Showing posts with label conspiracy theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy theory. Show all posts

Sunday, August 13, 2017

The Accidental Invention of the Illuminati Conspiracy By Sophia Smith Galer


It’s the conspiracy theory to dwarf all conspiracy theories. A smorgasbord of every other intrigue under the sun, the Illuminati are the supposed overlords controlling the world’s affairs, operating secretly as they seek to establish a New World Order.

But this far-fetched paranoia all started with a playful work of fiction in the 1960s. What does this tell us about our readiness to believe what we read and hear – and what can the Illuminati myth reveal about the fake news and stories we continue to be influenced by today?



More...

Monday, June 8, 2015

David Icke: Methods Of A Madman


Originally appeared here

Some people would call David Icke controversial. I would call him a brilliant psychotic.

His ability to speak for hours on an incomprehensible doctrine is stunning. But listen carefully and the methods of his madness become apparent.

He has a brilliant talent for the subtle interweaving of plausible with crazy, and packaging the in-between gray areas as thought-terminating clichés like “secret societies”, “brotherhood”, “free masons” and other slogans and catchphrases popular with modern conspiracy thinking.

The magic is in his ability to dispense seemingly innocuous tidbits of (allegedly true) earth history one moment, then slipping in talk of aliens crossbreeding with humans the next moment. Talk sane, touch on some crazy, go back to the safety of sane. Rinse and repeat until the listener can swallow the crazy with the sane.

This ability to subtly slide in and out of the realm of plausible is the same potent cocktail used by science fiction writers to blur the lines between the possible and the impossible to keep viewers coming back for more.

This 25 minute video has been distilled from a 217 minute video. I’ve removed the plausible to expose the rest. Enjoy the madness.


Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Psychology and Economy of Conspiracy Theories by Frankie Mullin



Within hours of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, internet forums were buzzing with alternative explanations for the attack. "The official story doesn't add up," people typed furiously into their keyboards. "We're being lied to."

Over the next few days, the rumors spread. Apparent glitches in reporting—as well as the "suspicious" suicide of the detective in charge of the investigation—were taken as evidence of subterfuge.

Most doubters, however, focused on scrutinizing amateur video footage of the event, asking whether policeman Ahmed Merabet was really shot in the head.. The questioning makes for grim reading. "Where's the blood? Why no splatter?" asked Reddit users. Others offered rebuttals, posting videos of bloodless shootings and suggesting: "Heads don't explode like watermelons."

A long, imaginative list of alternative explanations was offered: It was a false flag attack, executed by Mossad to fuel anti-Muslim sentiment; it was carried out by the CIA for the same reason; it was French Jews; it was a "black-op power bloc operation" to back up the war on terror; Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said that the West "playing games with the Islamic world."

Read more...

Saturday, January 10, 2015

200 Chomsky Lies by Paul Bogdanor


“He begins as a preacher to the world and ends as an intellectual crook.”
– Arthur Schlesinger
(Commentary, December 1969)

“Noam Chomsky skittles and skithers all over the political landscape to distract the reader’s attention from the plain truth.”
– Sidney Hook
(The Humanist, March-April 1971)

“In his ideological fanaticism he constantly shifts his arguments and bends references, quotations and facts, while declaring his ‘commitment to find the truth.’”
– Leopold Labedz
(Encounter, July 1980)

“Even on the rare occasions when Mr. Chomsky is dealing with facts and not with fantasies, he exaggerates by a factor of, plus or minus, four or five.”
– Walter Laqueur
(The New Republic, March 24, 1982)

“After many years, I came to the conclusion that everything he says is false. He will lie just for the fun of it. Every one of his arguments was tinged and coded with falseness and pretense. It was like playing chess with extra pieces. It was all fake.”
– Paul Postal
(The New Yorker, March 31, 2003)

In point by point style, Paul Bogdanor nails 200 absolute lies told by darling of the left Noam Chomsky.

Chomsky's political output is consistent with the rest of his oeuvre in one important respect: the method of argumentation. Across disciplines, he has long employed a variety of unscholarly techniques to insulate his conclusions from criticism. The linguist George Lakoff once identified Chomsky's tendency to "fight dirty when he argues. He uses every trick in the book." In the journal Artificial Intelligence, Margaret Boden, Professor of Cognitive Science at Sussex University, notesthat a review of her book by Chomsky is "a sadly unscholarly piece, guaranteed to mislead its readers about both the tone and the content of the book. It is also defamatory." In politics, Chomsky's preferred technique is vituperative abuse of his opponents. Take a few examples. Thomas Friedman of the New York Times is an "astonishing racist and megalomaniac". In disputing Chomsky's analogy between 9/11 and President Clinton's attack on a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, Christopher Hitchens "must be unaware that he is expressing such racist contempt". The French nation collectively has a "highly parochial and remarkably illiterate culture".

