+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C89 (global declarations)
+ac_c_conftest_c89_globals='
+/* Does the compiler advertise C89 conformance?
+ Do not test the value of __STDC__, because some compilers set it to 0
+ while being otherwise adequately conformant. */
+#if !defined __STDC__
+# error "Compiler does not advertise C89 conformance"
+#endif
+
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdarg.h>
+struct stat;
+/* Most of the following tests are stolen from RCS 5.7 src/conf.sh. */
+struct buf { int x; };
+struct buf * (*rcsopen) (struct buf *, struct stat *, int);
+static char *e (p, i)
+ char **p;
+ int i;
+{
+ return p[i];
+}
+static char *f (char * (*g) (char **, int), char **p, ...)
+{
+ char *s;
+ va_list v;
+ va_start (v,p);
+ s = g (p, va_arg (v,int));
+ va_end (v);
+ return s;
+}
+
+/* OSF 4.0 Compaq cc is some sort of almost-ANSI by default. It has
+ function prototypes and stuff, but not \xHH hex character constants.
+ These do not provoke an error unfortunately, instead are silently treated
+ as an "x". The following induces an error, until -std is added to get
+ proper ANSI mode. Curiously \x00 != x always comes out true, for an
+ array size at least. It is necessary to write \x00 == 0 to get something
+ that is true only with -std. */
+int osf4_cc_array ['\''\x00'\'' == 0 ? 1 : -1];
+
+/* IBM C 6 for AIX is almost-ANSI by default, but it replaces macro parameters
+ inside strings and character constants. */
+#define FOO(x) '\''x'\''
+int xlc6_cc_array[FOO(a) == '\''x'\'' ? 1 : -1];
+
+int test (int i, double x);
+struct s1 {int (*f) (int a);};
+struct s2 {int (*f) (double a);};
+int pairnames (int, char **, int *(*)(struct buf *, struct stat *, int),
+ int, int);'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C89 (body of main).
+ac_c_conftest_c89_main='
+ok |= (argc == 0 || f (e, argv, 0) != argv[0] || f (e, argv, 1) != argv[1]);
+'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C99 (global declarations)
+ac_c_conftest_c99_globals='
+// Does the compiler advertise C99 conformance?
+#if !defined __STDC_VERSION__ || __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901L
+# error "Compiler does not advertise C99 conformance"
+#endif
+
+#include <stdbool.h>
+extern int puts (const char *);
+extern int printf (const char *, ...);
+extern int dprintf (int, const char *, ...);
+extern void *malloc (size_t);
+
+// Check varargs macros. These examples are taken from C99 6.10.3.5.
+// dprintf is used instead of fprintf to avoid needing to declare
+// FILE and stderr.
+#define debug(...) dprintf (2, __VA_ARGS__)
+#define showlist(...) puts (#__VA_ARGS__)
+#define report(test,...) ((test) ? puts (#test) : printf (__VA_ARGS__))
+static void
+test_varargs_macros (void)
+{
+ int x = 1234;
+ int y = 5678;
+ debug ("Flag");
+ debug ("X = %d\n", x);
+ showlist (The first, second, and third items.);
+ report (x>y, "x is %d but y is %d", x, y);
+}
+
+// Check long long types.
+#define BIG64 18446744073709551615ull
+#define BIG32 4294967295ul
+#define BIG_OK (BIG64 / BIG32 == 4294967297ull && BIG64 % BIG32 == 0)
+#if !BIG_OK
+ #error "your preprocessor is broken"
+#endif
+#if BIG_OK
+#else
+ #error "your preprocessor is broken"
+#endif
+static long long int bignum = -9223372036854775807LL;
+static unsigned long long int ubignum = BIG64;
+
+struct incomplete_array
+{
+ int datasize;
+ double data[];
+};
+
+struct named_init {
+ int number;
+ const wchar_t *name;
+ double average;
+};
+
+typedef const char *ccp;
+
+static inline int
+test_restrict (ccp restrict text)
+{
+ // See if C++-style comments work.
+ // Iterate through items via the restricted pointer.
+ // Also check for declarations in for loops.
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; *(text+i) != '\''\0'\''; ++i)
+ continue;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+// Check varargs and va_copy.
