Booth, Rosario Dawson, Jessica Alba, Bruce Willis, Jeremy Piven,
Christopher Lloyd, Jaime King, Lady Gaga
Sin City (2005) is to me, one of Robert Rodriguez finest
days behind the camera, it was sheer cinematic perfection, the mood, the
images, the words, everything flowed with amazing finesse and clarity. So of
course when I heard that Rodriguez and Miller were teaming up again for a
sequel, I was more than excited. True, Robert Rodriguez can be a hit or miss
type of director, but you have to admit, when he’s running on all cylinders,
the guy can make some damn entertaining movies.
El Mariachi (1992),
Desperado
(1995)
From Dusk Till Dawn (1996),
Planet Terror (2007) and
Sin City (2005) are
all high watermarks in his career. And let’s not forget his more “for the hell
of it” films, like
Machete (2010) and
Machete Kills (2013), two great examples
of the fun b-movies that Rodriguez is so good at making. Here’s a guy who
understands Pulp Fiction, not the Tarantino movie, but the concept. He knows
how entertaining over the top violence can be. To top things off, he’s got a
kinetic style of storytelling, with a high emphasis on never letting the
audience get bored. He wants to give you that shock, that cheap thrill, he
wants you to chuckle and stare in awe at the screen. And on this aspect,
Sin
City 2: A Dame to Kill For delivers the goods.
This time around we go back to the seedy underbelly of Basin
City via four short stories all written by comic book mastermind Frank Miller.
The stories are: A Dame to Kill For, Just Another Saturday Night, The Long Bad
Night and Nancy’s Last Dance, which by the way was a story written specifically
for the film. On this sequel we get to see many of the characters presented to
us in the first film, like Marv, Nancy Callahan, Dwight, Gail, Hartigan and the
evil Senator Roark. We are also presented to a whole bag of new ones like the
wonderfully conniving Eva, played by Eva Green. She’s the ultimate seductress,
using her sensual powers to get what she wants, seducing her way to anything.
Welcome to Sin City, a place where nobody is squeaky clean.
Going back to Sin City feels like I never left, the
characters, the images, everything holds a certain familiarity to it. The film
still has that distinctive black and white look and the characters talk in that
special unmistakable Frank Miller talk. It’s cool to see the same characters
again, the only thing you have to be ready for is that certain characters are
now played by different actors, for example, the character of Dwight, who was
played by Clive Owen in the first film, is now being played by Josh Brolin. The character of ‘Manute’, who in the first film was played by
Michael Clarke Duncan is now played by Dennis Haysbert. Devon Aoki, who played
deadly little Miho in the first film, has been replaced by Jamie Chung, and so
forth. They are still the same characters, it’s just different actors playing
then. Good news is that since they are all Frank Miller comic book characters,
they still look and sound the same, you might not even notice the changes so
much.
So this film is interesting because its half prequel, half
sequel. Some of the stories take place before the first film, some after the
first film. This is the reason why we see some characters who died in the first
film back again, the most notable example would be Marv, who dies electrocuted
in the ending of the first film. Marv is featured prominently in this film,
which is a good move in my book since he was everyone’s favorite character from
the first film. He looks just a bit different, but he’s still good old pill
poppin’, head chopping Marv. The last story in the film, called Nancy’s Last
Stand is a good old revenge tale with Nancy looking to avenge the death of
Hartigan, the detective that saved her from being raped, and “the only man she
ever loved”. So yeah, you’ll feel like your revisiting your favorite, most fucked up
friends. This is the nature of Sin City, it’s not a pretty place; these aren't
wholesome characters. The stories that Frank Miller cooks up for these Sin City
graphic novels are about greedy, selfish characters, hatred and revenge pour
out of their every pore.
Frank Miller gets lots of heat because his stories have been
deemed ‘misogynistic’ by some…in the parlance of our times, misogynistic means
that his stories display a certain amount of hatred towards women? Um, I’ve
read most of the Sin City graphic novels and I don’t really see that at all.