The irony of Chomskyan invective in the political sphere is that it is highly selective. Chomsky has never regretted his intervention in the 1980s on behalf of a Holocaust denier, Robert Faurisson. Chomsky has no sympathy with Holocaust denial, and if he had stuck to defending Faurisson's right to free expression he would have been right and principled. Instead, he wrote: "As far as I can determine, [Faurisson] is a relatively apolitical liberal of some sort." The point here is not the perversity of the judgement. It is the way in which Chomsky espouses supposedly universal principles while extravagantly failing to apply them. Liberals and left-wingers who see value in US interventionism are racists, frauds, apologists for state terror and so on. Yet a man like Faurisson who exemplifies all of these qualities is regarded differently.

Consider, too, Chomsky's writings on Indochina, the issue on which he became famous as a political controversialist. He did not only excoriate an unjust and brutal US war. He derided refugee accounts of horrors after the fall of Cambodia, pointedly referring to "alleged Khmer Rouge atrocities" and disputing a comparison of Pol Pot's rule to Nazi Germany. In an interview last year, Chomsky characteristically congratulated himself on the astuteness of this analysis, declaring: "If we were to rewrite it now, we'd do it exactly the same way."

Here is your chance to see Chomsky at his deceptive best.  Download this book, read it, and pass it on.  Let's smash the Chomsky myth.

Download ebook here.

Friday, November 28, 2014

Robert Anton Wilson:::Prometheus Rising Excerpts


One of the most profound and important scientific philosophers of this century, Wilson has written many very important works of fiction and non-fiction. His vast intelligence and sharp wit are sufficient to shock and enlighten even the the most heavily imprinted domestic primate.

Tracklist:
1- Conversations (William Burroughs, Brion Gysin, Timothy Leary, Les Levine, and Robert Anton Wilson)
2- Secrets of Power

3- Burned Books
4- DisinfoNation - I_II
5- DisinfoNation - II_II

6- Infinity Factory - Hosted by Richard Metzger
7- An Incorrigible Optimist
8- Colonisation of Space
9- Namu Amida Buddha

Download:
http://www.adrive.com/public/YhuBVC/Prometheus%20Rising%20Excerpts.zip

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoax And Other Conspiracies You Should Stop Sharing On Social Media


The Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy theory has unfortunately been around since about a month after the shootings occurred, thanks in part to a hugely popular YouTube video and sites like InfoWars.
The truth of the matter is that 20 children, six adults, and the shooter’s own mother died that day in December 2012, but that’s not what the theories would have you to believe.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1604787/sandy-hook-hoax-and-other-conspiracies-you-should-stop-sharing-on-social-media/#MSmU8VJ60OROcdMg.99

Friday, July 11, 2014

Denying AIDS: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, and Human Tragedy by Seth C. Kalichman


*New Link*

Paralleling the discovery of HIV and the rise of the AIDS pandemic, a flock of naysayers has dedicated itself to replacing genuine knowledge with destructive misinformation—and spreading from the fringe to the mainstream media and the think tank. Now from the editor of the journal AIDS and Behavior comes a bold exposé of the scientific and sociopolitical forces involved in this toxic evasion. Denying AIDS traces the origins of AIDS dissidents disclaimers during the earliest days of the epidemic and delves into the psychology and politics of the current denial movement in its various incarnations. Seth Kalichman focuses not on the “difficult” or doubting patient, but on organized, widespread forms of denial (including the idea that HIV itself is a myth and HIV treatments are poison) and the junk science, faulty logic, conspiracy theories, and larger forces of homophobia and racism that fuel them.

The malignant results of AIDS denial can be seen in those individuals who refuse to be tested, ignore their diagnoses, or reject the treatments that could save their lives. Instead of ignoring these currents, asserts Kalichman, science has a duty to counter them. Among the topics covered: Why AIDS denialism endures, and why science must understand it. Pioneer virus HIV researcher Peter Duesberg’s role in AIDS denialism. Flawed immunological, virological, and pharmacological pseudoscience studies that are central to texts of denialism. The social conservative agenda and the politics of AIDS denial, from the courts to the White House. The impact of HIV misinformation on public health in South Africa. Fighting fiction with reality: anti-denialism and the scientific community. For anyone affected by, interested in, or working with researchers in HIV/AIDS, and public health professionals in general, the insight and vision of Denying AIDS will inspire outrage, discussion, and ultimately action.