+static bool
+test_varargs (const char *format, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+ va_start (args, format);
+ va_list args_copy;
+ va_copy (args_copy, args);
+
+ const char *str = "";
+ int number = 0;
+ float fnumber = 0;
+
+ while (*format)
+ {
+ switch (*format++)
+ {
+ case '\''s'\'': // string
+ str = va_arg (args_copy, const char *);
+ break;
+ case '\''d'\'': // int
+ number = va_arg (args_copy, int);
+ break;
+ case '\''f'\'': // float
+ fnumber = va_arg (args_copy, double);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ va_end (args_copy);
+ va_end (args);
+
+ return *str && number && fnumber;
+}
+'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C99 (body of main).
+ac_c_conftest_c99_main='
+ // Check bool.
+ _Bool success = false;
+ success |= (argc != 0);
+
+ // Check restrict.
+ if (test_restrict ("String literal") == 0)
+ success = true;
+ char *restrict newvar = "Another string";
+
+ // Check varargs.
+ success &= test_varargs ("s, d'\'' f .", "string", 65, 34.234);
+ test_varargs_macros ();
+
+ // Check flexible array members.
+ struct incomplete_array *ia =
+ malloc (sizeof (struct incomplete_array) + (sizeof (double) * 10));
+ ia->datasize = 10;
+ for (int i = 0; i < ia->datasize; ++i)
+ ia->data[i] = i * 1.234;
+
+ // Check named initializers.
+ struct named_init ni = {
+ .number = 34,
+ .name = L"Test wide string",
+ .average = 543.34343,
+ };
+
+ ni.number = 58;
+
+ int dynamic_array[ni.number];
+ dynamic_array[0] = argv[0][0];
+ dynamic_array[ni.number - 1] = 543;
+
+ // work around unused variable warnings
+ ok |= (!success || bignum == 0LL || ubignum == 0uLL || newvar[0] == '\''x'\''
+ || dynamic_array[ni.number - 1] != 543);
+'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C11 (global declarations)
+ac_c_conftest_c11_globals='
+// Does the compiler advertise C11 conformance?
+#if !defined __STDC_VERSION__ || __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112L
+# error "Compiler does not advertise C11 conformance"
+#endif
+
+// Check _Alignas.
+char _Alignas (double) aligned_as_double;
+char _Alignas (0) no_special_alignment;
+extern char aligned_as_int;
+char _Alignas (0) _Alignas (int) aligned_as_int;
+
+// Check _Alignof.
+enum
+{
+ int_alignment = _Alignof (int),
+ int_array_alignment = _Alignof (int[100]),
+ char_alignment = _Alignof (char)
+};
+_Static_assert (0 < -_Alignof (int), "_Alignof is signed");
+
+// Check _Noreturn.
+int _Noreturn does_not_return (void) { for (;;) continue; }
+
+// Check _Static_assert.
+struct test_static_assert
+{
+ int x;
+ _Static_assert (sizeof (int) <= sizeof (long int),
+ "_Static_assert does not work in struct");
+ long int y;
+};
+
+// Check UTF-8 literals.
+#define u8 syntax error!
+char const utf8_literal[] = u8"happens to be ASCII" "another string";
+
+// Check duplicate typedefs.
+typedef long *long_ptr;
+typedef long int *long_ptr;
+typedef long_ptr long_ptr;
+
+// Anonymous structures and unions -- taken from C11 6.7.2.1 Example 1.
+struct anonymous
+{
+ union {
+ struct { int i; int j; };
+ struct { int k; long int l; } w;
+ };
+ int m;
+} v1;
+'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C11 (body of main).
+ac_c_conftest_c11_main='
+ _Static_assert ((offsetof (struct anonymous, i)
+ == offsetof (struct anonymous, w.k)),
+ "Anonymous union alignment botch");
+ v1.i = 2;
+ v1.w.k = 5;
+ ok |= v1.i != 5;
+'
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C11 (complete).
+ac_c_conftest_c11_program="${ac_c_conftest_c89_globals}
+${ac_c_conftest_c99_globals}
+${ac_c_conftest_c11_globals}
+
+int
+main (int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ int ok = 0;
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c89_main}
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c99_main}
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c11_main}
+ return ok;
+}
+"
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C99 (complete).
+ac_c_conftest_c99_program="${ac_c_conftest_c89_globals}
+${ac_c_conftest_c99_globals}
+
+int
+main (int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ int ok = 0;
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c89_main}
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c99_main}
+ return ok;
+}
+"
+
+# Test code for whether the C compiler supports C89 (complete).