Actually, I honestly think that’s just a bunch of horse shit. Let me see, if I
remember correctly, Hartigan saves a little girl from being raped…how is that
misogynistic? That very same girl grows up, and Hartigan once again protects
her from ‘that Yellow Bastard’ who wants to rape her and kill her? This very
same girl that Hartigan saves, later becomes a strong female character by going
out to avenge the death of the man who saved her. Not misogynistic. Some of his
stories actually empower the female, by making them strong protagonists, like
in Sin City 2: A Dame to Kill For, where Nancy becomes a kick ass revenge
hungry female lead. Sure these are stories
about prostitutes, so what, there are prostitutes in the real world so how is that
displaying hatred towards women? Prostitutes are a real thing in the real
world, especially in the world of Sin City. In the first film, Marv falls head
over heels for “Goldie”, a woman he worships with every word that comes out of
his mouth. Another character called Dwight protects a waitress named Shellie from a violent,
psychotic ex-lover. In any case, if violence is inflicted upon women, it comes
from villains, not from the heroes who always protect the women, or love them
with tremendous amounts of love and admiration. And it’s not like women are
always depicted as being helpless victims, just ask the girls of old town, who
can more than take care of themselves. If you ask me, Miller actually displays
respect and admiration towards women, not hatred. Miller actually
addresses some very real issues about women, issues that need to be addressed
and talked about. So get outta here with your self righteous sanctimonious bull
crap. These are stories about a town called Sin City, if you can’t take the
heat, get out of hell’s kitchen.
Truth be told, being accused of being misogynistic is the
smallest of Miller’s problems; what Miller really received a lot of heat for
was for a story he drew and wrote called ‘Holy Terror’; a story that at one
point was going to be one of the most controversial Batman stories ever told. At one point it was going to be called ‘Holy Terror, Batman!’ But through the course of creating this tale, Miller
decided this was no longer a Batman story, so he changed the main character
from Batman into a new character of his own creation called ‘The Fixer’ and
printed the graphic novel through Legendary instead of DC. But originally, Holy Terror was going to be
all about Batman kicking Al Qaedas ass and killing a whole bunch of terrorists. The thing with Holy Terror is that Miller lived in New York during 9/11, and it
affected him in a big way, Holy Terror was made as a direct response to that.
Miller has gone down as saying “I can tell you squat about Islam, I don’t know
anything about it. But I know a goddamn lot about Al Qaeda and I want them all
to burn in hell”. So yeah, his public hatred towards Al Qaeda garnered hatred
from many. Miller knew this was going to happen. He labels the book as
“Propaganda” that is “bound to offend just about everybody” But then again, if
we look back in time, Captain America and Batman both kicked Hitler’s ass in
their own time, so to Miller, having Batman kick Al Qaeda’s ass was just a way
to pay homage to those classic politically charged comics and a way to comment
on the 9/11 attacks. Does it show hatred towards Muslims? Or just towards a
small terrorist group? Is it racist? I don’t know because I have yet to read
it, but you can’t expect a review of it here soon. Whatever the case maybe,
Miller doesn't back down from his work, he makes no apologies for it, and maybe
this is why as a form of retaliation, Sin City 2 has sadly tanked at the box
office. I doubt that many people have read Holy Terror, but god knows there’s a couple
of sites, and a couple of blogs and articles out there spewing nothing but hatred
for it. It could be that this all backfired on Miller and now Sin City 2 is
suffering at the box office for it.
This is all too bad, because to me Sin City 2 is fun times,
as fun and mean spirited as the first film was. Many have labeled it as “more of
the same” and I have to say that I agree. To me this sequel being more of the
same doesn’t bother me one bit because I love the film noir world of Sin City,
if it’s more of what I loved from the first film then so be it, I welcome it. I
got no problems with these stories being about prostitutes and psychotic
characters, this is Sin City, keyword ‘Sin’. If I had to say something negative
about the film is that the stories from the first film where slightly more
shocking and darker…by comparison these stories feel somewhat less important.
It’s not that they don’t chop off enough heads or that there isn’t enough white
blood, there’s tons of violence and nudity to garner the film it’s ‘R’ rating,
but by comparison, the stories from the first film felt like they had more of a
punch to them. But whatever, Sin City light is still Sin City and the film
still has enough grittiness, nudity and comic book violence to please fans of
the ‘R’ rating. I’m saddened that Sin City 2 has tanked the way it has, there’s
no real reason for it to be flopping as hard as it has, it’s an entertaining
film. Is it that audiences nowadays have become complete softies that can’t
take blood and violence in their entertainment? Has society grown only to
accept PG-13 films? Whatever, it’s their loss. I hope they enjoy their
umpteenth Step Up film.
Rating: 4 out of 5