Download book:

Monday, May 12, 2014

Paranoid Conspiracy Theorists Will Ruin Your Life



Vaccinations, fluoride, and birth certificates.  Chem-trails, dictators, and big brother.  Assassinations.  Spree killings.  CIA. FBI.  Earthquakes.  Hurricanes.  Global Warming.  Nine Eleven, secrets, Masons and Illuminati...

Read more:
http://www.onyxtruth.com/2014/04/01/pcts/

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

After the revolution comes the real terror

"…the whole so-called Libertarian ideology …. may sound nice on the surface but if you think it through, it's just a call for corporate tyranny. It takes away any barrier to corporate tyranny." - Noam Chomsky

"Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry

This essay examines what would really happen if conspiracy theorists got their way.  It is an examination of a splintered pseudo-religious cult and its dangerous ideas and how - if such ideas were ever to gain ground -  society as we know it would would be severely affected.   Their far-right libertarian view of revolution is fueled by a conspiratorial paranoia whose consequences are readily obvious.  The problem right from the start, of course, is that the conspiracy theories are false, and their adherents ideas for changing the world are based on an incorrect and often downright delusional view of reality. That means that their post-revolution solutions would have very severe unintended consequences because their solutions aren't aimed at solving real problems in the real world, but rather solving false problems that exist only in their fantasy world.



The vision I present here of a post-revolution conspiracist dominated world is, by definition, speculative. But then again, so is George Orwell’s 1984, a book that many conspiracy theorists cite as prescient gospel truth, and which many believe is literally coming to pass now (or already has). This essay is not a prediction of what I think will come to pass, just as Orwell’s wasn't either. This article is a profile of what may come to pass if conspiracy theorists of the sort who support Alex Jones, David Icke and the rest of the conspiratuality gurus had free reign to build the world that they say they want.  So close your eyes if you will and imagine the revolution has just taken place, the governments are toppled and the conspiracists are in control.  What will come next?




The first step on this journey would probably be the gallows.  Those deemed traitors to the 'cause' would be rounded up and strung up.  I myself have been told twice (on the David Icke forum) that when the revolution comes I will be standing on the gallows with the other 'traitors'.  This talk of gallows (among other ways of execution including burning people alive) appears all too common among conspiracists and examples are not hard to find:

9/11 Truthers:

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/semiliterateparanoiacswhofantasizeaboutt

http://www.vice.com/read/the-conspiracy-theory-community-are-dangerous-enemies-to-make

Chemtrailers:




This reasoning, which is (like most things conspiracy theorists believe in) not fully thought out, assumes that there will be some sort of 'revolution' where presumably the current political order will be undone, the conspiracies that these people believe in will be halted, and those who supported them will be punished.

So now what?  The government is toppled, the traitors are swinging from their ropes and society has more or less come to a halt.  Here we find the vacuum that is so common with all revolutions.  How will it be filled?  Examining just one of these group's ideas it is quickly understood that the post-revolution philosophy found in most conspiratuality is centered around a far-right libertarian agenda.  Thrive is a movie and movement centered around conspiracies and New Age ideas which has quickly developed into a movement.  It was set up by Foster Gamble and you can see their site here:

http://www.thrivemovement.com/

The website's Liberty page for example is a real shocker:

http://www.thrivemovement.com/solutions-liberty

Peppered with quotes from Ayn Rand, Ron Paul and Stefan Molyneux, the page even includes an attack on democracy. Gamble lumps democracy in with bigotry, imperialism, socialism, and fascism, and claims all of these - including democracy! - violate the "intrinsic freedom of others."    Although Gamble thinks he is creating a political center where the right and left can join together - in part because he interviews progressives throughout his film - most of the actual solutions he proposes are strictly libertarian.

The political center to which Gamble refers is a myth. George Lakoff, author of The Political Mind, explains why there is no such thing as an established 'moderate' or 'centrist' worldview - i.e., no single set of ideas characterizes a center or moderate political position. Consequently, different people will describe 'the center' in different ways, depending on their particular beliefs about what defines a political center. Moreover, the 'center' will also be defined by the prevailing political narrative. If libertarians, conservatives, and ultra right wing factions are debating liberal Democrats, the center will always be on the right. However, if socialists and communists were added to the debate, the center would move toward the left. So, identifying who is allowed into the discussion is a determining factor in defining the 'center.'