+ac_c_conftest_c89_program="${ac_c_conftest_c89_globals}
+
+int
+main (int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ int ok = 0;
+ ${ac_c_conftest_c89_main}
+ return ok;
+}
+"
+
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " stdio.h stdio_h HAVE_STDIO_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " stdlib.h stdlib_h HAVE_STDLIB_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " string.h string_h HAVE_STRING_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " inttypes.h inttypes_h HAVE_INTTYPES_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " stdint.h stdint_h HAVE_STDINT_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " strings.h strings_h HAVE_STRINGS_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " sys/stat.h sys_stat_h HAVE_SYS_STAT_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " sys/types.h sys_types_h HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " unistd.h unistd_h HAVE_UNISTD_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " wchar.h wchar_h HAVE_WCHAR_H"
+as_fn_append ac_header_c_list " minix/config.h minix_config_h HAVE_MINIX_CONFIG_H"
+as_fn_append ac_func_c_list " vprintf HAVE_VPRINTF"
+gt_needs="$gt_needs "
+
+# Auxiliary files required by this configure script.
+ac_aux_files="config.guess config.sub config.rpath compile missing install-sh"
+
+# Locations in which to look for auxiliary files.
+ac_aux_dir_candidates="${srcdir}${PATH_SEPARATOR}${srcdir}/..${PATH_SEPARATOR}${srcdir}/../.."
+
+# Search for a directory containing all of the required auxiliary files,
+# $ac_aux_files, from the $PATH-style list $ac_aux_dir_candidates.
+# If we don't find one directory that contains all the files we need,
+# we report the set of missing files from the *first* directory in
+# $ac_aux_dir_candidates and give up.
+ac_missing_aux_files=""
+ac_first_candidate=:
+printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: looking for aux files: $ac_aux_files" >&5
+as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR
+as_found=false
+for as_dir in $ac_aux_dir_candidates
+do
+ IFS=$as_save_IFS
+ case $as_dir in #(((
+ '') as_dir=./ ;;
+ */) ;;
+ *) as_dir=$as_dir/ ;;
+ esac
+ as_found=:
+
+ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: trying $as_dir" >&5
+ ac_aux_dir_found=yes
+ ac_install_sh=
+ for ac_aux in $ac_aux_files
+ do
+ # As a special case, if "install-sh" is required, that requirement
+ # can be satisfied by any of "install-sh", "install.sh", or "shtool",
+ # and $ac_install_sh is set appropriately for whichever one is found.
+ if test x"$ac_aux" = x"install-sh"
+ then
+ if test -f "${as_dir}install-sh"; then
+ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: ${as_dir}install-sh found" >&5
+ ac_install_sh="${as_dir}install-sh -c"
+ elif test -f "${as_dir}install.sh"; then
+ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: ${as_dir}install.sh found" >&5
+ ac_install_sh="${as_dir}install.sh -c"
+ elif test -f "${as_dir}shtool"; then
+ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: ${as_dir}shtool found" >&5
+ ac_install_sh="${as_dir}shtool install -c"
+ else
+ ac_aux_dir_found=no
+ if $ac_first_candidate; then
+ ac_missing_aux_files="${ac_missing_aux_files} install-sh"
+ else
+ break
+ fi
+ fi
+ else
+ if test -f "${as_dir}${ac_aux}"; then
+ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: ${as_dir}${ac_aux} found" >&5
+ else
+ ac_aux_dir_found=no
+ if $ac_first_candidate; then
+ ac_missing_aux_files="${ac_missing_aux_files} ${ac_aux}"
+ else
+ break
+ fi
+ fi
+ fi
+ done
+ if test "$ac_aux_dir_found" = yes; then
+ ac_aux_dir="$as_dir"
+ break
+ fi
+ ac_first_candidate=false
+
+ as_found=false
+done
+IFS=$as_save_IFS
+if $as_found
+then :
+
+else $as_nop
+ as_fn_error $? "cannot find required auxiliary files:$ac_missing_aux_files" "$LINENO" 5
+fi
+
+
+# These three variables are undocumented and unsupported,
+# and are intended to be withdrawn in a future Autoconf release.
+# They can cause serious problems if a builder's source tree is in a directory
+# whose full name contains unusual characters.
+if test -f "${ac_aux_dir}config.guess"; then
+ ac_config_guess="$SHELL ${ac_aux_dir}config.guess"
+fi
+if test -f "${ac_aux_dir}config.sub"; then
+ ac_config_sub="$SHELL ${ac_aux_dir}config.sub"
+fi
+if test -f "$ac_aux_dir/configure"; then
+ ac_configure="$SHELL ${ac_aux_dir}configure"
+fi
+