Lakoff's discovery is an important contribution to understanding how and why people vote the way they do. It explains the role of emotions, metaphors, and psychological history, all of which determine which buttons we push in the voting booth as well as which buttons have been pushed by the manipulators who know how to influence our behavior. 

But I fear we are diverting too much into discussion here so let me quickly return you to that post-revolution world.

Show Me the Money.
Just as everywhere today, the key factor in the world that conspiracy theorists have built is money. The problem, however, is that there isn't any. In a post-conspiracy world there are no banks or formal financial institutions. In the past 50 years, conspiracy theories regarding banks, finance and currency - infused with libertarian propaganda - became so prevalent that the banks either collapsed, were outlawed, or were driven out of business. Needless to say in America the U.S. Federal Reserve was the first to go. 'Fiat currency' is the ultimate evil, the tool of the Illuminati for world domination, so the very appearance of it is social taboo. Just as libertarians and conspiracy theorists today demand, the U.S. is back on the gold standard: all currency is backed by gold. However, early in the revolution, large corporations quickly purchased all of the gold bullion in the United States from the failing banks. All of this gold is still held in their vaults, heavily guarded. It never enters circulation. Gold and gold-backed currency are still traded by the large corporations, but in purely theoretical transactions that take place on balance sheets and in computer programs.

Looking at the situation in America alone as a result of this situation, there is no currency in circulation. The U.S. Treasury stopped printing money. In fact, due to massive de-funding of government, the U.S. Treasury no longer exists. No one has seen a piece of paper currency or coin except in a museum.  But because the amount of gold bullion in the United States is only a tiny fraction of the amount of money needed to keep the economy moving, and because the gold reserves are under effective control of private corporations, America has become a land of barter economies. Corporations who wish to do business with each other trade favors, contractual obligations and customers; this form of barter has been unofficially institutionalized in the form of 'credits,' which are not backed by any precious metals. Ironically, credits exactly mimic most of the features of 'fiat currency' that has been supposedly outlawed and socially stigmatized. In rural areas, as we will see, the chief form of currency is ammunition. Needless to say, the ideals of a conspiracist economy and the realities do not match up.

The Cities: Corporate Feudalism.
The supplanting of democracy by conspiracist thinking and libertarian ideology had the effect, during the revolution, of dismantling government at all levels. Because there is no effective law and the economy collapsed, the result was large-scale anarchy. Major cities are the only islands of calm in a sea of violence and lawlessness.

These major cities are all run by an interlocking coalition of corporations - the same ones that control all the gold and all the wealth. The major function of these corporations is to sell social services to city residents, and they are all monopolies. The Law Enforcement Corporation sells physical security. The Habitation Corporation sells housing. The Food Corporation sells food. The Justice Corporation sells access to the wholly-privatized court system. There is no economic competition. There is also no regulation. Prices are fixed, but in this environment prices don't matter, as we'll see.

The cities are walled enclaves, heavily guarded by military personnel, where residents have at least a chance at a life above the anarchy and poverty of the outside world - but at a huge cost. The price for a house alone in one of the cities is far beyond the amount of gold, credits or barter that any ordinary person could ever possess in a lifetime. Nevertheless, the corporations waive their prices and admit new residents in exchange for lifetime commitments to work for them - commitments secured by immense debt loads. This form of indentured servitude is essentially feudalism: the workers cannot quit, cannot lobby, cannot organize, and can be fired and expelled from the city for any reason or no reason. Social mobility is unknown. It is impossible for a common worker—one who cleans the streets, works in the restaurants, drives the bus, provides childcare, etc.- to rise above his or her station; the debt load that the common person has taken on in exchange for living in the city is insurmountable in a dozen lifetimes. In fact, the corporations have begun to tack the balance of peoples' unpaid debts on to the debts of their children in exchange for agreeing to let their children continue to live in the city after they reach the age of majority. In this way, the corporations acquire an underclass of hereditary serfs, bound to the land and the lord, just like medieval feudalism. These serf-like customers are often traded between corporations as a form of barter.

The corporations have no incentive to treat the workers well. So many more people want to get into the cities than the number of slots available. Consequently the labor supply is cheap and inexhaustible, so any concessions to workers are an unnecessary drain on efficiency. Workers toil 14 hours a day, seven days a week. If they get sick, they are fired and sent out of the city. Although they live better than anyone else in the society, the directors and managers of the corporations don't live without fear. The influence of conspiracist thinking at all levels of society makes a stable existence very precarious. All it takes is one errant accusation that a person is working for the Illuminati, or even sympathizes with the Illuminati, and the person will be ostracized from society, fired from his job, possibly expelled from the city itself or hung from the same gallows as the 'traitors'.

Evidence is irrelevant, and legal process is unnecessary; an accusation, even an implausible one, is tantamount to guilt. Savvy businessmen routinely accuse their rivals of being Illuminati agents. Promotion and demotion within corporations is due far less often to merit and hard work than it is personnel shifts as a result of firings and expulsions from the city, most of them reactions to conspiracy allegations. Consequently, the corporations are poorly-run, grotesquely wasteful and rife with incompetence. Because they have a captive base of indentured customers, however, and competence and efficiency have no economic value, the ineptitude of the corporate managers has no effect on profits.

The Countryside: Mad Max With Pogroms.
If life is bad in the cities, it's even worse in the countryside. Government - feared and vilified by conspiracy theorists as the root of all evil - simply does not exist. Outside the cities, there are no police, no local or state officials, and no organization of any kind. There are no courts. There are no hospitals. There are no schools. Roads crumbled into dust decades ago because no one was around to maintain them. No one provides any private social services. For one thing, the big corporations have nothing to gain by selling their services outside the city; the rural population has no money to pay for them anyway. For another, they don't need the business; they've got more customers than they can serve within the walls of the cities. Outside those walls, people manage to survive - barely - by tilling their own tiny farms at a subsistence level.

The level of violence in the countryside is shocking. During the revolution, the only personal liberty that was even remotely respected was the right to bear arms, and out in the country you can't survive without heavy firepower. Family farms are defended by minefields, barbed-wire fences and kids toting automatic weapons. In many areas, warlords have managed to take over the more productive farms, resulting in irregular patchworks of fiefdoms that are constantly fighting with each other. In addition to outright barter, ammunition is the chief de facto currency in these areas. Heavy weaponry looted from abandoned military bases is the chief source of power. Life in this libertarian paradise is, in the famous words of Thomas Hobbes, "nasty, brutish and short."

Disease takes a terrible toll on all sectors of society, including the rich in the cities, but out in the countryside it's particularly bad. Vaccines of any kind are distrusted as tools of the Illuminati. As a result, diseases that are easily preventable - polio, measles, rubella, chicken pox, etc. - kill and cripple tens of thousands every year, especially children. Infant mortality is frightful. There are no doctors in these outlying areas. They too were denounced long ago as tools of conspirators; during the revolution many doctors, accused of hiding cancer cures and collaborating with Illuminati-controlled pharmaceutical companies, were massacred or driven out of business. Even medical knowledge itself is dying out since all the medical schools were closed long ago.

The people who fare the worst in this society are Jews. Universally blamed for the imaginary conspiracies that supposedly brought society to the brink of ruin, Jews are refused entry to the cities, and in the countryside they are ruthlessly persecuted and massacred with regularity in horrific pogroms that resemble those of medieval Europe - except with automatic weapons. What few Jews remain have walled themselves up in heavily-armed ghettos with even worse conditions than the countryside whose virulently anti-Semitic (and heavily-armed) population they are hiding from. Nevertheless, as much as they hate Jews, the common people and the more powerful warlords of the countryside cannot organize any collective efforts to exterminate them, as much as they would like to. This inability is the only thing that allows the insular Jewish communities that still exist to carry on, hopeful that someday conditions will change and the world will come to its senses.


Knowledge—Forbidden Fruit.
The revolution that brought the conspiracy order to power was profoundly anti-intellectual. Experts on anything - especially scientists, economists (who argued against the economic changes), historians (who explained how the past had really occurred) and doctors (who were accused of suppressing cancer cures and tainting vaccines) - were mercilessly persecuted and massacred. In the revolution, all the universities were closed. Many libraries were burned or destroyed, their books distrusted as tools of the Illuminati. The Internet was regarded as a much more pure and reliable source of knowledge, because the Internet contained 'the truth' about conspiracies and books did not. As a result, in this conspiracist order, systemized education barely exists, libraries are virtually nonexistent, and most books are locked away and forgotten in vaults owned by the major city corporations - similar to the way books in the Middle Ages were locked up in monasteries.

If you think this is an exaggeration you should look at some of the Chemtrail conspiracy theories which allege that all the science books in the world (along with old films, WWII photos, and newspaper archives) have been tampered with to make it look like contrails have always been persistent, when in fact it only started around 1997. See for example here:

http://tankerenemy.blogspot.com/2009/01/contrailsciencecom-fake-books.html

The corporate managers of the cities, understanding that their power rests upon the perpetuation of conspiracy theories, carefully control what knowledge gets out to the common people. Any book or document that even remotely refutes or even questions conspiracy theories has been destroyed or altered after the fact to support conspiracy explanations. In this world, Osama bin Laden is lauded as a martyr, on whom the Illuminati unfairly blamed 9/11 and then assassinated him for this imaginary crime. Books or websites about Adolf Hitler routinely omit the Holocaust and instead laud his pro-free-market policies. American history books are wildly inaccurate, and present the country’s history as a relentless narrative of exploitation and conspiracies by the Illuminati and the Jews. Even science books contain numerous errors and omissions.

But, not many people read these books anyway; in fact, literacy has declined greatly because education as we now know it has ceased to exist. Most common people get all of their information from the Internet, which is controlled by the Information Corporation. There is very little written text on the Internet. Most material is either in the form of pictograms or videos. Almost all are either pornography, or simple morality plays dramatizing the evil and immorality of the Illuminati and the Jews. Most of these videos are less than a minute long and feature some hideously gory act of violence. Even very young children are desensitized to the most horrible images of human suffering, having been exposed to an unending stream of images of brutal retributions carried out against Illuminati sympathizers.

As the knowledge of true history, true science and critical thinking gradually fades, society is rapidly losing any real sense of its past or itself. Almost all events in history are reduced and simplified to a one-note narrative of exploitation by the Illuminati followed by the redemption of the revolution. Ancient history and the origins of man are described as being the result of extraterrestrial visitation. No one in this society knows that humans built the pyramids; even well-educated elites accept and honestly believe that all prehistoric structures of this nature were built by aliens. 

The major religions are all waning in practice. There are very few churches left. No one in this society has read or even heard of Shakespeare, of Tolstoy or of Leonardo Da Vinci. No one has ever been to an art museum or a music concert. In 100 years’ time, the collective store of human knowledge existing on Earth will have been reduced by half or more. It is truly a new Dark Age.

The Environment - A Rising Tide of Disaster.
Because there is no government, no environmental regulation and the city corporations have no incentive to be environmentally responsible, most countries are a stinking cesspool of environmental degradation. The corporation-run cities generate power through burning coal and oil - all reserves privately owned and controlled, of course. The cities export their garbage to the countryside where it sits in rotting heaps, breeding diseases and cancer clusters among the semi-feral rural population. Rural dwellers routinely build and furnish their own houses from the refuse of the cities, much of it contaminated. Because the corporate-run cities have no need for water treatment facilities—they can simply pump their sewage into the rivers at zero cost - rivers downstream of the major cities are indescribably foul. There are few forests left, the rural residents having deforested their lands for firewood.

The worst problem is global warming. Because the conspiracist order denounced anthropogenic global warming as a scam and a hoax by the Illuminati, even mentioning the existence of this problem is absolutely forbidden. Absolutely nothing has been done to ameliorate global warming - in fact, carbon emissions since the revolution have increased, despite having much less industry, because the corporations that run the cities have changed over to dirtier and more inefficient means of energy production and industrial usage. Rising sea levels have inundated coastlines. In the larger coastal cities like New York, makeshift seawalls have been built to hold back the ocean (built by slave labor of customer-serfs), but in rural coastal areas, the rising sea levels have turned many areas into fetid swamps. These swamps breed mosquitoes, which results in a high incidence of malaria in areas where it had once been thought to be eradicated. Combined with society’s distrust of doctors—thanks to conspiracy theories about suppressed cancer cures and tainted vaccines—the mortality from tropical diseases is much higher than it was before the revolution.

Global warming has also made peoples' jobs of feeding themselves much harder. Food crops are more difficult and costlier to raise, invasive and parasite species are hardier and more difficult to kill, and erosion of desiccated topsoil has turned vast areas into semi-arid wastelands incapable of cultivation. The increased strength of hurricanes due to global warming results in large swaths of the Atlantic coast being decimated at regular intervals - and because there is no government there are no relief agencies. No one pays any attention to these problems. In the cities, even mentioning the words “global warming” will mark you as an Illuminati sympathizer; in the countryside, the scientific knowledge to explain what’s happening no longer exists. In the meantime greenhouse gases continue to foul the atmosphere at an ever-increasing rate. The disaster of global warming is now, fifty years after the revolution, far beyond man's capacity to reverse it.

When the sun sets on this bleak country, filled with pollution and decay, its rays bleed through layers of carbon dioxide vapor and sulfuric acid. It sets on mosquito-infested marshes that were comfortable beachfront communities 60 years before. The clouds approaching on the horizon are filled with acid rain. Their caustic drops fall on acres of landfills and junkyards, oozing poison into a water table already contaminated with toxic chemicals and human feces. This is the brave new world that conspiracy ideology has built.

But there is worse yet to come...




Thursday, October 3, 2013

Fright-Wing Politics and the Death of Normal Discussion

Somewhere beyond right and left lies the fright-wing of politics: a place of paranoia where diabolical plots are hatched by opponents in power and only true patriots with special knowledge of these conspiracies have the courage to ask the tough questions.

Fright-wing proponents offer their fellow travelers the false comfort of rigid certainty in a changing world—dividing the world into good versus evil, us against them. Fundamentalism has a powerful appeal for people who feel powerless, especially when it gets dressed up as an ideology or attaches itself to a party label.

But when you pull the curtain back on fright-wing politics, behind the all-or-nothing demands, apocalyptic warnings and the addiction to self-righteous anger, you’ll see that fear is the motivating factor: fear of the other; fear wrapped up in a flag; fear calling itself freedom.  The fright-wingers are recycling scripts that are decades old. But it is not the language of the true leaders that have changed the world, as they like to believe. These true leaders  warned about the dangers of faction—fright-wingers enflame it. These true leaders were focused on uniting the nation, their nation—fright-wingers try to divide it.

They are selling the same old snake oil that merchants of political paranoia have been selling for most of history.  The federal government has been accused of tyranny and trying to restrict states’ rights since the debate to ratify the Constitution. The specter of a sinister plot to create a one-world government goes back almost a century to fights over the League of Nations against the backdrop of the Bolshevik revolution. It was carried forward by the John Birch Society, which drew recruits with its talk of U.N. troops invading the United States through the southern border with the approval of alleged Manchurian candidate and Soviet spy Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Days before John F. Kennedy’s assassination, 5,000 flyers were distributed in downtown Dallas, featuring side-by-side photos of Kennedy in profile and face forward, like a mug shot. Below it read “WANTED FOR TREASON” with this list of charges:

• Betraying the Constitution (which he swore to uphold): He is turning sovereignty of the U.S. over to the communist controlled United Nations: He is betraying our friends . . . and befriending our enemies.
• He has illegally invaded a sovereign State with federal troops.
• He has been caught in fantastic lies to the American people.

These accusations still echo from fright-wingers today. Nothing has really changed and the fright-wingers still pretend that their platform is solid truth.

But there is one interesting change observable in recent times and that is the part played by the mainstream media.  The pioneering television journalist Edward R. Murrow said, “To be persuasive, we must be believable; to be believable we must be credible; to be credible we must be truthful.”

Truth, or course, doesn’t come tailor-made for any one ideology or political party. But fright-wing politics has become an industry unto itself, and it is thriving at a time when the old news industry, aspiring to objectivity dominated by print reporting and the network evening news, seems to be fading. The fragmentation and self-segregation we are experiencing with television, radio and the Internet exacerbates our political differences while they decrease the confidence we had in the honesty and integrity of journalism altogether.

A case in point is the recent appeared in the somewhat mainstream Mother Jones under the dramatic title:

CIA Backs $630,000 Scientific Study on Controlling Global Climate
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/07/cia-geoengineering-control-climate-change

The report even carries this ridiculous graphic:


It's ridiculous because it's a picture of a tsunami, which was caused by an earthquake and has absolutely nothing to do with either climate or the weather. The actual article ends with a nod to conspiracy theorists:

"The CIA's decision to fund scientific work on geoengineering will no doubt excite conspiracy theorists. The last time the government tried to do cutting-edge research related to the atmosphere—with the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP),  which aimed to protect satellites from nuclear blasts—people speculated that it might be a death ray, a mind control weapon, or, worst of all…a way to control the weather."
It's too bad HAARP (one of the favorites of conspiracy theorists everywhere) was recently shut down for lack of funding:  http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/20130717/alaska-s-controversial-haarp-facility-closed-will-it-come-back-online

So what is the CIA's actual involvement in all of this? Here's what one of the panel members, Ken Caldeira had to say:

"There is no 'CIA study'.

There is a National Academy study that is funded by NOAA, NASA, the CIA, and the National Academy itself.

All of these parties had a hand in developing the charge to the committee which is publicly available here:

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/projectview.aspx?key=49540

Neither NOAA, NASA, nor the CIA have anything more to do with this study other than receiving the final committee report. You too will receive this same report.

The panel members are listed here: http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/CommitteeView.aspx?key=49540

We are a diverse groups of academics who share a commitment to openness, free-exchange of ideas, and transparency.

I am on record decrying many abuses by the US intelligence community including what I consider to be criminal drone attacks, secret wars, surveillance, etc. If I thought that somehow our report was going to help the CIA do something nefarious, you can be sure that I would not be a participant.

I want the US gov't to think through the situation that lies before us with respect to climate change. If a careful "thinking through" could occur, I think it would result in greatly increased emphasis on transforming our energy system into one that does not rely on using the atmosphere as a waste dump."

And regarding the actual project?  Let's see:

"Project Scope
An ad hoc committee will conduct a technical evaluation of a limited number of proposed geoengineering techniques, including examples of both solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, and comment generally on the potential impacts of deploying these technologies, including possible environmental, economic, and national security concerns. The study will:
  1. Evaluate what is currently known about the science of several (3-4) selected example techniques, including potential risks and consequences (both intended and unintended), such as impacts, or lack thereof, on ocean acidification,
  2. Describe what is known about the viability for implementation of the proposed techniques including technological and cost considerations,
  3. Briefly explain other geoengineering technologies that have been proposed (beyond the selected examples), and
  4. Identify future research needed to provide a credible scientific underpinning for future discussions.
The study will also discuss historical examples of related technologies (e.g., cloud seeding and other weather modification) for lessons that might be learned about societal reactions, examine what international agreements exist which may be relevant to the experimental testing or deployment of geoengineering technologies, and briefly explore potential societal and ethical considerations related to geoengineering. This study is intended to provide a careful, clear scientific foundation that informs ethical, legal, and political discussions surrounding geoengineering.

The project has support from the National Academy of Sciences, the U.S. intelligence community, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The approximate start date for the project is March 2013; a report is expected be issued in fall 2014."

So that's it. The CIA is not studying anything, they are just contributing the the funding a study on a topic that has potentially great geopolitical implications, and hence is of national security concern. It's no more nefarious than the studies they do on education demographics in Africa, or farming methods in Bangladesh, or anything else that goes into the World Factbook.

The above paranoia is typical of the peddled nonsense so readily found today.  In this case it was fueled by a mainstream media source and then transformed in the hands of fright-wingers forever eager to fabricate fear wherever they can.  Observe now how this story transforms:

CIA is Funding Government-Led Chemtrail Project: Spy Agency to Help Study 'Security Impacts' of Geo-Engineering
http://www.globalresearch.ca/cia-is-funding-government-led-chemtrailing-project-spy-agency-to-help-study-security-impacts-of-geo-engineering/5343414

There is so much nonsense paraded as fact in the above article that it would take a separate essay to deconstruct it all but one notable example of bunk can be found here:

"Indeed, as we reported last year, a Harvard University project experiment funded by Microsoft founder Bill Gates saw thousands of tonnes of sulphur particles sprayed over New Mexico as part of a geoengineering study, despite the fact that even staunch environmentalists have warned the project could have catastrphic affects on the earth's eco-system.

The paragraph provides a link to this article:  http://www.infowars.com/gates-funded-experiment-to-spray-atmosphere-with-sulphur-particles/

And we are told:

"'David Keith, one of the investigators, has argued that solar geoengineering could be an inexpensive method to slow down global warming, but other scientists warn that it could have unpredictable, disastrous consequences for the Earth’s weather systems and food supplies,'  reports the Guardian."

Very interesting but...here is what the article doesn't tell you about the Guardian source:

http://www.businessinsider.com/david-keith-says-guardian-story-is-substantially-fabricated-2012-7

"Substantially Fabricated".

The article claims:

"In 2008, a KSLA investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature."

But what it does not tell us is that the reprter of the original report made a mistake and retracted the claim because no unusual levels were found.   You can find a summary here:

http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/

It is indeed interesting that Mother Jones entered the discussion is a most dishonest manner and it is surely yet another indication of how even mainstream media is now a peddler in fright-wing politics.  The deceptive story is now even replicating in other mainstream sources:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cia-backs-630000-study-into-how-to-control-global-weather-through-geoengineering-8724501.html

Behind the fright-wing movement there are powerful interests spinning the truth so that certain agendas are persuadable in the public mind.  You will find these interest groups even in broader topics such as climate change and the snake-oil they deal in is not difficult to expose:




Is it not time that we take political discussion back and away from these proponents of fear?